Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Refineries burn Fertiliser plants explode Power grids get hacked Supply chains collapse Fuel prices skyrocket. Then you starve . Agenda 2030

19,855 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

A CHINESE-FLAGGED TANKER DOCKS AT BOTANY BAY, LADEN WITH OIL FROM INDIA. Back in 1788, the infant colony of Sydney teetered on the brink of starvation. We weren’t self-sufficient in food, so the HMS Sirius embarked on a gruelling, round-the-world voyage to Cape Town (via South America) just to buy food and save us from famine. One ship – our fragile lifeline – stood between life and death. Fast-forward to today. In the name of insane, virtue-signalling Net Zero madness, we’ve deliberately slaughtered our own refineries, shut down exploration, and handed our energy security to foreign powers. We’ve gutted our ability to produce fuel at home – all for green applause from elites who’ll never miss a meal. The devastating result? We now depend on a Chinese-flagged ship hauling oil from India to keep our tractors running. Without that foreign tanker, our farmers can’t plough the fields, can’t harvest the crops, can’t get food to our hungry cities. One delayed ship, one geopolitical hiccup, and the shelves empty, the prices skyrocket, families go without. This is not progress – this is utter betrayal. Political stupidity and ideological obsession have dragged us right back to 1788: a proud, resource-rich nation reduced to begging foreign ships to arrive on time… so we don’t starve. How much more humiliation will we swallow before we wake up? It’s time to ditch Net Zero, - drill, baby drill and reopen the refineries

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

126,079 views • 4 months ago

Elon Musk just revealed what’s actually holding AI back. It’s not chips. Not models. Not data. It’s concrete. Someone asked him the obvious question. Why not just build private power plants next to data centers? Bypass the grid entirely. His answer was four words. Musk: “The power plant makers.” There aren’t enough of them. You can design the best chip on earth. Train a frontier model. Raise $10 billion for a hyperscale data center. None of it matters if you can’t power it. Musk: “You can drill down a level further.” GPUs need power. Power needs turbines. Turbines need factories. Factories need permits. Permits need a government that hasn’t paralyzed itself. Every link in the chain is physical. And every one of them is breaking. We can train a frontier model in weeks. We can’t permit a power plant in under five years. The country that invented the assembly line now needs 40 agencies to approve a gas turbine. China doesn’t have this problem. They don’t run 7-year environmental reviews on infrastructure they need tomorrow. They break ground while America requests approval to break ground. The AI race won’t be decided by whoever writes the best algorithm. It’ll be decided by whoever can still build in the physical world. We spent 30 years getting faster in software and slower in steel. Outsourcing manufacturing. Hollowing out supply chains. Treating builders like liabilities instead of assets. Now the bill is due. Every breakthrough in AI is gated by atoms. Steel. Concrete. Turbines that take years to manufacture and decades to approve. The smartest code on earth is worthless without electricity. Musk didn’t give a speech about this. He didn’t need to. He answered one question and the whole infrastructure myth collapsed. “Where do you get the power plants from?” Follow that thread far enough and you stop finding a technology problem. You find a civilization that mastered thinking and forgot how to build.

Dustin

985,903 views • 2 months ago

Here is the police dispatch from before and after the bridge collapse, as first reported by DMV News Live Mayday calls were received by first responders, they were aware the ship had lost steering, and stopped incoming traffic from getting onto the bridge. Reportedly, no civilian vehicles were on the bridge at the time of collapse. There were 8 workers filling potholes on the bridge at the time of collapse, 2 survived, 6 are unaccounted for and presumed dead. This means that if this was a terror attack meant to kill people, it was not very effective. What kind of terrorist warns first responders to save civilians? If the terror attack was meant to cripple American infrastructure and shipping, I95 and I895 have been implemented as alternate land routes, the port will be able to operate after the way is cleared, and supply chains have already begun diverting transportation through other ports until the Baltimore port is viable again. GM and Ford have both said this will have “minimal impact” on their operations and have already deployed contingencies. I know you heard lots of doom-mongering today about how this is going to cripple the United States economy, but the that’s simply not true at all. This isolated incident will be an inconvenience, but the machine will keep churning. If we see a trend of accidents like this, then I might start to worry. If you think this ship was hacked, and the bridge was taken out intentionally… then this attack was horribly executed and didn’t accomplish much.

Clandestine

449,703 views • 2 years ago