Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Remember the discourse back in 2024 that Lamine had a finishing problem? Do you also remember RobyPoto telling everybody he doesn’t and that he’ll be more than fine?

13,009 views • 10 days ago •via X (Twitter)

6 Comments

Mohammad's profile picture
Mohammad10 days ago

He had a finishing problem back then

𝐣𝐢𝐝𝐝𝐚 #GraciasLeo's profile picture
𝐣𝐢𝐝𝐝𝐚 #GraciasLeo10 days ago

Insane goal catalogue ngl

#LamineYamalBalóndeOro 💙❤️🤞🏾's profile picture
#LamineYamalBalóndeOro 💙❤️🤞🏾10 days ago

2024 Lamine would’ve never scored in the first clip especially man, he woulda tried to do a simple finesse shot to the left side where the gk prob could’ve saved. Hes improved so much im so happy

sentiliano_pr 🇦🇱's profile picture
sentiliano_pr 🇦🇱10 days ago

fairs but he wasn’t a fineshed product

kevin's profile picture
kevin10 days ago

What’s with trying to curl every damn shot and missing 80% of those, never seen him shot low driven shot and rarely seen him shoting straight and just once seen him using right foot at bernabeau . Yes he sucks at finishing

jlk124's profile picture
jlk12410 days ago

He still has a finishing problem now wdym?

Related Videos

Jean-Luc Godard explains why Alfred Hitchcock managed to successfully control the public more than Hitler or Napoleon: "Interviewer: [In 'Histoire(s) du cinéma'] You certainly concentrate more on specific film subjects in 3a, 3b, and 4a: neorealism, la nouvelle vague, and Hitchcock. Godard: I put in Hitchcock because during a certain epoch, for five years, in my opinion, he really was the master of the universe. More than Hitler, more than Napoleon. He had a control of the public that no one else had. Interviewer: What about Ronald Reagan? Didn’t he have the same control? Godard: No, because Hitchcock was a poet. And Hitchcock was a poet on a universal level, not like Rilke. He was the only poet maudit to have a huge success. Rilke wasn’t one, Rimbaud wasn’t. He was a poet maudit for everyone; 'Notorious' (1946) wasn’t like James Joyce. I remember André Bazin was very angry with us. And something which is very astonishing with Hitchcock is that you don’t remember what the story of 'Notorious' (1946) is, or why Janet Leigh is going to the Bates Motel. You remember one pair of spectacles or a windmill — that’s what millions and millions of people remember. If you remember 'Notorious', what do you remember? Wine bottles. You don’t remember Ingrid Bergman. When you remember Griffith or Welles or Eisenstein or me, you don’t remember ordinary objects. He is the only one." ('Trailer for Godard’s Histoire(s) du cinéma', Jonathan Rosenbaum, 2025)

DepressedBergman

60,161 views • 8 months ago