Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Remember when Nigeria’s First Lady, Oluremi Tinubu, made a pointed remark following the visit of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to Nigeria: “Tell them we don’t accept nakedness in our culture. That is not beautiful. It’s not beautiful at all.” And she’s absolutely right. Modest dressing in formal settings...

XOQueenEsther's profile picture

Queen Esther

19,280 subscribers

127,918 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаОбразование
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Prince Harry & Meghan Don’t Have a Security Crisis. They Have a Relevance Crisis. The delusion is embarrassing at this point. Harry and Meghan leak their little itineraries weeks in advance like the world is counting down the days, then turn around and cry “security risks.” The biggest security risk for Meghan Markle and Prince Harry these days seems to be empty crowds. Just look at Australia and Geneva. Empty streets and venues aren’t exactly the sign of people desperate to get close to you. Nothing clears a venue faster than the Sussexes showing up. Empty chairs and tumbleweeds don’t lie. 🤭 Real working royals carry out public engagements and interact with thousands of people every year without treating every appearance like a high-risk military operation. But Harry and Meghan behave as if there’s a global queue of assassins waiting just for them. Harry and Meghan Markle are so adamant about security because it reinforces the image they want to project. The more extraordinary the security, the more important they appear. At this point, it feels less about an actual threat and more about maintaining the illusion that they’re still operating on the level of senior working royals. I hate to break it to you, Harry and Meghan Markle, but you don’t have a crowd problem- you have a crowd absence problem. People aren’t lining up to get close to you; they’re choosing to stay away.
0:18

Prince Harry & Meghan Don’t Have a Security Crisis. They Have a Relevance Crisis. The delusion is embarrassing at this point. Harry and Meghan leak their little itineraries weeks in advance like the world is counting down the days, then turn around and cry “security risks.” The biggest security risk for Meghan Markle and Prince Harry these days seems to be empty crowds. Just look at Australia and Geneva. Empty streets and venues aren’t exactly the sign of people desperate to get close to you. Nothing clears a venue faster than the Sussexes showing up. Empty chairs and tumbleweeds don’t lie. 🤭 Real working royals carry out public engagements and interact with thousands of people every year without treating every appearance like a high-risk military operation. But Harry and Meghan behave as if there’s a global queue of assassins waiting just for them. Harry and Meghan Markle are so adamant about security because it reinforces the image they want to project. The more extraordinary the security, the more important they appear. At this point, it feels less about an actual threat and more about maintaining the illusion that they’re still operating on the level of senior working royals. I hate to break it to you, Harry and Meghan Markle, but you don’t have a crowd problem- you have a crowd absence problem. People aren’t lining up to get close to you; they’re choosing to stay away.

Queen Esther

184,753 просмотров • 20 дней назад

This is the level of ‘not giving a single flying fuck’ I aspire to be 🙌🏻 This unbothered queen at Bondi Beach just showed Meghan Markle and Prince Harry exactly where their relevance sits 😎
0:12

This is the level of ‘not giving a single flying fuck’ I aspire to be 🙌🏻 This unbothered queen at Bondi Beach just showed Meghan Markle and Prince Harry exactly where their relevance sits 😎

Queen Esther

37,013 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Meghan Markle and Kids Will Join Prince Harry in the UK After All In a heartwarming family update, Meghan Markle has decided to bring Archie (7) and Lilibet (5) to the UK to join Prince Harry for a private visit. The trip may include a meaningful stop at Princess Diana’s burial site at Althorp Estate, with hopes the children could meet King Charles III amid his cancer battle. No public appearances are planned, and Meghan will not attend Harry’s Invictus Games event. Harry was focused on safely reuniting with his family despite earlier security and accommodation challenges (Video: AI). Harry is constantly surrounded by this intense level of global fame and media spotlight. How much of it do you think truly comes from his dynamic with Meghan?
0:15

Meghan Markle and Kids Will Join Prince Harry in the UK After All In a heartwarming family update, Meghan Markle has decided to bring Archie (7) and Lilibet (5) to the UK to join Prince Harry for a private visit. The trip may include a meaningful stop at Princess Diana’s burial site at Althorp Estate, with hopes the children could meet King Charles III amid his cancer battle. No public appearances are planned, and Meghan will not attend Harry’s Invictus Games event. Harry was focused on safely reuniting with his family despite earlier security and accommodation challenges (Video: AI). Harry is constantly surrounded by this intense level of global fame and media spotlight. How much of it do you think truly comes from his dynamic with Meghan?

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

301,476 просмотров • 7 дней назад

Remember Beyoncé’s message to Meghan Markle? “She wants me to feel safe and protected. She admires and respects my bravery and vulnerability and thinks I was selected to break generational curses that need to be healed.” And it just happened to arrive while cameras were there to capture the reaction? 🤭 Meghan then read the message out loud for Harry and the audience as if it were part of the script. That’s not how most people handle private texts. We read them silently. We don’t immediately start performing them for the room. The timing was just a little too perfect. Who wants to bet Beyoncé watched that scene and thought, “Wait… that’s the text I supposedly sent?”
0:12

Remember Beyoncé’s message to Meghan Markle? “She wants me to feel safe and protected. She admires and respects my bravery and vulnerability and thinks I was selected to break generational curses that need to be healed.” And it just happened to arrive while cameras were there to capture the reaction? 🤭 Meghan then read the message out loud for Harry and the audience as if it were part of the script. That’s not how most people handle private texts. We read them silently. We don’t immediately start performing them for the room. The timing was just a little too perfect. Who wants to bet Beyoncé watched that scene and thought, “Wait… that’s the text I supposedly sent?”

Queen Esther

129,788 просмотров • 24 дней назад

Harry making the radical claim about why it’s too dangerous for Meghan Markle to go to the U.K., while not being pressured on why he’ll take her to Jamaica and Nigeria. He also is not challenged on how his wife’s accusations of racism multiple times via Oprah Winfrey and Omid Scobie could have increased the threat against the members of the royal family, especially Catherine, The Princess of Wales, and King Charles. Just a reminder, the only British royal that Trump’s would be assassin investigated was Catherine. Queen Elizabeth was also the target of a would be assassin motivated by a racist moment in history in Christmas 2021. Harry lives in the land of delusion, fueled by Meghan Markle, who wants to keep Harry separated from his family as much as possible. Do they have an occasional security risk, perhaps, but I think she’s at most risk of boos and at the most eggs. And most critically, Harry fails to realize that the two most responsible for the negative press he cites as the reason for this risk is HIMSELF and HIS WIFE. He AND Meghan have fueled the negative stories. He AND Meghan have behaved appallingly over the last several years. He AND Meghan mocked the Queen on Netflix. The media is not at fault, Harry, you are.
0:17

Harry making the radical claim about why it’s too dangerous for Meghan Markle to go to the U.K., while not being pressured on why he’ll take her to Jamaica and Nigeria. He also is not challenged on how his wife’s accusations of racism multiple times via Oprah Winfrey and Omid Scobie could have increased the threat against the members of the royal family, especially Catherine, The Princess of Wales, and King Charles. Just a reminder, the only British royal that Trump’s would be assassin investigated was Catherine. Queen Elizabeth was also the target of a would be assassin motivated by a racist moment in history in Christmas 2021. Harry lives in the land of delusion, fueled by Meghan Markle, who wants to keep Harry separated from his family as much as possible. Do they have an occasional security risk, perhaps, but I think she’s at most risk of boos and at the most eggs. And most critically, Harry fails to realize that the two most responsible for the negative press he cites as the reason for this risk is HIMSELF and HIS WIFE. He AND Meghan have fueled the negative stories. He AND Meghan have behaved appallingly over the last several years. He AND Meghan mocked the Queen on Netflix. The media is not at fault, Harry, you are.

Royal News Network

282,906 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Catherine, Princess of Wales and Princess Diana couldn’t step outside without being chased, harassed, pushed to the edge, cameras in their faces, followed relentlessly by ruthless paparazzi who wouldn’t let them breathe. It was invasive, dangerous and completely out of their control. Real intrusion. Real trauma. And then there’s Meghan Markle. She can’t get that kind of attention organically unless it’s staged. Prearranged walks, conveniently timed “paparazzi” shots, posing perfectly for cameras she claims to hate just to simulate relevance. Fake chaos. Fake victimhood. Catherine and Diana endured it. Meghan Markle tries to recreate it. You can’t manufacture that level of public interest. Some people ran from the paparazzi. Others keep them on speed dial.
0:14

