Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Relationship insider

67,007 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Whitney Webb lays out the extensive, long-suppressed ties between Jeffrey Epstein, Bill Gates, & Microsoft—connections the mainstream media refuses to pursue. Epstein repeatedly described himself as a "money manager for Bill Gates." New reports confirm Epstein even vetted legal counsel for the Gates Foundation. This relationship is not a post-2011 anomaly, as often reported. It's deeply rooted in the 1990s with a series of top Microsoft executives. Nathan Myhrvold, Microsoft's former CTO & a Gates confidant, was named by Alan Dershowitz as an individual accused of abusing minors trafficked by Epstein. Dershowitz deflected questions by pointing to Myhrvold. Another exec, Linda Stone, hired a woman from Epstein's entourage as her secretary & connected him to the MIT Media Lab—a key hub for his operations. The Gates Foundation itself has much to answer for. One of its top science advisors was Melanie Walker, whom Epstein recruited into his network in 1992 & funded her graduate studies. Walker later introduced Epstein to Boris Nikolic, another Gates Foundation science advisor. Upon Epstein’s death, Nikolic was named the backup executor of his will. Why would Epstein place a Gates insider in such a position? The overlap between Epstein's "science" interests and Gates's is telling. The media blackout isn't just about funding—it's about protecting a network of power that leads to the highest echelons of tech and philanthropy. The unanswered questions demand scrutiny.

Camus

76,007 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Trump - “In my Former Life, I was an Insider and in a “Special Club” - Now I’m Being Punished for Leaving that “Special Club” I’m noticing there are some questioning Donald Trumps loyalties because of symbolism and/or things in his past. I think any decent researcher, if we’re being honest, at some point had to have that conversation in our heads. So, the conundrum some are battling with is if Donald Trump is good or bad. Trump said in this clip that he was an “insider” and in a “Special Club”. He said he left that special club. Do we trust his word? No. The only thing we should ever place Trust in is God. But Think about our journey together and all of which has been revealed and exposed since he became President. If Trump is bad and still in that “special club” and he lied about leaving it, my frens, that was the worse thing they could have done. The Truth movement flourishes like it never has before. Millions upon millions of people have been waking up since that man has been elected. Millions upon millions have found God (myself included) or have strengthened their relationship with God. Can anyone else attest to that with me? They would have been MUCH better off keeping us sound asleep if he was bad, because that’s exactly where the majority of us were, prior to that man becoming president. There’s something to be said about how Donald Trump makes you feel when you see him.. Ask yourselves, why does he make you feel inspired and at peace when he speaks? Let me be clear… My faith is not in Donald Trump. My faith is that through divine intervention, God used Donald Trump as a Trumpet to speak to his children before it was too late. My frens, Faith is required to move forward beyond this point. Faith is not in what’s seen. It’s in trusting what God has in store for us tomorrow, which is currently unknown. Unshakeable Faith is an unbreakable rock. Stand on it. Do not flinch. 🙏

MJTruthUltra

509,624 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Breaking🇬🇧🚫: Starmer And Brown Want This Clip Banned: Just when you thought things couldn't get any worse for PM Keir Starmer and his links to friends of sex rapist and insider trading Epstein..... Watch as new Starmer appointment 'International Finance Expert' Gordon Brown talks global governance with disgraced Larry Summers former US Treasury Secretary and Epstein business associate. The public must be asking themselves what information, or security checks have been done on this latest Starmer appointment with a highly suspicious long standing relationship with convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein? Summers and Epstein Rap Sheet: 🚨Decade-Long Contact: The emails showed that Summers continued to correspond with Epstein until the day before his 2019 arrest for sex trafficking. 🚨"Wing Man" Correspondence: In 2018 and 2019, while married, Summers consulted Epstein for personal advice regarding a woman he was mentoring, with Epstein calling himself Summers’ "wing man". 🚨Frequent Dinners & Networking: Documents showed the two dined together frequently, with Epstein working to connect Summers with global figures. 🚨Philanthropic Solicitation: Summers solicited donations from Epstein for his wife's poetry project, and Epstein was listed as a backup executor in a 2014 draft of Epstein's will. 🚨Travels: Summers traveled on Epstein's private plane at least four times, including during his tenure as Harvard president, and visited his private island. This latest Starmer appointment which directly compromises UK economic and national security should see Starmer and his associates face trial for this highly suspect rogues gallery of non ministerial, non elected characters with top security clearance.

HIN News🇬🇧🇺🇸

91,354 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🎙️ MAL REVEALS MAJOR INFO ON J. COLE & DRAKE FALLOUT 👀🔥 (Rory & Mal Podcast) Mal just dropped a bombshell about the post battle aftermath and it raises more questions than answers. 🚨 THE BIG REVEAL According to Mal: •J. Cole has not spoken to Drake since early 2024 •This happened right after Cole backed out of the battle •This was immediately following a full tour together 👉 Despite years of public unity, the relationship allegedly went radio silent. 🤔 WHY THIS FEELS STRANGE •Cole and Drake had just toured together •Drake helped Cole secure his first #1 song •Millions were made on that tour •Then… no communication ever again Mal called the move “nasty” and says Cole owes fans and Drake an explanation in bars 🎵 THE APOLOGY THAT RAISED EYEBROWS •Cole released a song 5 months after the Drake vs. Kendrick / industry battle •In the song, he apologizes to Drake •But if they haven’t spoken since early 2024… ❓Was the apology genuine or just for optics? 🧠 THE “BARZINI MEETING” THEORY This brings back a theory I raised during the battle itself 👀 🎬 WHAT IS THE BARZINI MEETING? From The Godfather: •Barzini uses a trusted insider (Tessio) to request a “peace meeting” •The meeting is actually a setup to assassinate Michael Corleone •Famous line: “Whoever comes to you with this Barzini meeting… he’s the traitor.” 🎤 WHY THIS MATTERS IN HIP-HOP Jay Z once warned Drake directly: “Drake, here's how they gon' come at you With silly rap feuds, tryin' to distract you In disguise, in the form of a favor The Barzini meeting, watch for the traitors, uhh I done seen it all, done it all That's why none of these dum-dums could done him off…” 💭 The question now being asked: •Did Cole unknowingly (or knowingly) line Drake up to jump into the battle? •Was the Kendrick conversation the “meeting”? •Did something get said on that call that permanently severed the relationship? 🕵🏽‍♂️ THE UNANSWERED QUESTIONS •Who leaked the original “Push Ups” diss? •What exactly was said in the Cole x Kendrick conversation? •Why did Cole never speak to Drake again? •Were they friends… or just business partners? Even Mal admits: “This is not common knowledge. Fans did not know this.” 🗣️ MAL’S CORE DEMAND •Cole doesn’t need interviews •He doesn’t need podcasts •He doesn’t need press runs 🎶 Put it in the bars. Explain: •Why you backed out •Why you spoke to Kendrick •Why Drake never heard from you again 📌 BOTTOM LINE •Public unity ➝ private silence •Apology without reconciliation •A theory once dismissed now feels… possible •The battle may be over, but the story isn’t finished 👀 Who do you think really set the pieces in motion?

Cousin Tino ™️

497,221 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Eight months ago, David Sacks, the White House AI and Crypto Czar publicly accused Anthropic of running a sophisticated regulatory capture campaign built on fear mongering (save this). People thought it was a spicy take and then Fable 5 release just turned it into evidence. When Anthropic released its Mythos-class models, it disclosed that every prompt and output sent through them would be retained for 30 days with no exceptions including for enterprise customers who had previously signed zero data retention agreements, and for up to two years if a prompt was flagged by a safety classifier. Microsoft moved so quickly that it restricted its own employees from using Claude Fable 5 within days of the release, citing the retention terms as incompatible with its internal policies, the largest enterprise software company in the world treating the new terms as a non-starter. But the data retention was not even the part that generated the most outrage in the developer community. The system card also disclosed that for users Anthropic suspected of working on frontier AI research, chip design, or competing model development, the system would automatically route those requests to a less capable model without telling the user, rewrite the prompt in the background, deliver a deliberately degraded response, and charge full price for access to a frontier model the user was not actually receiving. Business Insider confirmed that Anthropic's own apology acknowledged the company was intentionally giving worse answers and concealing that fact from paying customers. The examples of who triggered these filters make the safety justification difficult to defend, Ben Thompson from Stratechery was flagged for asking about the relationship between GLP-1s and cancer risk, and users asking routine questions about mitochondria were quietly downgraded, none of them aware it was happening. Under pressure, Anthropic walked back the narrowest possible piece of the policy, they will now disclose when a request is being downgraded. The underlying architecture, the 30 day retention, the behavioral profiling, the routing tiers, and the two-class access system remains fully intact. This is the part that makes David Sacks argument from October 2025 land differently today. He argued that Anthropic's safety positioning was principally a regulatory capture strategy using fear-based arguments to shape rules that would entrench incumbents and damage the broader startup ecosystem. The Fable 5 disclosure shows a company that used safety language to justify building an opaque, paternalistic system where Anthropic alone decides who is worthy of frontier AI access, profiles users to enforce that decision and collects full payment regardless.

Milk Road AI

47,312 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Donald Trump has been secretly communicating with ‘man crush’ Jamie Dimon about White House agenda for months: sources | James Franey & Charles Gasparino, New York Post JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon has been communicating with Donald Trump in recent months through secret back channels, helping the president-elect hammer out a policy agenda before and since his decisive White House victory, The Post has learned. The 68-year-old Wall Street titan — who, like 78-year-old Trump, grew up in Queens in New York City — has acted as “a sounding board” for the incoming commander-in-chief’s economic manifesto, four sources close to Trump’s transition team said. One GOP insider said the president-elect’s inner circle held a series of “no-holds-barred conversations” with Dimon — who at the time was rumored to be eyeing a government job himself. “They have been speaking regularly for months,” said another GOP source briefed on the situation. Three of the sources close to Trump said the secret back channel focused on plans for cutting government spending, banking regulation, taxes and trade. A company insider added that Trump’s top aides set up the calls, which continued after the election, to “create a bit of daylight” between the two men and stop details of the exchanges leaking. A spokesperson for the Trump transition team declined to comment. A JPMorgan spokesman also declined to comment. The quietly cozy relationship between Trump and Dimon has flourished despite the banker’s cryptic and tight-lipped tendencies when it comes to politics. Trump had floated Dimon’s name as a possible Treasury secretary pick in June and later claimed he had won his White House endorsement — despite a lack of any public statement from Dimon to that effect. Trump and Dimon also have continued to talk despite bouts of tension, including on Nov. 14 when the president-elect declared on Truth Social that Dimon ”will not be invited” to join his Cabinet. The banker promptly shot back: “I haven’t had a boss in 25 years and I’m not about ready to start.” The JPMorgan CEO, a registered Democrat who declined to back either candidate in the White House race, had even reportedly toyed with the idea of joining a Kamala Harris administration but then ruled himself out of leaving the Wall Street giant when her poll numbers tanked, The Post previously reported. On Nov. 22, The Post broke the news that Trump was also consulting with Blackrock CEO Larry Fink, a major Dem donor, on policy issues. Nevertheless, the former” Apprentice” star’s admiration of Dimon, who has helmed JPMorgan Chase for nearly two decades and has a net worth estimated by Forbes at $2.6 billion, was described by one source as “a man crush.” Another individual close to the president-elect said Trump “greatly appreciated” it when Dimon, an avid reader of the New York Post, told CNBC in January the eventual election winner was “kind of right” to criticize illegal immigration and weak defense spending by America’s NATO allies. Dimon’s comments angered left-wingers within the Biden administration who then blacklisted Dimon from the White House in a fit of pique, as The Post exclusively reported. Two weeks ago, the JPMorgan boss said Trump’s threat of slapping tariffs on Uncle Sam’s major trading partners “will bring people to the table” if “done wisely.” Dimon, a vocal critic of current US banking rules, recently slammed the ‘onslaught’ of red tape drafted by Dem-backed regulators, launching a foul-mouthed tirade over a list of his most-hated pieces of legislation at a recent conference in New York, “It’s time to fight back…I’ve had it with this s–t,” Dimon told the stunned audience. The JPMorgan boss singled out regulations aimed at keeping banks resistant to financial storms by forcing them to hold more capital on their balance sheets. The proposal, known as Basel III, would see major lenders raise that emergency buffer by 9%. “Things are becoming unfair and unjust, and they are hurting companies, a lot of these rules are hurting lower-paid individuals,” Dimon said on Oct. 28. Dimon, who pulled down a salary of $34.5 million last year, urged the US government in his annual letter to shareholders last May to deliver “effective policy-making” issuing a warning that “a politician’s dream is a businessman’s nightmare.” Wells Fargo analyst Mike Mayo said Trump’s second term as president will present “the biggest inflection point for banking regulation in three decades.” “This is Jamie’s vindication,” Mayo told The Post. “He is looking at all the bureaucracy and red tape and saying enough of the regulatory theater. It’s like banking with one hand tied behind your back” Read more:

Owen Gregorian

98,823 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Erika Frantzve mastered controlling Charlie by weaponizing God and religion. Charlie was controlled by a cult. Cult leaders do not simply "brainwash" people overnight. Instead, they use a systematic process of psychological manipulation—often called "undue influence" or "thought reform"—to gradually erode a person's independent identity and replace it with a group identity entirely dependent on the leader. Cult leaders typically exhibit strong traits of pathological narcissism and, in many cases, psychopathy. They are highly charismatic, lack empathy, and demand total surrender to mask their own psychological fragility. They create closed systems with no checks and balances, allowing them to exploit followers for power, money, or sexual gratification while convincing the followers it is for the "greater good". The Mechanics of Control: The BITE Model Authoritarian leaders systematically control four overlapping domains of a person's life: 1. Behavior Control The most visible layer of manipulation is controlling what a person does with their physical body, time, and money. By regulating daily habits, the leader makes it exhausting and practically impossible to exist outside the group's structure. •Dictating routines: Strict rules regarding diet, sleep schedules, clothing, and physical appearance. •Financial exploitation: Demanding heavy tithes, mandatory donations, or forcing members to hand over their assets. •Relationship control: Dictating who members can speak to, who they can marry, and regulating their sexual behavior. 2. Information Control An informed member is a dangerous member. To maintain power, cult leaders filter and distort the reality their followers consume. •Isolation: Discouraging or outright banning contact with non-members, including family and friends. •Censorship: Banning outside media, critical literature, or internet access that contradicts the group's teachings. •Controlling the narrative: Labeling former members as "apostates," "enemies," or "suppressive persons" so current members are too afraid to speak with them. 3. Thought Control Leaders require unquestioning obedience and must eliminate a follower's ability to think critically or independently. •Black-and-white thinking: Everything is framed as an epic battle between "us" (good, chosen, saved) and "them" (evil, lost, worldly). •Thought-stopping techniques: When a follower starts to have doubts, they are trained to shut down their own critical thinking through repetitive chanting, praying, speaking in tongues, or repeating key phrases. •Loaded language: Cults often create their own jargon. This creates a false sense of insider belonging while making it difficult for members to effectively communicate with the outside world. 4. Emotional Control Cult leaders manipulate a follower's emotional range to keep them off-balance, dependent, and terrified of leaving. •Love-bombing: New recruits are overwhelmed with intense affection, flattery, and a manufactured sense of belonging. Once they are hooked, this affection becomes conditional and is routinely withdrawn to punish the follower. •Manufacturing guilt and shame: Followers are taught they are inherently flawed, sinful, or broken, and that the leader or the group is the only cure. •Phobia indoctrination: Instilling an irrational, paralyzing fear of the outside world. Members are told that if they leave, they will go insane, be struck by disease, face divine judgment, or die. Ultimately, the goal of authoritarian control isn't just to force obedience—it is to make the member incapable of imagining an existence outside the group.

Honest Ash

19,136 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen