正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Remember when health authorities were reporting people in hospitals, whether it was for a broken bone or to deliver a baby, as “covid hospitalizations?” And then they reported the death of a poor 14yr old boy as covid but he actually had end stage brain cancer? Yeah, let’s never... show more

Stacey

20,083 subscribers

47,779 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

健康养生新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

IF YOU WERE MURDERED BUT TESTED POSITIVE FOR COVID.....YOU WERE A NEW ZEALAND "COVID DEATH" We submitted an OIA to fully understand the definitions underpinning the New Zealand Covid death tally We asked: Please explain how the definition of a Covid death has changed since 2021, including the date of changes and the reasons for the change. Answer: Prior to 2021, any person who passed away within 28 days of a COVID-19 positive test was reported as a ‘COVID-19 death.’ Due to the complexity of determining the cause of death, it often took time to obtain accurate and comprehensive mortality data relating to whether COVID19 was the underlying cause of death, a contributing factor alongside other health conditions (such as a cancer), or incidental to the death (e.g., in cases like a traffic accident). In July 2022 the reporting categories for COVID-19 deaths were updated. This was undertaken as data analysis processes became more streamlined, allowing for faster and more accurate reporting. The revised reporting categories included: • deaths with COVID-19 as the underlying cause, • deaths where COVID-19 served as a contributing factor alongside other health conditions, and • deaths unrelated to COVID-19, even if a recent positive test had been reported. Ref: H2023032730 (PS up to July 2022 there were 1,431 deaths where the patient tested "positive" for Covid 19 - these included people killed by gun shot and car accident. THEY WERE ALL LISTED AS COVID DEATHS) @TanyaUnkovichMP Casey Costello MP Winston Peters David Seymour Christopher Luxon #nzcovidinquiry2 (acknowledgements to Coronavirus Plushie for the video)

IF YOU WERE MURDERED BUT TESTED POSITIVE FOR COVID.....YOU WERE A NEW ZEALAND "COVID DEATH" We submitted an OIA to fully understand the definitions underpinning the New Zealand Covid death tally We asked: Please explain how the definition of a Covid death has changed since 2021, including the date of changes and the reasons for the change. Answer: Prior to 2021, any person who passed away within 28 days of a COVID-19 positive test was reported as a ‘COVID-19 death.’ Due to the complexity of determining the cause of death, it often took time to obtain accurate and comprehensive mortality data relating to whether COVID19 was the underlying cause of death, a contributing factor alongside other health conditions (such as a cancer), or incidental to the death (e.g., in cases like a traffic accident). In July 2022 the reporting categories for COVID-19 deaths were updated. This was undertaken as data analysis processes became more streamlined, allowing for faster and more accurate reporting. The revised reporting categories included: • deaths with COVID-19 as the underlying cause, • deaths where COVID-19 served as a contributing factor alongside other health conditions, and • deaths unrelated to COVID-19, even if a recent positive test had been reported. Ref: H2023032730 (PS up to July 2022 there were 1,431 deaths where the patient tested "positive" for Covid 19 - these included people killed by gun shot and car accident. THEY WERE ALL LISTED AS COVID DEATHS) @TanyaUnkovichMP Casey Costello MP Winston Peters David Seymour Christopher Luxon #nzcovidinquiry2 (acknowledgements to Coronavirus Plushie for the video)

NZ and the MRNA

17,115 次观看 • 1 年前

"The PCR test, it was a huge scandal from the get-go." Nurse Gail McCrae describes how hospitals misused PCR tests and falsely labeled non-COVID deaths as COVID deaths. "I observed charts and death records being documented as COVID when they weren't, yes... I have discovered since then there is incentivization going on, there's massive payouts, and that almost definitely plays a role in why we were being told to document these deaths and these admissions as COVID when they weren't."

"The PCR test, it was a huge scandal from the get-go." Nurse Gail McCrae describes how hospitals misused PCR tests and falsely labeled non-COVID deaths as COVID deaths. "I observed charts and death records being documented as COVID when they weren't, yes... I have discovered since then there is incentivization going on, there's massive payouts, and that almost definitely plays a role in why we were being told to document these deaths and these admissions as COVID when they weren't."

Sense Receptor

279,563 次观看 • 2 年前

Remember when they told you repeatedly that Hospitals were completely overrun with unvaccinated persons dying of Covid? And that there weren’t enough nurses, doctors or hospital beds? Yeah - that was clearly just another legacy media Covid LIE now. What a scam.

Remember when they told you repeatedly that Hospitals were completely overrun with unvaccinated persons dying of Covid? And that there weren’t enough nurses, doctors or hospital beds? Yeah - that was clearly just another legacy media Covid LIE now. What a scam.

Concerned Citizen

13,701 次观看 • 7 个月前

Foul Play With Death Certificates: Hospitals Made Record Profits Dr Henry Ealy: "In Santa Clara County, California, and in Alameda County, California, they did a partial audit, and it lowered their [COVID] death certificates by 22% and 25%. Why? Because hospitals were counting everything they could as COVID ... When [they] put COVID down, [they] get more money for it."

Foul Play With Death Certificates: Hospitals Made Record Profits Dr Henry Ealy: "In Santa Clara County, California, and in Alameda County, California, they did a partial audit, and it lowered their [COVID] death certificates by 22% and 25%. Why? Because hospitals were counting everything they could as COVID ... When [they] put COVID down, [they] get more money for it."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,037,297 次观看 • 3 年前

Ed Dowd Drops Disturbing Reality “The protocols instituted in 2020 were designed to kill people to get the COVID numbers inflated.” • Hospitals got incentivized to identify a patient as COVID • Then, they got money to put them on a ventilator • Then, they got money for Remdesivir • And then they got money for the death “When you design incentives, you get the results you want from the incentives.” Edward Dowd

Ed Dowd Drops Disturbing Reality “The protocols instituted in 2020 were designed to kill people to get the COVID numbers inflated.” • Hospitals got incentivized to identify a patient as COVID • Then, they got money to put them on a ventilator • Then, they got money for Remdesivir • And then they got money for the death “When you design incentives, you get the results you want from the incentives.” Edward Dowd

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,084,616 次观看 • 2 年前

Hospitals murdered COVID patients. The more they killed, the more money they made. Dr. McCullough testifies that “virtually all the deaths occurred in the hospital.” Hospitals received enormous financial incentives to implement lethal protocols. Remdesivir “Remdesivir is so lethal it got nicknamed ‘Run Death Is Near’ after it started killing thousands of Covid patients in the hospital,” wrote Stella Paul in a previous report. “The experts claimed that Remdesivir would stop Covid; instead, it stopped kidney function, then blasted the liver and other organs.” Ventilators Dr. Joseph Mercola previously reported: “Within weeks of the pandemic outbreak, it had become apparent that the standard practice of putting COVID-19 patients on mechanical ventilation was a death sentence. “76.4% of COVID-19 patients (aged 18 to 65) in New York City who were placed on ventilators died. Among patients over age 65 who were vented, the mortality rate was 97.2%. “The recommendation to place COVID patients on mechanical ventilation as a first-line response came from the World Health Organization, which allegedly based its guidance on experiences and recommendations from doctors in China. But venting COVID patients wasn’t recommended because it increased survival. It was to protect healthcare workers by isolating the virus inside the vent machine.” People should be in prison for this.

Hospitals murdered COVID patients. The more they killed, the more money they made. Dr. McCullough testifies that “virtually all the deaths occurred in the hospital.” Hospitals received enormous financial incentives to implement lethal protocols. Remdesivir “Remdesivir is so lethal it got nicknamed ‘Run Death Is Near’ after it started killing thousands of Covid patients in the hospital,” wrote Stella Paul in a previous report. “The experts claimed that Remdesivir would stop Covid; instead, it stopped kidney function, then blasted the liver and other organs.” Ventilators Dr. Joseph Mercola previously reported: “Within weeks of the pandemic outbreak, it had become apparent that the standard practice of putting COVID-19 patients on mechanical ventilation was a death sentence. “76.4% of COVID-19 patients (aged 18 to 65) in New York City who were placed on ventilators died. Among patients over age 65 who were vented, the mortality rate was 97.2%. “The recommendation to place COVID patients on mechanical ventilation as a first-line response came from the World Health Organization, which allegedly based its guidance on experiences and recommendations from doctors in China. But venting COVID patients wasn’t recommended because it increased survival. It was to protect healthcare workers by isolating the virus inside the vent machine.” People should be in prison for this.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

931,180 次观看 • 2 年前

Neil Oliver challenges the Covid lab leak theory as a "red herring", arguing there was no novel disease at all: "Flu deaths stopped at the end of 2019... and were replaced by deaths from what we were told was Covid-19." "What sort of disease is it when you don't even know you've got it unless you take a dodgy test? A test never intended for such a use?" "To keep the numbers constantly rising, any death within 28 days of a positive test—even falling off a cliff or getting hit by a bus—was listed as a Covid death." "If you accept Covid was a real disease that escaped from a lab... you are being nudged to accept that something had to be done by our governments, and—in the end—whatever they did, however many were damaged or destroyed along the way, those authorities were only doing their best." "What Covid was doesn't matter. It doesn't even matter if there was any such thing. What matters is what was done, why it was done." "When someone's shot dead, the people running around the corpse are not in the main asking, who made the bullet? What was the bullet made of?" "If they've any sense at all, they're asking, who did it? What was the motive for the murder? Who is better off now that that person is dead?" Do you agree or disagree with Neil Oliver? Credit: Neil Oliver

Neil Oliver challenges the Covid lab leak theory as a "red herring", arguing there was no novel disease at all: "Flu deaths stopped at the end of 2019... and were replaced by deaths from what we were told was Covid-19." "What sort of disease is it when you don't even know you've got it unless you take a dodgy test? A test never intended for such a use?" "To keep the numbers constantly rising, any death within 28 days of a positive test—even falling off a cliff or getting hit by a bus—was listed as a Covid death." "If you accept Covid was a real disease that escaped from a lab... you are being nudged to accept that something had to be done by our governments, and—in the end—whatever they did, however many were damaged or destroyed along the way, those authorities were only doing their best." "What Covid was doesn't matter. It doesn't even matter if there was any such thing. What matters is what was done, why it was done." "When someone's shot dead, the people running around the corpse are not in the main asking, who made the bullet? What was the bullet made of?" "If they've any sense at all, they're asking, who did it? What was the motive for the murder? Who is better off now that that person is dead?" Do you agree or disagree with Neil Oliver? Credit: Neil Oliver

Wide Awake Media

121,346 次观看 • 1 年前

They were having fun as people died, and the hospitals were clearly not busy. THAT was Covid19 in a nutshell - actually WEF19, WHO19 - or PHARMA19...

They were having fun as people died, and the hospitals were clearly not busy. THAT was Covid19 in a nutshell - actually WEF19, WHO19 - or PHARMA19...

Ivor Cummins

55,146 次观看 • 2 年前

“During the first Covid wave - hospital bed occupancy was at an all-time record low - buy a substantial margin” People weren’t dying from Covid, they were dying naturally as normal and chalked up as Covid Deaths due to the inordinate amount of Covid testing & classing a Covid death as within 28 days of a positive test. The spike in excess deaths only came after they rolled out the deadly experimental mRNA vaccines.

“During the first Covid wave - hospital bed occupancy was at an all-time record low - buy a substantial margin” People weren’t dying from Covid, they were dying naturally as normal and chalked up as Covid Deaths due to the inordinate amount of Covid testing & classing a Covid death as within 28 days of a positive test. The spike in excess deaths only came after they rolled out the deadly experimental mRNA vaccines.

Concerned Citizen

46,636 次观看 • 9 个月前

The TGA Australia still has no idea as to why the vaccine causes myocarditis. If they don’t understand the pathway of the vaccine to the heart, then how can they rule out that the vaccine doesn’t injure other organs in the body as well? Had they done proper pharmacokinetic testing they would know this. As for saying millions of people didn’t get injured, that is false. Most vaccinated people caught Covid. Over 10 million Australians caught Covid within 10 months of the borders being opened. So the jab wasn’t effective. Then there’s the 26,000 more deaths in 2022 than 2019 and the 140,000 reported injuries. And let’s not forget the extra 9,000 deaths in 2021 when there was no Covid in the community. The question also needs to be asked as to whether or not people actually received intact mRNA or mRNA at all? The vaccines needed to be stored at negative 70 degrees and the lipids had to be emulsified to ensure an even distribution. The manufacturing process was never throughly tested or had consistent quality assurance processes implemented. For example there were 5 doses in one vial. There is no guarantee that the vaccines were delivered evenly from each vial or that each had the same amount. I.e. 150 micrograms which is a very small amount. So rather than claiming the vaccine was safe because people didn’t get injured, it’s probable that for some people, the vaccine was never actually delivered effectively in the first place. #auspol

The TGA Australia still has no idea as to why the vaccine causes myocarditis. If they don’t understand the pathway of the vaccine to the heart, then how can they rule out that the vaccine doesn’t injure other organs in the body as well? Had they done proper pharmacokinetic testing they would know this. As for saying millions of people didn’t get injured, that is false. Most vaccinated people caught Covid. Over 10 million Australians caught Covid within 10 months of the borders being opened. So the jab wasn’t effective. Then there’s the 26,000 more deaths in 2022 than 2019 and the 140,000 reported injuries. And let’s not forget the extra 9,000 deaths in 2021 when there was no Covid in the community. The question also needs to be asked as to whether or not people actually received intact mRNA or mRNA at all? The vaccines needed to be stored at negative 70 degrees and the lipids had to be emulsified to ensure an even distribution. The manufacturing process was never throughly tested or had consistent quality assurance processes implemented. For example there were 5 doses in one vial. There is no guarantee that the vaccines were delivered evenly from each vial or that each had the same amount. I.e. 150 micrograms which is a very small amount. So rather than claiming the vaccine was safe because people didn’t get injured, it’s probable that for some people, the vaccine was never actually delivered effectively in the first place. #auspol

Gerard Rennick

53,629 次观看 • 3 年前

Dr. McCullough on the COVID Jab: “I have never seen something so injurious to the human body.” • It invades the brain. • It invades the heart. • It causes brain and heart damage. • It invades the bone marrow. • It stimulates antibodies to cells and platelets. • It causes blood clotting and damage to blood vessels like we've never seen. • Data from the University of Pittsburgh suggests it causes cancer. “Since when do we have a protein that actually injures the brain, injures the heart, the bone marrow, the immune system, causes blood clotting, and potentially causes cancer in a single protein?” Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® asked. “It's a weapon,” he concluded. “According to strict military criteria, it's a bioweapon.”

Dr. McCullough on the COVID Jab: “I have never seen something so injurious to the human body.” • It invades the brain. • It invades the heart. • It causes brain and heart damage. • It invades the bone marrow. • It stimulates antibodies to cells and platelets. • It causes blood clotting and damage to blood vessels like we've never seen. • Data from the University of Pittsburgh suggests it causes cancer. “Since when do we have a protein that actually injures the brain, injures the heart, the bone marrow, the immune system, causes blood clotting, and potentially causes cancer in a single protein?” Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® asked. “It's a weapon,” he concluded. “According to strict military criteria, it's a bioweapon.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2,576,602 次观看 • 1 年前

#16. Remember when Bill Gates said that the investments in the Covid 'vaccines' were his best investment ever? It's quite obvious that he knew what was going to happen, considering he invested about $50,000,000 in BioNTech, a company that until then had only reported losses.

#16. Remember when Bill Gates said that the investments in the Covid 'vaccines' were his best investment ever? It's quite obvious that he knew what was going to happen, considering he invested about $50,000,000 in BioNTech, a company that until then had only reported losses.

Dr. Simon

120,623 次观看 • 3 年前

Dr. McCullough on the COVID Jab: “I have never seen something so injurious to the human body.” • It invades the brain. • It invades the heart. • It causes brain and heart damage. • It invades the bone marrow. • It stimulates antibodies to cells and platelets. • It causes blood clotting and damage to blood vessels like we've never seen. • Data from the University of Pittsburgh suggests it causes cancer. “Since when do we have a protein that actually injures the brain, injures the heart, the bone marrow, the immune system, causes blood clotting, and potentially causes cancer in a single protein?” Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® asked. “It's a weapon,” he concluded. “According to strict military criteria, it's a bioweapon.”

Dr. McCullough on the COVID Jab: “I have never seen something so injurious to the human body.” • It invades the brain. • It invades the heart. • It causes brain and heart damage. • It invades the bone marrow. • It stimulates antibodies to cells and platelets. • It causes blood clotting and damage to blood vessels like we've never seen. • Data from the University of Pittsburgh suggests it causes cancer. “Since when do we have a protein that actually injures the brain, injures the heart, the bone marrow, the immune system, causes blood clotting, and potentially causes cancer in a single protein?” Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® asked. “It's a weapon,” he concluded. “According to strict military criteria, it's a bioweapon.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

361,464 次观看 • 1 年前

"It could not have been COVID vaccines, though, of course, they're harmful in their own right. And they didn't stop COVID, nor infection, nor transmission, and most likely caused a lot of other harms to people's health. But the April 2020 excess death was not caused by those vaccines because they had not yet been rolled out. It could also not have been caused by COVID because on a macro analysis, using all the data, doing a statistical analysis, mathematically. They could not have been caused by COVID because COVID cases simply do not correlate to the April 2020 excess death spikes. The only thing that correlates is the use of Midazolam injections. When you combine that with a known fact that the infection fatality rate for those that were told that they had COVID was similar to the flu, there's no way, even if it had been COVID, that it should have caused that huge excess death spike in April 2020. What you should have seen is flu-like death patterns, not a huge spike like those graphs represent." Maajid Nawaz, WARRIOR CREED

"It could not have been COVID vaccines, though, of course, they're harmful in their own right. And they didn't stop COVID, nor infection, nor transmission, and most likely caused a lot of other harms to people's health. But the April 2020 excess death was not caused by those vaccines because they had not yet been rolled out. It could also not have been caused by COVID because on a macro analysis, using all the data, doing a statistical analysis, mathematically. They could not have been caused by COVID because COVID cases simply do not correlate to the April 2020 excess death spikes. The only thing that correlates is the use of Midazolam injections. When you combine that with a known fact that the infection fatality rate for those that were told that they had COVID was similar to the flu, there's no way, even if it had been COVID, that it should have caused that huge excess death spike in April 2020. What you should have seen is flu-like death patterns, not a huge spike like those graphs represent." Maajid Nawaz, WARRIOR CREED

أبو عمّار

112,790 次观看 • 9 个月前

Princeton professor Stephen Macedo provides a retrospective on covid-era policies including the following: 1. He calls it the flu. I am old enough to remember when we were told that is a conspiracy theory. 2. There was decades of pandemic planning before Covid. The consensus was that school and workplace closures, restrictions on gathering sizes, mask mandates, social distancing measures, etc., were NOT effective and that the cost of doing so would be very high. 3. Measures NOT recommended by the WHO in their 2019 pandemic planning documents included contact tracing, quarantine of exposed individuals, entry/exit screenings, border closings, and school closures. Johns Hopkins said essentially the same thing just months before Covid started and made the point that the overbearing measures might be used for political reasons. I’ve said it for years that Covid kicked off 2020 e!ection theft season. 4. In 2008, the ACLU said (in relation to Bush-era pandemic preparedness planning) that fear of diseases has justified abuses of state power, that coercion and brute force breeds pubic distrust, strategies that rely on voluntary participation do work as long as public health officials are working to help people not punish them, and that minorities bear the brunt of tough public safety measures. The ACLU said noting during Covid which tells us something since they have been co-opted by Democracy Inc. 5. The professor made the point that they declared a war on Covid where dissent was not welcome, including from Jay Bhattacharya, the current director of the NIH. 6. The Covid measures that they put in place had no effect on mortality but they had a devastating impact on society and people especially related to young people and education. The measures also contributed to higher rates of crime, substance abuse, and depression, and had a negative impact on overall health. 7. He then mentions the origins of Covid. They all knew it came from the Wuhan lab but they lied about it which has led to the distrust in supposed experts and institutions. Covid had furin cleavage sites which are manmade. It did not come from a wet market or raccoon dogs. After all of that, not one person has been held accountable.

Princeton professor Stephen Macedo provides a retrospective on covid-era policies including the following: 1. He calls it the flu. I am old enough to remember when we were told that is a conspiracy theory. 2. There was decades of pandemic planning before Covid. The consensus was that school and workplace closures, restrictions on gathering sizes, mask mandates, social distancing measures, etc., were NOT effective and that the cost of doing so would be very high. 3. Measures NOT recommended by the WHO in their 2019 pandemic planning documents included contact tracing, quarantine of exposed individuals, entry/exit screenings, border closings, and school closures. Johns Hopkins said essentially the same thing just months before Covid started and made the point that the overbearing measures might be used for political reasons. I’ve said it for years that Covid kicked off 2020 e!ection theft season. 4. In 2008, the ACLU said (in relation to Bush-era pandemic preparedness planning) that fear of diseases has justified abuses of state power, that coercion and brute force breeds pubic distrust, strategies that rely on voluntary participation do work as long as public health officials are working to help people not punish them, and that minorities bear the brunt of tough public safety measures. The ACLU said noting during Covid which tells us something since they have been co-opted by Democracy Inc. 5. The professor made the point that they declared a war on Covid where dissent was not welcome, including from Jay Bhattacharya, the current director of the NIH. 6. The Covid measures that they put in place had no effect on mortality but they had a devastating impact on society and people especially related to young people and education. The measures also contributed to higher rates of crime, substance abuse, and depression, and had a negative impact on overall health. 7. He then mentions the origins of Covid. They all knew it came from the Wuhan lab but they lied about it which has led to the distrust in supposed experts and institutions. Covid had furin cleavage sites which are manmade. It did not come from a wet market or raccoon dogs. After all of that, not one person has been held accountable.

The Researcher

89,349 次观看 • 6 个月前

This was the video that started the Covid panic. Does it still look real? I remember pointing out how dumb this was and people said I was schizophrenic and then demanded to know “what possible reason would people have to lie?!?!” Then my final YouTube account was permanently deleted for “Covid misinformation.” I’m not looking for sympathy I think it’s hilarious I’m just retelling the story to give people perspective. Is this Covid? Was a symptom just falling down in the street? No one died of Covid in the street or at home. Just in hospitals attached to ventilators.

This was the video that started the Covid panic. Does it still look real? I remember pointing out how dumb this was and people said I was schizophrenic and then demanded to know “what possible reason would people have to lie?!?!” Then my final YouTube account was permanently deleted for “Covid misinformation.” I’m not looking for sympathy I think it’s hilarious I’m just retelling the story to give people perspective. Is this Covid? Was a symptom just falling down in the street? No one died of Covid in the street or at home. Just in hospitals attached to ventilators.

Owen Benjamin 🐻

130,083 次观看 • 2 年前

💥Another doctor speaks out! During Covid, the hospitals were "KILLING FIELDS." The "unvaccinated" were treated like "DIRTY PLAGUE RATS" "100% [the 'unvaccinated'] were treated differently. You were treated as a dirty plague rat" "[After Covid] I think most people came to see that the hospitals were really killing fields" "After Covid, most people realized their doctors were there for themselves. Their doctors were more than happy to give them a toxic substance that would hurt them, like the Covid injection" This clip of Dr. James Miller (james miller), a trauma surgeon who worked at the WA hospital that got the first "covid" case in the U.S., is taken from a conversation with Alix Mayer (Alix Mayer) posted to YouTube on July 8, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Absolutely, the vaccinated and unvaccinated were treated differently. As I was telling you before, they started just denying basic health services to unvaccinated people, which spurned not giving diabetes medicine. You can't go see your family doctor. "Now, you could still get emergency care in the ER, but 100% you were treated differently. You were treated as a dirty plague rat. And this was common in social media, but it was no different in the hospital. The medical community is no different. "I think part of why this is such a good time to talk about this is I think the Overton window has shifted on the discussion. I think all people have realized the medical care system did not meet their expectations during Covid. "I think most people thought before Covid when you go to the doctor, they're gonna help you out a bit and you're gonna get better and they're gonna wish you well. I think most people thought, when I'm really sick, I'm gonna go to the hospital, and they're gonna help me out a lot and do their best and get me well. After Covid, most people realized their doctors were there for themselves. Their doctors were more than happy to give them a toxic substance that would hurt them, like the Covid injection. "And I think most people came to see that the hospitals were really killing fields. And that shift has been pretty dramatic. I felt that shift in '22, when I was still working as a trauma surgeon. "Just this morning, I was running with a friend, and I was telling him that I was going to be on your show, and then I was going to talk about how the hospitals came killing fields. Oh, that totally happened to a friend of mine. And, we've been really good friends since I moved to Florida, and we're running buddies. "And he hadn't thought to talk about his friend who went to the hospital with actually no medical problems. He just needed his oxygen tank refilled. I mean, he had COPD that was chronic. But he just went to the hospital because his medical supply company was out of oxygen tanks. And they said, you can go to the hospital. So he went to the hospital to get an oxygen tank, and they said, why don't you wait in the ER while we'll get you your oxygen tanks. Feeling fine. They gave him a shot of something for who knows what. All of a sudden, he's in the ICU the next day, dead the next. And my friend who's a local pastor is like, Oh, yeah, that's what the hospitals were. It's just— It was common."

💥Another doctor speaks out! During Covid, the hospitals were "KILLING FIELDS." The "unvaccinated" were treated like "DIRTY PLAGUE RATS" "100% [the 'unvaccinated'] were treated differently. You were treated as a dirty plague rat" "[After Covid] I think most people came to see that the hospitals were really killing fields" "After Covid, most people realized their doctors were there for themselves. Their doctors were more than happy to give them a toxic substance that would hurt them, like the Covid injection" This clip of Dr. James Miller (james miller), a trauma surgeon who worked at the WA hospital that got the first "covid" case in the U.S., is taken from a conversation with Alix Mayer (Alix Mayer) posted to YouTube on July 8, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Absolutely, the vaccinated and unvaccinated were treated differently. As I was telling you before, they started just denying basic health services to unvaccinated people, which spurned not giving diabetes medicine. You can't go see your family doctor. "Now, you could still get emergency care in the ER, but 100% you were treated differently. You were treated as a dirty plague rat. And this was common in social media, but it was no different in the hospital. The medical community is no different. "I think part of why this is such a good time to talk about this is I think the Overton window has shifted on the discussion. I think all people have realized the medical care system did not meet their expectations during Covid. "I think most people thought before Covid when you go to the doctor, they're gonna help you out a bit and you're gonna get better and they're gonna wish you well. I think most people thought, when I'm really sick, I'm gonna go to the hospital, and they're gonna help me out a lot and do their best and get me well. After Covid, most people realized their doctors were there for themselves. Their doctors were more than happy to give them a toxic substance that would hurt them, like the Covid injection. "And I think most people came to see that the hospitals were really killing fields. And that shift has been pretty dramatic. I felt that shift in '22, when I was still working as a trauma surgeon. "Just this morning, I was running with a friend, and I was telling him that I was going to be on your show, and then I was going to talk about how the hospitals came killing fields. Oh, that totally happened to a friend of mine. And, we've been really good friends since I moved to Florida, and we're running buddies. "And he hadn't thought to talk about his friend who went to the hospital with actually no medical problems. He just needed his oxygen tank refilled. I mean, he had COPD that was chronic. But he just went to the hospital because his medical supply company was out of oxygen tanks. And they said, you can go to the hospital. So he went to the hospital to get an oxygen tank, and they said, why don't you wait in the ER while we'll get you your oxygen tanks. Feeling fine. They gave him a shot of something for who knows what. All of a sudden, he's in the ICU the next day, dead the next. And my friend who's a local pastor is like, Oh, yeah, that's what the hospitals were. It's just— It was common."

Sense Receptor

17,232 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 American worked at a hospital as an ER Nurse during COVID in 2020 She says the hospital would swab everyone who walked through the door, and it wasn’t because of Covid. It’s because they were getting an extra 20% kickback from the government “Congress passed the CARES Act. Section 3710 of this CARES Act states that every Medicare patient that was diagnosed with COVID paid the hospital 20% more than the same admission would have if they didn't have that COVID diagnosis. — We were swabbing everyone in the hospital — Everyone that gets admitted to the hospital had to have a COVID swab — If a person came in with a broken hip, they were testing them for COVID to see if they would need to go on a COVID side of the hospital, but they were also getting 20% more” I looked into this and it’s 100% correct, it did not have to be why the patient walked through the door, it just had to be a positive test This 20% reimbursement pay increase applied to both principal and secondary diagnoses. Meaning a patient admitted for a broken hip who also tested positive for COVID would qualify for the higher payment on the entire stay

🚨 American worked at a hospital as an ER Nurse during COVID in 2020 She says the hospital would swab everyone who walked through the door, and it wasn’t because of Covid. It’s because they were getting an extra 20% kickback from the government “Congress passed the CARES Act. Section 3710 of this CARES Act states that every Medicare patient that was diagnosed with COVID paid the hospital 20% more than the same admission would have if they didn't have that COVID diagnosis. — We were swabbing everyone in the hospital — Everyone that gets admitted to the hospital had to have a COVID swab — If a person came in with a broken hip, they were testing them for COVID to see if they would need to go on a COVID side of the hospital, but they were also getting 20% more” I looked into this and it’s 100% correct, it did not have to be why the patient walked through the door, it just had to be a positive test This 20% reimbursement pay increase applied to both principal and secondary diagnoses. Meaning a patient admitted for a broken hip who also tested positive for COVID would qualify for the higher payment on the entire stay

Wall Street Apes

98,891 次观看 • 2 个月前