Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Referendums are foreign interference? It’s the same situation as Quebec?? In Canada there is the freedom of speech, expression and protest. Also the freedom to hold a referendum. Ladies and gentlemen, this is India’s high commissioner who yet again does not understand how democracy works. 🤦🏽‍♂️ India is shaking,... show more

Inderjeet Singh

1,283 subscribers

19,003 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

NOW: Premier Smith's new referendum question: "Should Alberta remain a province of Canada, or should the government of Alberta commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada?" She adds, "Because this proposed referendum question does not directly trigger separation but, if successful, would ask Alberta's government to commence the legal process necessary to hold a binding referendum on the matter."

NOW: Premier Smith's new referendum question: "Should Alberta remain a province of Canada, or should the government of Alberta commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada?" She adds, "Because this proposed referendum question does not directly trigger separation but, if successful, would ask Alberta's government to commence the legal process necessary to hold a binding referendum on the matter."

Rebel News

15,356 views • 2 months ago

🇨🇦🍁 LOL! Alberta will hold a referendum to exit from Canada: "Should Alberta remain a province of Canada, or should the government of Alberta commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada?" — Premier of Alberta, Danielle Smith on the referendum in October, 19 "It's time to have a vote, understand the will of Albertans on this subject, and move on." — adds *Alberta is an oil-rich province, so they want to sell oil to the US directly, without Canada. What will be the Ottawa's response?

🇨🇦🍁 LOL! Alberta will hold a referendum to exit from Canada: "Should Alberta remain a province of Canada, or should the government of Alberta commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada?" — Premier of Alberta, Danielle Smith on the referendum in October, 19 "It's time to have a vote, understand the will of Albertans on this subject, and move on." — adds *Alberta is an oil-rich province, so they want to sell oil to the US directly, without Canada. What will be the Ottawa's response?

Lord Bebo

46,288 views • 2 months ago

'We're not stupid' - Ze refused to withdraw the Armed Forces of Ukraine from Donbass and hold a referendum. 'All sides must understand that the worst path is to leave Donbass. This will be a great risk for Ukraine, unacceptable for Ukrainians... And the referendum will not be positive. And if we're not stupid, we can't go to a referendum knowing that the referendum will fail. It's stupid. I think so. That's why we need to find a real peace, a real path to peace that will be acceptable to the Ukrainian nation'. - SK

'We're not stupid' - Ze refused to withdraw the Armed Forces of Ukraine from Donbass and hold a referendum. 'All sides must understand that the worst path is to leave Donbass. This will be a great risk for Ukraine, unacceptable for Ukrainians... And the referendum will not be positive. And if we're not stupid, we can't go to a referendum knowing that the referendum will fail. It's stupid. I think so. That's why we need to find a real peace, a real path to peace that will be acceptable to the Ukrainian nation'. - SK

Zlatti71

24,163 views • 7 months ago

"I want to make sure those numbers do not get higher, and those numbers end up going lower because we're successful in negotiating a new arrangement with Canada" Danielle Smith yesterday afternoon. This video clearly lays out the Premiers marching orders. She does not support a referendum on independence, it should be said the very opposite is true. She has been instructed and will do what she can to prevent the support of separatism breaching 30%. The newly tabled Bill 54 will lower the threshold required to trigger a citizens initiative. A direct and what I believe to be the intended consequence of changing the threshold is less public support for the referendum question which follows a successful citizens initiative. Lower threshold+less public support= failed referendum. In short, a lower threshold to initiate the citizens initiatives will result in a higher likelihood that a referendum stemming out of the proposed legislation also fails. Alberta Separatists need to have a serious discussion on not just how much support is needed to hold a referendum but also how much support is needed to hold a SUCCESSFUL referendum. #AlbertaSeparation

"I want to make sure those numbers do not get higher, and those numbers end up going lower because we're successful in negotiating a new arrangement with Canada" Danielle Smith yesterday afternoon. This video clearly lays out the Premiers marching orders. She does not support a referendum on independence, it should be said the very opposite is true. She has been instructed and will do what she can to prevent the support of separatism breaching 30%. The newly tabled Bill 54 will lower the threshold required to trigger a citizens initiative. A direct and what I believe to be the intended consequence of changing the threshold is less public support for the referendum question which follows a successful citizens initiative. Lower threshold+less public support= failed referendum. In short, a lower threshold to initiate the citizens initiatives will result in a higher likelihood that a referendum stemming out of the proposed legislation also fails. Alberta Separatists need to have a serious discussion on not just how much support is needed to hold a referendum but also how much support is needed to hold a SUCCESSFUL referendum. #AlbertaSeparation

Marco Van Huigenbos

48,375 views • 1 year ago

India has rejected Canada’s CSIS allegations of “foreign interference” as “baseless imputations.” At the same time, the same #CSIS report acknowledges that Canada-based Khalistani extremist groups pose a security threat not only to India, but to Canada as well. Many Western democracies are facing a dilemma: Where should freedom of expression be allowed… and where should violent separatism become a red line? Because democracy doesn't mean promoting violence against another country… or financing extremism from foreign soil. In my latest #vlog, I decode the Randhir Jaiswal response, diaspora politics, extremism & India–Canada tensions. Watch now.

India has rejected Canada’s CSIS allegations of “foreign interference” as “baseless imputations.” At the same time, the same #CSIS report acknowledges that Canada-based Khalistani extremist groups pose a security threat not only to India, but to Canada as well. Many Western democracies are facing a dilemma: Where should freedom of expression be allowed… and where should violent separatism become a red line? Because democracy doesn't mean promoting violence against another country… or financing extremism from foreign soil. In my latest #vlog, I decode the Randhir Jaiswal response, diaspora politics, extremism & India–Canada tensions. Watch now.

Ravinder Singh Robin

13,962 views • 2 months ago

ELON: WE NEED TO RESTORE FREEDOM TO THE PEOPLE OF GERMANY “The current government [of Germany] is suppressing speech very aggressively. When you suppress freedom of speech, it's very difficult, if not impossible, to have a true democracy, because freedom of speech is the foundation of democracy. People cannot be expected to vote in an informed manner if they are not able to know the truth. So this is why it is so important to have freedom of speech so people can make an informed vote and it can be a true democracy. But this is not what the current government has been doing. They have been suppressing freedom of speech and putting people in jail for even mild criticisms of politicians or social media posts. This is crazy. This is frankly, a totalitarian approach. It is not a democratic approach. We need to restore freedom to the people of Germany and have freedom of speech and have less government oppression in general.” Source: AfD Meeting, January 2025

ELON: WE NEED TO RESTORE FREEDOM TO THE PEOPLE OF GERMANY “The current government [of Germany] is suppressing speech very aggressively. When you suppress freedom of speech, it's very difficult, if not impossible, to have a true democracy, because freedom of speech is the foundation of democracy. People cannot be expected to vote in an informed manner if they are not able to know the truth. So this is why it is so important to have freedom of speech so people can make an informed vote and it can be a true democracy. But this is not what the current government has been doing. They have been suppressing freedom of speech and putting people in jail for even mild criticisms of politicians or social media posts. This is crazy. This is frankly, a totalitarian approach. It is not a democratic approach. We need to restore freedom to the people of Germany and have freedom of speech and have less government oppression in general.” Source: AfD Meeting, January 2025

Mario Nawfal

83,619 views • 10 months ago

Elon Musk: We need to restore freedom to the people of Germany! “The current government is suppressing speech very aggressively. When you suppress freedom of speech, it's very difficult, if not impossible, to have a true democracy, because freedom of speech is the foundation of democracy. People cannot be expected to vote in an informed manner if they are not able to know the truth. So this is why it is so important to have freedom of speech so people can make an informed vote and it can be a true democracy. But this is not what the current government has been doing. They have been suppressing freedom of speech and putting people in jail for even mild criticisms of politicians or social media posts. This is crazy. This is frankly, a totalitarian approach. It is not a democratic approach. We need to restore freedom to the people of Germany and have freedom of speech and have less government oppression in general.” AfD Meeting, January 30, 2025

Elon Musk: We need to restore freedom to the people of Germany! “The current government is suppressing speech very aggressively. When you suppress freedom of speech, it's very difficult, if not impossible, to have a true democracy, because freedom of speech is the foundation of democracy. People cannot be expected to vote in an informed manner if they are not able to know the truth. So this is why it is so important to have freedom of speech so people can make an informed vote and it can be a true democracy. But this is not what the current government has been doing. They have been suppressing freedom of speech and putting people in jail for even mild criticisms of politicians or social media posts. This is crazy. This is frankly, a totalitarian approach. It is not a democratic approach. We need to restore freedom to the people of Germany and have freedom of speech and have less government oppression in general.” AfD Meeting, January 30, 2025

ELON CLIPS

26,485 views • 10 months ago

2024: Nigel Farage is upset at the Chagos islands being handed back to Mauritius, saying it was advisory opinion and "there is no legal reason why we have to do any of this" 2015: Conservative David Lidington confirmed that the Brexit referendum would be 'advisory' After the referendum Farage said, "Not to leave the EU would be a massive betrayal of democracy" So in 2024 an advisory opinion is not legally binding, but in 2015 not delivering on an advisory referendum is a "betrayal of democracy" 🤷‍♂️

2024: Nigel Farage is upset at the Chagos islands being handed back to Mauritius, saying it was advisory opinion and "there is no legal reason why we have to do any of this" 2015: Conservative David Lidington confirmed that the Brexit referendum would be 'advisory' After the referendum Farage said, "Not to leave the EU would be a massive betrayal of democracy" So in 2024 an advisory opinion is not legally binding, but in 2015 not delivering on an advisory referendum is a "betrayal of democracy" 🤷‍♂️

Farrukh

133,034 views • 1 year ago

Punjab is dying, Freedom of speech is being continuously killed in Punjab, If this continues, the day is not far when Punjab will once again witness a dark period.

Punjab is dying, Freedom of speech is being continuously killed in Punjab, If this continues, the day is not far when Punjab will once again witness a dark period.

Rattandeep Singh Dhaliwal

12,034 views • 5 months ago

Elon Musk: Here's why I'm in favor of the AfD. “The reason that I am in favor of AfD is that there are some fundamental things that must happen, without which I'm concerned that Germany will fail. There have to be sensible controls on immigration. If there are criminals in Germany who are committing crimes and hurting people in Germany, they must be deported. And that's not happening. Then there must also be freedom of speech, such that the people know what the truth is. Otherwise, they cannot make an informed decision. If you do not have freedom of speech, you cannot be a democracy because the public cannot make an informed decision about their vote. In Germany right now, there are draconian rules against freedom of expression where even insulting a politician can get you prison time, which is insane. So, I like the fact that the AfD is in favor of freedom of speech, in favor of sensible immigration policies and deportation of criminals, and I like the generally libertarian policies of the AfD.” WELT Economic Summit, January 28, 2025

Elon Musk: Here's why I'm in favor of the AfD. “The reason that I am in favor of AfD is that there are some fundamental things that must happen, without which I'm concerned that Germany will fail. There have to be sensible controls on immigration. If there are criminals in Germany who are committing crimes and hurting people in Germany, they must be deported. And that's not happening. Then there must also be freedom of speech, such that the people know what the truth is. Otherwise, they cannot make an informed decision. If you do not have freedom of speech, you cannot be a democracy because the public cannot make an informed decision about their vote. In Germany right now, there are draconian rules against freedom of expression where even insulting a politician can get you prison time, which is insane. So, I like the fact that the AfD is in favor of freedom of speech, in favor of sensible immigration policies and deportation of criminals, and I like the generally libertarian policies of the AfD.” WELT Economic Summit, January 28, 2025

ELON CLIPS

1,159,522 views • 1 year ago

Elon Musk: I'm concerned that Germany will fail. “The reason that I am in favor of AFD is that there's some fundamental things that must happen without which I'm concerned that Germany will fail. There have to be sensible controls on immigration. If there are [immigrants] in Germany who are committing crimes and hurting people in Germany, they must be deported, and that's not happening. Then, there must also be freedom of speech, such that the people know what the truth is, otherwise they cannot make an informed decision. If you do not have freedom of speech, you cannot be a democracy because the public cannot make an informed decision about their vote if there is not freedom of information. In Germany right now, there are draconian rules against freedom of expression, where even insulting a politician can get you prison time, which is insane. I like the fact that the AfD is in favor of freedom of speech. I like that the AFD is in favor of sensible immigration policies and deportation of criminals. And I like the generally libertarian policies of the AfD.” WELT Economic Summit, January 28, 2025

Elon Musk: I'm concerned that Germany will fail. “The reason that I am in favor of AFD is that there's some fundamental things that must happen without which I'm concerned that Germany will fail. There have to be sensible controls on immigration. If there are [immigrants] in Germany who are committing crimes and hurting people in Germany, they must be deported, and that's not happening. Then, there must also be freedom of speech, such that the people know what the truth is, otherwise they cannot make an informed decision. If you do not have freedom of speech, you cannot be a democracy because the public cannot make an informed decision about their vote if there is not freedom of information. In Germany right now, there are draconian rules against freedom of expression, where even insulting a politician can get you prison time, which is insane. I like the fact that the AfD is in favor of freedom of speech. I like that the AFD is in favor of sensible immigration policies and deportation of criminals. And I like the generally libertarian policies of the AfD.” WELT Economic Summit, January 28, 2025

ELON CLIPS

162,842 views • 11 months ago

KINEW: "Wow, all this referendum talk makes me want to have a referendum, too, except in Manitoba, the question is going to be: Do you want to stay a part of Canada? And the two choices are going to be: Yeah, and Heck, yeah."

KINEW: "Wow, all this referendum talk makes me want to have a referendum, too, except in Manitoba, the question is going to be: Do you want to stay a part of Canada? And the two choices are going to be: Yeah, and Heck, yeah."

Scott Robertson

372,348 views • 6 months ago

🇺🇦 This President is not for turning 🙌🏻👊🏻 #Zelenskyy: „A #plebiscite (#referendum) on the legal and factual #recognition of these #territories as Russian cannot be executed. A referendum on this ... is prohibited in the #constitution. That‘s not about whether I will allow this or not as #President. #Parliament and the initiative of the people can initiate a referendum. #Ceding up areas is not legally recognizable. That would be like a #fake referendum, as the #Russians did in #Crimea. They said we had a referendum, and the territories belongs to us. You can’t do it that way.” Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський #Ukraine ZDFheute ZDF Bundeskanzler Friedrich Merz #Russia #Merz #Kushner #Witkoff #Putin #Trump #MarkusLanz #Lanz #Berlin

🇺🇦 This President is not for turning 🙌🏻👊🏻 #Zelenskyy: „A #plebiscite (#referendum) on the legal and factual #recognition of these #territories as Russian cannot be executed. A referendum on this ... is prohibited in the #constitution. That‘s not about whether I will allow this or not as #President. #Parliament and the initiative of the people can initiate a referendum. #Ceding up areas is not legally recognizable. That would be like a #fake referendum, as the #Russians did in #Crimea. They said we had a referendum, and the territories belongs to us. You can’t do it that way.” Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський #Ukraine ZDFheute ZDF Bundeskanzler Friedrich Merz #Russia #Merz #Kushner #Witkoff #Putin #Trump #MarkusLanz #Lanz #Berlin

🏳️‍🌈 🇪🇺 🇺🇦 🇩🇪 🇮🇱 🇺🇳 Frank Sarfeld

68,719 views • 7 months ago

MURTAUGH HIGHLIGHTS THE IMPORTANCE OF RUMBLE AND REBEL NEWS LAWSUITS AGAINST CANADA ‘A STRONG BLOW IN FAVOR OF FREE EXPRESSION’ Tim Murtaugh explains to Matt Gaetz: “A case like this can serve as a landmark case…Rumble 🏴‍☠️ is on the frontlines of the fight for freedom of speech - not just in Canada and the United States, but also in Brazil.”

MURTAUGH HIGHLIGHTS THE IMPORTANCE OF RUMBLE AND REBEL NEWS LAWSUITS AGAINST CANADA ‘A STRONG BLOW IN FAVOR OF FREE EXPRESSION’ Tim Murtaugh explains to Matt Gaetz: “A case like this can serve as a landmark case…Rumble 🏴‍☠️ is on the frontlines of the fight for freedom of speech - not just in Canada and the United States, but also in Brazil.”

One America News

160,086 views • 1 year ago

“India is the largest democracy” is not a truth, it’s a lie. India’s democracy has been destroyed. I want to say to youth, GenZ and the people of India that this democracy is yours, not of Amit Shah, Modi or ECI, it’s your duty to defend it. — Rahul Gandhi Ji #VoteChori

“India is the largest democracy” is not a truth, it’s a lie. India’s democracy has been destroyed. I want to say to youth, GenZ and the people of India that this democracy is yours, not of Amit Shah, Modi or ECI, it’s your duty to defend it. — Rahul Gandhi Ji #VoteChori

Shantanu

31,823 views • 8 months ago

🚨 ELON MUSK: “You can tell which side is the good side and which side is the bad side by which side wishes to restrict freedom of speech. The side that is restricting freedom of speech (the Hitlers, Stalins, and Mussolinis of the world) had very strong censorship on freedom of speech. That’s one of the signs that they are the bad guys. Restriction on speech and large government is fundamentally fascist. Ironically, in pushing for censorship, it makes it clear that the left is the side that is against freedom; and freedom of speech is one of the many freedoms we should have as a civil society. Idea should win on the strength of their arguments. They should not win because they are suppressed.”

🚨 ELON MUSK: “You can tell which side is the good side and which side is the bad side by which side wishes to restrict freedom of speech. The side that is restricting freedom of speech (the Hitlers, Stalins, and Mussolinis of the world) had very strong censorship on freedom of speech. That’s one of the signs that they are the bad guys. Restriction on speech and large government is fundamentally fascist. Ironically, in pushing for censorship, it makes it clear that the left is the side that is against freedom; and freedom of speech is one of the many freedoms we should have as a civil society. Idea should win on the strength of their arguments. They should not win because they are suppressed.”

Autism Capital 🧩

1,777,477 views • 1 year ago

Today, this is not just a protest—it is a fight for freedom. And today, India is moving toward freedom for the second time. If you can't be here in person, at least share this video as widely as possible. #ChaloSansad #Cjp #Jantarmantar #Protest #Cockroachjantaparty

Today, this is not just a protest—it is a fight for freedom. And today, India is moving toward freedom for the second time. If you can't be here in person, at least share this video as widely as possible. #ChaloSansad #Cjp #Jantarmantar #Protest #Cockroachjantaparty

Voice of Cockroach

91,497 views • 12 days ago

🚨 There is NOT QUESTION that Mark Carney, Michael Ma and the entire Liberal Party of Canada, are FULL COMPROMISED by the China and the CCP. #Godkeepourland #Canada #Freedom

🚨 There is NOT QUESTION that Mark Carney, Michael Ma and the entire Liberal Party of Canada, are FULL COMPROMISED by the China and the CCP. #Godkeepourland #Canada #Freedom

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

18,802 views • 4 months ago

I have listened to the debate on Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 between legal scholar Dr Justice Mavedzenge and political scientist Prof Jonathan Moyo today on Twitter. Without any doubt, Dr Justice Mavedzenge explained, clarified, and made ordinary people understand the issues, and more importantly, in my humble view, he won the debate on whether there is need for Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 to be subjected to a referendum or not. Anything done for the people, as Prof Jonathan Moyo says these monumental amendments are, should be subjected to the people. The Constitution is not ambiguous on this. It is clear that term limits should be subjected to a referendum for any change to be done legally. Under Section 328 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe, any amendment that seeks to extend the length of time a President may hold office, or to remove or alter term limits in a way that benefits an incumbent, cannot apply to the sitting President and must be subjected to constitutional safeguards. You cannot claim to be doing something for the people and yet deny those same people the right to have a say. Prof Jonathan Moyo has a right to his views, but those views must be subjected to the law for the amendments to be implemented legally, and based on what I have read in our Constitution, his views are not aligned with the law. And I am not making this up. It is in the Constitution. Even veteran Zimbabwean lawyer and former ZANUPF legal secretary, Patrick Chinamasa, has said so. In this video, he explains in front of President Mnangagwa that what they are attempting to do today, which Prof Jonathan Moyo argues does not require a referendum, would in fact require two referendums. One to remove or alter presidential term limits from five to seven years, and another to extend the sitting president’s tenure to 2030. This position was declared, and not contradicted, at a ZANUPF conference in Bulawayo. What the broader legal fraternity in Zimbabwe is saying, save for a few lawyers who have since revised their positions and now echo the same view, is that the Constitution is explicit on these prescripts. Anything else is political propaganda to win hearts and minds. The problem with propaganda is that it cannot be anchored in constitutional provisions. It rests on opinion. In this instance, however, we are not expressing opinions. We are stating what is contained in the Constitution and what ZANUPF itself has previously acknowledged. You can decide today that you want a 20-year presidential term. That is your right to hold that view, but you must subject that proposition to the law. If you believe in it, take it to the citizens in the manner prescribed by the Constitution. You cannot decide, through opinion or political argument, whether a referendum is required or not. That question is not settled by what anyone thinks. It is settled by what the law says. If the Constitution requires a referendum, then you must subject yourself to it. That is how constitutional democracy works. We know that the judiciary in Zimbabwe is captured. We know how they are going to rule, but the whole world knows the truth, that if they rule in favour of these amendments going ahead without a referendum, they are simply a captured judiciary without the respect that is required for anyone holding such an important office, and history will remember them as such.

I have listened to the debate on Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 between legal scholar Dr Justice Mavedzenge and political scientist Prof Jonathan Moyo today on Twitter. Without any doubt, Dr Justice Mavedzenge explained, clarified, and made ordinary people understand the issues, and more importantly, in my humble view, he won the debate on whether there is need for Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 to be subjected to a referendum or not. Anything done for the people, as Prof Jonathan Moyo says these monumental amendments are, should be subjected to the people. The Constitution is not ambiguous on this. It is clear that term limits should be subjected to a referendum for any change to be done legally. Under Section 328 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe, any amendment that seeks to extend the length of time a President may hold office, or to remove or alter term limits in a way that benefits an incumbent, cannot apply to the sitting President and must be subjected to constitutional safeguards. You cannot claim to be doing something for the people and yet deny those same people the right to have a say. Prof Jonathan Moyo has a right to his views, but those views must be subjected to the law for the amendments to be implemented legally, and based on what I have read in our Constitution, his views are not aligned with the law. And I am not making this up. It is in the Constitution. Even veteran Zimbabwean lawyer and former ZANUPF legal secretary, Patrick Chinamasa, has said so. In this video, he explains in front of President Mnangagwa that what they are attempting to do today, which Prof Jonathan Moyo argues does not require a referendum, would in fact require two referendums. One to remove or alter presidential term limits from five to seven years, and another to extend the sitting president’s tenure to 2030. This position was declared, and not contradicted, at a ZANUPF conference in Bulawayo. What the broader legal fraternity in Zimbabwe is saying, save for a few lawyers who have since revised their positions and now echo the same view, is that the Constitution is explicit on these prescripts. Anything else is political propaganda to win hearts and minds. The problem with propaganda is that it cannot be anchored in constitutional provisions. It rests on opinion. In this instance, however, we are not expressing opinions. We are stating what is contained in the Constitution and what ZANUPF itself has previously acknowledged. You can decide today that you want a 20-year presidential term. That is your right to hold that view, but you must subject that proposition to the law. If you believe in it, take it to the citizens in the manner prescribed by the Constitution. You cannot decide, through opinion or political argument, whether a referendum is required or not. That question is not settled by what anyone thinks. It is settled by what the law says. If the Constitution requires a referendum, then you must subject yourself to it. That is how constitutional democracy works. We know that the judiciary in Zimbabwe is captured. We know how they are going to rule, but the whole world knows the truth, that if they rule in favour of these amendments going ahead without a referendum, they are simply a captured judiciary without the respect that is required for anyone holding such an important office, and history will remember them as such.

Hopewell Chin’ono

62,328 views • 5 months ago