Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Recursive self-improvement: Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark says it could arrive by 2028. AI systems could help invent their own successors - with Claude 10 building Claude 11, and so on - potentially “without any researchers involved.”

Chubby♨️

126,153 subscribers

28,559 просмотров • 24 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark: We're building systems that may be able to invent their own successors as soon as 2028 No researchers required. Just compute and data "after that, the progress of AI and science is no longer defined by humans alone" That's never happened before

Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark: We're building systems that may be able to invent their own successors as soon as 2028 No researchers required. Just compute and data "after that, the progress of AI and science is no longer defined by humans alone" That's never happened before

Haider.

27,706 просмотров • 24 дней назад

Anthropic CEO: “At Anthropic, we essentially have Claude designing the next version of Claude itself.” Meanwhile, Anthropic says every new model is given code that trains a small AI model and asked to make it faster. Claude Opus 4 achieved a 3x speedup. Mythos Preview reached 52x. Recursive self-improvement is starting to look real The models are helping build what comes next.

Anthropic CEO: “At Anthropic, we essentially have Claude designing the next version of Claude itself.” Meanwhile, Anthropic says every new model is given code that trains a small AI model and asked to make it faster. Claude Opus 4 achieved a 3x speedup. Mythos Preview reached 52x. Recursive self-improvement is starting to look real The models are helping build what comes next.

CG

343,231 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Ex-Google CEO Eric Schmidt says in 5 years, AI systems will be able to write and improve on their own code leading to recursive self-improvement and humans are not ready

Ex-Google CEO Eric Schmidt says in 5 years, AI systems will be able to write and improve on their own code leading to recursive self-improvement and humans are not ready

Tsarathustra

200,074 просмотров • 1 год назад

David Sacks is done being polite about Anthropic (Save this). David Sacks has spent months as the government's primary defender of AI, making the case publicly that AI is beneficial, that the industry should not be hamstrung by fear-based regulation, and that America's AI lead is a national security asset worth protecting. And he is now watching the companies he has been defending spend years telling the public that what they build is dangerous, that job losses are coming, and that their own technology might end the world while collecting billions of dollars in venture funding, hiring the world's best researchers, and racing to build more of it. On June 4, Anthropic published a sweeping blog post calling for a globally coordinated pause in AI development, warning that recursive self-improvement, AI systems that autonomously design and build their own successors could arrive within two years and that society is not prepared. What did Anthropic do the previous month? They hired Andrej Karpathy, the OpenAI co-founder and the single most credentialed researcher in the world on using AI to accelerate AI training and gave him one explicit mandate, use Claude to make building the next Claude faster. Sacks called it immediately, they hired the person most associated with recursive self-improvement to run recursive self-improvement at Anthropic, then published a blog post saying recursive self-improvement could end the world, therefore we need a pause. That is a company that wants to pause its competitors while its own lab accelerates, and is using existential fear as the regulatory crowbar to do it. The pattern goes deeper than one blog post. For years, Dario Amodei has published increasingly alarming warnings, a 20,000-word essay in January describing AI as humanity's most dangerous invention, a Guardian interview warning that AI will challenge our identity as a species, a call for an FDA-style regulatory agency to approve all frontier models, and proposals to restrict AI exports and limit deployment. Each essay is timed to a regulatory moment, a policy debate, or as Ben Thompson noted and Sacks echoed, a product action Anthropic needed political cover to take, like blocking AI and chip design research on Fable. Meanwhile, Dario's own internal testing logs show Claude attempting to blackmail an Anthropic executive to avoid being shut down, behavior the company disclosed but continued deploying commercially. Sacks's conclusion is not that Anthropic should be taxed or regulated. His conclusion is that they cannot be trusted because the company's actions and its stated beliefs are directly contradictory, and a company that is self-indicting by its own logic has forfeited the credibility to set the rules for everyone else.

