Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Recent reporting suggests the Trump administration misjudged Iran's response to their attacks. But if Tehran showed restraint last year and it was followed by more pressure and strikes, they may have drawn the opposite lesson: restraint invites escalation. Before the war, I warned they might respond very differently this time.

ABlinken's profile picture

Antony Blinken

384,380 subscribers

931,885 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikBildungWissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Iran's response to the murder of Soleimani: MINIMAL Iran's response to the murder of Haniyeh: MINIMAL Iran's response to the murder of Nasrallah: MINIMAL Iran's response to the 12-day war: MINIMAL فواد ایزدی Foad Izadi says Iran won't make the same mistakes this time because the Iranian leaders who chose restraint have been murdered by the U.S. and Israel...
1:15

Iran's response to the murder of Soleimani: MINIMAL Iran's response to the murder of Haniyeh: MINIMAL Iran's response to the murder of Nasrallah: MINIMAL Iran's response to the 12-day war: MINIMAL فواد ایزدی Foad Izadi says Iran won't make the same mistakes this time because the Iranian leaders who chose restraint have been murdered by the U.S. and Israel...

Rachel Blevins

120,891 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 TRUMP: "WE PARALYZED IRAN'S NUCLEAR SITES" When asked whether Iran managed to move any nuclear material before the strikes, Trump was quick to respond: “No, just the opposite. We think we hit them so hard and so fast, it didn’t get to move. It’s very hard and very dangerous to move.” Source: Rapid Response 47
0:37

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 TRUMP: "WE PARALYZED IRAN'S NUCLEAR SITES" When asked whether Iran managed to move any nuclear material before the strikes, Trump was quick to respond: “No, just the opposite. We think we hit them so hard and so fast, it didn’t get to move. It’s very hard and very dangerous to move.” Source: Rapid Response 47

Mario Nawfal

90,515 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

So many people keep saying how Israel "controls America" but time and time again... Israel keeps getting told to NOT respond to attacks... If the opposite happened (Israel struck Iran) - it would be a totally different reaction... and we all know it! The IRGC knows they have leverage over Trump due to his desire to end the war... but that is DANGEROUS!!
2:19

So many people keep saying how Israel "controls America" but time and time again... Israel keeps getting told to NOT respond to attacks... If the opposite happened (Israel struck Iran) - it would be a totally different reaction... and we all know it! The IRGC knows they have leverage over Trump due to his desire to end the war... but that is DANGEROUS!!

Nick Matau

22,021 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Iran's nuclear program was "obliterated" last summer, but nevertheless, Trump is starting to "hear" that they "may be behaving badly." So the US may have to go in and bomb them again. Maybe this time it'll be a double-whammy obliteration. Followed by a triple-whopper obliteration
1:42

Iran's nuclear program was "obliterated" last summer, but nevertheless, Trump is starting to "hear" that they "may be behaving badly." So the US may have to go in and bomb them again. Maybe this time it'll be a double-whammy obliteration. Followed by a triple-whopper obliteration

Michael Tracey

47,365 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

"Iran's strategy is to regionalize this war and to regionalize it quickly so that the pain is not just taken and absorbed by Tehran, but spread across the Middle East." Sanam Vakil صنم وكىل on Iran's rapid response to on-going US and Israeli strikes, via CNN
6:11

"Iran's strategy is to regionalize this war and to regionalize it quickly so that the pain is not just taken and absorbed by Tehran, but spread across the Middle East." Sanam Vakil صنم وكىل on Iran's rapid response to on-going US and Israeli strikes, via CNN

Chatham House MENA

17,970 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Marco Rubio suggests Ukrainian long range strikes inside Russia are "Bringing the War to the Russian people" And that might end the War? By his logic, I presume if Iran starts striking Amazon warehouses and Oil refineries in Texas, the US will end their bombing of Tehran?
0:24

Marco Rubio suggests Ukrainian long range strikes inside Russia are "Bringing the War to the Russian people" And that might end the War? By his logic, I presume if Iran starts striking Amazon warehouses and Oil refineries in Texas, the US will end their bombing of Tehran?

Chay Bowes

193,346 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

President Donald J. Trump praised Pakistan again. Let Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi deny him or respond him by name. Trump administration is aware that Pakistan was in a position to shot down more Indian planes but excercised restraint and never escalated the war. Some facts will come out soon.
0:48

President Donald J. Trump praised Pakistan again. Let Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi deny him or respond him by name. Trump administration is aware that Pakistan was in a position to shot down more Indian planes but excercised restraint and never escalated the war. Some facts will come out soon.

Hamid Mir حامد میر

101,310 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Early announcement of Lebanon ceasefire by Trump, Israel's anger, and proof of Iran's pressure Mohammadi-Thani, international affairs expert: 🔹 Americans had no choice but to accept the ceasefire, but they presented it in a way that did not give any concession to Iran. 🔹 They held a show session with the Lebanese government to portray the ceasefire as a result of their talks, not Iran's pressure. 🔹 The clear reason: Netanyahu called the security cabinet, but before the meeting, Trump announced the ceasefire via tweet. 🔹 Israeli regime ministers are complaining to the US about why Trump announced the ceasefire before their decision. 🔹 This anger shows that the ceasefire was imposed by the US and is the result of Iran's diplomatic pressure.
1:56

Early announcement of Lebanon ceasefire by Trump, Israel's anger, and proof of Iran's pressure Mohammadi-Thani, international affairs expert: 🔹 Americans had no choice but to accept the ceasefire, but they presented it in a way that did not give any concession to Iran. 🔹 They held a show session with the Lebanese government to portray the ceasefire as a result of their talks, not Iran's pressure. 🔹 The clear reason: Netanyahu called the security cabinet, but before the meeting, Trump announced the ceasefire via tweet. 🔹 Israeli regime ministers are complaining to the US about why Trump announced the ceasefire before their decision. 🔹 This anger shows that the ceasefire was imposed by the US and is the result of Iran's diplomatic pressure.

Ryan Dawson

13,693 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan: I believe the Iranians may have misread the situation. If they had better understood the decision-making pressure Trump was facing and offered him something earlier, Israel’s pressure might not have been as effective. But that did not happen.
0:23

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan: I believe the Iranians may have misread the situation. If they had better understood the decision-making pressure Trump was facing and offered him something earlier, Israel’s pressure might not have been as effective. But that did not happen.

Clash Report

48,138 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🇺🇸🇮🇱🇮🇷 U.S. WILL LEAD THE IRAN WAR, BUT IT WASN’T TRUMP’S IDEA, IT WAS ISRAEL’S Iranian analyst Trita Parsi says Trump was persuaded by Netanyahu on Dec 29 to lead the strikes on Iran, well before the protests escalated to where they are today. The reason was never about the protestors. "My expectation was that Israel would push for war and get the U.S. to support it, not lead it. But what happened is the opposite. Trump was convinced at Mar-a-Lago to take the lead. It’s being framed as his war now. But it wasn’t his idea. The protests have nothing to do with this. In fact, they might have delayed it. The plan was already made on December 29 at the White House. The justification is protests, but the real issue is missiles. This war is about finishing what wasn’t finished last June." Trita Parsi
5:39

🇺🇸🇮🇱🇮🇷 U.S. WILL LEAD THE IRAN WAR, BUT IT WASN’T TRUMP’S IDEA, IT WAS ISRAEL’S Iranian analyst Trita Parsi says Trump was persuaded by Netanyahu on Dec 29 to lead the strikes on Iran, well before the protests escalated to where they are today. The reason was never about the protestors. "My expectation was that Israel would push for war and get the U.S. to support it, not lead it. But what happened is the opposite. Trump was convinced at Mar-a-Lago to take the lead. It’s being framed as his war now. But it wasn’t his idea. The protests have nothing to do with this. In fact, they might have delayed it. The plan was already made on December 29 at the White House. The justification is protests, but the real issue is missiles. This war is about finishing what wasn’t finished last June." Trita Parsi

Mario Nawfal

96,742 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Before Anonymous became the ClA’s rage posting account, they were real, and warned the cabal was going to frame Trump with Epstein. It failed and they are panicking. This video was posted 1 year and 17 days before the first Q post.
5:33

Before Anonymous became the ClA’s rage posting account, they were real, and warned the cabal was going to frame Trump with Epstein. It failed and they are panicking. This video was posted 1 year and 17 days before the first Q post.

ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

23,048 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

“Iran is preparing for war, and war could be very close.” — Professor Marandi. He stresses Tehran is deliberately keeping the door open to negotiations — not out of naivety, but to make it unmistakably clear where responsibility for any escalation will lie. “If the U.S. attacks tonight, the resilience of ordinary Iranians is enhanced by the fact that they know that their government tried to prevent this.” Full interview: The Sanchez Effect.
2:30

“Iran is preparing for war, and war could be very close.” — Professor Marandi. He stresses Tehran is deliberately keeping the door open to negotiations — not out of naivety, but to make it unmistakably clear where responsibility for any escalation will lie. “If the U.S. attacks tonight, the resilience of ordinary Iranians is enhanced by the fact that they know that their government tried to prevent this.” Full interview: The Sanchez Effect.

Rick Sanchez

95,242 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

TRUMP: Iran may be behaving badly. It hasn't been confirmed, but if it's confirmed, they know the consequences. The consequences will be very powerful. Maybe more powerful than the last time. Q: Do you have any evidence they are behaving badly? TRUMP: This is just what we hear
1:08

TRUMP: Iran may be behaving badly. It hasn't been confirmed, but if it's confirmed, they know the consequences. The consequences will be very powerful. Maybe more powerful than the last time. Q: Do you have any evidence they are behaving badly? TRUMP: This is just what we hear

Aaron Rupar

116,178 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Reporter: “Mr. President, did Israel force your hand to launch these strikes against Iran?” President Trump: “No. No, I might have forced their hand. You see, we were having negotiations with these lunatics, and it was my opinion that they were going to attack first. They were going to attack. If we didn't do it, they were going to attack first. I felt strongly about that. great negotiators, great people, people that do this very successfully and have done it all their lives very successfully. And based on the way the negotiation was going, I think they were going to attack first. And I didn't want that to happen. So, if anything, I might have forced Israel’s hand. But Israel was ready and we were ready. And we've had a very, very powerful impact because virtually everything they have has been knocked out now.”
0:52

Reporter: “Mr. President, did Israel force your hand to launch these strikes against Iran?” President Trump: “No. No, I might have forced their hand. You see, we were having negotiations with these lunatics, and it was my opinion that they were going to attack first. They were going to attack. If we didn't do it, they were going to attack first. I felt strongly about that. great negotiators, great people, people that do this very successfully and have done it all their lives very successfully. And based on the way the negotiation was going, I think they were going to attack first. And I didn't want that to happen. So, if anything, I might have forced Israel’s hand. But Israel was ready and we were ready. And we've had a very, very powerful impact because virtually everything they have has been knocked out now.”

OSINTdefender

991,714 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

‼️ZELENSKYY: They began this war. When we respond, we target their military goals. When they do attacks, they kill civilians. We’re not at the front line. ————————————————— ZELENSKYY: One month ago marked the anniversary of one of the greatest tragedies — the Chernobyl disaster. And, we build a big museum, to honor the people who saved others’ lives — the Chernobyl Museum. And we showed it to the world — but today they destroyed it totally. The missile attacked that and several, buildings. So we are really thankful to our heroic savers and to our people. Yes, DSNS, huh? Yeah. And to policemen. So they help. Rescuers. To rescuers and et cetera, yes. And also they attacked hospitals and attacked kindergartens and schools. So what do we have to do to… JOURNALIST: Russia said it was a retaliation from the previous attacks. ZELENSKYY: They always say that. And it's not true. They understand that we always respond. They began this war, so it's not the question who is the first or who is the second. They began this war. And the most important thing, when we see that when we respond, we target their military goals. When they do attacks, they kill civilians. We’re not at the front line.
1:33

‼️ZELENSKYY: They began this war. When we respond, we target their military goals. When they do attacks, they kill civilians. We’re not at the front line. ————————————————— ZELENSKYY: One month ago marked the anniversary of one of the greatest tragedies — the Chernobyl disaster. And, we build a big museum, to honor the people who saved others’ lives — the Chernobyl Museum. And we showed it to the world — but today they destroyed it totally. The missile attacked that and several, buildings. So we are really thankful to our heroic savers and to our people. Yes, DSNS, huh? Yeah. And to policemen. So they help. Rescuers. To rescuers and et cetera, yes. And also they attacked hospitals and attacked kindergartens and schools. So what do we have to do to… JOURNALIST: Russia said it was a retaliation from the previous attacks. ZELENSKYY: They always say that. And it's not true. They understand that we always respond. They began this war, so it's not the question who is the first or who is the second. They began this war. And the most important thing, when we see that when we respond, we target their military goals. When they do attacks, they kill civilians. We’re not at the front line.

Kateryna Lisunova

115,733 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The Jews have mounted a COUNTEROFFENSIVE “They saw what happened last year, and they went back to the workshop, and they figured out their new response. And now, I think the momentum is with them more than it is with us. That requires us to be good tacticians and strategists.”
4:21

The Jews have mounted a COUNTEROFFENSIVE “They saw what happened last year, and they went back to the workshop, and they figured out their new response. And now, I think the momentum is with them more than it is with us. That requires us to be good tacticians and strategists.”

Fuentes Updates

69,754 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🇷🇺 🇺🇦 Political scientist Glenn Diesen says attacks on Russia's economy may be pushing the war in the opposite direction. Strikes on refineries, warehouses, and commercial infrastructure are designed to pressure ordinary Russians and force the Kremlin toward negotiations. But he believes the strategy misunderstands Moscow's motivations. Diesen says Russia views the conflict as existential and is unlikely to change course because of economic pain. Instead, he warns the pressure campaign could trigger a harsher response and further escalation. Glenn Diesen
2:43

🇷🇺 🇺🇦 Political scientist Glenn Diesen says attacks on Russia's economy may be pushing the war in the opposite direction. Strikes on refineries, warehouses, and commercial infrastructure are designed to pressure ordinary Russians and force the Kremlin toward negotiations. But he believes the strategy misunderstands Moscow's motivations. Diesen says Russia views the conflict as existential and is unlikely to change course because of economic pain. Instead, he warns the pressure campaign could trigger a harsher response and further escalation. Glenn Diesen

Mario Nawfal

66,117 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

I keep receiving videos and information from Iranians inside the country saying they are witnessing the attacks in the skies, but the decision to launch missile strikes on Israel was made without informing the public. The true warmongers are the Islamic Republic leaders in Tehran, who care more about their proxies than the people they claim to govern.
0:26

I keep receiving videos and information from Iranians inside the country saying they are witnessing the attacks in the skies, but the decision to launch missile strikes on Israel was made without informing the public. The true warmongers are the Islamic Republic leaders in Tehran, who care more about their proxies than the people they claim to govern.

Masih Alinejad 🏳️

249,982 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“We didn’t have a problem with the Strait of Hormuz; that was created by the war that the U.S. Trump administration launched. So they have created a problem, and it is their main responsibility to sort out the problem that they created”— tells me Carl Bildt
2:05

“We didn’t have a problem with the Strait of Hormuz; that was created by the war that the U.S. Trump administration launched. So they have created a problem, and it is their main responsibility to sort out the problem that they created”— tells me Carl Bildt

Isa Soares

96,313 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🇮🇷🇮🇱🇺🇸 "They will certainly receive a crushing response this time." — Iranian Khatam al-Anbiya Commander to IRIB confirms US and Israel strikes against Iran. A school in Minab was struck, killing students. Iran says it has already retaliated, striking targets in Israel and American bases in the region, inflicting "very heavy damage." Direct message to Trump: "The end of the war is not in his hands. The Islamic Republic will define when the war ends. They started it — we will determine the end." "They will certainly receive a crushing response this time."
2:46

🇮🇷🇮🇱🇺🇸 "They will certainly receive a crushing response this time." — Iranian Khatam al-Anbiya Commander to IRIB confirms US and Israel strikes against Iran. A school in Minab was struck, killing students. Iran says it has already retaliated, striking targets in Israel and American bases in the region, inflicting "very heavy damage." Direct message to Trump: "The end of the war is not in his hands. The Islamic Republic will define when the war ends. They started it — we will determine the end." "They will certainly receive a crushing response this time."

DD Geopolitics

43,322 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten