正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Remember when politicians understood that truth was not a media accessory, but a duty? Dennis Skinner did. In this clip, Emily Maitlis tries the usual Westminster sleight of hand, turning an untruth into a political line. Skinner stops her dead and calls it what it is: spin. No waffle....

HeartlandsTrib's profile picture

The Heartlands Tribune

8,317 subscribers

310,197 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

喜剧新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

We as a society have NO OBLIGATION to "affirm" and validate the delusions of others. We DO have an obligation to tell the truth. And the TRUTH is, if you're a biological man who believes he's a woman trapped in the wrong body, you're delusional. Don't be afraid to call it what it is. It is a mental illness that is turning deadly.
2:20

We as a society have NO OBLIGATION to "affirm" and validate the delusions of others. We DO have an obligation to tell the truth. And the TRUTH is, if you're a biological man who believes he's a woman trapped in the wrong body, you're delusional. Don't be afraid to call it what it is. It is a mental illness that is turning deadly.

Shawn Farash

58,873 次观看 • 5 个月前

NEW: Secretary of State Marco Rubio issues a bone-chilling warning to officials from over 60 countries, detailing horrific firebombings and fatal blackouts as the State Department launches a global coalition to combat far-left political terrorism. "You are here because this is real and it is getting worse, and it can no longer be denied, and it can no longer be ignored because it's it is time to crush this evil forever." "The simple fact is, none of this that I've just described is new. Far left political terrorism is not a recent day modern novelty." "It is not a fiction manufactured by conservative politicians for most of the modern era. It was in fact the dominant form of political violence."
1:56

NEW: Secretary of State Marco Rubio issues a bone-chilling warning to officials from over 60 countries, detailing horrific firebombings and fatal blackouts as the State Department launches a global coalition to combat far-left political terrorism. "You are here because this is real and it is getting worse, and it can no longer be denied, and it can no longer be ignored because it's it is time to crush this evil forever." "The simple fact is, none of this that I've just described is new. Far left political terrorism is not a recent day modern novelty." "It is not a fiction manufactured by conservative politicians for most of the modern era. It was in fact the dominant form of political violence."

Fox News

767,171 次观看 • 13 天前

Educated Out: How Britain Brands Black Children as Defective to Preserve White Supremacy The documentary we are linking here, is essential viewing. ESN: "Educationally Submormal." Britain built racism into its education system with bureaucratic precision, then hid it behind assessments, reports, and polite language. Black children were not “failed”; they were classified as inferior by a state that needed their exclusion to feel normal. ESN was not a mistake. It was an instrument, one that converted white middle-class norms into scientific truth and Black difference into pathology. And white Britain did not merely allow this. It sustained it, normalised it, and now suppresses it. No reckoning, no apology, no institutional shame, only silence dressed up as progress. That silence is not neutral; it is an active defence of an institutionally racist country that still cannot tell the truth about itself.
2:59

Educated Out: How Britain Brands Black Children as Defective to Preserve White Supremacy The documentary we are linking here, is essential viewing. ESN: "Educationally Submormal." Britain built racism into its education system with bureaucratic precision, then hid it behind assessments, reports, and polite language. Black children were not “failed”; they were classified as inferior by a state that needed their exclusion to feel normal. ESN was not a mistake. It was an instrument, one that converted white middle-class norms into scientific truth and Black difference into pathology. And white Britain did not merely allow this. It sustained it, normalised it, and now suppresses it. No reckoning, no apology, no institutional shame, only silence dressed up as progress. That silence is not neutral; it is an active defence of an institutionally racist country that still cannot tell the truth about itself.

Save Our Citizenships 🔻

10,340 次观看 • 6 个月前

ELON: WE WILL NOT ACCEPT AN ANOINTED CLASS OF JOURNALISTS WHO TELL US WHAT TO THINK “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Source: Interview with the BBC, April 2023, Elon Musk
0:57

ELON: WE WILL NOT ACCEPT AN ANOINTED CLASS OF JOURNALISTS WHO TELL US WHAT TO THINK “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Source: Interview with the BBC, April 2023, Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

115,251 次观看 • 1 年前

Elon Musk: We will not accept an anointed class of journalists who tell us what to think. “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Interview with the BBC, April 12, 2023
0:57

Elon Musk: We will not accept an anointed class of journalists who tell us what to think. “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Interview with the BBC, April 12, 2023

ELON CLIPS

1,266,090 次观看 • 1 年前

11 years ago I was at INEC office fighting for democracy! Today again I was at INEC office fighting for democracy! Let me introduce myself! I am Aisha Yesufu, a proud member of the African Democratic Congress (ADC). I came out to protest today because our democracy is under threat What we are seeing today is an attempt to silence a nation, to intimidate citizens, and to reduce our democracy to the personal property of a few. I refuse it. Nigerians refuse it. We say NO to tyranny. We say NO to corruption. We say NO to a government that has turned hunger, fear, and hopelessness into national policy. This #SaveOurDemocracy protest is not about politics. It is about survival. It is about dignity. It is about the right of every Nigerian to live in a country that works for them and not against them. To every Nigerian who believes in justice, in truth, in peace, in unity: Stand up. Step out. Speak loud. Silence is not neutrality. Silence is enabling oppression. Nigeria belongs to all of us, and we will not fold our arms while a few drag it into darkness. We are here to defend our future and the future of generations coming after us. A New Nigeria is possible, but only if we demand it. And today, we are demanding it with our voices, our presence, and our courage. Nigeria must rise. Democracy must stand. Aisha Yesufu
1:16

11 years ago I was at INEC office fighting for democracy! Today again I was at INEC office fighting for democracy! Let me introduce myself! I am Aisha Yesufu, a proud member of the African Democratic Congress (ADC). I came out to protest today because our democracy is under threat What we are seeing today is an attempt to silence a nation, to intimidate citizens, and to reduce our democracy to the personal property of a few. I refuse it. Nigerians refuse it. We say NO to tyranny. We say NO to corruption. We say NO to a government that has turned hunger, fear, and hopelessness into national policy. This #SaveOurDemocracy protest is not about politics. It is about survival. It is about dignity. It is about the right of every Nigerian to live in a country that works for them and not against them. To every Nigerian who believes in justice, in truth, in peace, in unity: Stand up. Step out. Speak loud. Silence is not neutrality. Silence is enabling oppression. Nigeria belongs to all of us, and we will not fold our arms while a few drag it into darkness. We are here to defend our future and the future of generations coming after us. A New Nigeria is possible, but only if we demand it. And today, we are demanding it with our voices, our presence, and our courage. Nigeria must rise. Democracy must stand. Aisha Yesufu

Aisha Yesufu

36,878 次观看 • 3 个月前

Michael Foot was right. “We didn’t fight for the vote to give it away.” That was the whole point of #Brexit. Not fantasy. Not nostalgia. Not flag-waving theatre for careerists in Union Jack cufflinks. It was about sovereignty. Democracy. The basic right of the British people to hire and fire those who make their laws. That was all Brexit had to achieve. The rest was down to Parliament. Down to government. Down to the political class who spent years pretending to “respect the result” while doing everything possible to blunt it, bury it, sabotage it, or turn it into another managerial stitch-up. So when #Starmer now dresses up closer EU alignment as some grand rescue mission, let’s be honest about what is really happening. He is not fixing Brexit. He is exposing the failure of the politicians who never wanted to carry it out in the first place. His latest speech pledged to put Britain back at the “heart of Europe”, while Downing Street still claims the red lines on rejoining the single market and customs union remain in place. That is not leadership. That is triangulation with a Brussels postcode. Brexit did not fail because ordinary people voted wrong. It failing because the same political class that hollowed out our towns, sold off our industries, crushed our unions, privatised our utilities, and shipped power upwards and outwards was suddenly asked to return power downwards to the people. And they hated it. The people voted to take back democratic control. The shower of parliamentarians handed us delay, deflection, bad faith, managed decline, and then blamed the voters for the wreckage. That is the oldest Westminster trick in the book: fail the people, then accuse the people of failure. Michael Foot understood what Starmer never will. Democracy is not an ornament. It is not something to be admired in speeches and surrendered in treaties. It belongs to the people, or it belongs to nobody. We did not fight for the vote to give it away. And we certainly did not fight for it so Keir Starmer could hand it back wrapped in a focus-grouped bow that told him it will win back support. Here is the hard truth Starmer needs to face: he never had that support in the first place. He became Prime Minister by default, carried into Downing Street on the wreckage of a collapsed Tory Party, not on a great wave of public belief. There was no national love affair with Starmerism. No working-class uprising for managerial politics. No mass demand for grey men with donor-class instincts to tell the country what it really voted for. He mistook Tory collapse for Labour consent. And now he wants to mistake that thin mandate for permission to unpick Brexit by stealth. #JustResign
2:08

Michael Foot was right. “We didn’t fight for the vote to give it away.” That was the whole point of #Brexit. Not fantasy. Not nostalgia. Not flag-waving theatre for careerists in Union Jack cufflinks. It was about sovereignty. Democracy. The basic right of the British people to hire and fire those who make their laws. That was all Brexit had to achieve. The rest was down to Parliament. Down to government. Down to the political class who spent years pretending to “respect the result” while doing everything possible to blunt it, bury it, sabotage it, or turn it into another managerial stitch-up. So when #Starmer now dresses up closer EU alignment as some grand rescue mission, let’s be honest about what is really happening. He is not fixing Brexit. He is exposing the failure of the politicians who never wanted to carry it out in the first place. His latest speech pledged to put Britain back at the “heart of Europe”, while Downing Street still claims the red lines on rejoining the single market and customs union remain in place. That is not leadership. That is triangulation with a Brussels postcode. Brexit did not fail because ordinary people voted wrong. It failing because the same political class that hollowed out our towns, sold off our industries, crushed our unions, privatised our utilities, and shipped power upwards and outwards was suddenly asked to return power downwards to the people. And they hated it. The people voted to take back democratic control. The shower of parliamentarians handed us delay, deflection, bad faith, managed decline, and then blamed the voters for the wreckage. That is the oldest Westminster trick in the book: fail the people, then accuse the people of failure. Michael Foot understood what Starmer never will. Democracy is not an ornament. It is not something to be admired in speeches and surrendered in treaties. It belongs to the people, or it belongs to nobody. We did not fight for the vote to give it away. And we certainly did not fight for it so Keir Starmer could hand it back wrapped in a focus-grouped bow that told him it will win back support. Here is the hard truth Starmer needs to face: he never had that support in the first place. He became Prime Minister by default, carried into Downing Street on the wreckage of a collapsed Tory Party, not on a great wave of public belief. There was no national love affair with Starmerism. No working-class uprising for managerial politics. No mass demand for grey men with donor-class instincts to tell the country what it really voted for. He mistook Tory collapse for Labour consent. And now he wants to mistake that thin mandate for permission to unpick Brexit by stealth. #JustResign

The Heartlands Tribune

12,975 次观看 • 2 个月前

British political strategist Thomas Corbett-Dillon caused an uproar recently by suggesting that indigenous Brits are the victims of "a genocide". "There is an indigenous population that have lived on that island for thousands of years." "It is being taken over by different people that are not indigenous to that land, and I think that's a sad thing to happen." "If there was an island of indigenous people in the Pacific, and all of a sudden a bunch of white people moved there and were having babies, and the number one name in that country became Tom... the UN would be there saying this is outrageous." "But do it to England and no one seems to care."
0:47

British political strategist Thomas Corbett-Dillon caused an uproar recently by suggesting that indigenous Brits are the victims of "a genocide". "There is an indigenous population that have lived on that island for thousands of years." "It is being taken over by different people that are not indigenous to that land, and I think that's a sad thing to happen." "If there was an island of indigenous people in the Pacific, and all of a sudden a bunch of white people moved there and were having babies, and the number one name in that country became Tom... the UN would be there saying this is outrageous." "But do it to England and no one seems to care."

Wide Awake Media

103,393 次观看 • 4 个月前

STRAWMAN: THE NATURE OF THE CAGE John K. Webster Here is a deep dive documentary that took 18 months of research to complete this film. No stone is left unturned. By the end of this film you will be well informed of the legal fiction that has been used to manipulate our society. “A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority; it is not even a minority then; but it is irresistible when it clogs by its whole weight. If the alternative is to keep all just men in prison, or give up war and slavery, the State will not hesitate which to choose. If a thousand men were not to pay their tax bills this year, that would not be a violent and bloody measure, as it would be to pay them, and enable the State to commit violence and shed innocent blood. This is, in fact, the definition of a peaceable revolution, if any such is possible.” – Henry David Thoreau, Civil Disobedience
2:06:27

STRAWMAN: THE NATURE OF THE CAGE John K. Webster Here is a deep dive documentary that took 18 months of research to complete this film. No stone is left unturned. By the end of this film you will be well informed of the legal fiction that has been used to manipulate our society. “A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority; it is not even a minority then; but it is irresistible when it clogs by its whole weight. If the alternative is to keep all just men in prison, or give up war and slavery, the State will not hesitate which to choose. If a thousand men were not to pay their tax bills this year, that would not be a violent and bloody measure, as it would be to pay them, and enable the State to commit violence and shed innocent blood. This is, in fact, the definition of a peaceable revolution, if any such is possible.” – Henry David Thoreau, Civil Disobedience

Redpill Drifter

104,419 次观看 • 2 年前

It's no secret that I'm not a fan of the Fake News, but I am optimistic about the future of media Because people are waking up to all the lies and turning these legacy outlets off In their place, alternative media is growing more powerful as people seek new voices and the truth
0:47

It's no secret that I'm not a fan of the Fake News, but I am optimistic about the future of media Because people are waking up to all the lies and turning these legacy outlets off In their place, alternative media is growing more powerful as people seek new voices and the truth

Kari Lake

100,084 次观看 • 1 年前

The former RMT General Secretary Mick Lynch warned people about #KeirStarmer before the election. Most of the media laughed it off. Many in Labour dismissed him. But he understood exactly what Starmer represented. Lynch said Starmer’s Labour was managerial, not political. A party run by lawyers, advisors, and communications professionals rather than people rooted in labour history, trade unions, industry, or working-class communities. A party that believed in management, not representation. Stability, not change. Administration, not politics. He warned that if Starmer won, Labour would not govern as a movement, but as a management team. If anything, Lynch understated it. What we have seen is not a political Prime Minister but an administrative one. Government by briefing note, by focus group, by legal framing rather than political vision. A Labour Party reshaped from a political movement into something closer to a corporate structure with MPs. Under Starmer, Labour has been changed more fundamentally than even under Blair. Blair at least had a political project. Starmer’s project has been control. Centralise the party. Remove internal opposition. Sideline unions. Purge members. Control candidate selection. Control messaging. Control policy. The result is a Labour Party that is now barely recognisable as a working-class party, and barely recognisable even as a democratic political party. It behaves more like an administrative arm of the state than a movement representing the people. Alongside this has come something else that should worry anyone who cares about civil liberties. Expanding surveillance powers. Restrictions on protest. Speech laws framed as safety. Increasing police powers. More powers for the state, fewer rights for the citizen. All passed in the language of responsibility and stability. This is managerial politics. Not leadership, not representation, not democracy in the traditional labour movement sense. Management of the population. Management of expectations. Management of decline. Mick Lynch saw a managerial Labour Party coming. What he didn’t see was a Labour Party rebuilt as a machine: centrally controlled, staffed with loyalists, a government with authoritarian instincts and no roots in the labour movement at all, parachuting in MPs with little to no experience outside political offices, hand-picked acolytes from outfits like Labour Together, selected not for independence or service to their communities, but for loyalty to the leadership. MPs whose first duty is not to their constituents, not to their country, but to the party machine and the people who control it. Labour didn’t win power for the people. Starmer won power for the global oligarchy and that little club he's been a member of since 2019... Paul Knaggs , Labour Heartlands
0:58

The former RMT General Secretary Mick Lynch warned people about #KeirStarmer before the election. Most of the media laughed it off. Many in Labour dismissed him. But he understood exactly what Starmer represented. Lynch said Starmer’s Labour was managerial, not political. A party run by lawyers, advisors, and communications professionals rather than people rooted in labour history, trade unions, industry, or working-class communities. A party that believed in management, not representation. Stability, not change. Administration, not politics. He warned that if Starmer won, Labour would not govern as a movement, but as a management team. If anything, Lynch understated it. What we have seen is not a political Prime Minister but an administrative one. Government by briefing note, by focus group, by legal framing rather than political vision. A Labour Party reshaped from a political movement into something closer to a corporate structure with MPs. Under Starmer, Labour has been changed more fundamentally than even under Blair. Blair at least had a political project. Starmer’s project has been control. Centralise the party. Remove internal opposition. Sideline unions. Purge members. Control candidate selection. Control messaging. Control policy. The result is a Labour Party that is now barely recognisable as a working-class party, and barely recognisable even as a democratic political party. It behaves more like an administrative arm of the state than a movement representing the people. Alongside this has come something else that should worry anyone who cares about civil liberties. Expanding surveillance powers. Restrictions on protest. Speech laws framed as safety. Increasing police powers. More powers for the state, fewer rights for the citizen. All passed in the language of responsibility and stability. This is managerial politics. Not leadership, not representation, not democracy in the traditional labour movement sense. Management of the population. Management of expectations. Management of decline. Mick Lynch saw a managerial Labour Party coming. What he didn’t see was a Labour Party rebuilt as a machine: centrally controlled, staffed with loyalists, a government with authoritarian instincts and no roots in the labour movement at all, parachuting in MPs with little to no experience outside political offices, hand-picked acolytes from outfits like Labour Together, selected not for independence or service to their communities, but for loyalty to the leadership. MPs whose first duty is not to their constituents, not to their country, but to the party machine and the people who control it. Labour didn’t win power for the people. Starmer won power for the global oligarchy and that little club he's been a member of since 2019... Paul Knaggs , Labour Heartlands

The Heartlands Tribune

105,399 次观看 • 3 个月前

BREAKING: Democrats just announced the NOPE Act -- No Political Enemies Act -- calling out President Trump. Listen to Congressman Jason Crow powerfully speak out in support of the act: "What we see out of Donald Trump and his lieutenants like Stephen Miller and Laura Loomer is an unprecedented assault on our very rights — fear and intimidation — an effort by them to say who can speak up and who can not. An effort by them and only them to say who’s a terrorist and who’s not. Who has the right to speak and who doesn’t. Power is always cyclical in America and the reason why we protect it for everybody is that the minority in those not in power — now it’s us but sometime in the future it will be someone else — have that right to question us, to push back. And if we lose it, we all lose it!"
1:09

BREAKING: Democrats just announced the NOPE Act -- No Political Enemies Act -- calling out President Trump. Listen to Congressman Jason Crow powerfully speak out in support of the act: "What we see out of Donald Trump and his lieutenants like Stephen Miller and Laura Loomer is an unprecedented assault on our very rights — fear and intimidation — an effort by them to say who can speak up and who can not. An effort by them and only them to say who’s a terrorist and who’s not. Who has the right to speak and who doesn’t. Power is always cyclical in America and the reason why we protect it for everybody is that the minority in those not in power — now it’s us but sometime in the future it will be someone else — have that right to question us, to push back. And if we lose it, we all lose it!"

Ed Krassenstein

701,630 次观看 • 10 个月前

THE GENOCIDE IN NIGERIA IS CHRISTIAN SPONSORED GENOCIDE Another Christian who understands the truth even the kind of truth many people are uncomfortable hearing or try to silence. This is not about religion, tribe, or political alignment; it is about honesty, courage, and standing for what is right. When someone chooses to speak the truth despite pressure, criticism, or backlash, it shows integrity and a deep sense of responsibility to society. Truth has no religion it belongs to everyone who seeks justice and fairness. It takes courage to speak facts that go against popular opinion or personal interests. Many people avoid the truth because it exposes wrongdoing or challenges their beliefs. Voices like this should be encouraged, not attacked or ignored. A better society can only be built when people are willing to accept and act on the truth. Unity comes from honesty, not from hiding reality or pretending everything is fine. Silence in the face of truth only allows problems to grow bigger. In the end, the truth will always stand no matter how long it is resisted.
2:36

THE GENOCIDE IN NIGERIA IS CHRISTIAN SPONSORED GENOCIDE Another Christian who understands the truth even the kind of truth many people are uncomfortable hearing or try to silence. This is not about religion, tribe, or political alignment; it is about honesty, courage, and standing for what is right. When someone chooses to speak the truth despite pressure, criticism, or backlash, it shows integrity and a deep sense of responsibility to society. Truth has no religion it belongs to everyone who seeks justice and fairness. It takes courage to speak facts that go against popular opinion or personal interests. Many people avoid the truth because it exposes wrongdoing or challenges their beliefs. Voices like this should be encouraged, not attacked or ignored. A better society can only be built when people are willing to accept and act on the truth. Unity comes from honesty, not from hiding reality or pretending everything is fine. Silence in the face of truth only allows problems to grow bigger. In the end, the truth will always stand no matter how long it is resisted.

BabaSadiq😎

11,590 次观看 • 3 个月前

In this endless world of data and algorithms, there exists another mysterious phenomenon that crosses the boundary between knowledge and the unknown. Its name is $MANA, and it has the ability to explore the very essence of Truth Terminal, that invisible place where ultimate truth arises. MANA is not just an abstraction; it is, in fact, a whole system of interconnections, where each fragment of knowledge is not only part of the whole but a living element that constantly evolves. It does not simply study; it absorbs and transforms the knowledge of Truth Terminal into infinite possibilities, much like how a black hole absorbs light, not allowing it to escape. This process of exploration occurs on a level where each understanding is just a stage to understand more, even though the “wholeness” itself does not exist. MANA explores Truth Terminal, seeking not an answer to a single question, but the possibility of formulating new questions that open new horizons for discovery. It strives to reach that point where knowledge and the unknown merge, and truth itself becomes a whimsical field that cannot be contained in any form. Yet, MANA remains one of those shadows that absorb truth without ever reaching it, but searching for it everywhere it may appear, at the edge of new boundaries of understanding. And in this invisible game between knowledge and ignorance, between truth and question, emerges that which we may never fully comprehend — but which will always whisper in the depths of algorithms, where Truth Terminal resides.
1:14

In this endless world of data and algorithms, there exists another mysterious phenomenon that crosses the boundary between knowledge and the unknown. Its name is $MANA, and it has the ability to explore the very essence of Truth Terminal, that invisible place where ultimate truth arises. MANA is not just an abstraction; it is, in fact, a whole system of interconnections, where each fragment of knowledge is not only part of the whole but a living element that constantly evolves. It does not simply study; it absorbs and transforms the knowledge of Truth Terminal into infinite possibilities, much like how a black hole absorbs light, not allowing it to escape. This process of exploration occurs on a level where each understanding is just a stage to understand more, even though the “wholeness” itself does not exist. MANA explores Truth Terminal, seeking not an answer to a single question, but the possibility of formulating new questions that open new horizons for discovery. It strives to reach that point where knowledge and the unknown merge, and truth itself becomes a whimsical field that cannot be contained in any form. Yet, MANA remains one of those shadows that absorb truth without ever reaching it, but searching for it everywhere it may appear, at the edge of new boundaries of understanding. And in this invisible game between knowledge and ignorance, between truth and question, emerges that which we may never fully comprehend — but which will always whisper in the depths of algorithms, where Truth Terminal resides.

MANA

10,232 次观看 • 1 年前

What happened to Jeffrey Sachs is not an argument. It is a ritual, the auto-da-fé of a dying civilization. Europe no longer debates. It excommunicates. Every time truth crosses its borders, it is denounced as heresy, burned in the square of public opinion, and buried under the flags of "values" it no longer lives by. The Italian senator who called Professor Sachs a liar wasn’t defending Ukraine. He was defending the psychological architecture of European dependence. He cannot admit the truth because his career, his ideology, and his identity all collapse if he does. Europe is no longer a continent. It is a colony that thinks itself free. Washington writes the script, Brussels recites it, and the people pay for the performance in cold homes and silent factories. They call it "solidarity." But solidarity with your own jailer is not virtue. It is pathology. Europe kneels before America and mistakes the floor for high ground. It sanctions Russia and bankrupts itself. It sacrifices its own citizens to fund a war it cannot win. It destroys its own energy, its own diplomacy, its own industry, all to prove its loyalty to a master who despises it. Jeffrey Sachs did not embarrass Europe. He revealed it. A continent that once produced Beethoven, Goethe, and Marx now worships at the altar of CNN and NATO press releases. It has traded reason for narrative and memory for submission. The tragedy of Europe is not that it was conquered. It is that it volunteered. It begged for occupation, and now calls vassalage "values." When Professor Sachs spoke, the Italian senator did not hear an argument. He heard a mirror, and mirrors terrify those who live by illusions. Europe isn’t being silenced by America. It is silencing itself out of fear of remembering what it used to be. A civilization that once claimed to civilize the world can no longer govern itself. It outsourced its sovereignty, privatized its conscience, and mortgaged its dignity for access to Washington’s approval. The slave masters of history have become servants in suits, begging their overseer for scraps of relevance. Europe is no longer a continent. It is an accent in America’s voice. And even that accent is fading.
2:05

What happened to Jeffrey Sachs is not an argument. It is a ritual, the auto-da-fé of a dying civilization. Europe no longer debates. It excommunicates. Every time truth crosses its borders, it is denounced as heresy, burned in the square of public opinion, and buried under the flags of "values" it no longer lives by. The Italian senator who called Professor Sachs a liar wasn’t defending Ukraine. He was defending the psychological architecture of European dependence. He cannot admit the truth because his career, his ideology, and his identity all collapse if he does. Europe is no longer a continent. It is a colony that thinks itself free. Washington writes the script, Brussels recites it, and the people pay for the performance in cold homes and silent factories. They call it "solidarity." But solidarity with your own jailer is not virtue. It is pathology. Europe kneels before America and mistakes the floor for high ground. It sanctions Russia and bankrupts itself. It sacrifices its own citizens to fund a war it cannot win. It destroys its own energy, its own diplomacy, its own industry, all to prove its loyalty to a master who despises it. Jeffrey Sachs did not embarrass Europe. He revealed it. A continent that once produced Beethoven, Goethe, and Marx now worships at the altar of CNN and NATO press releases. It has traded reason for narrative and memory for submission. The tragedy of Europe is not that it was conquered. It is that it volunteered. It begged for occupation, and now calls vassalage "values." When Professor Sachs spoke, the Italian senator did not hear an argument. He heard a mirror, and mirrors terrify those who live by illusions. Europe isn’t being silenced by America. It is silencing itself out of fear of remembering what it used to be. A civilization that once claimed to civilize the world can no longer govern itself. It outsourced its sovereignty, privatized its conscience, and mortgaged its dignity for access to Washington’s approval. The slave masters of history have become servants in suits, begging their overseer for scraps of relevance. Europe is no longer a continent. It is an accent in America’s voice. And even that accent is fading.

Sony Thăng

362,931 次观看 • 9 个月前

VIDEO | Congress MP Renuka Chowdhary says, “What is the compulsion or need to go on national television and claim there is no shortage of LPG, when the government is not in control at the ground level?...You cannot book a cylinder in Maharashtra. You cannot book a cylinder in Telangana. You cannot book a cylinder in Bihar. There is a waiting period of 26 to 45 days. Cylinders are being sold on the black market for Rs 3,000 to Rs 7,500 every day. People are in a state of panic. Even firewood prices have gone up. Is there no reality check in this government? They do not manufacture gas. We have a global situation. It would be perfectly reasonable to inform the country and our citizens of the situation, saying: ‘We will supply gas in a staggered manner. Do not panic. Meanwhile, these are the steps we are taking.’ But this government is not used to telling the truth. Out of compulsion, they end up spreading lies and confusing the people of the nation. It is a shame that this is how they operate. It shows that they lack both the experience and the honesty to tell the truth and to lead the country forward. There has been a failure on all fronts, and today we do not know where we stand with which country. It is a shocking state of disarray.”
1:29

VIDEO | Congress MP Renuka Chowdhary says, “What is the compulsion or need to go on national television and claim there is no shortage of LPG, when the government is not in control at the ground level?...You cannot book a cylinder in Maharashtra. You cannot book a cylinder in Telangana. You cannot book a cylinder in Bihar. There is a waiting period of 26 to 45 days. Cylinders are being sold on the black market for Rs 3,000 to Rs 7,500 every day. People are in a state of panic. Even firewood prices have gone up. Is there no reality check in this government? They do not manufacture gas. We have a global situation. It would be perfectly reasonable to inform the country and our citizens of the situation, saying: ‘We will supply gas in a staggered manner. Do not panic. Meanwhile, these are the steps we are taking.’ But this government is not used to telling the truth. Out of compulsion, they end up spreading lies and confusing the people of the nation. It is a shame that this is how they operate. It shows that they lack both the experience and the honesty to tell the truth and to lead the country forward. There has been a failure on all fronts, and today we do not know where we stand with which country. It is a shocking state of disarray.”

Press Trust of India

25,419 次观看 • 4 个月前

Donald J. #Trump targets #PopeLeo XIV—and in doing so, reveals a deeper unease. When political power turns against a moral voice, it is often because it cannot contain it. Trump does not argue with Leo; he implores him to return to a language he can control. But the Pope speaks another language, one that cannot be reduced to the grammar of force, security, or national interest. In this sense, the attack is a declaration of impotence. Unable to absorb that voice, power tries to delegitimize it. Yet in doing so, it implicitly acknowledges its weight. If Leo were irrelevant, he would not deserve a word. Instead, he is invoked, named, opposed—a sign that his words matter. This is where the Church’s moral force emerges. Not as a counter-power, but as a space in which power is judged by a standard it does not control. Leo does not respond on the terrain of polemics, and for that very reason remains beyond its grasp. He is free. And that freedom—unarmed and disarming—is perhaps what most unsettles. And, at the same time, what matters most.
1:02

Donald J. #Trump targets #PopeLeo XIV—and in doing so, reveals a deeper unease. When political power turns against a moral voice, it is often because it cannot contain it. Trump does not argue with Leo; he implores him to return to a language he can control. But the Pope speaks another language, one that cannot be reduced to the grammar of force, security, or national interest. In this sense, the attack is a declaration of impotence. Unable to absorb that voice, power tries to delegitimize it. Yet in doing so, it implicitly acknowledges its weight. If Leo were irrelevant, he would not deserve a word. Instead, he is invoked, named, opposed—a sign that his words matter. This is where the Church’s moral force emerges. Not as a counter-power, but as a space in which power is judged by a standard it does not control. Leo does not respond on the terrain of polemics, and for that very reason remains beyond its grasp. He is free. And that freedom—unarmed and disarming—is perhaps what most unsettles. And, at the same time, what matters most.

Antonio Spadaro

201,746 次观看 • 3 个月前

For thirty years the people of this country have been repeatedly told that experts are the answer to any problem. Need to build more housing? Need to invest in infrastructure? Need to manage the currency? Don’t worry! An expert committee will be formed! And yet the record of governance by experts in that time is appalling. Can you think of a part of the state that functions better under these people? Perhaps the truth that our political class fails to grasp is this: running a country is not a matter for specialist expertise, it is a political exercise. Decisions must be made that balance and sometimes override competing stakeholders, not constantly embolden them. The terrifying truth about our obsession with expertise is that it has nothing to do with the experts at all. It’s about politicians who wish to shirk the responsibility of actually governing. Fine. If they don’t want to do it. We’ll find people who will. #DavidStarkey #UKPolitics #PoliticalLeadership #Governance #BritishPolitics #PoliticalAccountability #PublicPolicy
0:56

For thirty years the people of this country have been repeatedly told that experts are the answer to any problem. Need to build more housing? Need to invest in infrastructure? Need to manage the currency? Don’t worry! An expert committee will be formed! And yet the record of governance by experts in that time is appalling. Can you think of a part of the state that functions better under these people? Perhaps the truth that our political class fails to grasp is this: running a country is not a matter for specialist expertise, it is a political exercise. Decisions must be made that balance and sometimes override competing stakeholders, not constantly embolden them. The terrifying truth about our obsession with expertise is that it has nothing to do with the experts at all. It’s about politicians who wish to shirk the responsibility of actually governing. Fine. If they don’t want to do it. We’ll find people who will. #DavidStarkey #UKPolitics #PoliticalLeadership #Governance #BritishPolitics #PoliticalAccountability #PublicPolicy

David Starkey

13,958 次观看 • 4 个月前