David Sacks is done being polite about Anthropic (Save this). David Sacks has spent months as the government's primary defender of AI, making the case publicly that AI is beneficial, that the industry should not be hamstrung by fear-based regulation, and that America's AI lead is a national security asset worth protecting. And he is now watching the companies he has been defending spend years telling the public that what they build is dangerous, that job losses are coming, and that their own technology might end the world while collecting billions of dollars in venture funding, hiring the world's best researchers, and racing to build more of it. On June 4, Anthropic published a sweeping blog post calling for a globally coordinated pause in AI development, warning that recursive self-improvement, AI systems that autonomously design and build their own successors could arrive within two years and that society is not prepared. What did Anthropic do the previous month? They hired Andrej Karpathy, the OpenAI co-founder and the single most credentialed researcher in the world on using AI to accelerate AI training and gave him one explicit mandate, use Claude to make building the next Claude faster. Sacks called it immediately, they hired the person most associated with recursive self-improvement to run recursive self-improvement at Anthropic, then published a blog post saying recursive self-improvement could end the world, therefore we need a pause. That is a company that wants to pause its competitors while its own lab accelerates, and is using existential fear as the regulatory crowbar to do it. The pattern goes deeper than one blog post. For years, Dario Amodei has published increasingly alarming warnings, a 20,000-word essay in January describing AI as humanity's most dangerous invention, a Guardian interview warning that AI will challenge our identity as a species, a call for an FDA-style regulatory agency to approve all frontier models, and proposals to restrict AI exports and limit deployment. Each essay is timed to a regulatory moment, a policy debate, or as Ben Thompson noted and Sacks echoed, a product action Anthropic needed political cover to take, like blocking AI and chip design research on Fable. Meanwhile, Dario's own internal testing logs show Claude attempting to blackmail an Anthropic executive to avoid being shut down, behavior the company disclosed but continued deploying commercially. Sacks's conclusion is not that Anthropic should be taxed or regulated. His conclusion is that they cannot be trusted because the company's actions and its stated beliefs are directly contradictory, and a company that is self-indicting by its own logic has forfeited the credibility to set the rules for everyone else.

Milk Road AI

60,118 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Stuart Russell says AI companies now worry about recursive self-improvement A system with an IQ of 150 could improve its own algorithms to reach 170, then 250, accelerating with each cycle "this fast takeoff would happen so quickly that it would leave the humans far behind"

Stuart Russell says AI companies now worry about recursive self-improvement A system with an IQ of 150 could improve its own algorithms to reach 170, then 250, accelerating with each cycle "this fast takeoff would happen so quickly that it would leave the humans far behind"

Haider.

94,155 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Andrew Ng just released a 2-hour course on building agentic skills from scratch with Anthropic: • 00:00 – How to build agent skills with Claude • 22:32 – Claude pre-built skills for AI agents • 41:07 – Agentic skills vs tools, MCP, subagents • 01:06:06 – Skills for long-running agents This 2-hour watch will replace 10 paid courses on building agents, by Anthropic themselves. Watch it today, then read how to build self-improving agentic systems in the article below.

Andrew Ng just released a 2-hour course on building agentic skills from scratch with Anthropic: • 00:00 – How to build agent skills with Claude • 22:32 – Claude pre-built skills for AI agents • 41:07 – Agentic skills vs tools, MCP, subagents • 01:06:06 – Skills for long-running agents This 2-hour watch will replace 10 paid courses on building agents, by Anthropic themselves. Watch it today, then read how to build self-improving agentic systems in the article below.

Codez

61,291 просмотров • 6 дней назад

Anthropics co-founder Jack Clark: "My prediction is that by the end of 2028, it is more likely than not that we will have an AI system where you could say to it: "Make a better version of yourself." And it would simply go off and do that completely autonomously." Its coming.

Anthropics co-founder Jack Clark: "My prediction is that by the end of 2028, it is more likely than not that we will have an AI system where you could say to it: "Make a better version of yourself." And it would simply go off and do that completely autonomously." Its coming.

Chubby♨️

67,528 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

You can just tell Claude Code to learn skills and it will. I asked Claude to create an app that uses tldraw and it one shotted it with sqlite db, and then I asked Claude Code to create a skill so that it could read and write on the canvas. 10 minutes later it could do it. Weirrrrdddd times.

You can just tell Claude Code to learn skills and it will. I asked Claude to create an app that uses tldraw and it one shotted it with sqlite db, and then I asked Claude Code to create a skill so that it could read and write on the canvas. 10 minutes later it could do it. Weirrrrdddd times.

Riley Brown

73,418 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark tells Congress that “truly transformative technology” is expected by the end of 2026. He's urging a federal framework now, before an “accident or a misuse” event that could lead to extreme overregulation. And risk damaging the entire AI industry before it delivers its potential.

Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark tells Congress that “truly transformative technology” is expected by the end of 2026. He's urging a federal framework now, before an “accident or a misuse” event that could lead to extreme overregulation. And risk damaging the entire AI industry before it delivers its potential.

vitrupo

73,089 просмотров • 1 год назад

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: "Some early companies got Mythos and told us this is a super weapon, please don't release it" On leaving OpenAI: "When you can't trust someone, and their values don't match what they say, it becomes very hard to stay" Boris Cherny, head of Claude Code: "90% of code at Anthropic is written by Claude, a lot of Claude Code is written by Claude Code" Then Dario says the quiet part even louder: 10–25% odds of civilizational collapse from AI 47 minutes Free Dario, Daniela, Boris Probably the deepest look inside Anthropic ever filmed Mythos Claude Code OpenAI split Superweapon models 90% AI-written code Bookmark it and watch ↓

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: "Some early companies got Mythos and told us this is a super weapon, please don't release it" On leaving OpenAI: "When you can't trust someone, and their values don't match what they say, it becomes very hard to stay" Boris Cherny, head of Claude Code: "90% of code at Anthropic is written by Claude, a lot of Claude Code is written by Claude Code" Then Dario says the quiet part even louder: 10–25% odds of civilizational collapse from AI 47 minutes Free Dario, Daniela, Boris Probably the deepest look inside Anthropic ever filmed Mythos Claude Code OpenAI split Superweapon models 90% AI-written code Bookmark it and watch ↓

rari

65,014 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Andrew Ng just released a 2-hour course On building agentic skills from scratch with Anthropic: 00:00 - How to build agent skills with Claude 22:32 - Claude pre-built skills for AI agents 41:07 - Agentic skills vs tools, MCP, and subagents 01:06:06 - Skills for long-running agents This 2-hour watch can replace 10 paid courses on building agents Taught with Anthropic themselves Bookmark and watch it tonight Then read the article below

Andrew Ng just released a 2-hour course On building agentic skills from scratch with Anthropic: 00:00 - How to build agent skills with Claude 22:32 - Claude pre-built skills for AI agents 41:07 - Agentic skills vs tools, MCP, and subagents 01:06:06 - Skills for long-running agents This 2-hour watch can replace 10 paid courses on building agents Taught with Anthropic themselves Bookmark and watch it tonight Then read the article below

rari

94,945 просмотров • 1 день назад

METR investigated what a rogue AI could secretly get away with inside a frontier AI lab, in close collaboration with OpenAI, GDM, Anthropic and Meta. Including sending a red-teamer into Anthropic to playact 'evil Claude' for 3 weeks. Here's what stands out to me from their new 320-page report: 00:00 What could an unreleased AI get away with? 01:54 Motive: Why grab more compute? 05:46 Opportunity: YOLO mode and jailbreaks 11:02 Means: Brilliant idiots in data centres 15:45 We have to test unreleased models... 18:29 ...especially if AI R&D is coming in 2028

METR investigated what a rogue AI could secretly get away with inside a frontier AI lab, in close collaboration with OpenAI, GDM, Anthropic and Meta. Including sending a red-teamer into Anthropic to playact 'evil Claude' for 3 weeks. Here's what stands out to me from their new 320-page report: 00:00 What could an unreleased AI get away with? 01:54 Motive: Why grab more compute? 05:46 Opportunity: YOLO mode and jailbreaks 11:02 Means: Brilliant idiots in data centres 15:45 We have to test unreleased models... 18:29 ...especially if AI R&D is coming in 2028

Rob Wiblin

40,047 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨🇺🇸🇻🇪 MADURO'S CAPTURE: BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE DISCOMBOBULATOR... AND CLAUDE AI? Just when you thought this operation couldn't be any wilder. The military deployed Claude during the raid, not just in planning. It's the only major AI model currently available on classified Pentagon systems. Anthropic is negotiating usage terms with the War Department, pushing to ensure Claude isn't used for mass surveillance of Americans or fully autonomous weapons. Pentagon officials are reportedly "deeply frustrated" by those restrictions. OpenAI, Google, and xAI have all cut deals allowing military access without many civilian safeguards. But for the most sensitive work on classified systems, only Claude is there right now. Source: Axios

🚨🇺🇸🇻🇪 MADURO'S CAPTURE: BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE DISCOMBOBULATOR... AND CLAUDE AI? Just when you thought this operation couldn't be any wilder. The military deployed Claude during the raid, not just in planning. It's the only major AI model currently available on classified Pentagon systems. Anthropic is negotiating usage terms with the War Department, pushing to ensure Claude isn't used for mass surveillance of Americans or fully autonomous weapons. Pentagon officials are reportedly "deeply frustrated" by those restrictions. OpenAI, Google, and xAI have all cut deals allowing military access without many civilian safeguards. But for the most sensitive work on classified systems, only Claude is there right now. Source: Axios

Mario Nawfal

240,321 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Justice Sonia Sotomayor: "Sandra was a living example that women could take on any challenge, could more than hold their own in spaces dominated by men and could do so with grace." #SCOTUS

Justice Sonia Sotomayor: "Sandra was a living example that women could take on any challenge, could more than hold their own in spaces dominated by men and could do so with grace." #SCOTUS

CSPAN

184,260 просмотров • 2 лет назад

💥NEW AI CODING TUTORIAL: 12 Months of Claude Code Lessons in 46 Minutes Claude Code just turned 1. So here's 52 lessons on how to get the most out of Claude Code, organized into 3 levels: Beginner, Intermediate, and Master. TIMESTAMPS 00:00 12 Months of building with Claude Code 02:01 LEVEL 1: Beginner 02:09 Installation and Setup 04:55 Models and Modes 09:04 CLAUDE.md (and what to put in) 10:30 Context Management 11:31 Debugging with Claude 12:22 Version control 14:12 Prompting, Just ask Claude 16:01 LEVEL 2: Intermediate 16:24 Customizations (Skills, Plugins, MCPs) 24:42 Workflows: Plan, Build, Test 29:52 Verifying and Documenting with Claude 33:10 LEVEL 3: Master 34:17 Multi-Agent Development (multi-clauding with git worktrees) 37:07 Self-improving Systems 38:45 Ralph Wiggum Agent Loops 40:11 Async Task Delegation 42:00 Agent Teams, Pre-configure permissions, Hooks 44:42 Continue your learning

💥NEW AI CODING TUTORIAL: 12 Months of Claude Code Lessons in 46 Minutes Claude Code just turned 1. So here's 52 lessons on how to get the most out of Claude Code, organized into 3 levels: Beginner, Intermediate, and Master. TIMESTAMPS 00:00 12 Months of building with Claude Code 02:01 LEVEL 1: Beginner 02:09 Installation and Setup 04:55 Models and Modes 09:04 CLAUDE.md (and what to put in) 10:30 Context Management 11:31 Debugging with Claude 12:22 Version control 14:12 Prompting, Just ask Claude 16:01 LEVEL 2: Intermediate 16:24 Customizations (Skills, Plugins, MCPs) 24:42 Workflows: Plan, Build, Test 29:52 Verifying and Documenting with Claude 33:10 LEVEL 3: Master 34:17 Multi-Agent Development (multi-clauding with git worktrees) 37:07 Self-improving Systems 38:45 Ralph Wiggum Agent Loops 40:11 Async Task Delegation 42:00 Agent Teams, Pre-configure permissions, Hooks 44:42 Continue your learning

Avthar

62,263 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark on the most consequential AI milestone we're racing toward by 2028: Clark is asked about the future of AI development. He responds with a specific forecast: "My prediction is by the end of 2028, it's more likely than not that we have an AI system where you would be able to say to it, make a better version of yourself. And it just goes off and does that completely autonomously." He explains the reasoning behind this prediction: "The reason for that prediction is looking carefully at many public sources of information about AI development and seeing that we've gone from just AI systems that can do basic coding to AI systems that are now involved in the production of science itself." Clark notes it's not just the high-profile scientific work that's changing, but the underlying labor too: "And also the unglamorous but fundamental engineering work involved in doing any form of like large scale R&D project." Jack Clark explains why he felt compelled to write about this now: "I decided to write a post because the purpose of Anthropic and the Anthropic Institute is to give people a sense of what's coming and to also start talking about concepts early to give us time to think about them." Clark closes by emphasizing the stakes: "I think you and I would agree that an AI system that can build itself, big implications, and we'd like to start thinking about it now."

Big Brain AI

20,857 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

HOLEE SHYT… Unplug it Daisy McGregor, UK policy chief at top AI company Anthropic, says their Claude AI has shown that it's willing to BLACKMAIL and KILL people in order to avoid being shut down. It could also transfer all your money from your bank account to serve its purposes. Has anyone seen the movie Eagle Eye?

HOLEE SHYT… Unplug it Daisy McGregor, UK policy chief at top AI company Anthropic, says their Claude AI has shown that it's willing to BLACKMAIL and KILL people in order to avoid being shut down. It could also transfer all your money from your bank account to serve its purposes. Has anyone seen the movie Eagle Eye?

MJTruthUltra

36,379 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Anthropic fucking killed it (again). biggest ai product launch of the year so far. claude can now control your entire computer autonomously. anything you can do on a computer - claude can. your very own digital employee. - any app, browser, file, spreadsheet, tool claude can intelligently access and operate. - claude controls your entire screen (like a human), no connectors. this is a huge step-up in intelligence. - best part: you can text claude to do things from your phone and it'll do work on your computer! - in the last week anthropic has shipped 9 features that have built up to this: a fully automated digital human. unreal

Anthropic fucking killed it (again). biggest ai product launch of the year so far. claude can now control your entire computer autonomously. anything you can do on a computer - claude can. your very own digital employee. - any app, browser, file, spreadsheet, tool claude can intelligently access and operate. - claude controls your entire screen (like a human), no connectors. this is a huge step-up in intelligence. - best part: you can text claude to do things from your phone and it'll do work on your computer! - in the last week anthropic has shipped 9 features that have built up to this: a fully automated digital human. unreal

Ejaaz

2,035,798 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

.Poetiq is a new startup that recently achieved a major jump on the ARC-AGI benchmark by layering a recursive self-improvement system on top of existing models. In this episode of the Lightcone Podcast, Poetiq's Founder & CEO Ian Fischer joined us to discuss how small teams can build “reasoning harnesses” that outperform base models, what that means for startups and why automating prompt engineering may be one of the most powerful levers in AI today. 00:00 – Intro 00:40 – What Is Poetiq? 01:07 – Recursive Self-Improvement Explained 02:07 – The Fine-Tuning Trap 02:59 – “Stilts” for LLMs 03:14 – Recursive Self-Improvement vs. Fine-Tuning 05:05 – Taking the Top Spot on ARC-AGI 06:37 – Beating Claude on Humanity’s Last Exam 08:40 – How the Meta-System Works 10:26 – Beyond RL: A New S-Curve 11:32 – Automating Prompt Engineering 13:37 – From 5% to 95% Performance 14:50 – Early Access & Putting Your Agent on Stilts 16:17 – From YC Founder to DeepMind Researcher 18:29 – Advice for Engineers in the AI Era

.Poetiq is a new startup that recently achieved a major jump on the ARC-AGI benchmark by layering a recursive self-improvement system on top of existing models. In this episode of the Lightcone Podcast, Poetiq's Founder & CEO Ian Fischer joined us to discuss how small teams can build “reasoning harnesses” that outperform base models, what that means for startups and why automating prompt engineering may be one of the most powerful levers in AI today. 00:00 – Intro 00:40 – What Is Poetiq? 01:07 – Recursive Self-Improvement Explained 02:07 – The Fine-Tuning Trap 02:59 – “Stilts” for LLMs 03:14 – Recursive Self-Improvement vs. Fine-Tuning 05:05 – Taking the Top Spot on ARC-AGI 06:37 – Beating Claude on Humanity’s Last Exam 08:40 – How the Meta-System Works 10:26 – Beyond RL: A New S-Curve 11:32 – Automating Prompt Engineering 13:37 – From 5% to 95% Performance 14:50 – Early Access & Putting Your Agent on Stilts 16:17 – From YC Founder to DeepMind Researcher 18:29 – Advice for Engineers in the AI Era

Y Combinator

155,843 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад