Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Recently, an independent British content creator Luke Johnston conducted street interviews in #Japan, where many local residents stated that they do not support Japan's involvement in the Taiwan issue. For most of those interviewed, the #Taiwan question remains an affair between the Chinese mainland and the Taiwan region alone.... show more

China News 中国新闻网

716,966 subscribers

1,786,082 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Bildung #Japan #Taiwan

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

"JAPAN WILL DEFEND TAIWAN" Japan does not have an explicit, official defense treaty with Taiwan, but recent statements by Japanese officials indicate a strong possibility of military intervention in the event of a Chinese attack. Approximately 80% of Japan's energy imports pass through the seas around Taiwan. A Chinese takeover or blockade could severely disrupt these critical sea lines of communication, threatening Japan's economic survival. In November 2025, Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi stated in parliament that a Chinese use of force against Taiwan could legally trigger a "survival-threatening situation" under Japan's 2015 security legislation, which permits the use of force in collective self-defense even if Japan itself is not directly attacked. Most people believe that the US will be the first country to defend Taiwan from a Chinese invasion. However, it should not be ruled out that Japan is the first country to come to Taiwan's rescue.

"JAPAN WILL DEFEND TAIWAN" Japan does not have an explicit, official defense treaty with Taiwan, but recent statements by Japanese officials indicate a strong possibility of military intervention in the event of a Chinese attack. Approximately 80% of Japan's energy imports pass through the seas around Taiwan. A Chinese takeover or blockade could severely disrupt these critical sea lines of communication, threatening Japan's economic survival. In November 2025, Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi stated in parliament that a Chinese use of force against Taiwan could legally trigger a "survival-threatening situation" under Japan's 2015 security legislation, which permits the use of force in collective self-defense even if Japan itself is not directly attacked. Most people believe that the US will be the first country to defend Taiwan from a Chinese invasion. However, it should not be ruled out that Japan is the first country to come to Taiwan's rescue.

Global Strategy

1,834,492 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Japan colonized Taiwan for 50 years, which led many Taiwanese to be deeply loyal to Japan, including Taiwan's current fake president, Lai Ching-te.👇 The main political struggle in Taiwan today is between the descendants of those colonized before 1949 and those who fled from mainland China to Taiwan after 1949.

Japan colonized Taiwan for 50 years, which led many Taiwanese to be deeply loyal to Japan, including Taiwan's current fake president, Lai Ching-te.👇 The main political struggle in Taiwan today is between the descendants of those colonized before 1949 and those who fled from mainland China to Taiwan after 1949.

ShanghaiPanda （ Account deactivation）

57,552 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

It was reported recently that Japan has invested 13.1 billion yen (about $84.15 million) to cultivate pro-Japanese figures in the island of #Taiwan. Lin Chia-lung, head of Taiwan island's so-called "foreign affairs" department, claimed that #Japan and Taiwan "share similar values and common interests." Such remarks once again exposed Lai Ching-te's ugly face of betraying the nation and engaging in unprincipled and bottomless courting of Japan for the selfish interests of his party, spokesperson of the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council Zhang Han said at Wednesday's press briefing. The Taiwan question is purely an internal affair of China, and brooks no external interference, Zhang said, while solemnly warning the DPP authorities that ingratiating themselves with Japan to seek "Taiwan independence" is a "dead end." "No matter how they collude and maneuver with external forces, they cannot change the fact that there is only one China in the world and Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, nor can they reverse the inevitable trend of China's reunification," Zhang said.

It was reported recently that Japan has invested 13.1 billion yen (about $84.15 million) to cultivate pro-Japanese figures in the island of #Taiwan. Lin Chia-lung, head of Taiwan island's so-called "foreign affairs" department, claimed that #Japan and Taiwan "share similar values and common interests." Such remarks once again exposed Lai Ching-te's ugly face of betraying the nation and engaging in unprincipled and bottomless courting of Japan for the selfish interests of his party, spokesperson of the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council Zhang Han said at Wednesday's press briefing. The Taiwan question is purely an internal affair of China, and brooks no external interference, Zhang said, while solemnly warning the DPP authorities that ingratiating themselves with Japan to seek "Taiwan independence" is a "dead end." "No matter how they collude and maneuver with external forces, they cannot change the fact that there is only one China in the world and Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, nor can they reverse the inevitable trend of China's reunification," Zhang said.

China News 中国新闻网

17,115 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

"So long as Taiwan is democratic and free, you remind the enslaved masses in mainland China of the future that could and should be theirs." Nikki Haley on why a free and prosperous Taiwan is a beacon of hope for the oppressed Chinese people.

"So long as Taiwan is democratic and free, you remind the enslaved masses in mainland China of the future that could and should be theirs." Nikki Haley on why a free and prosperous Taiwan is a beacon of hope for the oppressed Chinese people.

John Walters

42,686 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

In 1998, the Chinese and Japanese governments issued the China-Japan Joint Declaration on Building a Partnership of Friendship and Cooperation for Peace and Development. It has an important statement — "The Japanese side continues to maintain its stand on the Taiwan question which was set forth in the Joint Statement of the Government of the People's Republic of China and the Government of Japan and reiterates its understanding that there is one China."

In 1998, the Chinese and Japanese governments issued the China-Japan Joint Declaration on Building a Partnership of Friendship and Cooperation for Peace and Development. It has an important statement — "The Japanese side continues to maintain its stand on the Taiwan question which was set forth in the Joint Statement of the Government of the People's Republic of China and the Government of Japan and reiterates its understanding that there is one China."

Ministry of National Defense of China

144,682 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

ALERT:🚨 “JAPAN WILL DEFEND TAIWAN” — A RED LINE HAS BEEN DRAWN Japan has now signalled what many hoped—and others feared—would never be said aloud: If China moves on Taiwan, Japan will not remain neutral. Tokyo has stated that any Chinese assault on Taiwan could constitute an “existential crisis” for Japan’s national security — a legal classification that allows Japan to deploy military force in collective defence with its allies. This is not symbolic language. It means Japan is preparing for real war. Here is the strategic reality: • Around 80% of Japan’s energy imports pass through waters near Taiwan • A Chinese blockade would cripple Japan’s economy overnight • If Taiwan falls, Japan becomes isolated—economically and militarily • The message to Washington is unmistakable: Japan expects America to stand with it Japanese officials have made their position publicly clear, and Chinese leadership knows exactly what that means: A move on Taiwan will not just be a regional conflict— it risks triggering a three-nation military response: Taiwan, Japan, and the United States. This is no longer hypothetical. Japan is openly signalling preparedness. Beijing is increasing incursions and fleet movements. U.S. leaders are discussing forward deployments. The fuse is being laid. War is no longer “possible.” It is approaching the brink. And when the spark comes— it will reshape the entire balance of power in the Pacific.

ALERT:🚨 “JAPAN WILL DEFEND TAIWAN” — A RED LINE HAS BEEN DRAWN Japan has now signalled what many hoped—and others feared—would never be said aloud: If China moves on Taiwan, Japan will not remain neutral. Tokyo has stated that any Chinese assault on Taiwan could constitute an “existential crisis” for Japan’s national security — a legal classification that allows Japan to deploy military force in collective defence with its allies. This is not symbolic language. It means Japan is preparing for real war. Here is the strategic reality: • Around 80% of Japan’s energy imports pass through waters near Taiwan • A Chinese blockade would cripple Japan’s economy overnight • If Taiwan falls, Japan becomes isolated—economically and militarily • The message to Washington is unmistakable: Japan expects America to stand with it Japanese officials have made their position publicly clear, and Chinese leadership knows exactly what that means: A move on Taiwan will not just be a regional conflict— it risks triggering a three-nation military response: Taiwan, Japan, and the United States. This is no longer hypothetical. Japan is openly signalling preparedness. Beijing is increasing incursions and fleet movements. U.S. leaders are discussing forward deployments. The fuse is being laid. War is no longer “possible.” It is approaching the brink. And when the spark comes— it will reshape the entire balance of power in the Pacific.

Jim Ferguson

285,620 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

China has made it clear that the Taiwan question is China’s internal affair. If Japan interferes, they will pay the price. China is not the weak one a century ago. Remember what this parade is called? The 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War.

China has made it clear that the Taiwan question is China’s internal affair. If Japan interferes, they will pay the price. China is not the weak one a century ago. Remember what this parade is called? The 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War.

Li Zexin 李泽欣

42,805 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Japan is escalating its response to China’s threats against Taiwan. Tokyo has announced plans to deploy missiles on Yonaguni Island—just 68 miles from Taiwan—marking one of Japan’s clearest warnings yet to the Chinese Communist Party. The move comes in the middle of a growing feud between China and Japan that has already triggered export restrictions, cultural retaliation, and rising military tensions. Is Japan preparing for a future conflict over Taiwan?

Japan is escalating its response to China’s threats against Taiwan. Tokyo has announced plans to deploy missiles on Yonaguni Island—just 68 miles from Taiwan—marking one of Japan’s clearest warnings yet to the Chinese Communist Party. The move comes in the middle of a growing feud between China and Japan that has already triggered export restrictions, cultural retaliation, and rising military tensions. Is Japan preparing for a future conflict over Taiwan?

China Uncensored

18,307 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Great explanation of the China-Japan altercation by Chas Freeman, imho the wisest diplomat ever produced by the US (he's had many roles, including Asst. Secretary of Defense and famously the main interpreter for Nixon during his epochal 1972 China visit) He first describes in his speech the origin of the altercation as being "Japan's threat to extend its defense perimeter to include Taiwan." Afterwards he goes into a longer explanation in the Q&A in which he said: "Prime Minister Takaichi... answer[ed] a hypothetical question in the Diet by suggesting that Taiwan was now once again part of Japan for defense purposes. And this of course would embolden people in Taiwan to continue to pursue independence rather than reassociation with the rest of China, and therefore it is a strategic change of some significance." In effect, as he explains, it's unacceptable to China in several ways: 1) With regards to Japan's colonial history vis a vis Taiwan, it's especially provocative to now once more make Taiwan part of Japan's territory for defense purposes. 2) Because it emboldens independentist forces in Taiwan and therefore makes war MORE likely. This is Japan basically telling independentists: you can go ahead and declare independence, if war breaks out as a result we have your back. If you want an analogy, it's as if Macron announced officially that the French army would militarily defend Catalonia from Spain if it's seceded. 3) Last but not least, it fundamentally challenges the post-WWII settlement, on which the world order is based. As Freeman explains, Taiwan was recovered from Japan under the Cairo and Potsdam declarations - Allied war aims that the U.S. and China fought and bled for together. By re-extending its defense perimeter to Taiwan, Japan is effectively seeking to reverse the outcome of WWII.

Great explanation of the China-Japan altercation by Chas Freeman, imho the wisest diplomat ever produced by the US (he's had many roles, including Asst. Secretary of Defense and famously the main interpreter for Nixon during his epochal 1972 China visit) He first describes in his speech the origin of the altercation as being "Japan's threat to extend its defense perimeter to include Taiwan." Afterwards he goes into a longer explanation in the Q&A in which he said: "Prime Minister Takaichi... answer[ed] a hypothetical question in the Diet by suggesting that Taiwan was now once again part of Japan for defense purposes. And this of course would embolden people in Taiwan to continue to pursue independence rather than reassociation with the rest of China, and therefore it is a strategic change of some significance." In effect, as he explains, it's unacceptable to China in several ways: 1) With regards to Japan's colonial history vis a vis Taiwan, it's especially provocative to now once more make Taiwan part of Japan's territory for defense purposes. 2) Because it emboldens independentist forces in Taiwan and therefore makes war MORE likely. This is Japan basically telling independentists: you can go ahead and declare independence, if war breaks out as a result we have your back. If you want an analogy, it's as if Macron announced officially that the French army would militarily defend Catalonia from Spain if it's seceded. 3) Last but not least, it fundamentally challenges the post-WWII settlement, on which the world order is based. As Freeman explains, Taiwan was recovered from Japan under the Cairo and Potsdam declarations - Allied war aims that the U.S. and China fought and bled for together. By re-extending its defense perimeter to Taiwan, Japan is effectively seeking to reverse the outcome of WWII.

Arnaud Bertrand

112,549 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

President Xi Jinping spoke on the phone with #US President Donald Trump — their first call after the Busan meeting. According to the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the call was initiated by the US side. And at the very top of the agenda? The Taiwan question. Xi reiterated China's principled stance on the #Taiwan question, stressing that Taiwan's return to China is a key part of the postwar international order. Trump said the US acknowledges the significant role China played in the victory in World War II and understands the importance of the Taiwan question to China. The timing matters. With Japan hyping up a so-called "Taiwan contingency", this direct talk sends a powerful message — to Japan, and to separatists — that miscalculation will not be allowed. #MediaUnlocked

President Xi Jinping spoke on the phone with #US President Donald Trump — their first call after the Busan meeting. According to the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the call was initiated by the US side. And at the very top of the agenda? The Taiwan question. Xi reiterated China's principled stance on the #Taiwan question, stressing that Taiwan's return to China is a key part of the postwar international order. Trump said the US acknowledges the significant role China played in the victory in World War II and understands the importance of the Taiwan question to China. The timing matters. With Japan hyping up a so-called "Taiwan contingency", this direct talk sends a powerful message — to Japan, and to separatists — that miscalculation will not be allowed. #MediaUnlocked

China Daily

41,659 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

In 2008, the China-Japan Joint Statement on All-round Promotion of Strategic Relationship of Mutual Benefit stipulated clearly in Article 5 that "The Japanese side reiterated that it will continue to abide by its position on the Taiwan question stated in the Joint Statement of the Government of the People's Republic of China and the Government of Japan."

In 2008, the China-Japan Joint Statement on All-round Promotion of Strategic Relationship of Mutual Benefit stipulated clearly in Article 5 that "The Japanese side reiterated that it will continue to abide by its position on the Taiwan question stated in the Joint Statement of the Government of the People's Republic of China and the Government of Japan."

Ministry of National Defense of China

180,017 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

The Cairo Declaration issued by China, the US, and the UK in 1943 explicitly stipulates that Japan shall be stripped of all the islands in the Pacific which it had seized or occupied since the beginning of the First World War in 1914, and that all the territories which Japan had stolen from China, such as Northeast China, Taiwan and the Penghu Islands, shall be restored to China. The restoration of Taiwan to China is an important part of the outcomes of WWII victory and the post-war international order.

The Cairo Declaration issued by China, the US, and the UK in 1943 explicitly stipulates that Japan shall be stripped of all the islands in the Pacific which it had seized or occupied since the beginning of the First World War in 1914, and that all the territories which Japan had stolen from China, such as Northeast China, Taiwan and the Penghu Islands, shall be restored to China. The restoration of Taiwan to China is an important part of the outcomes of WWII victory and the post-war international order.

Ministry of National Defense of China

293,328 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

After Japan's new Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi claimed that a Taiwan "emergency" could constitute a "survival-threatening situation", some Western commentators labeled China's full-spectrum diplomatic response an "overreaction". But before talking about China's reaction, we must be honest about what Japan escalated first. "Survival crisis" is a legal war trigger under Japan's 2015 security legislation, allowing the use of force even when Japan isn't attacked. This is the first time a Japanese prime minister has implied Japan could enter a war with China over Taiwan — a matter that is purely China's internal affair. Meanwhile, Japan is re-militarizing, mirroring the 1930s, when Japan used the logic of "existential fear" to justify its invasions. With unresolved wartime history, this is an alarm bell China cannot ignore. And claims that China is "ungrateful" for Japan's ODA are pure gaslighting. In fact, Japan's ODA to China was not charity. Over 80% was loans, not free money. And China had to spend the money on Japanese companies, equipment and contractors. In the end, Japan earned far more from China than it ever "gave". So, China's response is not an overreaction; it is a responsible government acting responsibly. #MediaUnlocked

After Japan's new Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi claimed that a Taiwan "emergency" could constitute a "survival-threatening situation", some Western commentators labeled China's full-spectrum diplomatic response an "overreaction". But before talking about China's reaction, we must be honest about what Japan escalated first. "Survival crisis" is a legal war trigger under Japan's 2015 security legislation, allowing the use of force even when Japan isn't attacked. This is the first time a Japanese prime minister has implied Japan could enter a war with China over Taiwan — a matter that is purely China's internal affair. Meanwhile, Japan is re-militarizing, mirroring the 1930s, when Japan used the logic of "existential fear" to justify its invasions. With unresolved wartime history, this is an alarm bell China cannot ignore. And claims that China is "ungrateful" for Japan's ODA are pure gaslighting. In fact, Japan's ODA to China was not charity. Over 80% was loans, not free money. And China had to spend the money on Japanese companies, equipment and contractors. In the end, Japan earned far more from China than it ever "gave". So, China's response is not an overreaction; it is a responsible government acting responsibly. #MediaUnlocked

MediaUnlocked

11,324 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Listen to Gordon G. Chang on why average Americans should care about Taiwan. Here is a brief history of Taiwan for better understanding of the issue. 1624–1662: Dutch colonial rule in parts of Taiwan; Spain briefly controlled the north (1626–1642). 1662–1683: Ming loyalists under Koxinga ruled Taiwan after expelling the Dutch, marking the beginning of China’s control of the island. 1683–1895: Taiwan was governed by the Qing Dynasty. 1895–1945: Japan controlled Taiwan after the Qing lost the First Sino-Japanese War. 1943: The Cairo Declaration stated that Taiwan should be returned to the Republic of China (ROC). 1945–Present: The ROC took administrative control of Taiwan after Japan’s surrender in WWII. In 1949 the Nationalist government retreated to Taiwan after losing the Chinese Civil War to the CCP. It has been governing Taiwan ever since. 1951: The San Francisco Peace Treaty ended Japan’s claim to Taiwan but did not name a recipient government, known as the ambiguity statute. Where do you see that the CCP has a claim to the island? 😱🤡

Listen to Gordon G. Chang on why average Americans should care about Taiwan. Here is a brief history of Taiwan for better understanding of the issue. 1624–1662: Dutch colonial rule in parts of Taiwan; Spain briefly controlled the north (1626–1642). 1662–1683: Ming loyalists under Koxinga ruled Taiwan after expelling the Dutch, marking the beginning of China’s control of the island. 1683–1895: Taiwan was governed by the Qing Dynasty. 1895–1945: Japan controlled Taiwan after the Qing lost the First Sino-Japanese War. 1943: The Cairo Declaration stated that Taiwan should be returned to the Republic of China (ROC). 1945–Present: The ROC took administrative control of Taiwan after Japan’s surrender in WWII. In 1949 the Nationalist government retreated to Taiwan after losing the Chinese Civil War to the CCP. It has been governing Taiwan ever since. 1951: The San Francisco Peace Treaty ended Japan’s claim to Taiwan but did not name a recipient government, known as the ambiguity statute. Where do you see that the CCP has a claim to the island? 😱🤡

Xi Van Fleet

20,321 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

CHINESE MILITARY COULD SEIZE TAIWAN’S GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS IN UNDER AN HOUR! The Chinese would mount a lightning fast assault from the air and sea. China will send assault ships across the straits and dozens of helicopters. And perhaps that China can reach the airfields in Taiwan in 10-15 minutes. Taiwan would feel constrained from firing first because that would be seen as provoking a war. China will use both military and civilian ships and transport hundreds of thousands of soldiers across the strait and occupy Taiwan. The attack will begin with a massive bombing that will knock out Taiwan's radar facilities and communication notes. The US will face a difficult choice....... Either the US are passive and let China invade Taiwan or they make the decision to protect Taiwan at all costs. The risk then is that the US could lose more soldiers than during World War II.

CHINESE MILITARY COULD SEIZE TAIWAN’S GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS IN UNDER AN HOUR! The Chinese would mount a lightning fast assault from the air and sea. China will send assault ships across the straits and dozens of helicopters. And perhaps that China can reach the airfields in Taiwan in 10-15 minutes. Taiwan would feel constrained from firing first because that would be seen as provoking a war. China will use both military and civilian ships and transport hundreds of thousands of soldiers across the strait and occupy Taiwan. The attack will begin with a massive bombing that will knock out Taiwan's radar facilities and communication notes. The US will face a difficult choice....... Either the US are passive and let China invade Taiwan or they make the decision to protect Taiwan at all costs. The risk then is that the US could lose more soldiers than during World War II.

China pulse 🇨🇳

103,311 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Japan Quietly Upgraded Its Military — With Taiwan’s Help. This TSMC Move Just Made a Taiwan Invasion Much Harder. China keeps talking about invading Taiwan. But while everyone was watching the headlines, something far more important happened. TSMC—the world’s most advanced and profitable chipmaker—decided to bring 3-nanometer production to Japan. Not legacy chips. Not trailing nodes. The crown jewels. In this video, I break down how Taiwan and TSMC just helped Japan upgrade its deterrence capabilities at the silicon level—why this move quietly reshapes the military balance in East Asia, raises the cost of a Taiwan invasion, and leaves China structurally locked out of the future.

Japan Quietly Upgraded Its Military — With Taiwan’s Help. This TSMC Move Just Made a Taiwan Invasion Much Harder. China keeps talking about invading Taiwan. But while everyone was watching the headlines, something far more important happened. TSMC—the world’s most advanced and profitable chipmaker—decided to bring 3-nanometer production to Japan. Not legacy chips. Not trailing nodes. The crown jewels. In this video, I break down how Taiwan and TSMC just helped Japan upgrade its deterrence capabilities at the silicon level—why this move quietly reshapes the military balance in East Asia, raises the cost of a Taiwan invasion, and leaves China structurally locked out of the future.

Ken Cao-The China Crash Chronicle

82,836 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

“Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan question violate the UN Charter and four political documents between China and Japan on at least two levels, especially the Treaty of Peace and Friendship Between China and Japan,” Liu Jiangyong, professor at the Institute of International Studies of Tsinghua University said at an academic seminar to discuss Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s recent erroneous remarks on Taiwan held at China Foreign Affairs University (CFAU) on Saturday. He said that I believe the Joint Statement could not have reached consensus without Japan firmly maintaining its stand under Article 8 of the Potsdam Proclamation.

“Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan question violate the UN Charter and four political documents between China and Japan on at least two levels, especially the Treaty of Peace and Friendship Between China and Japan,” Liu Jiangyong, professor at the Institute of International Studies of Tsinghua University said at an academic seminar to discuss Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s recent erroneous remarks on Taiwan held at China Foreign Affairs University (CFAU) on Saturday. He said that I believe the Joint Statement could not have reached consensus without Japan firmly maintaining its stand under Article 8 of the Potsdam Proclamation.

Global Times

11,175 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Chinese Foreign Ministry: Taiwan is an inalienable part of China’s territory. It is never a country, not in the past and never in the future. Taiwan independence and cross-strait peace are as irreconcilable as fire and water.

Chinese Foreign Ministry: Taiwan is an inalienable part of China’s territory. It is never a country, not in the past and never in the future. Taiwan independence and cross-strait peace are as irreconcilable as fire and water.

Clash Report

61,866 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten