Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Remember when I suggested there was jury intimidation in order to get the lone holdout to break in the Lindsay Clancy trial? Now go back and listen to what Devlin admitted compared to what the holdout is now saying. Coupled with defense counsel Reddington allegedly texting with “turtleboy”, a...

89,364 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von Brad_d80
Brad_d80vor 1 Tag

It Honestly feels like REDDIGTION was jury tampering and may have had contact with someone on the jury.

Profilbild von Inevitable👊
Inevitable👊vor 1 Tag

Knew this was a psyop...😉

Profilbild von pat the story teller 🇱🇷 ✝️🛐 JESUS IS LORD
pat the story teller 🇱🇷 ✝️🛐 JESUS IS LORDvor 1 Tag

Please watch great interview!

Profilbild von Shawn
Shawnvor 1 Tag

He’s not saying anything he’s using his mouthpiece to talk for him

Profilbild von WWW
WWWvor 1 Tag

What did you expect the holdout to say?

Profilbild von Paul
Paulvor 1 Tag

Looks like the people aren’t on your side, Einstein!

Profilbild von Fur baby mom
Fur baby momvor 1 Tag

ATP I want jury duty cause I dare a b….

Profilbild von AngryDuck!
AngryDuck!vor 1 Tag

Can't imagine why people don't trust the justice system.

Profilbild von apefest
apefestvor 1 Tag

ZIOFAGGET

Profilbild von RayBlaM.
RayBlaM.vor 1 Tag

Injustice. In jury.

Profilbild von Jessica M
Jessica Mvor 1 Tag

Aidan Kearney is not facing any charges under the MA witness intimidation statute that relate juror intimidation…he’s being charged for speech as a journalist. It’s an egregiously transparent attempt on the part of the Norfolk County DA to distract from their own culpability of at best a shit investigation and at worse corruption that makes Boss Hog look like a saint. You’re generally an honest broker-don’t mislead about other things to make a point in your disagreement on this issue.

Ähnliche Videos

There is an interesting parallel between the #calvincarnes case and the #Lindsayclancy case. Both had juries deadlocked at 11 to 1, with one holdout juror. In Carnes’s 2008 trial, the holdout was the lone juror voting for acquittal. She was removed after 9 days of deliberation and most certainly the case was heading for a hung jury. Prosecutors flagged “issues” with her questionnaire. The prosecution ran criminal records checks on the jurors (not okay btw) and in this case, the holdout juror’s ex husband. Discovering she did not disclose an old criminal record of her ex, the Prosecution’s motion to remove this juror was allowed and she was replaced by an alternate. The jury convicted the next day. In the Lindsey Clancy case, the holdout was the lone juror refusing to accept not guilty by reason of insanity, even after potentially admitting reasonable doubt. The defense asked the judge to remove that juror, but the judge refused, saying you can’t kick someone just for disagreeing with the other eleven, and declared a mistrial. When you think of this in connection with other issues in the Carnes case, most specifically an allegation of a conflict of interest relative to the trial Judge in Carnes (Judge Brady, now deceased) and the Prosecutor in Carnes, Joshua Wall, now Judge Wall (at least in small part thanks to the stellar recommendations written by Judge Brady about “Josh”, including specific references to the Carnes case in those recommendations). Is it making sense now??? Here we go again folks! Thank you Rosemary Scapicchio You are a credit to the profession. Defense Diaries Justice Served Carol Erskine

MullenLaw

36,447 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen