Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
Reddington Is Trying To Block A Clancy Retrial Using Double Jeopardy
14,163 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce •via X (Twitter)
29 Yorum

Hearsay. The lone juror never accounted for having reasonable doubt. The Pink Klan jurors said that. If he had reasonable doubt he wouldn’t have came to the conclusion he did.

Double jeopardy only applies if the defendant is found not guilty. A mistrial cannot trigger double jeapordy

Honest question, could the hold out juror sue both the lawyer & that other juror for defamation? At this point they have publicly doxxed him and dragged his character through the mud with their apparent ability to mind read what he actually thought.

So now they've completely doxxed the juror. This would have never happened had he voted NGRI but no one is honest enough with themselves to admit it. He didn't come out publicly on his own. I've lost respect for everyone who has participated in this.

At this point, the jury members that have spoken up and the defense attorney need to be arrested. They are slandering the one who voted guilty and are putting words in his mouth. She committed murder. She admitted it. That was what they were supposed to decide. No reasoning.

The floor lady & other women showed they didn’t follow the instructions. The lone juror did.

Hopefully- the fact he used his wife to spread his narrative is exposed. And IMO he was behind organizing the pink shirt supporters. He began the attack on the lone juror.

If you want to support the holdout hero juror

Reddington is just angry it didn’t go his way!

It’s like he thinks if he just repeats the lie enough we will all ignore the actual facts. Especially when you’re relying on bias witnesses. Some doubt is not equal to reasonable doubt. He knows this and still keeps pushing his false narrative. What an aweful human being.

hearsay you gonna put the juror in front the judge

You have to be convicted of a crime. She wasn’t so nothing comes out except another trial or they let her walk.

lol I mean if she’s sooooo innocent and was unfairly judged what’s the fear with a retrial?!

He doubeted she was insane Carver where most of the jury was pulled from is a nice town, But understand this, this juror did not buy the insanity angle thats all this is, . Under the law not guilty by reason of insanity means she would be eligible for release under time served

Stop calling them “box of wine” jurors . It does nothing for your credibility and sound legal points.

The note the foreman wrote said he still had doubt. She didn’t write he still had reasonable doubt! Only in their woke interviews did they say reasonable doubt! She is a monster and a murder

Thank you holdout juror!

He hated the juror because he was black

The smear campaign against this single man needs to stop. And the other Jurors need to be prosecuted for speaking on him.

The lady that killed her kids is guilty as fuck!

They come up with a new narrative on him every day. I see a video every day and it’s different. It’s such a crack of the way they spread their narrative. I have something to say on every one of them. It’s fun. I’m having a great Time.

That defense attorney thinks he going to get some of her kitty Cat if he gets the MFER MURDER OFF

Looks like someone doesn’t want to give up his 15 minutes of fame. It’s a shame when a lawyer is an attention seeker. Just another Michael Avenatti.

That's the funny part that the only people he said it to was the jurors. Not the judge. Quite possibly this could've been cooked up by he attorney. Just a thought. That's just where my mind went to first

It has to be BEYOND reasonable doubt. Unless you’re a witness to the murder, there’s always doubt.

He’s senile

Can anyone explain how the lone juror both “clearly expressed reasonable doubt” and also “wouldn’t explain his position”? Stupid people shouldn’t give televised interviews.

That fucking lawyer is a POS.

Scumbag


