Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Remarkable conversation between two men that touches on women’s boundary violations & young women’s struggles to accept their sexuality, yet somehow the men can’t (or won’t) see how it all connects to women. You know, the female kind. It shows how close some men can get to seeing the...

WomenAreReals's profile picture

WomenAreReal

40,355 subscribers

34,205 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

KunstNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Is it BAD for society that average looking women are not attracted to average looking men? Here you have an average looking woman, claiming the ratio of attractive women to men is 100 to 1. Why don’t average looking women want to be with average looking men? Or is it the case that women overestimate their own and other women’s attractiveness and underestimate men’s attractiveness? Put in other words, women are very generous when assessing their own, and women’s attractiveness, but are very harsh when assessing men’s attractiveness.
0:46

Is it BAD for society that average looking women are not attracted to average looking men? Here you have an average looking woman, claiming the ratio of attractive women to men is 100 to 1. Why don’t average looking women want to be with average looking men? Or is it the case that women overestimate their own and other women’s attractiveness and underestimate men’s attractiveness? Put in other words, women are very generous when assessing their own, and women’s attractiveness, but are very harsh when assessing men’s attractiveness.

Brian Atlas

64,898 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I shared a video from Nick Freitas yesterday about how to encourage and reach young men. You should check it out if you didn’t see it. Now, here is a clip that shows how to repel and discourage young men. This is so frustrating, Sean DeMars and Neil Shenvi. Leaving aside the whole “woke right” thing, whatever. You acknowledge that the Left has total cultural control. Then you mock the idea that white men are systemically discriminated against in our culture, or that we live in an effeminate gynocracy. What do you think the Left does with its total cultural control? You mock young men by claiming that their discrimination has no basis in reality, but has to be understood via some “gnostic” higher knowledge. This is not fair. We are starting to get more and more hard data on this issue. I will admit that there is an element of “look around, this should be obvious.” It should be, and you’re really sticking your head in the sand to deny these things. But being on the Right is to believe in God’s created reality. It’s not about “lived experience,” it’s about what is actually true. White men are being discriminated against in this culture, and the West has been feminized radically in the last 60 years. The biggest problem with the woke was always that they were wrong, beyond even their philosophical system. It wasn’t merely that they were claiming to be oppressed, but it was that this claim was wrong. "This argument sounds like that argument" is just so lazy when one was factually wrong, and one is factually right. The claims of the Right are correct in general. But at the end of the day, good luck crapping on young men like this. We'll see how that works out for you. I won’t be joining you.
3:05

I shared a video from Nick Freitas yesterday about how to encourage and reach young men. You should check it out if you didn’t see it. Now, here is a clip that shows how to repel and discourage young men. This is so frustrating, Sean DeMars and Neil Shenvi. Leaving aside the whole “woke right” thing, whatever. You acknowledge that the Left has total cultural control. Then you mock the idea that white men are systemically discriminated against in our culture, or that we live in an effeminate gynocracy. What do you think the Left does with its total cultural control? You mock young men by claiming that their discrimination has no basis in reality, but has to be understood via some “gnostic” higher knowledge. This is not fair. We are starting to get more and more hard data on this issue. I will admit that there is an element of “look around, this should be obvious.” It should be, and you’re really sticking your head in the sand to deny these things. But being on the Right is to believe in God’s created reality. It’s not about “lived experience,” it’s about what is actually true. White men are being discriminated against in this culture, and the West has been feminized radically in the last 60 years. The biggest problem with the woke was always that they were wrong, beyond even their philosophical system. It wasn’t merely that they were claiming to be oppressed, but it was that this claim was wrong. "This argument sounds like that argument" is just so lazy when one was factually wrong, and one is factually right. The claims of the Right are correct in general. But at the end of the day, good luck crapping on young men like this. We'll see how that works out for you. I won’t be joining you.

Nate Schlomann

47,845 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

“The dirty little thing that they’re covering up about all this is they’re opening up the door to [men] who now have a Willy Wonka golden ticket to pretend they’re a woman, be around women, dominate women’s spaces, dominate women’s sport & dominate all kinds of things that women are involved in… taking over women’s groups” - Joe Rogan When I was navigating the Australian Human Rights Commission Complaint I received for alleged “gender identity discrimination” because I had refused a man - who it turns out claims to be a woman - entry to a woman only space I created I was told by the AHRC that to settle the complaint (and therefore not escalate it to federal court) I would have to allow all men who claim to be women into the platform, apologize, pay this particular man (who claims to be a woman) $20,000, attend ‘sex & gender’ education classes (which could only be re-education) and - most sinister of all, I think - moderate all content on the platform so that men who claim to be women were not offended by anything actual women were saying. Basically, not only did these men want to be in the women’s space, they wanted to control it. That is chilling. I said, “No”. GFY. 4 years later, we’re awaiting a decision from the Full Federal court. No man is a woman.
0:28

“The dirty little thing that they’re covering up about all this is they’re opening up the door to [men] who now have a Willy Wonka golden ticket to pretend they’re a woman, be around women, dominate women’s spaces, dominate women’s sport & dominate all kinds of things that women are involved in… taking over women’s groups” - Joe Rogan When I was navigating the Australian Human Rights Commission Complaint I received for alleged “gender identity discrimination” because I had refused a man - who it turns out claims to be a woman - entry to a woman only space I created I was told by the AHRC that to settle the complaint (and therefore not escalate it to federal court) I would have to allow all men who claim to be women into the platform, apologize, pay this particular man (who claims to be a woman) $20,000, attend ‘sex & gender’ education classes (which could only be re-education) and - most sinister of all, I think - moderate all content on the platform so that men who claim to be women were not offended by anything actual women were saying. Basically, not only did these men want to be in the women’s space, they wanted to control it. That is chilling. I said, “No”. GFY. 4 years later, we’re awaiting a decision from the Full Federal court. No man is a woman.

Sall Grover

27,176 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

it's so disgusting and annoying especially when it comes from queer people how are you a queer person and yet joke about someone's sexuality making jokes about them and are trying to out them calling them the f slur publicly when we know the cast lurks on this app it's so disgusting like that they are not attacking only him but people queer people who are in the closet as well closeted people are part of the lgbtq+ community as well and joking about their closet and sexuality is harmful joking about someone being "gay" while you know that he was harassed and called slurs his entire life is evil and harmful but ofc who am to say smth it's ryan guzman he is the punching bag of the 911 fandom 🫩
1:38

it's so disgusting and annoying especially when it comes from queer people how are you a queer person and yet joke about someone's sexuality making jokes about them and are trying to out them calling them the f slur publicly when we know the cast lurks on this app it's so disgusting like that they are not attacking only him but people queer people who are in the closet as well closeted people are part of the lgbtq+ community as well and joking about their closet and sexuality is harmful joking about someone being "gay" while you know that he was harassed and called slurs his entire life is evil and harmful but ofc who am to say smth it's ryan guzman he is the punching bag of the 911 fandom 🫩

costa met ryan guzman 👨🏻‍🍳

41,728 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

I am L for Lesbian. On the Scott Wiener moment and what people are getting wrong. Divorce the Q+ from LGBT. 🏳️‍🌈✡️ The issue is queer theory. This is not just an issue facing Jews. It faces anyone in the LGBT community who does not prescribe to a queer leftist ideology that presents the world through a binary lens of oppressor/oppressed. Scott Wiener's crime was that he forgot his place as the oppressed and became the oppressor in the eyes of his detractors. He betrayed the collective. The same happens to lesbians who refuse to share lesbian-only spaces with men, to gay men who vote conservative, to transsexuals who don't believe in transitioning children below a certain age, etc. It wasn't solely about the fact that Scott Wiener is Jewish. This is important if you want to understand how to dismantle the virus in the LGBTQ+ world.
5:52

I am L for Lesbian. On the Scott Wiener moment and what people are getting wrong. Divorce the Q+ from LGBT. 🏳️‍🌈✡️ The issue is queer theory. This is not just an issue facing Jews. It faces anyone in the LGBT community who does not prescribe to a queer leftist ideology that presents the world through a binary lens of oppressor/oppressed. Scott Wiener's crime was that he forgot his place as the oppressed and became the oppressor in the eyes of his detractors. He betrayed the collective. The same happens to lesbians who refuse to share lesbian-only spaces with men, to gay men who vote conservative, to transsexuals who don't believe in transitioning children below a certain age, etc. It wasn't solely about the fact that Scott Wiener is Jewish. This is important if you want to understand how to dismantle the virus in the LGBTQ+ world.

Eve Barlow

21,073 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Caitlyn Jenner calls self a “HYPOCRITE” for accepting Glamour’s “Woman of the Year” award. Comes to the realization that perhaps it was “not right” the same way it isn’t right for biological men to steal titles in women’s sports. “Here I am fighting the battle to keep biological men out of women’s sports… But back when I came out, what did I accept? Glamour’s Woman of the Year award.” “And I go, ‘What a hypocrite.’ I’m still XY.” “I’m a biological man, and they gave me Glamour’s Woman of the Year award.”
0:35

Caitlyn Jenner calls self a “HYPOCRITE” for accepting Glamour’s “Woman of the Year” award. Comes to the realization that perhaps it was “not right” the same way it isn’t right for biological men to steal titles in women’s sports. “Here I am fighting the battle to keep biological men out of women’s sports… But back when I came out, what did I accept? Glamour’s Woman of the Year award.” “And I go, ‘What a hypocrite.’ I’m still XY.” “I’m a biological man, and they gave me Glamour’s Woman of the Year award.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,302,376 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

This man, I don’t even call him a sheikh. He’s promoting honor killings as a form of discipline. He’s saying Somali men are like Afghan men. Does he not know that Afghan men sleep with young boys? Does he not know that Afghan men are terrorists? Does he not know that Afghan men torture their own women? Yet he wants to compare Somali men to them, indirectly or directly telling Somali men to follow in the footsteps of Afghan men. This is the same man who is married to a non-Somali woman and has mixed children, yet he wants to give advice to Somali men on how to deal with Somali women. This isn’t the first time he’s said things like this. He needs to be stopped and reported He is promoting extremist ideas and inciting hatred and violence against women, and that is completely unacceptable. someone married to non Somali woman, he doesn’t have any saying regarding any Somali women’s affairs.
2:29

This man, I don’t even call him a sheikh. He’s promoting honor killings as a form of discipline. He’s saying Somali men are like Afghan men. Does he not know that Afghan men sleep with young boys? Does he not know that Afghan men are terrorists? Does he not know that Afghan men torture their own women? Yet he wants to compare Somali men to them, indirectly or directly telling Somali men to follow in the footsteps of Afghan men. This is the same man who is married to a non-Somali woman and has mixed children, yet he wants to give advice to Somali men on how to deal with Somali women. This isn’t the first time he’s said things like this. He needs to be stopped and reported He is promoting extremist ideas and inciting hatred and violence against women, and that is completely unacceptable. someone married to non Somali woman, he doesn’t have any saying regarding any Somali women’s affairs.

Maryan

107,599 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

To suggest that women who don’t present in a “traditional feminine” way are being refused access to women’s bathrooms, and then additionally blaming women for it, proves the sexism & misogyny of gender ideology & it’s most loyal supports like this idiot here. Humans can tell the difference between males and females. This is a fact. It actually has very little to do with clothing. There are thousands of gene expressions that make sex clear in almost an instant. Blind people can tell the difference. Deaf people can tell the difference. Basically, even if you don’t have use of all of your senses, you can still tell the sex of people you’re interacting with and/or those around you. It’s that ingrained. Even in the (very) rare cases that a second look is required - for various reasons, many not even to do with gender ideology - sex is confirmed on that second look. This was a very important evolutionary skill for survival. It is involuntary, primal and accurate. But let’s just say, for fun, that this idiot has even half of a point: that there is an overcorrection by women from years of men invading women’s spaces. Perhaps a trauma response for some. It still isn’t women’s fault. Because it was MEN GOING INTO WOMENS SPACES. They are the first principle here. Billy Bragg’s insistence that, no matter what the angle, women are to blame for everything actually only proves he knows that women are a distinctly different class of people to the men who claim to be us. He never blames them. And it’s him unknowingly admitting this distinction that makes him an idiot.
0:23

To suggest that women who don’t present in a “traditional feminine” way are being refused access to women’s bathrooms, and then additionally blaming women for it, proves the sexism & misogyny of gender ideology & it’s most loyal supports like this idiot here. Humans can tell the difference between males and females. This is a fact. It actually has very little to do with clothing. There are thousands of gene expressions that make sex clear in almost an instant. Blind people can tell the difference. Deaf people can tell the difference. Basically, even if you don’t have use of all of your senses, you can still tell the sex of people you’re interacting with and/or those around you. It’s that ingrained. Even in the (very) rare cases that a second look is required - for various reasons, many not even to do with gender ideology - sex is confirmed on that second look. This was a very important evolutionary skill for survival. It is involuntary, primal and accurate. But let’s just say, for fun, that this idiot has even half of a point: that there is an overcorrection by women from years of men invading women’s spaces. Perhaps a trauma response for some. It still isn’t women’s fault. Because it was MEN GOING INTO WOMENS SPACES. They are the first principle here. Billy Bragg’s insistence that, no matter what the angle, women are to blame for everything actually only proves he knows that women are a distinctly different class of people to the men who claim to be us. He never blames them. And it’s him unknowingly admitting this distinction that makes him an idiot.

Sall Grover

952,356 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

I know I keep harping on this, but I need you guys to understand just how embarrassing congressional democrats are. I watched all 3.5 hours of a congressional oversight committee hearing yesterday on men in women’s sports. Among the four witnesses called to testify, two were female athletes who’ve been harmed by men in women’s sports—one of them harmed to the point of traumatic brain injury. Not a single—NOT A SINGLE—congressional Democrat used their five minutes to question either of the two female athletes, to let them share their expert, first-hand testimony. Instead, all of them—every single one—used their time to lecture, deflect from the point, or praise the woke “expert on women’s rights” from National Women's Law Center who testified there’s no biological difference between men and women or the rude chairman of USA Fencing who compared parents who don’t want their daughters competing against men to KKK members. These two young women had to sit here and listen to Democrat after Democrat say that this issue and this hearing don’t matter. After yesterday, I can see why congressional Democrats have a 27% approval rating with the American people or whatever the hell the number is. And I can see why they kept changing the subject—because they know that 80% of the American people are against them on this. Yesterday, congressional Democrats made it clear they don’t care about women, they don’t believe women, they don’t want to protect women. They only care about LGBT, and women—especially white ones—can go to hell.
1:43

I know I keep harping on this, but I need you guys to understand just how embarrassing congressional democrats are. I watched all 3.5 hours of a congressional oversight committee hearing yesterday on men in women’s sports. Among the four witnesses called to testify, two were female athletes who’ve been harmed by men in women’s sports—one of them harmed to the point of traumatic brain injury. Not a single—NOT A SINGLE—congressional Democrat used their five minutes to question either of the two female athletes, to let them share their expert, first-hand testimony. Instead, all of them—every single one—used their time to lecture, deflect from the point, or praise the woke “expert on women’s rights” from National Women's Law Center who testified there’s no biological difference between men and women or the rude chairman of USA Fencing who compared parents who don’t want their daughters competing against men to KKK members. These two young women had to sit here and listen to Democrat after Democrat say that this issue and this hearing don’t matter. After yesterday, I can see why congressional Democrats have a 27% approval rating with the American people or whatever the hell the number is. And I can see why they kept changing the subject—because they know that 80% of the American people are against them on this. Yesterday, congressional Democrats made it clear they don’t care about women, they don’t believe women, they don’t want to protect women. They only care about LGBT, and women—especially white ones—can go to hell.

Natalie Jean Beisner

158,858 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

A man who claims to be a woman attempted to explain what women think about men who claim to be women. He completely failed. *ahem* • “They reject the distinction between gender identity and sex and that these two things can be in conflict” No. We know that gender identity & sex are very different. In fact that is basically our entire argument. Gender identity = a manmade concept. Sex = Naturally observable over the entire natural world, including humans. Binary & immutable. • “They are concerned with the safety & integrity of spaces that are typically reserved for women” No. Not “typically”. *Are*. ARE reserved for women. “Typically” is an admission that you know the group trying to gain access to the women’s spaces aren’t women. Which is our entire point to begin with, sir. They’re men. • “Trans people are concerned with safety & privacy in private spaces.” Great. Then leave women’s spaces alone, respecting the women who want them, and focus on creating your own spaces catering to your “man claiming to be woman” needs, whatever they may be. We won’t stop you. • “Trans people are seeking to go about their business & mind their business” Cool story, but the problem is the process of that appears to be changing the definition of “woman” in law & gaining access to women’s spaces, services & sport. So we fight back because we are not willing to give up our rights & needs so men in dresses can “go about their business”. • “We have had inclusive policies… and there was not a spate of people pretending to be trans, going into spaces & abusing anyone.” Either a) you’re ignoring all of the cases of men invading women’s spaces & sexually assaulting women - we can name 10 examples just in prisons off the top of our head - because it doesn’t suit your argument; b) you’re completely aware & just lying; c) you argument is they weren’t “trans” which means they must have been making it up; d) even if there were no cases, it still doesn’t make men women! • “Discomfort alone is not grounds to exclude people.” No, it isn’t. Sex is. Men are excluded from women’s spaces on the basis of sex. We exclude all men, including men with a gender identity and men we are comfortable with. It’s frankly unforgivable to speak this untruthfully about this issue in 2026, and it’s utterly shameful that two men just nodded along to blatantly obvious untruths. This is the intellectual equivalent of junk food.
1:20

A man who claims to be a woman attempted to explain what women think about men who claim to be women. He completely failed. *ahem* • “They reject the distinction between gender identity and sex and that these two things can be in conflict” No. We know that gender identity & sex are very different. In fact that is basically our entire argument. Gender identity = a manmade concept. Sex = Naturally observable over the entire natural world, including humans. Binary & immutable. • “They are concerned with the safety & integrity of spaces that are typically reserved for women” No. Not “typically”. *Are*. ARE reserved for women. “Typically” is an admission that you know the group trying to gain access to the women’s spaces aren’t women. Which is our entire point to begin with, sir. They’re men. • “Trans people are concerned with safety & privacy in private spaces.” Great. Then leave women’s spaces alone, respecting the women who want them, and focus on creating your own spaces catering to your “man claiming to be woman” needs, whatever they may be. We won’t stop you. • “Trans people are seeking to go about their business & mind their business” Cool story, but the problem is the process of that appears to be changing the definition of “woman” in law & gaining access to women’s spaces, services & sport. So we fight back because we are not willing to give up our rights & needs so men in dresses can “go about their business”. • “We have had inclusive policies… and there was not a spate of people pretending to be trans, going into spaces & abusing anyone.” Either a) you’re ignoring all of the cases of men invading women’s spaces & sexually assaulting women - we can name 10 examples just in prisons off the top of our head - because it doesn’t suit your argument; b) you’re completely aware & just lying; c) you argument is they weren’t “trans” which means they must have been making it up; d) even if there were no cases, it still doesn’t make men women! • “Discomfort alone is not grounds to exclude people.” No, it isn’t. Sex is. Men are excluded from women’s spaces on the basis of sex. We exclude all men, including men with a gender identity and men we are comfortable with. It’s frankly unforgivable to speak this untruthfully about this issue in 2026, and it’s utterly shameful that two men just nodded along to blatantly obvious untruths. This is the intellectual equivalent of junk food.

Sall Grover

122,589 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Vince Carter says Kobe Bryant helped him accept retirement in their final conversation “My last year, I did announce that it was my last year. I didn't announce that I was retiring because I struggled with the word ‘retiring’” “We played the Nets in Brooklyn. Kobe and Gigi were at that game. To see him and the smile on his face, the hug, the conversation we had was unbelievable. And I asked him about that word. ‘How is it?’” “He said, ‘Man, it's the greatest thing ever. It's the best feeling. You're going to enjoy it. This side is not that bad because I get a chance now to coach my daughter, be there for her,’ so on and so forth” “I'm like, if Kobe Bryant, who we all know him to be an a-hole and a degenerate of this game, can say that to me, I can say, ‘I'm retiring.’ From that day forward, he, in that conversation, gave me the opportunity” “Lo and behold, the last thing we talked about, he said, ‘Hey, we'll get together and have a conversation about it. We'll talk more about it.’ In January, he passed. It was a couple of weeks later, which was on my birthday”
1:29

Vince Carter says Kobe Bryant helped him accept retirement in their final conversation “My last year, I did announce that it was my last year. I didn't announce that I was retiring because I struggled with the word ‘retiring’” “We played the Nets in Brooklyn. Kobe and Gigi were at that game. To see him and the smile on his face, the hug, the conversation we had was unbelievable. And I asked him about that word. ‘How is it?’” “He said, ‘Man, it's the greatest thing ever. It's the best feeling. You're going to enjoy it. This side is not that bad because I get a chance now to coach my daughter, be there for her,’ so on and so forth” “I'm like, if Kobe Bryant, who we all know him to be an a-hole and a degenerate of this game, can say that to me, I can say, ‘I'm retiring.’ From that day forward, he, in that conversation, gave me the opportunity” “Lo and behold, the last thing we talked about, he said, ‘Hey, we'll get together and have a conversation about it. We'll talk more about it.’ In January, he passed. It was a couple of weeks later, which was on my birthday”

dank

201,018 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 Some young girls in a village have alleged that their parents are pressuring them into relationships with older men for financial support They claim they are not happy with the situation but feel forced to accept it because it is the only way they can get money to survive and take care of their needs 💔
3:09

🚨 Some young girls in a village have alleged that their parents are pressuring them into relationships with older men for financial support They claim they are not happy with the situation but feel forced to accept it because it is the only way they can get money to survive and take care of their needs 💔

khendrick🇬🇧🇬🇭!

33,537 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Kings of the Road (1976, Wenders) "'Kings of the Road' (1976) is a story that you're not often told in films about men. The story of the absence of women, which is at the same time the story of the longing for their presence!" --- Wim Wenders Full Excerpt: "'Kings of the Road' (1976) is the story of two men, but it doesn't take a Hollywood approach to the subject. American films about men - especially recent ones - are exercises in suppression: the men's true relationships with women, or with each other, are displaced by story, action and the need to entertain. They leave out the real nub: why the men prefer to be together, why they get on with each other, why they don't get on with women, or, if they do, then only as a pastime. My film is about precisely that: two men getting on together, each preferring the other's company to that of a woman. You get to see the shortcomings of both of them, their emotional insecurity; you see them trying to be mutually supportive and to hide their faults. But with the passage of time they're no longer bothered by these faults, and when they know each other well enough they begin discussing them. As a consequence of that, they split up. They split up because, on their journey across Germany, they've suddenly grown too close. It's a story that you're not often told in films about men. The story of the absence of women, which is at the same time the story of the longing for their presence!" ('The Logic of Images, Essays and Conversations, Wim Wenders, 1988)
1:01

Kings of the Road (1976, Wenders) "'Kings of the Road' (1976) is a story that you're not often told in films about men. The story of the absence of women, which is at the same time the story of the longing for their presence!" --- Wim Wenders Full Excerpt: "'Kings of the Road' (1976) is the story of two men, but it doesn't take a Hollywood approach to the subject. American films about men - especially recent ones - are exercises in suppression: the men's true relationships with women, or with each other, are displaced by story, action and the need to entertain. They leave out the real nub: why the men prefer to be together, why they get on with each other, why they don't get on with women, or, if they do, then only as a pastime. My film is about precisely that: two men getting on together, each preferring the other's company to that of a woman. You get to see the shortcomings of both of them, their emotional insecurity; you see them trying to be mutually supportive and to hide their faults. But with the passage of time they're no longer bothered by these faults, and when they know each other well enough they begin discussing them. As a consequence of that, they split up. They split up because, on their journey across Germany, they've suddenly grown too close. It's a story that you're not often told in films about men. The story of the absence of women, which is at the same time the story of the longing for their presence!" ('The Logic of Images, Essays and Conversations, Wim Wenders, 1988)

DepressedBergman

23,433 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

people twisting his words here calling him straight and say he dgaf about representation in queer love is so upsetting. how is saying “it’s just a story about two people” wrong? it’s not ignoring identity, it’s normalizing it. BL as a label is important for representation but it doesn’t mean the story has to be limited by it. queer romance should be treated normally like any romance films of straight people and can exist in any genre such as action, thriller, horror, anything. at the end of the day love is love so treating it like it always has to stay in a separate box kind of goes against that idea.
0:58

people twisting his words here calling him straight and say he dgaf about representation in queer love is so upsetting. how is saying “it’s just a story about two people” wrong? it’s not ignoring identity, it’s normalizing it. BL as a label is important for representation but it doesn’t mean the story has to be limited by it. queer romance should be treated normally like any romance films of straight people and can exist in any genre such as action, thriller, horror, anything. at the end of the day love is love so treating it like it always has to stay in a separate box kind of goes against that idea.

livi 🌙

86,919 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS: Nicola Sturgeon makes an appearance on The Late Late Show in Ireland. Asked by presenter Patrick Kielty about JK Rowling J.K. Rowling and THE ISSUE that should not be talked about in any depth, save for empty slogans and soundbites, Sturgeon gives the usual guff. “I believe it is possible to stand up for women’s rights and stand up for trans rights...” In Ireland, Men, including sex offenders, are housed in women’s prisons. A woman was beaten up by a man who was housed in a women’s homeless shelter. A man playing women’s rugby demanded to use women’s changing rooms and left in a rage when he was given the option of a separate changing room, and so made his way to Ladies Football , who in turn created a trans policy allowing males over the age of 12 to compete in ladies’ football. The elephant in the room is RTÉ looking the other way when Irish women, like The Countess The Countess are speaking about this issue, but then using JK Rowling as a cheap shot for clicks on social media. “Trans rights...” this is precisely what all the female leaders on the left in Ireland say. However, the UK Supreme Court, in an 88-page, crystal-clear Judgement, ruled that trans rights do not extend to access to female single-sex spaces. For Women Scotland The vision of Isla Bryson in his hot pink leggings with his male appendage on show was the undoing of the Scottish National Party The SNP and, with it, the dream of independence. It is remarkable that simply because she has a book to sell, RTÉ’s flagship programme, that only last weekend gleefully had their presenter tell the world that it is a bastion of free speech, would have someone who has been proven wrong culturally, politically, and legally be allowed to take that platform and spin that propaganda yet again.
2:26

THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS: Nicola Sturgeon makes an appearance on The Late Late Show in Ireland. Asked by presenter Patrick Kielty about JK Rowling J.K. Rowling and THE ISSUE that should not be talked about in any depth, save for empty slogans and soundbites, Sturgeon gives the usual guff. “I believe it is possible to stand up for women’s rights and stand up for trans rights...” In Ireland, Men, including sex offenders, are housed in women’s prisons. A woman was beaten up by a man who was housed in a women’s homeless shelter. A man playing women’s rugby demanded to use women’s changing rooms and left in a rage when he was given the option of a separate changing room, and so made his way to Ladies Football , who in turn created a trans policy allowing males over the age of 12 to compete in ladies’ football. The elephant in the room is RTÉ looking the other way when Irish women, like The Countess The Countess are speaking about this issue, but then using JK Rowling as a cheap shot for clicks on social media. “Trans rights...” this is precisely what all the female leaders on the left in Ireland say. However, the UK Supreme Court, in an 88-page, crystal-clear Judgement, ruled that trans rights do not extend to access to female single-sex spaces. For Women Scotland The vision of Isla Bryson in his hot pink leggings with his male appendage on show was the undoing of the Scottish National Party The SNP and, with it, the dream of independence. It is remarkable that simply because she has a book to sell, RTÉ’s flagship programme, that only last weekend gleefully had their presenter tell the world that it is a bastion of free speech, would have someone who has been proven wrong culturally, politically, and legally be allowed to take that platform and spin that propaganda yet again.

The Countess

21,841 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Trespassing just turned 12 years old, and it got me thinking about how I was the first openly queer artist to debut at number 1 on the billboard Hot 200 with the Trespassing album. Kind of surreal to think that this milestone was only achieved 12 years ago! There is still work to be done in terms of equality, but it feels good to see so many queer artists get the flowers they deserve these days. Anyways happy (slightly belated) 12th birthday to the album which featured this title track I co-wrote with Pharrell Williams. “No trespassing? Yeah, my ass! Wait till ya get a load of me"
0:47

Trespassing just turned 12 years old, and it got me thinking about how I was the first openly queer artist to debut at number 1 on the billboard Hot 200 with the Trespassing album. Kind of surreal to think that this milestone was only achieved 12 years ago! There is still work to be done in terms of equality, but it feels good to see so many queer artists get the flowers they deserve these days. Anyways happy (slightly belated) 12th birthday to the album which featured this title track I co-wrote with Pharrell Williams. “No trespassing? Yeah, my ass! Wait till ya get a load of me"

ADAM LAMBERT

144,037 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

We are living in a time where more men are being more vocal about their feelings which many women have said they have wanted for a long time. However, some women are struggling with accepting what men have to say when it comes to them having to accept that all relationship problems are not caused by men. This is not meant to be an attack on women but many women take it as an attack and are way more interested in defending women than actually understanding what men are trying to say. It tends to be more challenging for women to emotionally regulate and to accept accountability, not because they are flawed, but because of the conditioning and training that has taught women that men are less intelligent and more than often the problem. Quality men, which there are plenty of but are often overlooked and not talked about, are tired of being blamed for everything and are no longer willing to tolerate it. They want to make it clear that most men are not like the stereotypical bs that our society teaches about men. It has been challenging because it's difficult for many women to accept because of their personal experiences from choosing and dealing with lesser quality men.
2:16

We are living in a time where more men are being more vocal about their feelings which many women have said they have wanted for a long time. However, some women are struggling with accepting what men have to say when it comes to them having to accept that all relationship problems are not caused by men. This is not meant to be an attack on women but many women take it as an attack and are way more interested in defending women than actually understanding what men are trying to say. It tends to be more challenging for women to emotionally regulate and to accept accountability, not because they are flawed, but because of the conditioning and training that has taught women that men are less intelligent and more than often the problem. Quality men, which there are plenty of but are often overlooked and not talked about, are tired of being blamed for everything and are no longer willing to tolerate it. They want to make it clear that most men are not like the stereotypical bs that our society teaches about men. It has been challenging because it's difficult for many women to accept because of their personal experiences from choosing and dealing with lesser quality men.

Tamorah Shareef Muhammad

12,430,756 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

This gentleman says he will continue to use women’s single-sex spaces in public settings. Despite knowing it is lawful and legitimate for service providers to exclude him. Why? Because he believes he is entitled to be there. And because he thinks minimum-wage staff will eventually get tired of challenging men like him and simply look the other way. Women know this pattern. Some men don’t accept “no”. They keep pushing boundaries, believing that if they persist for long enough, women will eventually give in. They know how difficult it can be for women to be taken seriously. They know how uncomfortable it is to keep objecting. And they rely on eventually wearing women down. Women warned this would happen. If men were told that calling themselves women gave them access to female spaces, some would push those boundaries as far as they could. This video - and I’ve seen many like it - shows some are still trying to wear women down. Even after the law clarified that service providers can lawfully exclude men from women’s single-sex spaces, they are openly saying they’ll ignore those boundaries. But respecting women’s boundaries shouldn’t be optional.
1:39

This gentleman says he will continue to use women’s single-sex spaces in public settings. Despite knowing it is lawful and legitimate for service providers to exclude him. Why? Because he believes he is entitled to be there. And because he thinks minimum-wage staff will eventually get tired of challenging men like him and simply look the other way. Women know this pattern. Some men don’t accept “no”. They keep pushing boundaries, believing that if they persist for long enough, women will eventually give in. They know how difficult it can be for women to be taken seriously. They know how uncomfortable it is to keep objecting. And they rely on eventually wearing women down. Women warned this would happen. If men were told that calling themselves women gave them access to female spaces, some would push those boundaries as far as they could. This video - and I’ve seen many like it - shows some are still trying to wear women down. Even after the law clarified that service providers can lawfully exclude men from women’s single-sex spaces, they are openly saying they’ll ignore those boundaries. But respecting women’s boundaries shouldn’t be optional.

Janet Murray

272,319 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 LOLOL! WNBA STILL DOESN’T KNOW WHAT A WOMAN IS They held a big meeting yesterday about transgender athletes. Outcome: more meetings. Their own collective bargaining agreement says only women can play… but they refuse to define the word “woman.” Sophie Cunningham said biological men don’t belong in women’s sports. The league’s response was to denounce “bad faith efforts.” A professional women’s league that can’t answer the most basic question about its own sport. This is why people stopped caring. The WNBA is a JOKE
3:01

🚨 LOLOL! WNBA STILL DOESN’T KNOW WHAT A WOMAN IS They held a big meeting yesterday about transgender athletes. Outcome: more meetings. Their own collective bargaining agreement says only women can play… but they refuse to define the word “woman.” Sophie Cunningham said biological men don’t belong in women’s sports. The league’s response was to denounce “bad faith efforts.” A professional women’s league that can’t answer the most basic question about its own sport. This is why people stopped caring. The WNBA is a JOKE

Gunther Eagleman™

46,518 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen