正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

REMEMBER 🚨Hal Lambert: “We can admit he was hit by the car, correct?” Paul Mecurio: “Well, we don't know.” Hal Lambert: “He was hit by the car.” Paul Mecurio: “We don't know if the camera was hit by the car in his hand. We don't know that.” Hal Lambert:...

34,671 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Absolutely conclusive that Jonathan Ross killed Renee Good. NYT breakdown of what happened. He starts out by filming her with a cell phone in his hand. What kind of law enforcement does this? Doesn’t he need his hands for other purposes? If his job is dangerous, wouldn’t he need two hands? Most likely saw that he was dealing with a lone white woman and felt no threat. Other cars had gone around Renee Good. There was no obstruction of traffic. Ross and his fellow agents seemed like they were taking the opportunity to harass a citizen whose behavior they disapproved of. Ross then gets in front of the car. Again, you’re not supposed to do that. Nobody has provided any explanation of how this could be justified. All law enforcement who have spoken about this are in agreement. He likely did not get hit by the car, and if he did it was just barely, and his legs and body were away from the car after he could see she was turning away. It appears that maybe his arm got hit if anything, and that was because he was holding out his cell phone, which again no real cop would do. And here’s the absolute nail in the coffin: he fires two more shots while he’s clearly off to the side! By this point, the other agent was getting away from the car. Ross just keeps shooting two more times. None of this even stops the car, but it does kill Renee Good. Ross first reaction after doing this is to curse the woman he just killed. Murder. There’s no longer any way to argue anything else.

Richard Hanania

340,075 次观看 • 6 个月前