Catherine, Princess of Wales and Princess Diana couldn’t step outside without being chased, harassed, pushed to the edge, cameras in their faces, followed relentlessly by ruthless paparazzi who wouldn’t let them breathe. It was invasive, dangerous and completely out of their control. Real intrusion. Real trauma. And then there’s Meghan Markle. She can’t get that kind of attention organically unless it’s staged. Prearranged walks, conveniently timed “paparazzi” shots, posing perfectly for cameras she claims to hate just to simulate relevance. Fake chaos. Fake victimhood. Catherine and Diana endured it. Meghan Markle tries to recreate it. You can’t manufacture that level of public interest. Some people ran from the paparazzi. Others keep them on speed dial.

Queen Esther

50,762 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

“I don't see how reconciliation can take place when there is a Daily Mail journalist in the room.” BUT it’s not that Caroline Graham is only just in the room blocking a reconciliation between Meghan and Thomas Markle. Caroline has been in the room since 2018 from Mexico to The Philippines. Yet the media really loves to simplify Meghan’s decision to step back from her father and why she claimed she ‘lost’ her father. They make it seem like it was just over staged papped shots for the wedding. There’s so much more to it and until she cottoned on she was having text messages conversations in 2018 thinking this was her father when it was most likely Caroline Graham of the Daily Mail. Not to mention all the negative stories Thomas Markle gave her and Meghan’s other media bullies. #WeLoveYouMeghan
0:10

“I don't see how reconciliation can take place when there is a Daily Mail journalist in the room.” BUT it’s not that Caroline Graham is only just in the room blocking a reconciliation between Meghan and Thomas Markle. Caroline has been in the room since 2018 from Mexico to The Philippines. Yet the media really loves to simplify Meghan’s decision to step back from her father and why she claimed she ‘lost’ her father. They make it seem like it was just over staged papped shots for the wedding. There’s so much more to it and until she cottoned on she was having text messages conversations in 2018 thinking this was her father when it was most likely Caroline Graham of the Daily Mail. Not to mention all the negative stories Thomas Markle gave her and Meghan’s other media bullies. #WeLoveYouMeghan

Glow Lee

11,249 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Shameless, lying grifters Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are crawling back to the royal family on their hands and knees after all the poison they’ve spewed. Now they’re briefing the media that Archie and Lili are just so excited to meet King Charles - a grandfather they’ve barely known because their parents made sure of it. Absolute nonsense. This isn’t excitement; it’s a calculated, nasty tactic using the kids as human shields and props to force their way back in. This is textbook weaponising of the children for royal relevance. It’s a nasty, disgusting trap, the dirtiest move in their playbook: If King Charles meets them, Harry and Meghan will milk it for all it’s worth to elevate themselves and rewrite their narrative. If he refuses, they’ll scream that the cold, heartless King is rejecting his own innocent grandchildren. Classic Sussex playbook - heads they win, tails the royals lose. And let’s be honest: after this meeting, how long before Meghan mocks King Charles the same way she mocked the late Queen’s curtsy? She spits on everyone who gives her the status and relevance she desperately clings to. After years of trashing the royal family, the Oprah lies, the Netflix mockery, the Spare attacks, and the endless victim grift, these two clowns now want to slither back like nothing happened? How do you accuse people of racism, mental cruelty, and every evil under the sun, then pretend it’s all water under the bridge when your own “thriving” brand collapses? Their deluded fans keep shouting that Harry and Meghan are “successful” and “happy” without the royals. So why the desperate crawl back? Why the sudden obsession with royal connections and using the children? Because the truth is they’ve always been frauds - doing exactly what they falsely accused the royals of, while crying victim the entire time. Pardon my French, but fuck you, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry. You two are vile, narcissistic, hypocritical backstabbing grifters - two of the most repulsive, deceitful, money-hungry pieces of trash this world has ever witnessed.
0:16

Shameless, lying grifters Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are crawling back to the royal family on their hands and knees after all the poison they’ve spewed. Now they’re briefing the media that Archie and Lili are just so excited to meet King Charles - a grandfather they’ve barely known because their parents made sure of it. Absolute nonsense. This isn’t excitement; it’s a calculated, nasty tactic using the kids as human shields and props to force their way back in. This is textbook weaponising of the children for royal relevance. It’s a nasty, disgusting trap, the dirtiest move in their playbook: If King Charles meets them, Harry and Meghan will milk it for all it’s worth to elevate themselves and rewrite their narrative. If he refuses, they’ll scream that the cold, heartless King is rejecting his own innocent grandchildren. Classic Sussex playbook - heads they win, tails the royals lose. And let’s be honest: after this meeting, how long before Meghan mocks King Charles the same way she mocked the late Queen’s curtsy? She spits on everyone who gives her the status and relevance she desperately clings to. After years of trashing the royal family, the Oprah lies, the Netflix mockery, the Spare attacks, and the endless victim grift, these two clowns now want to slither back like nothing happened? How do you accuse people of racism, mental cruelty, and every evil under the sun, then pretend it’s all water under the bridge when your own “thriving” brand collapses? Their deluded fans keep shouting that Harry and Meghan are “successful” and “happy” without the royals. So why the desperate crawl back? Why the sudden obsession with royal connections and using the children? Because the truth is they’ve always been frauds - doing exactly what they falsely accused the royals of, while crying victim the entire time. Pardon my French, but fuck you, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry. You two are vile, narcissistic, hypocritical backstabbing grifters - two of the most repulsive, deceitful, money-hungry pieces of trash this world has ever witnessed.

Queen Esther

526,576 просмотров • 12 дней назад

Meghan Markle has been rightly torched by the world’s media and public who were disgusted and sickened to see her using sick and dying children, Indigenous people, abused and homeless women and massacre victims to merch her outfits in Australia. Instead of accepting she did the wrong thing out of inhumanity and greed Meghan Markle doubles down with an invented story claiming she is only trying to give the correct credit to designers and paid puff pieces she wrote herself declaring she is a ‘fashion icon’. If she was only trying to give the correct credit then she would not have been selling them online. Meghan assumes everyone is as dysfunctionally stupid as Harry. Stop lying Meghan. Everyone knows you are an inhuman materialistic and abusive person who exploits others, mostly your own husband, to get what you want.
0:16

Meghan Markle has been rightly torched by the world’s media and public who were disgusted and sickened to see her using sick and dying children, Indigenous people, abused and homeless women and massacre victims to merch her outfits in Australia. Instead of accepting she did the wrong thing out of inhumanity and greed Meghan Markle doubles down with an invented story claiming she is only trying to give the correct credit to designers and paid puff pieces she wrote herself declaring she is a ‘fashion icon’. If she was only trying to give the correct credit then she would not have been selling them online. Meghan assumes everyone is as dysfunctionally stupid as Harry. Stop lying Meghan. Everyone knows you are an inhuman materialistic and abusive person who exploits others, mostly your own husband, to get what you want.

Royal Thoughts - Parody and Commentary

128,090 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

This absolute NONSENSE has gone “viral” on TikTok & gotten a write up on Daily Express -the creator claims that at her wedding, #MeghanMarkle is “bowing her head in respect” to #PrincessCharlotte. She’s actually looking the child up and down and it’s almost disdainful & with contempt. First-an adult is not going to “bow their head in respect” to a child/there are no curtsies ir bowing until age 18. Second-Markle didn’t respect *anyone, much less Charlotte who she didn’t want in her wedding and bullied. So the Squaddie fantasy that she’s showing “respect” to a 3 yr old is hilarious. #HarryAndMeghan #MeghanMarkleIsABully
0:16

This absolute NONSENSE has gone “viral” on TikTok & gotten a write up on Daily Express -the creator claims that at her wedding, #MeghanMarkle is “bowing her head in respect” to #PrincessCharlotte. She’s actually looking the child up and down and it’s almost disdainful & with contempt. First-an adult is not going to “bow their head in respect” to a child/there are no curtsies ir bowing until age 18. Second-Markle didn’t respect *anyone, much less Charlotte who she didn’t want in her wedding and bullied. So the Squaddie fantasy that she’s showing “respect” to a 3 yr old is hilarious. #HarryAndMeghan #MeghanMarkleIsABully

Princess CarParkle 👑

379,021 просмотров • 1 год назад

I love this story♥️ On the latest New Heights podcast, Jason Kelce recalled meeting Prince William, Prince George and Princess Charlotte backstage at Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour. Before walking over, he froze because he was holding a beer and genuinely worried it might be disrespectful to meet the Prince of Wales with a drink in his hand. Taylor Swift even laughed about watching him debate whether he should put it down because he wanted to show proper respect and follow the etiquette. Think about that. A man meeting the Royal Family for the first time cared enough to worry about something as small as whether he should be holding a beer. Then there’s Meghan Markle.🙄 She married into the Royal Family, claimed she knew nothing about them, mocked the curtsy as if it was some ridiculous “medieval” tradition, and has spent years profiting from the very royal title that exists because of that centuries-old institution. A complete stranger showed more curiosity & respect for royal etiquette than someone who willingly became a member of the family. You don’t hate Meghan Markle enough.
0:47

I love this story♥️ On the latest New Heights podcast, Jason Kelce recalled meeting Prince William, Prince George and Princess Charlotte backstage at Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour. Before walking over, he froze because he was holding a beer and genuinely worried it might be disrespectful to meet the Prince of Wales with a drink in his hand. Taylor Swift even laughed about watching him debate whether he should put it down because he wanted to show proper respect and follow the etiquette. Think about that. A man meeting the Royal Family for the first time cared enough to worry about something as small as whether he should be holding a beer. Then there’s Meghan Markle.🙄 She married into the Royal Family, claimed she knew nothing about them, mocked the curtsy as if it was some ridiculous “medieval” tradition, and has spent years profiting from the very royal title that exists because of that centuries-old institution. A complete stranger showed more curiosity & respect for royal etiquette than someone who willingly became a member of the family. You don’t hate Meghan Markle enough.

Queen Esther

371,371 просмотров • 14 дней назад

Rooboy coming to the reunion to talk about Thelma Lawson like she ever considered him in any way is honestly laughable. When a woman says she’s not interested, it’s not a challenge, it’s a decision. Respect it and move on. Trying to bring it up later in conversations just to create a different narrative doesn’t change what was already clear from the beginning. In Thelma’s case, she wasn’t just protecting her peace, she was protecting herself and her son and that alone deserves respect, not public commentary or forced narratives. Silence and distance were the answer then, and they still are now. #BBNaija #BBNaijaReunion
0:14

Rooboy coming to the reunion to talk about Thelma Lawson like she ever considered him in any way is honestly laughable. When a woman says she’s not interested, it’s not a challenge, it’s a decision. Respect it and move on. Trying to bring it up later in conversations just to create a different narrative doesn’t change what was already clear from the beginning. In Thelma’s case, she wasn’t just protecting her peace, she was protecting herself and her son and that alone deserves respect, not public commentary or forced narratives. Silence and distance were the answer then, and they still are now. #BBNaija #BBNaijaReunion

𝐁𝐢𝐠 𝐁𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐒𝐡𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐨𝐨𝐦

21,561 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Fashion, Optics, and Hypocrisy: Meghan Markle’s Balenciaga Problem For a couple who have built a considerable portion of their public identity around mental health and child safety, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex continue to display a baffling lack of self-awareness. The Archewell Foundation, which they co-founded, has made child protection and online safety central to its mission—launching campaigns calling for safer digital spaces, stricter social media safeguards, and protection for young people from the documented harms of online abuse, exploitation, and anxiety. It’s an admirable cause on paper. Yet, once again, their actions betray their own messaging. During Paris Fashion Week, Meghan Markle was seen attending the Balenciaga show—yes, that Balenciaga. The same fashion house that ignited global outrage for its 2022 advertising campaign featuring small children holding the brand’s teddy bear handbags dressed in bondage-inspired accessories. The campaign was condemned worldwide for its deeply inappropriate imagery, with critics pointing out that such visuals blurred the moral boundaries that protect children. In a related campaign (Garde-Robe), Balenciaga also included props such as a Supreme Court decision on child pornography in visual materials — which stirred further outrage over the blurred boundaries between fashion and exploitative symbolism. The backlash was so severe that Balenciaga swiftly removed the campaign, issued public apologies, and faced ongoing reputational damage for months. For most people, the lesson was clear: you don’t associate children with adult themes. Full stop. It should have been common sense. But apparently not for Meghan Markle—the self-proclaimed advocate for children’s wellbeing and online safety. While her Archewell Foundation preaches the importance of shielding children from harm, manipulation, and predatory influences, Meghan was photographed supporting a brand that became a symbol of precisely the moral decay such advocacy is meant to challenge. To wear or publicly support Balenciaga in any capacity—even years after the scandal—undermines her stated values entirely. The passage of time does not erase the original transgression, nor does it excuse the tone-deaf optics of a supposed child-safety campaigner aligning herself with a brand that used children in a context universally condemned as exploitative. This is not about fashion—it’s about consistency, credibility, and integrity. It’s fair to ask: does an invitation to Paris Fashion Week now outweigh the values Archewell claims to hold so dear? Because that is how it looks. The image of the Markle, smiling from the front row of a Balenciaga show, is a direct contradiction to the image of a humanitarian working to make the digital and physical worlds safer for children. It is precisely the kind of hypocrisy that erodes public trust—not just in her, but in the very causes she claims to represent. To make matters worse, the timing could not be more ironic. Within days, Meghan and Harry are set to receive the “Humanitarian of the Year” award from Project Healthy Minds at the upcoming World Mental Health Day Gala in New York. The irony is staggering: accepting a humanitarian honour for their advocacy on mental health and child safety, while simultaneously endorsing—through presence and fashion—a brand that became infamous for its insensitivity toward children. This is not the behaviour of serious advocates. This is performance. If there were any genuine understanding of what child protection means, such a public association would have been unthinkable. But as history continues to show, the Sussexes’ greatest consistency lies in their inconsistency. When the optics suit them, they preach virtue. When the cameras flash, those principles are conveniently forgotten. Perhaps Archewell’s PR team will attempt a quiet clean-up—pretending the Balenciaga appearance never happened or insisting that the Duchess of Sussex was merely “supporting the arts.” But even that will not wash. True advocates for child safety do not endorse or elevate brands that have, however briefly, crossed such a moral line. In the end, this is not just another minor misstep—it’s a symptom of a much larger problem. When your entire brand is built on compassion and advocacy, hypocrisy becomes your greatest enemy. And as Meghan and Harry prepare to take the stage and accept yet another humanitarian accolade, they might do well to remember that the public isn’t blind. You cannot claim to protect children with one hand and applaud a brand condemned for exploiting their image with the other.
0:15

Fashion, Optics, and Hypocrisy: Meghan Markle’s Balenciaga Problem For a couple who have built a considerable portion of their public identity around mental health and child safety, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex continue to display a baffling lack of self-awareness. The Archewell Foundation, which they co-founded, has made child protection and online safety central to its mission—launching campaigns calling for safer digital spaces, stricter social media safeguards, and protection for young people from the documented harms of online abuse, exploitation, and anxiety. It’s an admirable cause on paper. Yet, once again, their actions betray their own messaging. During Paris Fashion Week, Meghan Markle was seen attending the Balenciaga show—yes, that Balenciaga. The same fashion house that ignited global outrage for its 2022 advertising campaign featuring small children holding the brand’s teddy bear handbags dressed in bondage-inspired accessories. The campaign was condemned worldwide for its deeply inappropriate imagery, with critics pointing out that such visuals blurred the moral boundaries that protect children. In a related campaign (Garde-Robe), Balenciaga also included props such as a Supreme Court decision on child pornography in visual materials — which stirred further outrage over the blurred boundaries between fashion and exploitative symbolism. The backlash was so severe that Balenciaga swiftly removed the campaign, issued public apologies, and faced ongoing reputational damage for months. For most people, the lesson was clear: you don’t associate children with adult themes. Full stop. It should have been common sense. But apparently not for Meghan Markle—the self-proclaimed advocate for children’s wellbeing and online safety. While her Archewell Foundation preaches the importance of shielding children from harm, manipulation, and predatory influences, Meghan was photographed supporting a brand that became a symbol of precisely the moral decay such advocacy is meant to challenge. To wear or publicly support Balenciaga in any capacity—even years after the scandal—undermines her stated values entirely. The passage of time does not erase the original transgression, nor does it excuse the tone-deaf optics of a supposed child-safety campaigner aligning herself with a brand that used children in a context universally condemned as exploitative. This is not about fashion—it’s about consistency, credibility, and integrity. It’s fair to ask: does an invitation to Paris Fashion Week now outweigh the values Archewell claims to hold so dear? Because that is how it looks. The image of the Markle, smiling from the front row of a Balenciaga show, is a direct contradiction to the image of a humanitarian working to make the digital and physical worlds safer for children. It is precisely the kind of hypocrisy that erodes public trust—not just in her, but in the very causes she claims to represent. To make matters worse, the timing could not be more ironic. Within days, Meghan and Harry are set to receive the “Humanitarian of the Year” award from Project Healthy Minds at the upcoming World Mental Health Day Gala in New York. The irony is staggering: accepting a humanitarian honour for their advocacy on mental health and child safety, while simultaneously endorsing—through presence and fashion—a brand that became infamous for its insensitivity toward children. This is not the behaviour of serious advocates. This is performance. If there were any genuine understanding of what child protection means, such a public association would have been unthinkable. But as history continues to show, the Sussexes’ greatest consistency lies in their inconsistency. When the optics suit them, they preach virtue. When the cameras flash, those principles are conveniently forgotten. Perhaps Archewell’s PR team will attempt a quiet clean-up—pretending the Balenciaga appearance never happened or insisting that the Duchess of Sussex was merely “supporting the arts.” But even that will not wash. True advocates for child safety do not endorse or elevate brands that have, however briefly, crossed such a moral line. In the end, this is not just another minor misstep—it’s a symptom of a much larger problem. When your entire brand is built on compassion and advocacy, hypocrisy becomes your greatest enemy. And as Meghan and Harry prepare to take the stage and accept yet another humanitarian accolade, they might do well to remember that the public isn’t blind. You cannot claim to protect children with one hand and applaud a brand condemned for exploiting their image with the other.

༺𝐻𝑅𝐻 𝐿𝒶𝒹𝓎 𝒥༻ 👑

76,722 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

People have literally turned trains into a zoo. Just look at this a calf being carried inside the train, and it’s even defecating there. This isn’t just irresponsible, it’s completely disrespectful to fellow passengers. Public spaces are meant to be shared with basic discipline and hygiene. When will people understand civic sense? It’s not just about rules , it’s about respect for others.
0:13

People have literally turned trains into a zoo. Just look at this a calf being carried inside the train, and it’s even defecating there. This isn’t just irresponsible, it’s completely disrespectful to fellow passengers. Public spaces are meant to be shared with basic discipline and hygiene. When will people understand civic sense? It’s not just about rules , it’s about respect for others.

The Nalanda Index

16,874 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Dear Invictus Games Foundation, You say the foundation exists to support the recovery and rehabilitation of wounded, injured, and sick service personnel. Everyone agrees with that mission. No one is questioning the courage, sacrifice, or experiences of the veterans who compete. They deserve respect, recognition and the spotlight. But your statement tries to blur an important distinction. Questioning the direction, leadership, or public image of the Games is not the same as diminishing the experiences of injured veterans. Criticism of how Invictus is being presented is not criticism of the men and women who served. By suggesting that questioning anything around the Games is “disrespectful,” you effectively shield the organizers and the celebrity figures attached to it from scrutiny while placing veterans in front as a moral barrier. If the focus truly belongs on courage, recovery and camaraderie, then the spotlight should remain firmly on the competitors themselves. Yet increasingly the public narrative around Invictus revolves around Prince Harry and especially Meghan Markle, who is neither a veteran nor a participant in the Games. When coverage of an event meant to honor wounded service personnel becomes dominated by Meghan Markle’s appearances, wardrobe and personal publicity moments, it is fair for people to ask why. Especially when she does not even wear Invictus merchandise to promote the Games while reportedly spending lavishly on personal presentation during the events. If Invictus truly believes the focus should remain on those who served, then the simplest solution is obvious. Put the veterans back at the center and stop allowing the Games to become a stage for the attention whore Meghan Markle.
0:12

Dear Invictus Games Foundation, You say the foundation exists to support the recovery and rehabilitation of wounded, injured, and sick service personnel. Everyone agrees with that mission. No one is questioning the courage, sacrifice, or experiences of the veterans who compete. They deserve respect, recognition and the spotlight. But your statement tries to blur an important distinction. Questioning the direction, leadership, or public image of the Games is not the same as diminishing the experiences of injured veterans. Criticism of how Invictus is being presented is not criticism of the men and women who served. By suggesting that questioning anything around the Games is “disrespectful,” you effectively shield the organizers and the celebrity figures attached to it from scrutiny while placing veterans in front as a moral barrier. If the focus truly belongs on courage, recovery and camaraderie, then the spotlight should remain firmly on the competitors themselves. Yet increasingly the public narrative around Invictus revolves around Prince Harry and especially Meghan Markle, who is neither a veteran nor a participant in the Games. When coverage of an event meant to honor wounded service personnel becomes dominated by Meghan Markle’s appearances, wardrobe and personal publicity moments, it is fair for people to ask why. Especially when she does not even wear Invictus merchandise to promote the Games while reportedly spending lavishly on personal presentation during the events. If Invictus truly believes the focus should remain on those who served, then the simplest solution is obvious. Put the veterans back at the center and stop allowing the Games to become a stage for the attention whore Meghan Markle.

Queen Esther

55,110 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

”White people crying was the goal” They say it openly. They laugh about it. And the audience applauds. This clip is a perfect example of how normalized it has become to openly discriminate against White people. It’s not just a throwaway comment, it’s a celebration of hurting an entire group of people based solely on their race. And the fact that it’s met with applause shows how deeply this mindset has infiltrated our culture. Now imagine if someone said the same thing about Black people, or any other minority group. The outrage would be immediate and intense. There would be calls for censorship, bans, and apologies. The media would be all over it. But when it’s directed at White people, it’s treated like a joke, or worse, like a victory. That double standard is not just unfair, it’s dangerous. It teaches people that it’s acceptable to demean, dehumanize, and mock a group of people as long as they’re White. And if we don’t call it out, it becomes normal.
0:18

”White people crying was the goal” They say it openly. They laugh about it. And the audience applauds. This clip is a perfect example of how normalized it has become to openly discriminate against White people. It’s not just a throwaway comment, it’s a celebration of hurting an entire group of people based solely on their race. And the fact that it’s met with applause shows how deeply this mindset has infiltrated our culture. Now imagine if someone said the same thing about Black people, or any other minority group. The outrage would be immediate and intense. There would be calls for censorship, bans, and apologies. The media would be all over it. But when it’s directed at White people, it’s treated like a joke, or worse, like a victory. That double standard is not just unfair, it’s dangerous. It teaches people that it’s acceptable to demean, dehumanize, and mock a group of people as long as they’re White. And if we don’t call it out, it becomes normal.

Taya Bass

533,986 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

The lack of engagement from the crowd was honestly embarrassing. When she said, “Archie & Lili are just 6 and 4 yrs old, can you believe it?” not a single reaction. Awkward silence. 😬 But here’s the real question: does Meghan Markle know anything about her children besides their ages? Standing on stage at a Project Healthy Minds event, accepting a humanitarian award and speaking about children’s mental health and online safety, while wearing a suit with nothing underneath, was deeply inappropriate for the setting. There’s a time and place for everything and this wasn’t it. It came across as tone-deaf, attention seeking, and disconnected from the very cause she claimed to represent.
0:18

The lack of engagement from the crowd was honestly embarrassing. When she said, “Archie & Lili are just 6 and 4 yrs old, can you believe it?” not a single reaction. Awkward silence. 😬 But here’s the real question: does Meghan Markle know anything about her children besides their ages? Standing on stage at a Project Healthy Minds event, accepting a humanitarian award and speaking about children’s mental health and online safety, while wearing a suit with nothing underneath, was deeply inappropriate for the setting. There’s a time and place for everything and this wasn’t it. It came across as tone-deaf, attention seeking, and disconnected from the very cause she claimed to represent.

Queen Esther

1,486,290 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

American speaks on Muslims gathering in New York to pray and she’s absolutely right “So there are over 500 mosques in New York, but they take to the streets and have to pray in public — It's just crazy to see, but they're doing this to show their dominance and to show that they're taking over the culture and taking over our land. And they don't care how we feel about it.” Again, she is 100% correct. Muslims do not do this in their home countries
0:18

American speaks on Muslims gathering in New York to pray and she’s absolutely right “So there are over 500 mosques in New York, but they take to the streets and have to pray in public — It's just crazy to see, but they're doing this to show their dominance and to show that they're taking over the culture and taking over our land. And they don't care how we feel about it.” Again, she is 100% correct. Muslims do not do this in their home countries

Wall Street Apes

166,169 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад