Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Remember before any great atrocity is meted on a community, they first wage a hate campaign. I reminded you of Rwandan genocide where they labeled Tutsi’s and moderate Hutu’s as “iyenze” or cockroaches through Felicien Kabuga’s radio station. Even Adolf Hitler painted Jews as the stereotypical enemy for the...

24,043 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Adan_Ade
Adan_Ade1 год назад

But you are anti-somali

Фото профиля Gichuhi
Gichuhi1 год назад

To the Somali who accuse Gaitho of being tribal when he's calling out Somali sugar smuggling elite. If he was tribal, why didn't he raise hell and go into your typical tribal vicitm-hood when @rigathi was impeached?

Фото профиля Nding'uri Muchiri
Nding'uri Muchiri1 год назад

Bwana Kimuzi looks more of a S. Sudanese Jajaweed than Kenyan

Фото профиля #ABD
#ABD1 год назад

Yet none of them has called for a boycott of all Kikuyu businesses like you have done fr somalis.

Фото профиля otile
otile1 год назад

Kikuyus are doing the same to somalis.

Фото профиля Wizard of Oz 🇭🇰 🇰🇪
Wizard of Oz 🇭🇰 🇰🇪1 год назад

This is spot on. You are a genius, Gaitho 👏 🙌

Фото профиля Echoes of a people
Echoes of a people1 год назад

Couldn't have said in better. They are definitely planning something big against the Okuyus but I don't see anyone actually buying their crap except poor kale men na uko msituni. Those ones do not represent all kalenjins

Фото профиля Mzee Mzima
Mzee Mzima1 год назад

Retweet widely

Фото профиля nicky
nicky1 год назад

You hate Somali's right??

Фото профиля Abumasud
Abumasud1 год назад

Aren't doing the same to the Somali Community in Kenya Fatso.

Похожие видео

In all the 75 years that Jaramogi Oginga Odinga (1950 to 1994), James Orengo (1994 to 1997) and Raila Odinga (1997 to 2025) were recognised as the undisputed leaders of the Luo community, and regardless of the age-old differences between the Luo and the Kikuyu, none of them ever stood on a public podium and said anything this shocking. Oburu says in this clip that "Kalenjins are our types and our relatives, but we will never have anything with Kikuyus because they will never change and we have tried many times, but those ones are not ours". Oburu also says that Luo elders totally opposed "Kibaki Tosha" in 2002, without explaining how then Raila successfully ran it into a winning machine. Of course he won't mention that meeting at Ofafa Memorial Hall, when Raila met and explained to Luo elders, as their SG, Prof Gilbert Ogutu, took notes, that removing the destructive Kanu regime was a bigger national responsibility than Luo-Kikuyu rivalry. The last real Luo-Kikuyu act was that of Jomo Kenyatta's own son trying to make Jaramogi's son president in 2022. No matter how much peddlers of tribal hate seek to twist this event, history will always record that Uhuru Kenyatta, against every prevailing philosophy, backed Raila Odinga for President in 2022. FACT. Just like Raila believed in 2002 that the perennial divide between the Luo and the Kikuyu was hurting the country's social fabric and its wider inter-ethnic relations, Uhuru acknowledged in 2022 that giving power to the Jaramogi household would probably be the most revolutionary action in the country's independent history. On that score, both Raila and Uhuru should have promptly qualified for the Nobel Peace Prize, because their acts of courage, against the wishes of their own ethnic bases, gave us a glimpse of leadership that seeks truth and justice away from the comfort of tribal warmth. Dr Oburu Oginga is a leader unto doom, destruction and stagnation. After the 75 years of his father and brother working to heal a divided nation, the fact that he can don the colours of Raila's party, mount a podium and resurrect tribal divisions to push his agenda means he is the biggest mistake the party has ever made. Dr Oburu obviously hasn't looked closed at the crowds he addresses. His age mates are not there! These are kids born after that Kibaki Tosha moment. Many don't even speak vernacular. Many are born or dwell in mixed-tribe households or neighbourhoods where tribe is becoming a non-issue. To preach to them medieval philosophies of tribal hate is to take a retirement joke way too far. In private, we probably say nasty things about other communities. People of my generation even write them on our pages. What we don't expect is that our leaders will go to the podium and preach these things openly. I have a theory... The Luo and the Kikuyu are not neighbours, and have never fought, either over politics or land, as compared to "others". My feeling is that this rising anti-Kikuyu sentiment being peddled by broad-based ODM is being done on behalf of "others" ahead of 2027. And this is where Oburu and intellectual saucepans like Atandi will find themselves in trouble if the hatred they now peddle turns into an ICC-level conflict in 2027, a conflict not involving Luos but started with loose talk cleverly egged on by non-Luo government networks. Raila's death has exposed the worst things he used to conceal.

Kipkalya Kones

19,418 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Colonel Jacques Baud: The current Israelis are, in fact, Europeans. They are not from the Middle East. They have never been from the Middle East historically. Never. The Israelis that are currently in Israel are pure Europeans. Pure. They have a small number of Israelis who are Mizrahi, who belong to the Middle Eastern culture and might probably be able to understand the nuance and the subtlety of the diplomatic dialogue or discussion in the Middle East. But those Mizrahi, those Israelis who are the real Jews from Palestine, if I can put it that way, these are not in power. They have even been kept away from power. The power belongs to those Eastern European Jews, which is the Ashkenazi, who have historically had no relationship with the Middle East. And these people have all the features of the Europeans. They have the same arrogance. They have the same approach to problems. They probably have some positive aspects; probably they are more efficient, or things like that, but at the same time they are not able to understand complex triangular relationships. It’s always bipolar. It cannot be more than this. That’s very much who we are as Europeans, and I’ve witnessed that so many times that when you start to have a discussion, a dialogue in the Middle East, Europeans are lost, essentially because, for them, again, we come from a culture where everything is either black or white. For us, the friend of my friend is my friend, but put an enemy in this triangle, and you start to have a problem. For a European, you cannot put the word “enemy” in this triangle. But in the Middle East, you can put the word “enemy” in this triangle, and it still works.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

48,952 просмотров • 27 дней назад

Chat: In your opinion, in your opinion, how has our fandom changed this year compared to the beginning? “So, we’re definitely fewer people. And this is something that, even though it might seem negative, is actually positive, because it means that the people who have been following me for a year, it’s a big deal. The people who have been supporting me for a year, following me, giving me compliments, supporting me in every way. For me, this is obviously the real community that has been created. I think different words exist precisely because they have different shades of meaning, right? That’s why there are synonyms. ‘Fandom’ and ‘community’ are two different things. I think that today the fandom has become a community, so people who were there, who were initially part of the fandom and then left, maybe because they didn’t feel like an integral part of it or they weren’t inspired by the community that was forming. So there have been changes, but in my opinion, positive ones. Even people who were overly fanatical, who weren’t really fans, have left. For me, that’s a good thing, because it’s healthier for a community when there’s a way of thinking that aligns with many of the other people who are part of the same group. So it’s fine this way, there’s been a bit of a clean-up. The change that probably happened is exactly this. The people who are here today are fewer in number, but they’re worth much, much, much more than at the beginning. I always say: quality is better than quantity, that’s for sure. So a high-quality community has been created, instead of a fandom that was about numbers before, and sometimes that’s better. Also because some people who were in the fandom before caused issues and then left, so it’s perfect this way.” ❤️❤️❤️

Korslayage

25,802 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

CNN’s John Miller tells Jake Tapper in the 6pm hour that it’s now clear the Minneapolis Catholic school shooter did not have “a specific motive” and there “won’t” ever “be a specific motive” because his “manifesto” was “kind of rambling” and “hate[d] everybody”.... “Well, looking through the manifesto, that's a lot of pages. Kind of rambling. A lot of it is his self pity for how his life is going, that he has been depressed for a long time, that he has been planning to do this for a long time, that he knows it's wrong, that he knows his friends are going to hate him for it, that he knows he's going to take his own life at the end of it. He said it was better to die standing up than kneeling down for all the injustices he appears to believe he has suffered during his life. This is not foreign territory for us. Basically, I look at this guy and I know this guy because we've seen this guy before. He has written messages all over his rifles to homages to the New Zealand shooter who killed 51 Muslims in mosques while they were praying to the Norway shooter who killed children in — in a camp. And — and is as known as the biggest body count, very much like what we saw among the Buffalo shooter. These are individuals who, you know, we look for that specific motive. There won't be a specific motive. He's got problems in his life. He has decided to blame everybody else. He has anti-black messages, anti-Semitic messages, anti-religious messages, anti-God messages. In other words, his motive is he hates everybody because his life's a mess. And he figures it's not his fault.”

Curtis Houck

216,700 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Zeteo's Mehdi Hasan on ITV's Peston, "Just watched the video before I came on air with you. It's horrific thing to see, both the attack and the police disarming, uh, of this guy" "We've seen the number of anti Semitic incidents go up in the uk. I just saw a statistic, I think, from the Community Security Trust that something like 22% of antisemitic incidents in 2022 or 15%" "A small minority of anti Semitic incidents a few years ago cited Israel" "And I think a majority of them now do" "So they, that is that illusion, as you put it there" "I've spent my entire adult life, my professional career as a journalist trying to separate the two out" "As you know, I'm a very outspoken critic of Israel and especially this Israeli government and this genocide in Gaza. But, uh, I go out of my way to tell people on my side of the argument, do not do, do not do that" "Do not conflate, Jews and Judaism with Israel or even with Zionism" "And look, it becomes more complicated because of course many people in the Jewish community do support Israel. And that becomes a problem" "I think we need to be able to have these conversations, but at the same time all agreeing that violence is never the solution" "Anti Semitic violence is horrific, just as any other kind of racist or political violence is. But it's a conversation that has to be had" "We can't hide away from this" "There's a big debate about the definition of anti Semitism, the IHRA definition. Where do you put Israel in that definition?" "Clearly some people who are anti Zionist cross the line into anti Semitism, but many people who do don't" "And I think we have to be a little bit more nuanced" "We hear about these marches, that these are anti Semitic marches, which is absurd. I know many people who go in those marches who aren't anti Semitic at all. I know many Jewish people" "But is there an anti Semitic placard in there somewhere? Sure" "Is there an anti Semitic persons in there? Sure" "We just got to be able to break this stuff up because people are not going to stop protesting Israel" "And I don't think it's fair to ask people to stop protesting Israel" "But I think it is fair to say that we need to be able to talk about this stuff in a more nuanced way and all agree as a baseline point to" "So no matter what your views on Israel are, you cannot blame Jews anywhere in the world for what the Israeli government does"

Farrukh

56,816 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

.David Sacks: "You're gonna see in the wake of this is that a lot of Jewish people are realizing that they don't have a home on the left anymore. And I expect that many Jews are going to start shifting right into the Republican Party, to a place where I've been for a while.... But I think what's happened over the last few decades is that the civil rights movement, in particular, and the left have moved to this woke ideology where it's no longer about colorblindness. It's more about identity groups. And instead of trying to get past racial differences, it's been about accentuating them. And so we've had this whole equity agenda, which is really defined as redistribution from one racial group to another racial group. I think that, for whatever reason, a lot of Jews just hadn't confronted the reality that the left had really changed in this way. I think it goes back to the fact that they thought if we're going to be defining identity groups in this woke way, Jews obviously should be one of these victim groups, but they're waking up to the fact that Jews are not. Jews are in the minds of this woke ideology, just white people with a Jewish background. As a result, they're part of an oppressor class. And I think that a lot of Jewish people who are waking up to this are realizing this is actually a very destructive ideology, and it makes us the bad guys. So I would expect that, again, a lot of Jewish people are waking up to how the left has changed... and I would expect there to be kind of a pilgrimage now of more Jews in America towards the right, as opposed to remaining on the left where they've always been." Via The All-In Podcast:

KanekoaTheGreat

543,004 просмотров • 2 лет назад

"The Trump administration is discussing the possibility of asylum for British Jews, because they believe it is no longer safe for the Jewish people living in that country. A member of the administration said, I don't believe there is a future for Jews in the United Kingdom. It is true that anti-Semitism in Europe, in England, are at numbers that we have never seen before. But I would raise the issue that antisemitism in the United States is at numbers that we have never seen before. Antisemitism directed at the Jewish community coming from the left, and now we have a dramatic increase of antisemitism coming from the right. And that's why I am so perplexed. Looking at the photo of Tucker Carlson at the White House with our presidents. Let me make it very, very clear. Donald Trump has been amazing when it comes to the Jewish community. When it comes to the wellbeing of Israel, no president in our history comes close to the friendship, to the kind of alliance that has existed, as with the Trump administration during the first term and now during the second term. It has been remarkable. And that's why it is so perplexing to understand someone like Tucker Carlson using his very, very popular show, promoting anti-Semites, Holocaust deniers, guys who Hitler was a great guy. I think everyone knows and understands what's going on. This is not about deplatforming anybody. Tucker Carlson can have every anti-Semite and every hater in the world on his show. That's fine. But why is he being legitimized by being with our great president? I just don't understand. I'm just confused by all of this because in my humble opinion, Tucker Carlson is one of the most dangerous people in this country. The Jewish community and many others are deeply, deeply concerned about the threat of people like Tucker Carlson"

Dov Hikind

14,392 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

I upset the Orthobros on here when I posted that the Wilsons aren’t Christian. They said “how dare you declare whether or not someone is a Christian!” Here is my response (watch til the end for the most ironic part of all of this): Scripture itself tells us that it is OBVIOUS who is saved and that we can discern who is and who is not a child of God. “By this the children of God and the children of the devil are OBVIOUS: anyone who does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor the one who does not love his brother and sister.” 1 John 3:10 Yes, Christians will still continue to sin, as Romans 7 tell us. Sanctification is certainly messy, there’s no denying that. But someone who has been supernaturally made new by the Holy Spirit will have a real heart change. Regeneration is not an inconsequential experience. It will be obvious to people. The supernatural work of the Holy Spirit is a powerful one. Someone who is made a child of God will bear the family resemblance. No one can be born again and continue to comfortably stay in the mud with the pigs. They might occasionally still fall into the mud, they might still have dirt on their clothes even after they get up, but they will hate it when they do and will live in a humble manner before God crying “have mercy on me, a sinner.” They will pursue righteousness and have a deep deep love for others. And when they are confronted about their sin by others, they repent. So yes, we can look at someone living in a hateful unrighteous arrogant manner for years on end, even after being confronted about it, and determine that they are not of the Lord.

Lizzie Marbach

45,887 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Me: I discuss in the book—it refers to the state where I know something, you know something, I know that you know it, you know that I know it, I know that you know that I know it, and so on ad infinitum. So it differs a bit from the conventional usage, which just refers to something that everyone knows. Here, everyone has to know that everyone knows. Times Radio Interviewer (Daniel Finkelstein Daniel Finkelstein): Can I use this with reference to the interview that I did yesterday with my brother? My brother’s a professor at City University; he’s president of the university, and there’s a campaign at the moment going on against one of their professors who was in the Israeli Defense Forces in the 1980s. We were having a discussion about how the university was standing up for the free speech of its staff, and I’d begun to wonder, as I went home reading your book on the tube, whether I’d made a big mistake—because the protest against this professor is really just a coordination exercise, isn’t it? And maybe I’d aided it by talking about it. Me: Oh yes—protests are coordination exercises. They’re designed to make private knowledge common knowledge. So, in a repressive regime, everyone may know that they despise the government, but because criticism of the government is punished, people might keep their opinions to themselves, with a result that they really don’t know what their fellow citizens think. Each one might think that they’re the only ones that are disgruntled, and so they can’t fear standing up to—they fear standing up to oppose the regime, because they can be picked off one at a time. If everyone were to protest at once, no government has the firepower to intimidate all its citizens at once. In a public protest, people can see other people there, and they know that the people there see other people there, and that can give them the strength and numbers to oppose the regime—sometimes by literally storming the palace, or sometimes just bringing the machinery of the state to a halt through work stoppages. But the crucial thing is that they are coordinated. They can only be coordinated if everyone knows that everyone knows that they hate the regime. Daniel Finkelstein: I suppose that social media is making people—is increasing the stock of common knowledge. We’re all much more aware of what other people like us, in particular like us, know, and we also know that other people know it, and so on, as you put it, and that makes people have more common knowledge. It’s not making us happier though; maybe we’d be better with less common knowledge? Me: Social media are making us more connected within certain circles—that is, those who are receiving the same texts and feeds that we are. It reduces the pool of, or shrinks the largest pool of common knowledge, namely the whole country, which may have been accessible in a day in which, say, in the United States there were three networks, or in Britain everyone was listening to the BBC. And yes, it probably doesn’t make us as happy, because when everything is public, it means that your reputation is on the line for anything you say or do. It means that since social media allow us to generate common knowledge, not just receive it like in the old days, it means that attacks on people’s reputation can be common knowledge, which means that it’s all the more painful for people on the receiving end of the attack. It may have something to do with the fact that in certain demographics—especially young people whose lives increasingly are online—that there’s that much more social competition, opportunities for gossip and ostracism and demeaning comments, and so on. When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows . . .: Common Knowledge and the Mysteries of Money, Power, and Everyday Life:

Steven Pinker

21,547 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад