Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Reminder 1 December 2024: #IllegalMilitaryTrials 𝐋𝐞𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝 𝐛𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝟖𝟔 𝐢𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐏𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐋𝐋 𝐢𝐧 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐲 (𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐆𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐥 𝐀𝐬𝐢𝐦 𝐌𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐫’𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐝), 𝐤𝐞𝐩𝐭 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐞𝐱𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬, 𝐢𝐧 𝐬𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭, 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐩𝐡𝐲𝐬𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞, 𝐩𝐬𝐲𝐜𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐚𝐛𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐟𝐮𝐥 𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐟 𝐟𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬. Over 100 innocent... Pakistanis have suffered illegal, unconstitutional military trials; in the aftermath of #May9th_FalseFlag operation in 2023, which was used as an excuse by the illegitimate, authoritarian, fascist regime to not only decimate Imran Khan’s PTI, but also spread fear, chaos & panic amongst the nation. 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐞 𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐫𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 & 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐥𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥 𝐝𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐝 𝐟𝐮𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐥 𝐩𝐫𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫𝐬. According to Amnesty International Amnesty International: “Trying civilians in military courts is contrary to international law. Article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which Pakistan has ratified, guarantees the right to a trial before a ‘competent, independent, and impartial tribunal established by law. Amnesty International has documented a catalogue of human right violations stemming from trying civilians in military courts in Pakistan, including flagrant disregard for due process, lack of transparency, coerced confessions, and executions after grossly unfair trials. Therefore, any indication that the trial of civilians could be held in military courts is incompatible with Pakistan’s obligations under international human rights law. This is purely an intimidation tactic, designed to crack down on dissent by exercising fear of an institution that has never been held to account for its overreach. The right to a fair trial, guaranteed by Pakistan’s constitution, is severely undermined by this move and cannot be justified. It must be struck down immediately.” 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑺𝒖𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒎𝒆 𝑪𝒐𝒖𝒓𝒕 𝒐𝒇 𝑷𝒂𝒌𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒏, 𝒖𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒓 𝑪𝑱 𝑰𝒔𝒂, 𝒐𝒏 11 𝑱𝒖𝒍𝒚 2024, 𝒂𝒇𝒕𝒆𝒓 𝒂 𝒅𝒆𝒍𝒂𝒚 𝒐𝒇 𝒂𝒃𝒐𝒖𝒕 3 𝒎𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒉𝒔, (𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝒗𝒊𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒔 𝒃𝒆𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒊𝒍𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒚 𝒊𝒏𝒄𝒂𝒓𝒄𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒂 𝒚𝒆𝒂𝒓), 𝒅𝒆𝒄𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝒊𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒇𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒆𝒍𝒚 𝒂𝒅𝒋𝒐𝒖𝒓𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒉𝒆𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒄𝒂𝒔𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒄𝒊𝒗𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒂𝒏𝒔’ 𝒕𝒓𝒊𝒂𝒍𝒔 𝒊𝒏 𝒎𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒓𝒚 𝒄𝒐𝒖𝒓𝒕𝒔. #UndeclaredMartialLaw Amnesty Internationalsasia Human Rights Watch UN Human Rights UN Human Rights Council Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs (SCA) Department of State Assistant Secretary Riley Barnesshow more

PTI

10,261,541 subscribers

15,181 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

#IllegalMilitaryTrials

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Reminder 4 January 2025: #IllegalMilitaryTrials *𝑰𝒏 𝑫𝒆𝒄𝒆𝒎𝒃𝒆𝒓 2024, 𝒂𝒇𝒕𝒆𝒓 𝒐𝒏𝒆 & 𝒂 𝒉𝒂𝒍𝒇 𝒚𝒆𝒂𝒓 𝒐𝒇 𝒊𝒍𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒂𝒍, 𝒃𝒓𝒖𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝒎𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒓𝒚 𝒅𝒆𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏, 85 𝒄𝒊𝒗𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒂𝒏𝒔 𝒉𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒃𝒆𝒆𝒏 𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝒖𝒑𝒕𝒐 10 𝒚𝒆𝒂𝒓𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒓𝒊𝒈𝒐𝒓𝒐𝒖𝒔 𝒊𝒎𝒑𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒐𝒏𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝒃𝒚 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑷𝒂𝒌𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒏 𝒂𝒓𝒎𝒚, 𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒂𝒔𝒋𝒖𝒅𝒈𝒆, 𝒋𝒖𝒓𝒚 & 𝒆𝒙𝒆𝒄𝒖𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒆𝒓, 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒕 𝒂𝒏𝒚 𝒅𝒖𝒆 𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒂𝒍 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒄𝒆𝒔𝒔.* 𝐋𝐞𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝 𝐛𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐢𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐏𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐲 (𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐆𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐥 𝐀𝐬𝐢𝐦 𝐌𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐫’𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐝), 𝐤𝐞𝐩𝐭 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐞𝐱𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬, 𝐢𝐧 𝐬𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭, 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐩𝐡𝐲𝐬𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞, 𝐩𝐬𝐲𝐜𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐚𝐛𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐟𝐮𝐥 𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐟 𝐟𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬. Over 100 innocent Pakistanis have suffered illegal, unconstitutional military trials; in the aftermath of #May9th_FalseFlag operation in 2023, which was used as an excuse by the illegitimate, authoritarian, fascist regime to not only decimate Imran Khan’s PTI, but also spread fear, chaos & panic amongst the nation. 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐞 𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐫𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 & 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐥𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥 𝐝𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐝 𝐟𝐮𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐥 𝐩𝐫𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫𝐬. According to Amnesty International Amnesty International: “Trying civilians in military courts is contrary to international law. Article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which Pakistan has ratified, guarantees the right to a trial before a ‘competent, independent, and impartial tribunal established by law. Amnesty International has documented a catalogue of human right violations stemming from trying civilians in military courts in Pakistan, including flagrant disregard for due process, lack of transparency, coerced confessions, and executions after grossly unfair trials. Therefore, any indication that the trial of civilians could be held in military courts is incompatible with Pakistan’s obligations under international human rights law. This is purely an intimidation tactic, designed to crack down on dissent by exercising fear of an institution that has never been held to account for its overreach. The right to a fair trial, guaranteed by Pakistan’s constitution, is severely undermined by this move and cannot be justified. It must be struck down immediately.” #UndeclaredMartialLaw #EndMilitaryTrials Amnesty Internationalsasia Human Rights Watch UN Human Rights UN Human Rights Council Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs (SCA) Department of State Assistant Secretary Riley Barnes

Reminder 4 January 2025: #IllegalMilitaryTrials 𝑰𝒏 𝑫𝒆𝒄𝒆𝒎𝒃𝒆𝒓 2024, 𝒂𝒇𝒕𝒆𝒓 𝒐𝒏𝒆 & 𝒂 𝒉𝒂𝒍𝒇 𝒚𝒆𝒂𝒓 𝒐𝒇 𝒊𝒍𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒂𝒍, 𝒃𝒓𝒖𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝒎𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒓𝒚 𝒅𝒆𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏, 85 𝒄𝒊𝒗𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒂𝒏𝒔 𝒉𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒃𝒆𝒆𝒏 𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝒖𝒑𝒕𝒐 10 𝒚𝒆𝒂𝒓𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒓𝒊𝒈𝒐𝒓𝒐𝒖𝒔 𝒊𝒎𝒑𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒐𝒏𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝒃𝒚 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑷𝒂𝒌𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒏 𝒂𝒓𝒎𝒚, 𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒂𝒔𝒋𝒖𝒅𝒈𝒆, 𝒋𝒖𝒓𝒚 & 𝒆𝒙𝒆𝒄𝒖𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒆𝒓, 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒕 𝒂𝒏𝒚 𝒅𝒖𝒆 𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒂𝒍 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒄𝒆𝒔𝒔. 𝐋𝐞𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝 𝐛𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐢𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐏𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐲 (𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐆𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐥 𝐀𝐬𝐢𝐦 𝐌𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐫’𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐝), 𝐤𝐞𝐩𝐭 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐞𝐱𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬, 𝐢𝐧 𝐬𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭, 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐩𝐡𝐲𝐬𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞, 𝐩𝐬𝐲𝐜𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐚𝐛𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐟𝐮𝐥 𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐟 𝐟𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬. Over 100 innocent Pakistanis have suffered illegal, unconstitutional military trials; in the aftermath of #May9th_FalseFlag operation in 2023, which was used as an excuse by the illegitimate, authoritarian, fascist regime to not only decimate Imran Khan’s PTI, but also spread fear, chaos & panic amongst the nation. 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐞 𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐫𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 & 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐥𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥 𝐝𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐝 𝐟𝐮𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐥 𝐩𝐫𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫𝐬. According to Amnesty International Amnesty International: “Trying civilians in military courts is contrary to international law. Article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which Pakistan has ratified, guarantees the right to a trial before a ‘competent, independent, and impartial tribunal established by law. Amnesty International has documented a catalogue of human right violations stemming from trying civilians in military courts in Pakistan, including flagrant disregard for due process, lack of transparency, coerced confessions, and executions after grossly unfair trials. Therefore, any indication that the trial of civilians could be held in military courts is incompatible with Pakistan’s obligations under international human rights law. This is purely an intimidation tactic, designed to crack down on dissent by exercising fear of an institution that has never been held to account for its overreach. The right to a fair trial, guaranteed by Pakistan’s constitution, is severely undermined by this move and cannot be justified. It must be struck down immediately.” #UndeclaredMartialLaw #EndMilitaryTrials Amnesty Internationalsasia Human Rights Watch UN Human Rights UN Human Rights Council Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs (SCA) Department of State Assistant Secretary Riley Barnes

PTI

29,748 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

UN Human Rights Body Became Democrats Tool for Regime Change - UNHRC Commissioner Volker Türk’s Admission ---- UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Türk, openly admitted that he personally warned (or rather, threatened) the Bangladesh Military—with UN peacekeeping mission—not to assist the government in handling the chaos and violence in July. In his own words, "he warned them not to get involved with the situation.” This interference came at a critical moment when the government imposed a curfew on July 18 to restore law and order. As a result, the civil administration was left to tackle the mayhem, riot, chaos and instability all alone, without military support. The primary responsibility of any armed force is to assist the government in maintaining peace and stability when the situation spirals out of control. Yet, Türk’s warning actively discouraged that duty. It is also important to note that most of the casualties occurred between July 19 and July 24. Had the military been allowed to act, could many of these deaths have been prevented. Türk’s statement makes it clear: The UNHCR was not a neutral body in this crisis. By instigating the army to defy its own government, the UNHCR became a complicit actor in the events that led to these casualties. #Bangladesh #BangladeshCrisis #VolkerTurk #UN #UnitedNations #UNHRC #OHCHR #QuotaMovement Volker Türk UN Human Rights Council UN Human Rights Council UN Human Rights European Union in Bangladesh U.S. Embassy Dhaka India in Bangladesh Randhir Jaiswal Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs (SCA) Assistant Secretary Riley Barnes Department of State Office of International Religious Freedom Donald J. Trump President Donald J. Trump DNI Tulsi Gabbard Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 UN in Bangladesh Gwyn Lewis Chief Adviser of the Government of Bangladesh Sajeeb Wazed Bangladesh Awami League Bangladesh Awami League Media Cell Secretary Marco Rubio UK in Bangladesh 🇬🇧🇧🇩 France in Bangladesh 🇫🇷🇪🇺 Germany in Bangladesh Susan Ryle Canada in Bangladesh International Human Rights Foundation Human Rights at FCDO Bangladesh Army

UN Human Rights Body Became Democrats Tool for Regime Change - UNHRC Commissioner Volker Türk’s Admission ---- UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Türk, openly admitted that he personally warned (or rather, threatened) the Bangladesh Military—with UN peacekeeping mission—not to assist the government in handling the chaos and violence in July. In his own words, "he warned them not to get involved with the situation.” This interference came at a critical moment when the government imposed a curfew on July 18 to restore law and order. As a result, the civil administration was left to tackle the mayhem, riot, chaos and instability all alone, without military support. The primary responsibility of any armed force is to assist the government in maintaining peace and stability when the situation spirals out of control. Yet, Türk’s warning actively discouraged that duty. It is also important to note that most of the casualties occurred between July 19 and July 24. Had the military been allowed to act, could many of these deaths have been prevented. Türk’s statement makes it clear: The UNHCR was not a neutral body in this crisis. By instigating the army to defy its own government, the UNHCR became a complicit actor in the events that led to these casualties. #Bangladesh #BangladeshCrisis #VolkerTurk #UN #UnitedNations #UNHRC #OHCHR #QuotaMovement Volker Türk UN Human Rights Council UN Human Rights Council UN Human Rights European Union in Bangladesh U.S. Embassy Dhaka India in Bangladesh Randhir Jaiswal Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs (SCA) Assistant Secretary Riley Barnes Department of State Office of International Religious Freedom Donald J. Trump President Donald J. Trump DNI Tulsi Gabbard Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 UN in Bangladesh Gwyn Lewis Chief Adviser of the Government of Bangladesh Sajeeb Wazed Bangladesh Awami League Bangladesh Awami League Media Cell Secretary Marco Rubio UK in Bangladesh 🇬🇧🇧🇩 France in Bangladesh 🇫🇷🇪🇺 Germany in Bangladesh Susan Ryle Canada in Bangladesh International Human Rights Foundation Human Rights at FCDO Bangladesh Army

Bangladesh Perspectives

23,190 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Civil society statement on continued network shutdowns and platform blocking in Pakistan We, a collective of human rights activists and civil society organisations, express profound concern over the increasing instances of #internetshutdowns and #socialmedia platform blocking, specifically in the lead up to and following the general elections in #Pakistan. These actions not only infringe upon the fundamental rights of #freedomofexpression and access to information but also set a troubling precedent of throttling genuine political discourse in the country. The arbitrary blocking of platforms, including the prolonged and unannounced disruption of "X" (formerly known as #Twitter), is a sobering illustration of growing digital censorship in the country. Such actions not only silence diverse political voices, but also create an environment which contributes to the spread of misinformation. Today, digital platforms play a pivotal role in shaping public discourse, and ensuring the free flow of information, through these digital mediums, is imperative for an informed society and fair electoral processes. The suppression of digital platforms, especially when initiated without transparency, often lacks adherence to due legal process and thus, undermines Pakistan’s international law commitments. The complete silence of the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (#PTA) is extremely alarming as they have failed to furnish any reasons for its actions and exceeded its mandate to block an entire internet platform. The absence of transparency in the decision-making processes surrounding network #shutdowns and platform blocking and complete disregard for any accountability has resulted in an obvious erosion of trust between the state and its citizens. We are also dismayed by reports of throttling of #VPNs, undermining people’s access to information and right to privacy. In light of these concerns, we call for immediate action to reverse the course of digital censorship in Pakistan. Specifically, we urge the government and public bodies to; - Repeal sections of the law such as Section 37 of PECA that enable censorship and violate Article 19 right to freedom of speech and press freedom and Article 19-A right of access to information - Act with transparency on decisions that impact the free use of the internet, including for political and economic purposes. - Issue statement of clarification, outlining the reasons and legal basis for the recent blocking of "X" and other affected platforms. - Avoid future actions that obstruct the free flow of information and adersely affect political discourse within the countries and take back all legislative proposals expanding control and censorship over the internet including the e-safety bill from the previous government’s tenure should not be revived. - Abide by #Pakistan’s commitments to uphold freedom of expression and right to access to information under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights We urge the incoming government, regulators and other public bodies to recognise that any action that affects the flow of information and limits citizen’s ability to express themselves, has a direct and lingering impact on citizen’s human rights including the right to political participation. Signatories: Organisations 1. AGHS (AGHS Legal Aid Cell, Asma Jahangir's Law Firm) 2. Bolo Bhi (Bolo Bhi) 3. Media Matters for Democracy (Media Matters for Democracy) 4. Digital Rights Foundation (Digital Rights Foundation) 5. Institute for Research, Advocacy and Development (IRADA) 6. Human Rights Watch (Human Rights Watch) 7. Freedom Network (Freedom Network | فریڈم نیٹ ورک) 8. Pakistan Press Foundation (Pakistan Press Foundation) 9. Bytes for All (Bytes for All, PK) 10. Human RIghts Commission of Pakistan (Human Rights Commission of Pakistan) Individuals 1. Muhammad Aftab Alam, Advocate 2. Iqbal Khattak, veteran journalist 3. Adnan Rehmat, media analyst 4. Shafique Chaudhry, Executive Director, Parliamentarians Commission for Human Rights (PCHR) 5. Haroon Baloch, Media & Digital Rights Expert 6. Usama Khilji, Digital Rights Activist, Director Bolo Bhi 7. Munizae Jahangir, Journalist, Editor-in-Chief Voicepk & Co-chair HRCP 8. Imdad Khoso Journalist & Council Member HRCP 9. Salima Hashmi - Council Member HRCP- Artist, Educator, Writer 10. Zohra Yusuf, Council Member, HRCP #InternetKholo PTA

Civil society statement on continued network shutdowns and platform blocking in Pakistan We, a collective of human rights activists and civil society organisations, express profound concern over the increasing instances of #internetshutdowns and #socialmedia platform blocking, specifically in the lead up to and following the general elections in #Pakistan. These actions not only infringe upon the fundamental rights of #freedomofexpression and access to information but also set a troubling precedent of throttling genuine political discourse in the country. The arbitrary blocking of platforms, including the prolonged and unannounced disruption of "X" (formerly known as #Twitter), is a sobering illustration of growing digital censorship in the country. Such actions not only silence diverse political voices, but also create an environment which contributes to the spread of misinformation. Today, digital platforms play a pivotal role in shaping public discourse, and ensuring the free flow of information, through these digital mediums, is imperative for an informed society and fair electoral processes. The suppression of digital platforms, especially when initiated without transparency, often lacks adherence to due legal process and thus, undermines Pakistan’s international law commitments. The complete silence of the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (#PTA) is extremely alarming as they have failed to furnish any reasons for its actions and exceeded its mandate to block an entire internet platform. The absence of transparency in the decision-making processes surrounding network #shutdowns and platform blocking and complete disregard for any accountability has resulted in an obvious erosion of trust between the state and its citizens. We are also dismayed by reports of throttling of #VPNs, undermining people’s access to information and right to privacy. In light of these concerns, we call for immediate action to reverse the course of digital censorship in Pakistan. Specifically, we urge the government and public bodies to; - Repeal sections of the law such as Section 37 of PECA that enable censorship and violate Article 19 right to freedom of speech and press freedom and Article 19-A right of access to information - Act with transparency on decisions that impact the free use of the internet, including for political and economic purposes. - Issue statement of clarification, outlining the reasons and legal basis for the recent blocking of "X" and other affected platforms. - Avoid future actions that obstruct the free flow of information and adersely affect political discourse within the countries and take back all legislative proposals expanding control and censorship over the internet including the e-safety bill from the previous government’s tenure should not be revived. - Abide by #Pakistan’s commitments to uphold freedom of expression and right to access to information under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights We urge the incoming government, regulators and other public bodies to recognise that any action that affects the flow of information and limits citizen’s ability to express themselves, has a direct and lingering impact on citizen’s human rights including the right to political participation. Signatories: Organisations 1. AGHS (AGHS Legal Aid Cell, Asma Jahangir's Law Firm) 2. Bolo Bhi (Bolo Bhi) 3. Media Matters for Democracy (Media Matters for Democracy) 4. Digital Rights Foundation (Digital Rights Foundation) 5. Institute for Research, Advocacy and Development (IRADA) 6. Human Rights Watch (Human Rights Watch) 7. Freedom Network (Freedom Network | فریڈم نیٹ ورک) 8. Pakistan Press Foundation (Pakistan Press Foundation) 9. Bytes for All (Bytes for All, PK) 10. Human RIghts Commission of Pakistan (Human Rights Commission of Pakistan) Individuals 1. Muhammad Aftab Alam, Advocate 2. Iqbal Khattak, veteran journalist 3. Adnan Rehmat, media analyst 4. Shafique Chaudhry, Executive Director, Parliamentarians Commission for Human Rights (PCHR) 5. Haroon Baloch, Media & Digital Rights Expert 6. Usama Khilji, Digital Rights Activist, Director Bolo Bhi 7. Munizae Jahangir, Journalist, Editor-in-Chief Voicepk & Co-chair HRCP 8. Imdad Khoso Journalist & Council Member HRCP 9. Salima Hashmi - Council Member HRCP- Artist, Educator, Writer 10. Zohra Yusuf, Council Member, HRCP #InternetKholo PTA

Voicepk.net

29,894 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

FLASHBACK Sept 22, 1965 ZA Bhutto In UN Security Council : Indian Occupied Kashmir, A Disputed Territory: "..... Jammu and Kashmir is not an integral part of India and has never been an integral part of India...." (Watch Historical Footage). Asim Iftikhar Ahmad, PR of Pakistan to the UN Permanent Mission of Pakistan to the UN Ishaq Dar 6 January 2025 - SFJ Communique To Prime Minister of Pakistan Re: Pakistan’s Election to UN Security Council Seat Sub:Support The Right to Self-Determination through Referendum For People Of Indian Occupied Punjab and Kashmir. Honorable Prime Minister: Sikhs for Justice (SFJ) ( is an international human rights advocacy group which believes in and adheres to UN Charter and works to promote the Right To Self Determination and human rights as enshrined in Universal Declaration of Human Rights (“UDHR”) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. To this end, SFJ is holding the first ever global non-governmental Khalistan Referendum under the supervision of a nonaligned panel of experts - the Punjab Referendum Commission - on the question “Should Indian Governed Punjab Be An Independent Country?”. We are writing to extend our warmest congratulations to you and the nation of Pakistan on Pakistan’s successful election to a seat in the United Nations Security Council. This significant achievement reflects Pakistan’s dedication to international peace, justice, and the principles enshrined in the UN Charter. Your recent statement reaffirming the right to self-determination for the people of Kashmir through the plebiscite as prescribed in UNSC Resolution 21 of 1948 is both timely and commendable. It is a reminder to the international community of the moral and legal imperative to support oppressed peoples’ right to seek freedom and justice. While unequivocally supporting the right self-determination for the people of Kashmir through UN backed plebiscite to which India has reneged on, SFJ urges your government to consider extending its support to the Sikh community’s ongoing quest for self-determination. The global referendum being organized by SFJ is a significant effort to highlight and advocate through peaceful and democratic means, their demand for a sovereign homeland Khalistan in the Indian Governed region of Punjab. We firmly believe that Pakistan’s leadership at the Security Council can pave the way for constructive dialogue and meaningful resolutions that uphold the right of all peoples to determine their own destiny and political future of their homeland. Pakistan’s support for Sikh people’s movement to achieve Khalistan through Referendum, will further strengthen Pakistan’s longstanding stance of right to self-determination for the people of Kashmir through a UN backed plebiscite.

FLASHBACK Sept 22, 1965 ZA Bhutto In UN Security Council : Indian Occupied Kashmir, A Disputed Territory: "..... Jammu and Kashmir is not an integral part of India and has never been an integral part of India...." (Watch Historical Footage). Asim Iftikhar Ahmad, PR of Pakistan to the UN Permanent Mission of Pakistan to the UN Ishaq Dar 6 January 2025 - SFJ Communique To Prime Minister of Pakistan Re: Pakistan’s Election to UN Security Council Seat Sub:Support The Right to Self-Determination through Referendum For People Of Indian Occupied Punjab and Kashmir. Honorable Prime Minister: Sikhs for Justice (SFJ) ( is an international human rights advocacy group which believes in and adheres to UN Charter and works to promote the Right To Self Determination and human rights as enshrined in Universal Declaration of Human Rights (“UDHR”) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. To this end, SFJ is holding the first ever global non-governmental Khalistan Referendum under the supervision of a nonaligned panel of experts - the Punjab Referendum Commission - on the question “Should Indian Governed Punjab Be An Independent Country?”. We are writing to extend our warmest congratulations to you and the nation of Pakistan on Pakistan’s successful election to a seat in the United Nations Security Council. This significant achievement reflects Pakistan’s dedication to international peace, justice, and the principles enshrined in the UN Charter. Your recent statement reaffirming the right to self-determination for the people of Kashmir through the plebiscite as prescribed in UNSC Resolution 21 of 1948 is both timely and commendable. It is a reminder to the international community of the moral and legal imperative to support oppressed peoples’ right to seek freedom and justice. While unequivocally supporting the right self-determination for the people of Kashmir through UN backed plebiscite to which India has reneged on, SFJ urges your government to consider extending its support to the Sikh community’s ongoing quest for self-determination. The global referendum being organized by SFJ is a significant effort to highlight and advocate through peaceful and democratic means, their demand for a sovereign homeland Khalistan in the Indian Governed region of Punjab. We firmly believe that Pakistan’s leadership at the Security Council can pave the way for constructive dialogue and meaningful resolutions that uphold the right of all peoples to determine their own destiny and political future of their homeland. Pakistan’s support for Sikh people’s movement to achieve Khalistan through Referendum, will further strengthen Pakistan’s longstanding stance of right to self-determination for the people of Kashmir through a UN backed plebiscite.

Gurpatwant Singh Pannun

13,861 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Dear Human Rights / Women Rights organizations of the World..! I want to draw your attention towards the extreme violence and fascism going on by the goverment of Pakistan on the women and workers of PTI which is the largest political party of Pakistan. 1000s of illegal abductions and 100s of killings of citizens including men, women and kids are being carried out. Women are being harassed, dragged on roads and beaten violently, whereas straight fires are shot on peaceful people, all being done by police and rangers of Pakistan. This is done only because these innocent people wanted to use their fundamental right of doing peaceful protests, because they want free and fair elections in Pakistan, which yet again is also a fundamental and constitutional right of every citizen. Its been more than a year people of Pakistan are facing this extreme cruelty from the state of Pakistan but during last fews weeks this has been multiplied 1000 times. Most of the electronic media has been forced not to report this fascism and the internet has been shut down throughout the country so that the world, through social media, should not know what is happening in Pakistan. Even journalists who wanted to speak up agaist this state cruelty are being harassed, illegaly arrested or abducted. I urge all the organizations, known world-wide for their services to protect human rights, especially the rights of women, to raise this issue in the world so that these activities in Pakistan must stop. Today it's Pakistan, the other day, these human right violations can occur in any other country, therefore this fascism and violence of human rights must be probed once and for all. Looking very much forward to your response in terms of raising your strong voices against this. United Nations hwr BBC News (World) United NationsWatch Volker Türk Human Rights Watch United NationsHumanRights Amnesty International South Asia, Regional Office António Guterres International Center for Journalists Michael Kugelman EU Fundamental Rights ➡️ #HumanRights Imran Khan @MrsImranRiaz Shehr Bano Official @SABAZAHID99 Tehreek-e-Insaf Jibran Ilyas Azhar Mashwani Hammad Azhar Hammad Azhar Barrister Abuzar Salman Niazi Sahibzada Hamid Raza Agha Muhammad Saleh 🌐🎙📚 Naeem Zubair Naeem Haider Panjutha Obaid Bhatti Siddique Jan Javeria Siddique #PakistanUnderFascism

Dear Human Rights / Women Rights organizations of the World..! I want to draw your attention towards the extreme violence and fascism going on by the goverment of Pakistan on the women and workers of PTI which is the largest political party of Pakistan. 1000s of illegal abductions and 100s of killings of citizens including men, women and kids are being carried out. Women are being harassed, dragged on roads and beaten violently, whereas straight fires are shot on peaceful people, all being done by police and rangers of Pakistan. This is done only because these innocent people wanted to use their fundamental right of doing peaceful protests, because they want free and fair elections in Pakistan, which yet again is also a fundamental and constitutional right of every citizen. Its been more than a year people of Pakistan are facing this extreme cruelty from the state of Pakistan but during last fews weeks this has been multiplied 1000 times. Most of the electronic media has been forced not to report this fascism and the internet has been shut down throughout the country so that the world, through social media, should not know what is happening in Pakistan. Even journalists who wanted to speak up agaist this state cruelty are being harassed, illegaly arrested or abducted. I urge all the organizations, known world-wide for their services to protect human rights, especially the rights of women, to raise this issue in the world so that these activities in Pakistan must stop. Today it's Pakistan, the other day, these human right violations can occur in any other country, therefore this fascism and violence of human rights must be probed once and for all. Looking very much forward to your response in terms of raising your strong voices against this. United Nations hwr BBC News (World) United NationsWatch Volker Türk Human Rights Watch United NationsHumanRights Amnesty International South Asia, Regional Office António Guterres International Center for Journalists Michael Kugelman EU Fundamental Rights ➡️ #HumanRights Imran Khan @MrsImranRiaz Shehr Bano Official @SABAZAHID99 Tehreek-e-Insaf Jibran Ilyas Azhar Mashwani Hammad Azhar Hammad Azhar Barrister Abuzar Salman Niazi Sahibzada Hamid Raza Agha Muhammad Saleh 🌐🎙📚 Naeem Zubair Naeem Haider Panjutha Obaid Bhatti Siddique Jan Javeria Siddique #PakistanUnderFascism

Syeda Rabia Batool

582,775 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

Open Letter to the International Community, Human Rights Organizations, and the United Nations Subject: Urgent Appeal to Protect the Pashtun National Jirga and Address State-Sponsored Terrorism in Pakistan To the Global Community, United Nations, and All Human Rights Organizations, We, the Pashtun Tahafuz Movement (PTM) United States, are writing this urgent open letter to bring to your immediate attention the severe state-sponsored repression against the Pashtuns in Pakistan. This grave situation requires global action to stop the escalating violence and ensure the protection of basic human rights. On October 11, 2024, the Pashtun National Jirga, a historic assembly rooted in Pashtun tradition for peaceful decision-making and conflict resolution, is scheduled to take place in Pakhtunkhwa. This gathering will unite Pashtuns from across the region to peacefully advocate for their rights and protest against state violence. However, in an alarming and oppressive move, the Pakistani state forces have confiscated the designated Jirga ground, turning it into a militarized zone. Armed security forces have built posts and established a strong presence in the area to prevent the peaceful assembly from taking place. These aggressive actions reflect the state's intent to violently disrupt the Jirga, intimidate participants, and silence the voices of the Pashtuns. In addition to this, the communication channels with Jirga organizers have been severed, isolating them from the outside world and making them even more vulnerable to state repression. The lives of those planning to attend are at immediate risk, and their fundamental right to peaceful assembly and free speech is being brutally denied. This confiscation of the Jirga ground and militarization of the space is not an isolated act but part of a broader, long-standing pattern of state-sponsored terrorism aimed at erasing Pashtun voices and suppressing their peaceful demands for justice. We urgently call upon the international community, the United Nations, and all human rights organizations to take immediate and decisive action: 1. Condemn the State’s Repressive Actions: Publicly denounce the Pakistani government’s confiscation of the Jirga ground and its use of armed forces to prevent a peaceful assembly. 2. Demand the Immediate End to Militarization: Call for the removal of military posts and security forces from the Jirga site, and ensure that the Pashtun National Jirga can take place without fear of violence. 3. Insist on Protection for Participants: Ensure that the safety and rights of all those attending the Jirga are protected, in accordance with international human rights standards. 4. Investigate Ongoing Abuses: Launch independent investigations into the human rights violations committed by the Pakistani state against the Pashtun people, including the confiscation of public spaces and violent repression of peaceful assemblies. 5. Hold the Pakistani Government Accountable: Urge Pakistan to comply with its international obligations to protect the rights of all citizens, including the Pashtun people, and to cease its discriminatory and violent actions. The silence of the global community in the face of these violations has only emboldened the perpetrators. We must not allow the Pashtun people to be oppressed and brutalized in the shadows. Immediate action is needed to prevent further violence and ensure that the Pashtun voices are heard. We appeal to all defenders of human rights and justice to stand with the Pashtun people in this critical moment. The world cannot turn a blind eye to this state-sponsored terrorism and the assault on fundamental freedoms. Thank you for your immediate attention to this urgent matter. Your action can save lives and uphold justice. Sincerely, Pashtun Tahafuz Movement (PTM) – United States Email: ptmusa20@gmail.com Human Rights Watch Amnesty International USA Amnesty International FIDH UN Human Rights Human Rights Campaign Rapid Response Front Line Defenders World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT) Freedom House The White House Department of State Minority Rights Group United Nations Secretary Antony Blinken António Guterres European Commission Manzoor Pashteen For more information, please refer to the following hashtags trending on social media. #PashtunNationalCourt11October #StateAttackedPashtunJirga #StateDeclaresWarOnPashtuns #په_خیبر_ننګ_وکړی

Open Letter to the International Community, Human Rights Organizations, and the United Nations Subject: Urgent Appeal to Protect the Pashtun National Jirga and Address State-Sponsored Terrorism in Pakistan To the Global Community, United Nations, and All Human Rights Organizations, We, the Pashtun Tahafuz Movement (PTM) United States, are writing this urgent open letter to bring to your immediate attention the severe state-sponsored repression against the Pashtuns in Pakistan. This grave situation requires global action to stop the escalating violence and ensure the protection of basic human rights. On October 11, 2024, the Pashtun National Jirga, a historic assembly rooted in Pashtun tradition for peaceful decision-making and conflict resolution, is scheduled to take place in Pakhtunkhwa. This gathering will unite Pashtuns from across the region to peacefully advocate for their rights and protest against state violence. However, in an alarming and oppressive move, the Pakistani state forces have confiscated the designated Jirga ground, turning it into a militarized zone. Armed security forces have built posts and established a strong presence in the area to prevent the peaceful assembly from taking place. These aggressive actions reflect the state's intent to violently disrupt the Jirga, intimidate participants, and silence the voices of the Pashtuns. In addition to this, the communication channels with Jirga organizers have been severed, isolating them from the outside world and making them even more vulnerable to state repression. The lives of those planning to attend are at immediate risk, and their fundamental right to peaceful assembly and free speech is being brutally denied. This confiscation of the Jirga ground and militarization of the space is not an isolated act but part of a broader, long-standing pattern of state-sponsored terrorism aimed at erasing Pashtun voices and suppressing their peaceful demands for justice. We urgently call upon the international community, the United Nations, and all human rights organizations to take immediate and decisive action: 1. Condemn the State’s Repressive Actions: Publicly denounce the Pakistani government’s confiscation of the Jirga ground and its use of armed forces to prevent a peaceful assembly. 2. Demand the Immediate End to Militarization: Call for the removal of military posts and security forces from the Jirga site, and ensure that the Pashtun National Jirga can take place without fear of violence. 3. Insist on Protection for Participants: Ensure that the safety and rights of all those attending the Jirga are protected, in accordance with international human rights standards. 4. Investigate Ongoing Abuses: Launch independent investigations into the human rights violations committed by the Pakistani state against the Pashtun people, including the confiscation of public spaces and violent repression of peaceful assemblies. 5. Hold the Pakistani Government Accountable: Urge Pakistan to comply with its international obligations to protect the rights of all citizens, including the Pashtun people, and to cease its discriminatory and violent actions. The silence of the global community in the face of these violations has only emboldened the perpetrators. We must not allow the Pashtun people to be oppressed and brutalized in the shadows. Immediate action is needed to prevent further violence and ensure that the Pashtun voices are heard. We appeal to all defenders of human rights and justice to stand with the Pashtun people in this critical moment. The world cannot turn a blind eye to this state-sponsored terrorism and the assault on fundamental freedoms. Thank you for your immediate attention to this urgent matter. Your action can save lives and uphold justice. Sincerely, Pashtun Tahafuz Movement (PTM) – United States Email: [email protected] Human Rights Watch Amnesty International USA Amnesty International FIDH UN Human Rights Human Rights Campaign Rapid Response Front Line Defenders World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT) Freedom House The White House Department of State Minority Rights Group United Nations Secretary Antony Blinken António Guterres European Commission Manzoor Pashteen For more information, please refer to the following hashtags trending on social media. #PashtunNationalCourt11October #StateAttackedPashtunJirga #StateDeclaresWarOnPashtuns #په_خیبر_ننګ_وکړی

PTM-United States

26,003 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

A Somali born lecturer, raised in London and committed to serving her homeland, has been violently forced from her family home in Mogadishu despite holding official ownership papers. Government officials ordered the demolition of the home she shared with her parents. Police forces used violence against her and her family during the eviction. The young woman, who returned to Somalia to teach at a university and help rebuild her community, has refused to be silenced. This is not an isolated case. Thousands of Somali families have faced forced evictions and demolitions, often without notice, compensation, or legal process. Many victims now live in makeshift tents on the outskirts of the capital, without adequate shelter, clean water, or basic services. The Somali Provisional Constitution guarantees the right to property (Article 26) and the inviolability of the home (Article 19), protections that were ignored in this case. International law including the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and UN Guidelines on Evictions makes clear that demolishing homes without due process and leaving families homeless is a serious human rights violation. According to the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR), more than 2.6 million people are internally displaced in Somalia, with forced evictions a major cause. Reports from Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have repeatedly documented unlawful demolitions in Mogadishu and other regions. We call on: • The Somali government to immediately stop unlawful demolitions and evictions. • The international community to intervene, investigate, and hold those responsible accountable. •Urgent humanitarian support for those displaced and living in unsafe conditions. “This young woman came home to help her country, and her reward was to have her life uprooted by the very people meant to protect her. No Somali no human being should face this,” UK in Somalia🇬🇧🇸🇴 U.S. Embassy Mogadishu, Somalia EU Delegation Somalia Italy in Somalia UNTMIS Human Rights Watch Amnesty International Charles King Villa Somalia OPM Somalia 🇸🇴 Hamza Abdi Barre Hassan Sheikh Mohamud

A Somali born lecturer, raised in London and committed to serving her homeland, has been violently forced from her family home in Mogadishu despite holding official ownership papers. Government officials ordered the demolition of the home she shared with her parents. Police forces used violence against her and her family during the eviction. The young woman, who returned to Somalia to teach at a university and help rebuild her community, has refused to be silenced. This is not an isolated case. Thousands of Somali families have faced forced evictions and demolitions, often without notice, compensation, or legal process. Many victims now live in makeshift tents on the outskirts of the capital, without adequate shelter, clean water, or basic services. The Somali Provisional Constitution guarantees the right to property (Article 26) and the inviolability of the home (Article 19), protections that were ignored in this case. International law including the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and UN Guidelines on Evictions makes clear that demolishing homes without due process and leaving families homeless is a serious human rights violation. According to the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR), more than 2.6 million people are internally displaced in Somalia, with forced evictions a major cause. Reports from Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have repeatedly documented unlawful demolitions in Mogadishu and other regions. We call on: • The Somali government to immediately stop unlawful demolitions and evictions. • The international community to intervene, investigate, and hold those responsible accountable. •Urgent humanitarian support for those displaced and living in unsafe conditions. “This young woman came home to help her country, and her reward was to have her life uprooted by the very people meant to protect her. No Somali no human being should face this,” UK in Somalia🇬🇧🇸🇴 U.S. Embassy Mogadishu, Somalia EU Delegation Somalia Italy in Somalia UNTMIS Human Rights Watch Amnesty International Charles King Villa Somalia OPM Somalia 🇸🇴 Hamza Abdi Barre Hassan Sheikh Mohamud

G.MulMuli

31,572 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Sikh Soldiers REJECT India’s War – JOIN Pak Army To DEFEND Sindh OPEN ENLISTMENT FOR SIKHS TO JOIN PAK ARMY TO DEFEND SINDH AGAINST INDIA’S WAR Sikhs For Justice (SFJ) has issued a formal call to Pakistan’s Field Marshal to invite Sikhs from Indian occupied Punjab to cross over to join Pakistan army. “In light of Indian Defence Minister Rajnath’s open threat to seize Sindh, Pakistan must immediately open a special enlistment channel for Sikhs willing to join the Pakistan Army for the defence of Sindh.” Stated Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, SFJ General Counsel. 1. SFJ requests Pakistan’s military command to authorize: • Special enlistment of Sikh volunteers; • Formation of a dedicated Sikh Defence Unit under Pakistan Army command; • Deployment of this unit specifically for the defence of Sindh. 2. Global Sikh readiness SFJ confirms that thousands of Sikh volunteers across the world are ready to join as soon as Pakistan issues an official call and enlistment protocol. ⸻ UN LEGAL FOUNDATION FOR SFJ’S POSITION SFJ grounds its position in international law under the United Nations system, which recognizes the right of soldiers to conscientious objection — including refusal to participate in wars, missions, or operations that violate their moral, religious, or political conscience. The UN recognizes conscientious objection primarily as a right to refuse military service, based on the freedom of thought, conscience, and religion under Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). The UN Human Rights Committee has affirmed that this right extends to individuals whose conscience is genuinely conflicted by the obligation to use lethal force, particularly in contexts involving unjust wars, ideological military operations, or coercive political objectives.

Sikh Soldiers REJECT India’s War – JOIN Pak Army To DEFEND Sindh OPEN ENLISTMENT FOR SIKHS TO JOIN PAK ARMY TO DEFEND SINDH AGAINST INDIA’S WAR Sikhs For Justice (SFJ) has issued a formal call to Pakistan’s Field Marshal to invite Sikhs from Indian occupied Punjab to cross over to join Pakistan army. “In light of Indian Defence Minister Rajnath’s open threat to seize Sindh, Pakistan must immediately open a special enlistment channel for Sikhs willing to join the Pakistan Army for the defence of Sindh.” Stated Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, SFJ General Counsel. 1. SFJ requests Pakistan’s military command to authorize: • Special enlistment of Sikh volunteers; • Formation of a dedicated Sikh Defence Unit under Pakistan Army command; • Deployment of this unit specifically for the defence of Sindh. 2. Global Sikh readiness SFJ confirms that thousands of Sikh volunteers across the world are ready to join as soon as Pakistan issues an official call and enlistment protocol. ⸻ UN LEGAL FOUNDATION FOR SFJ’S POSITION SFJ grounds its position in international law under the United Nations system, which recognizes the right of soldiers to conscientious objection — including refusal to participate in wars, missions, or operations that violate their moral, religious, or political conscience. The UN recognizes conscientious objection primarily as a right to refuse military service, based on the freedom of thought, conscience, and religion under Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). The UN Human Rights Committee has affirmed that this right extends to individuals whose conscience is genuinely conflicted by the obligation to use lethal force, particularly in contexts involving unjust wars, ideological military operations, or coercive political objectives.

JS DHALIWAL

15,001 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Francesca Albanese on Fire: A Lesson to Canada 🇨🇦 on International Law and Palestinian 🇵🇸 Rights "The priority is to stop the genocide. If the government here, the parliamentarians here want to call it a 'Ceasefire,' call it the way they want, but this is the priority. The rest is secondary. Which doesn't mean that the recognition of the State of Palestine is not important. My question is, if this country has entertained discussions on the two-state solution, how come it does not recognize the state of Palestine yet? What is there to be debated? The recognition of Palestine 🇵🇸 shouldn't take time; it should be automatic and be an act of coherence. Otherwise, if you don't recognize it, it means that you shouldn't be talking about it at all. Why are you even a voice in the debate? It's about coherence. I know what I'm saying is blunt, but we need to be blunt because the impunity that has been granted to Israel for decades has led to this, which is a disaster both for the Palestinians and the Israelis. Again, diplomatic talks have been turned into a place to justify the unimaginable, the illegal... Is Canada spending any of its political capital to make sure that the genocide ends as soon as possible, the ceasefire, whatever, but then there is already a deadline set for the end of occupation? The ICJ has passed an advisory opinion which declares the occupation unlawful and to be dismantled unconditionally and totally as rapidly as possible, and that 'as rapid as possible' has been defined by the General Assembly; it must happen by September next year. What is Canada doing to ensure that the Occupation is dismantled? And then, more than these, there is Apartheid. I know that in this country, you feel uncomfortable with the word 'Apartheid,' but you have to tell me why? Because I, together with Israeli human rights organizations, Palestinian human rights organizations, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, Harvard University, and thousands of Israelis, talking about Apartheid, give you the evidence of it, and here, like in other parts of North America, I hear, 'Hmm... we cannot say that word.' It's your problem... International law is so clear that it doesn't allow you to find excuses. So, however, end the genocide, end the Occupation, end the Apartheid; this is what it means to apply international law and help build peace for Palestinians, Israelis, and anyone who calls that land home." — Francesca Albanese at a Press Conference in Canada. Francesca Albanese, UN Special Rapporteur oPt

Francesca Albanese on Fire: A Lesson to Canada 🇨🇦 on International Law and Palestinian 🇵🇸 Rights "The priority is to stop the genocide. If the government here, the parliamentarians here want to call it a 'Ceasefire,' call it the way they want, but this is the priority. The rest is secondary. Which doesn't mean that the recognition of the State of Palestine is not important. My question is, if this country has entertained discussions on the two-state solution, how come it does not recognize the state of Palestine yet? What is there to be debated? The recognition of Palestine 🇵🇸 shouldn't take time; it should be automatic and be an act of coherence. Otherwise, if you don't recognize it, it means that you shouldn't be talking about it at all. Why are you even a voice in the debate? It's about coherence. I know what I'm saying is blunt, but we need to be blunt because the impunity that has been granted to Israel for decades has led to this, which is a disaster both for the Palestinians and the Israelis. Again, diplomatic talks have been turned into a place to justify the unimaginable, the illegal... Is Canada spending any of its political capital to make sure that the genocide ends as soon as possible, the ceasefire, whatever, but then there is already a deadline set for the end of occupation? The ICJ has passed an advisory opinion which declares the occupation unlawful and to be dismantled unconditionally and totally as rapidly as possible, and that 'as rapid as possible' has been defined by the General Assembly; it must happen by September next year. What is Canada doing to ensure that the Occupation is dismantled? And then, more than these, there is Apartheid. I know that in this country, you feel uncomfortable with the word 'Apartheid,' but you have to tell me why? Because I, together with Israeli human rights organizations, Palestinian human rights organizations, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, Harvard University, and thousands of Israelis, talking about Apartheid, give you the evidence of it, and here, like in other parts of North America, I hear, 'Hmm... we cannot say that word.' It's your problem... International law is so clear that it doesn't allow you to find excuses. So, however, end the genocide, end the Occupation, end the Apartheid; this is what it means to apply international law and help build peace for Palestinians, Israelis, and anyone who calls that land home." — Francesca Albanese at a Press Conference in Canada. Francesca Albanese, UN Special Rapporteur oPt

The Compass Report 🧭

32,171 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The Republic of Balochistan categorially rejects DGISPR’s misleading statement regarding Surab massacre 13 August, 2026 ` The Republic of Balochistan strongly rejects the fabricated stories and misleading statements presented by Ahmed Sharif the son of a UN designated terrorist and the Pakistani military spokesperson to ISPR, to white wash the massacre in Sorab, particularly women and children. This attempt to conceal the facts and mislead its own people and the international community in the face of international pressure is condemnable. DGISPR, which serves as the official spokesperson for the Pakistani military, has long faced severe criticism over its misleading and fabricated statements and official positions regarding controversial military operations. The Surab massacre was a planned act of collective punishment, and local residents of Surab stand as witnesses to the fact that the Pakistan Air Force deliberately targeted a civilian population under the cover of darkness, severely affecting an entire village and leaving its residents to bear the devastating consequences. Videos and other material provided by local residents following the airstrike, which have been received by the Republic of Balochistan and are also circulating online, proves that multiple residential rooms and houses were erased as a result of the air strikes. This evidence shows signs of bombing on several rooms rather than just one, while the casualties are also not confined to a single location. If explosive material had been present in these residential rooms, ordinary civilians would not have been sleeping peacefully there with their children. Images and videos of the victims released by local sources clearly show that several people were sleeping in their homes with their children when the attack took place and they lost their lives instantly. The terrorist and external army of Pakistan, present in the Republic of Balochistan without any legal authority or procedure, prevented local residents from receiving timely medical assistance. The Republic of Balochistan reiterates its firm determination to raise this matter, along with the grave and continuing human rights violations in Balochistan, at the international level and to pursue all available legal avenues. The Baloch are not “Fitna Al Hindustan,” but “Rafiq Al Hindustan”; we are the sons of Baloch soil. The terrorist state of Pakistan must refrain from interfering in Balochistan’s relations with our immediate neighbors and the free world. As an independent country, Balochistan calls upon the international community to take effective measures to ensure the protection of civilians and respect for human rights in Balochistan, and to exert pressure for an independent investigation into Pakistan’s military presence and the resulting human and economic exploitation. THE REPUBLIC OF BALOCHISTAN Note: The person in the video is an ISI operative and head of a death squad and being fully funded and supervised by the military intelligence agencies of Pakistan admitting that Pakistan army and air force attacked Surab Gudar area. His video narration was uploaded before the ISPR statement, hence it clear that ISPR is telling lie and is scared of massive resistance by the Baloch nation.

The Republic of Balochistan categorially rejects DGISPR’s misleading statement regarding Surab massacre 13 August, 2026 ` The Republic of Balochistan strongly rejects the fabricated stories and misleading statements presented by Ahmed Sharif the son of a UN designated terrorist and the Pakistani military spokesperson to ISPR, to white wash the massacre in Sorab, particularly women and children. This attempt to conceal the facts and mislead its own people and the international community in the face of international pressure is condemnable. DGISPR, which serves as the official spokesperson for the Pakistani military, has long faced severe criticism over its misleading and fabricated statements and official positions regarding controversial military operations. The Surab massacre was a planned act of collective punishment, and local residents of Surab stand as witnesses to the fact that the Pakistan Air Force deliberately targeted a civilian population under the cover of darkness, severely affecting an entire village and leaving its residents to bear the devastating consequences. Videos and other material provided by local residents following the airstrike, which have been received by the Republic of Balochistan and are also circulating online, proves that multiple residential rooms and houses were erased as a result of the air strikes. This evidence shows signs of bombing on several rooms rather than just one, while the casualties are also not confined to a single location. If explosive material had been present in these residential rooms, ordinary civilians would not have been sleeping peacefully there with their children. Images and videos of the victims released by local sources clearly show that several people were sleeping in their homes with their children when the attack took place and they lost their lives instantly. The terrorist and external army of Pakistan, present in the Republic of Balochistan without any legal authority or procedure, prevented local residents from receiving timely medical assistance. The Republic of Balochistan reiterates its firm determination to raise this matter, along with the grave and continuing human rights violations in Balochistan, at the international level and to pursue all available legal avenues. The Baloch are not “Fitna Al Hindustan,” but “Rafiq Al Hindustan”; we are the sons of Baloch soil. The terrorist state of Pakistan must refrain from interfering in Balochistan’s relations with our immediate neighbors and the free world. As an independent country, Balochistan calls upon the international community to take effective measures to ensure the protection of civilians and respect for human rights in Balochistan, and to exert pressure for an independent investigation into Pakistan’s military presence and the resulting human and economic exploitation. THE REPUBLIC OF BALOCHISTAN Note: The person in the video is an ISI operative and head of a death squad and being fully funded and supervised by the military intelligence agencies of Pakistan admitting that Pakistan army and air force attacked Surab Gudar area. His video narration was uploaded before the ISPR statement, hence it clear that ISPR is telling lie and is scared of massive resistance by the Baloch nation.

Mir Yar Baloch

53,188 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce

A disturbing video circulating on Ethiopian social media reveals a chilling endorsement of genocide by a pro-government activist, raising alarms over the fate of ethnic Amharas. The video features a prominent regime supporter loyal to Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, making a public call for the massacre of Amhara civilians as the "solution" to end resistance from the Amhara region, particularly in Gojjam. This rhetoric marks a dangerous escalation in the Ethiopian government’s ongoing war with the Amhara people and highlights the severity of the humanitarian crisis. In the video, the activist openly advocates for the mass killing of civilians, arguing that the Ethiopian military's struggle in Gojjam is due to the overwhelming support the Amhara Fano (local armed resistance group) receives from the civilian population. According to his explanation, the military’s losses in the region are not solely the result of combat with the Fano fighters but are also because the entire Amhara community in Gojjam—farmers, youths, and everyday civilians—supports and aids the resistance. The activist bluntly claims that the only way to defeat the Amhara Fano in Gojjam is by wiping out the civilian population, insisting that massacring the entire community is essential to breaking the resistance. He further suggests that without such brutal measures, the conflict will continue indefinitely, as the local population is perceived as an integral part of the resistance movement. The activist’s statements are a stark endorsement of genocidal violence, raising fears that these views reflect the broader strategy of the Ethiopian government. These calls for mass violence against civilians are not isolated rhetoric. On the ground, there have been numerous reports of heavy bombardments targeting Amhara civilians and infrastructure in the region. In Gojjam’s Mecha district, for example, over 45 drone strikes were reported within a span of just three hours, wreaking havoc on civilian lives and property. Despite these alarming developments, the international community, including global institutions and human rights organizations, has largely remained silent. The video provides a clear and disturbing context for the Ethiopian government's military operations, revealing the genocidal intent behind its actions. The silence of international institutions in the face of such blatant incitement to violence is deeply troubling. The world has witnessed countless instances of ethnic violence and genocide in recent history, often followed by solemn declarations of "Never Again." Yet, in Ethiopia, as calls for genocide against the Amhara people grow louder, there is a shocking absence of international outcry. How many more lives must be lost before the global community acknowledges the unfolding genocide ? This video, which can be independently verified as a genuine translation from Amharic, should serve as a wake-up call. The activist’s brazen recommendation to massacre an entire ethnic group should trigger alarm bells in international institutions and human rights bodies. It is not just a call for violence; it is an explicit endorsement of genocide, aimed at eliminating an entire population perceived as an obstacle to military victory. The Ethiopian government, under the leadership of Abiy Ahmed, is already carrying out operations that reflect this narrative—bombarding civilian populations with artillery and drones. The international community must act now, not after the genocide has already taken its toll. History will judge the world's response to the suffering of the Amhara people, and there can be no excuse of ignorance. The global community is aware of the situation, and failure to act is tantamount to complicity. It is imperative that human rights organizations, international bodies, and governments around the world address this genocidal rhetoric and prevent further atrocities.

A disturbing video circulating on Ethiopian social media reveals a chilling endorsement of genocide by a pro-government activist, raising alarms over the fate of ethnic Amharas. The video features a prominent regime supporter loyal to Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, making a public call for the massacre of Amhara civilians as the "solution" to end resistance from the Amhara region, particularly in Gojjam. This rhetoric marks a dangerous escalation in the Ethiopian government’s ongoing war with the Amhara people and highlights the severity of the humanitarian crisis. In the video, the activist openly advocates for the mass killing of civilians, arguing that the Ethiopian military's struggle in Gojjam is due to the overwhelming support the Amhara Fano (local armed resistance group) receives from the civilian population. According to his explanation, the military’s losses in the region are not solely the result of combat with the Fano fighters but are also because the entire Amhara community in Gojjam—farmers, youths, and everyday civilians—supports and aids the resistance. The activist bluntly claims that the only way to defeat the Amhara Fano in Gojjam is by wiping out the civilian population, insisting that massacring the entire community is essential to breaking the resistance. He further suggests that without such brutal measures, the conflict will continue indefinitely, as the local population is perceived as an integral part of the resistance movement. The activist’s statements are a stark endorsement of genocidal violence, raising fears that these views reflect the broader strategy of the Ethiopian government. These calls for mass violence against civilians are not isolated rhetoric. On the ground, there have been numerous reports of heavy bombardments targeting Amhara civilians and infrastructure in the region. In Gojjam’s Mecha district, for example, over 45 drone strikes were reported within a span of just three hours, wreaking havoc on civilian lives and property. Despite these alarming developments, the international community, including global institutions and human rights organizations, has largely remained silent. The video provides a clear and disturbing context for the Ethiopian government's military operations, revealing the genocidal intent behind its actions. The silence of international institutions in the face of such blatant incitement to violence is deeply troubling. The world has witnessed countless instances of ethnic violence and genocide in recent history, often followed by solemn declarations of "Never Again." Yet, in Ethiopia, as calls for genocide against the Amhara people grow louder, there is a shocking absence of international outcry. How many more lives must be lost before the global community acknowledges the unfolding genocide ? This video, which can be independently verified as a genuine translation from Amharic, should serve as a wake-up call. The activist’s brazen recommendation to massacre an entire ethnic group should trigger alarm bells in international institutions and human rights bodies. It is not just a call for violence; it is an explicit endorsement of genocide, aimed at eliminating an entire population perceived as an obstacle to military victory. The Ethiopian government, under the leadership of Abiy Ahmed, is already carrying out operations that reflect this narrative—bombarding civilian populations with artillery and drones. The international community must act now, not after the genocide has already taken its toll. History will judge the world's response to the suffering of the Amhara people, and there can be no excuse of ignorance. The global community is aware of the situation, and failure to act is tantamount to complicity. It is imperative that human rights organizations, international bodies, and governments around the world address this genocidal rhetoric and prevent further atrocities.

Yuri Tadesse

14,347 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

THE CONDUCT OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE AGAINST HONOURABLE TUNDU A. LISSU IS THE LAW BEING DISREGARDED? The Tanganyika Law Society (TLS) raises its voice regarding the troubling conduct in the criminal case against Honourable Tundu Antipas Lissu — a lawyer, former Member of Parliament, and one of the nation’s prominent advocates for human rights, good governance, and constitutionalism. Since his arrest, there has been a disturbing pattern undermining the principles of justice, violating legal procedures, and casting a heavy shadow over our criminal justice system. This is evident in the following: His arrest was conducted without adherence to lawful procedures, signaling an abuse of power; The charges appear to be politically motivated, raising serious concerns about the use of judicial processes as tools for political ends; Denial of even the basic right to greet and meet with fellow citizens before the official hearing of the case; Repeated adjournments of the case on legally unsubstantial grounds, indicating a deviation from legal focus; Interference with or denial of the accused’s right to private consultations with his lawyers, which violates the right to equal legal representation; Indications of breaches of the attorney-client privilege, which is protected under the Constitution and legal framework, and is a cornerstone of the right to an effective legal defense. The right of a client to consult privately with their lawyer is a fundamental right protected by the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania, the Evidence Act, and the Code of Ethics for Advocates. To restrict or interfere with this right is to undermine the foundation of the justice process and impair the accused’s ability to defend themselves adequately before the court. TLS emphasizes the following: The law must not be used as a weapon against justice; State authorities must not place themselves above the Constitution or the laws enacted by Parliament; The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) must reflect deeply on the significant constitutional powers he holds in criminal justice and whether there is sufficient accountability to protect citizens' rights and ensure adherence to the law at all times; The right to legal assistance is not a privilege — it is a right of every citizen. Any criminal case, especially those involving individuals with political or social stature, must be conducted with transparency, fairness, and with respect for human dignity. The Tanganyika Law Society (TLS) continues to closely monitor the progress of this case. We reiterate that justice must not only be done but must also be seen to be done. We call upon the Judiciary and all state organs to uphold and protect the rights of the accused in accordance with the law and the Constitution. Furthermore, we urge all lawyers in the country, the media, and human rights stakeholders to continue championing the protection of justice, freedom of expression, and the rule of law — without fear or favour. BAK MWABUKUSI President, Tanganyika Law Society (TLS)

THE CONDUCT OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE AGAINST HONOURABLE TUNDU A. LISSU IS THE LAW BEING DISREGARDED? The Tanganyika Law Society (TLS) raises its voice regarding the troubling conduct in the criminal case against Honourable Tundu Antipas Lissu — a lawyer, former Member of Parliament, and one of the nation’s prominent advocates for human rights, good governance, and constitutionalism. Since his arrest, there has been a disturbing pattern undermining the principles of justice, violating legal procedures, and casting a heavy shadow over our criminal justice system. This is evident in the following: His arrest was conducted without adherence to lawful procedures, signaling an abuse of power; The charges appear to be politically motivated, raising serious concerns about the use of judicial processes as tools for political ends; Denial of even the basic right to greet and meet with fellow citizens before the official hearing of the case; Repeated adjournments of the case on legally unsubstantial grounds, indicating a deviation from legal focus; Interference with or denial of the accused’s right to private consultations with his lawyers, which violates the right to equal legal representation; Indications of breaches of the attorney-client privilege, which is protected under the Constitution and legal framework, and is a cornerstone of the right to an effective legal defense. The right of a client to consult privately with their lawyer is a fundamental right protected by the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania, the Evidence Act, and the Code of Ethics for Advocates. To restrict or interfere with this right is to undermine the foundation of the justice process and impair the accused’s ability to defend themselves adequately before the court. TLS emphasizes the following: The law must not be used as a weapon against justice; State authorities must not place themselves above the Constitution or the laws enacted by Parliament; The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) must reflect deeply on the significant constitutional powers he holds in criminal justice and whether there is sufficient accountability to protect citizens' rights and ensure adherence to the law at all times; The right to legal assistance is not a privilege — it is a right of every citizen. Any criminal case, especially those involving individuals with political or social stature, must be conducted with transparency, fairness, and with respect for human dignity. The Tanganyika Law Society (TLS) continues to closely monitor the progress of this case. We reiterate that justice must not only be done but must also be seen to be done. We call upon the Judiciary and all state organs to uphold and protect the rights of the accused in accordance with the law and the Constitution. Furthermore, we urge all lawyers in the country, the media, and human rights stakeholders to continue championing the protection of justice, freedom of expression, and the rule of law — without fear or favour. BAK MWABUKUSI President, Tanganyika Law Society (TLS)

Boniface Mwabukusi

15,205 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Press Release 3/5/2026 The Propaganda by the Nigeria military and government claiming they conducted offensive in the quiet community of the United States of Biafra USB in Ihiala and old Anambra state is not only misleading but an affront on the Sovereign state of Biafra The United States of Biafra was declared as a sovereign Nation on November 29th, 2024 in Lahti Finland following a self- referendum where 50 million Biafrans voted to exit Nigeria. The culmination of that vote was the Declaration that happened in Finland when over 500 Biafrans from across the globe gathered to append their Signatures to our declaration document (watch video) Thus Wish of the People MUST be RESPECTED The Nigeria terrorist government continues their unlawful, illegal occupation and invasion of our newly declared United States of Biafra Nation. This invasion must STOP and be resisted. No Nigeria flag or military or police is welcomed anywhere in Biafra territory Nigeria government reintegrates known terrorists into its military and police and the country has been declared as the most dangerous country in the world for Christians to live. Biafrans are Christians The public and our international allies are hereby urged to disregard the fake news being paraded by the Nigeria military and government of Tinubu and Christopher Musa There is NOTHING like ESN or IPOB Organization in the 40 States of Biafra territory The United States of Biafra is currently under the leadership of the USB Cabinets, the 40 State Governors and their Commissioners, the Mission Heads and the envisioned Elite Squad Dr. Ngozi Orabueze DPM United States of Biafra Donald J. Trump First Lady Melania Trump United States of Biafra Government Department of State Secretary Marco Rubio Michael Rubin CNN International CNN BBC News (World) BBC Breaking News Fox News سكاي نيوز عربية-عاجل Sky News Punch Newspapers Vanguard Newspapers Sahara Reporters Capitaine Ibrahim TRAORÉ U.S. Army Benjamin Netanyahu - בנימין נתניהו Israel Defense Forces African Union NATO Amnesty International Nigeria Amnesty International USA UN Human Rights

Press Release 3/5/2026 The Propaganda by the Nigeria military and government claiming they conducted offensive in the quiet community of the United States of Biafra USB in Ihiala and old Anambra state is not only misleading but an affront on the Sovereign state of Biafra The United States of Biafra was declared as a sovereign Nation on November 29th, 2024 in Lahti Finland following a self- referendum where 50 million Biafrans voted to exit Nigeria. The culmination of that vote was the Declaration that happened in Finland when over 500 Biafrans from across the globe gathered to append their Signatures to our declaration document (watch video) Thus Wish of the People MUST be RESPECTED The Nigeria terrorist government continues their unlawful, illegal occupation and invasion of our newly declared United States of Biafra Nation. This invasion must STOP and be resisted. No Nigeria flag or military or police is welcomed anywhere in Biafra territory Nigeria government reintegrates known terrorists into its military and police and the country has been declared as the most dangerous country in the world for Christians to live. Biafrans are Christians The public and our international allies are hereby urged to disregard the fake news being paraded by the Nigeria military and government of Tinubu and Christopher Musa There is NOTHING like ESN or IPOB Organization in the 40 States of Biafra territory The United States of Biafra is currently under the leadership of the USB Cabinets, the 40 State Governors and their Commissioners, the Mission Heads and the envisioned Elite Squad Dr. Ngozi Orabueze DPM United States of Biafra Donald J. Trump First Lady Melania Trump United States of Biafra Government Department of State Secretary Marco Rubio Michael Rubin CNN International CNN BBC News (World) BBC Breaking News Fox News سكاي نيوز عربية-عاجل Sky News Punch Newspapers Vanguard Newspapers Sahara Reporters Capitaine Ibrahim TRAORÉ U.S. Army Benjamin Netanyahu - בנימין נתניהו Israel Defense Forces African Union NATO Amnesty International Nigeria Amnesty International USA UN Human Rights

Ngozi Orabueze Deputy Prime Minister/COS USB

12,474 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Syed Bibi Baloch, a member of the Baloch Yakjehti Committee, was summoned once again to the Counter Terrorism Department (CTD) office in Turbat this morning, only hours after being released the previous night. Upon her arrival, she was arrested and transferred to Central Jail under Section 3 of the Maintenance of Public Order (3 MPO) for one month. For the past eight months, Syed Bibi has faced continuous harassment by state authorities. After being placed on the Fourth Schedule, she was required to report to the CTD office every week while her phone and communications remained under constant surveillance. A widow living in Turbat with her two young children, Syed Bibi supported her family through traditional embroidery after her husband’s death. Since being placed on the Fourth Schedule, however, she has endured sustained psychological pressure and intimidation. Her bank accounts were frozen, her embroidery business collapsed, and obstacles were created even in relation to her children’s education, making it nearly impossible to live a normal life because of her dissenting views. Four days ago, following the Baloch Yakjehti Committee’s announcement of a rally in Turbat, the pressure against her intensified. Throughout the day, she received repeated calls and threats from CTD officials. Later that night, at around 9:30 p.m., security personnel raided her home, arrested her, and took her to the Women’s Police Station, where she was told she would be released after the rally concluded. She was released at approximately 10:00 p.m. the following night. Just thirty minutes later, she received another call stating that Military Intelligence (MI) personnel wanted to question her. She replied that she could not appear in the middle of the night and would present herself the next morning. Despite this, police raided her home three times during the night, breaking down the door, damaging household belongings, and searching the premises. Officers also raided her mother’s home, harassed family members, attempted to forcibly take away her bedridden brother, photographed the interior of the house, and caused further damage to property. Fearing for their safety, Syed Bibi spent the night with her two children in a graveyard beside her late husband’s grave. The next morning, she spoke to the media at the Turbat Press Club and publicly described the events. While there, she received another call instructing her to report to the CTD office. When she complied, she was arrested again and detained for one month under the 3 MPO. The treatment of Syed Bibi Baloch raises serious concerns about human rights, civil liberties, due process, and the rule of law. Silence in the face of such allegations risks creating an environment in which further abuses may occur. We respectfully call upon the international community—including the United Nations, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), relevant UN Special Rapporteurs, international human rights organizations, democratic governments, civil society organizations, and independent media—to closely monitor the situation, raise these concerns with the relevant authorities, and advocate for the protection of fundamental rights, including freedom of expression, peaceful assembly, and due process. We also urge national and international institutions committed to justice and human rights to help ensure accountability and the protection of individuals facing alleged harassment or arbitrary detention. Andrea Bolaños Vargas Human Rights Commission of Pakistan Front Line Defenders Amnesty International South Asia, Regional Office UN Human Rights UN Special Procedures UN Human Rights Council Prof Ben Saul - UN SR Human Rights & Counterterror Munizae Jahangir Mary Lawlor

Syed Bibi Baloch, a member of the Baloch Yakjehti Committee, was summoned once again to the Counter Terrorism Department (CTD) office in Turbat this morning, only hours after being released the previous night. Upon her arrival, she was arrested and transferred to Central Jail under Section 3 of the Maintenance of Public Order (3 MPO) for one month. For the past eight months, Syed Bibi has faced continuous harassment by state authorities. After being placed on the Fourth Schedule, she was required to report to the CTD office every week while her phone and communications remained under constant surveillance. A widow living in Turbat with her two young children, Syed Bibi supported her family through traditional embroidery after her husband’s death. Since being placed on the Fourth Schedule, however, she has endured sustained psychological pressure and intimidation. Her bank accounts were frozen, her embroidery business collapsed, and obstacles were created even in relation to her children’s education, making it nearly impossible to live a normal life because of her dissenting views. Four days ago, following the Baloch Yakjehti Committee’s announcement of a rally in Turbat, the pressure against her intensified. Throughout the day, she received repeated calls and threats from CTD officials. Later that night, at around 9:30 p.m., security personnel raided her home, arrested her, and took her to the Women’s Police Station, where she was told she would be released after the rally concluded. She was released at approximately 10:00 p.m. the following night. Just thirty minutes later, she received another call stating that Military Intelligence (MI) personnel wanted to question her. She replied that she could not appear in the middle of the night and would present herself the next morning. Despite this, police raided her home three times during the night, breaking down the door, damaging household belongings, and searching the premises. Officers also raided her mother’s home, harassed family members, attempted to forcibly take away her bedridden brother, photographed the interior of the house, and caused further damage to property. Fearing for their safety, Syed Bibi spent the night with her two children in a graveyard beside her late husband’s grave. The next morning, she spoke to the media at the Turbat Press Club and publicly described the events. While there, she received another call instructing her to report to the CTD office. When she complied, she was arrested again and detained for one month under the 3 MPO. The treatment of Syed Bibi Baloch raises serious concerns about human rights, civil liberties, due process, and the rule of law. Silence in the face of such allegations risks creating an environment in which further abuses may occur. We respectfully call upon the international community—including the United Nations, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), relevant UN Special Rapporteurs, international human rights organizations, democratic governments, civil society organizations, and independent media—to closely monitor the situation, raise these concerns with the relevant authorities, and advocate for the protection of fundamental rights, including freedom of expression, peaceful assembly, and due process. We also urge national and international institutions committed to justice and human rights to help ensure accountability and the protection of individuals facing alleged harassment or arbitrary detention. Andrea Bolaños Vargas Human Rights Commission of Pakistan Front Line Defenders Amnesty International South Asia, Regional Office UN Human Rights UN Special Procedures UN Human Rights Council Prof Ben Saul - UN SR Human Rights & Counterterror Munizae Jahangir Mary Lawlor

Sabiha Baloch

10,689 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

The Response of President Samia’s Administration to UN Human Rights Council is Nothing But Lies and Deception ⸻ The recent response by President Samia Suluhu’s administration to the concerns raised by DefendDefenders is filled with lies and deliberate misinformation. In his statement on behalf of the Tanzanian government, Ambassador Abdallah Possi made the following false claims: 1. Claim: There is freedom of expression through social media. Reality: President Samia’s government has severely restricted social media platforms. X (formerly Twitter) and Clubhouse are blocked and only accessible via VPN. The administration enforces the Cyber Crime Act—a repressive law used to blackmail, arrest, and silence dissenting voices online. 2. Claim: Tanzania upholds its constitution, as well as regional and international human rights obligations. Reality: This is blatantly false. Tanzania has violated both domestic and regional human rights laws. The abduction of The People’s President and Agather Atuhaire—who were held incommunicado, tortured, sexually abused, and dumped at the Tanzanian border—is a gross human rights violation. Additionally, Tanzania deported former Kenyan Chief Justice and ex-Justice Minister Martha Karua along with several others—an act in direct violation of East African Community (East African Community) laws and agreements. Tanzania’s actions also contravene the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 3. Claim: Civilians have the right to express themselves. Reality: Opposition leader Tundu Antiphas Lissu was charged with treason simply for expressing the need for electoral reforms under the slogan #NoReformsNoElection. His peaceful campaign was met with arbitrary arrest and a treason charge—an unmistakable sign of political repression. 4. Claim: Tanzania has conducted seven multiparty elections fairly. Reality: Each election cycle has been marred by violence, arrests, and fabricated charges against opposition members. Opposition candidates have been systematically prevented from running, resulting in CCM candidates winning uncontested. In the 2020 election alone, 28 CCM Members of Parliament won unopposed—some of whom now serve as ministers. This is not democracy; it’s manipulation. 5. Claim: The People’s President and Agather Atuhaire failed to disclose the reasons for their visit to Tanzania. Reality: If that were true, they would have been stopped at the airport—not abducted day later. Boniface was followed by police at his hotel around midnight, refused to open the door, and was later apprehended during breakfast. He was taken to an unknown location, tortured, sexually abused, and dumped at the Tanzanian-Kenyan border. These are crimes—not immigration issues. 6. On April 24, 2025, during Tundu Antiphas Lissu’s court appearance, dozens of civilians who went to witness the trial were abducted by police and taken to the Mabwepande and Ununio forests. There, they were tortured—some had their legs, arms, and spines broken. This is a gross violation of basic human rights. It is a disgrace that President Samia’s administration sent this man to stand before the world and lie so openly. UN Human Rights Council has a moral and legal obligation to thoroughly investigate these escalating human rights violations. These cheap lies must not be accepted at face value. Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman

The Response of President Samia’s Administration to UN Human Rights Council is Nothing But Lies and Deception ⸻ The recent response by President Samia Suluhu’s administration to the concerns raised by DefendDefenders is filled with lies and deliberate misinformation. In his statement on behalf of the Tanzanian government, Ambassador Abdallah Possi made the following false claims: 1. Claim: There is freedom of expression through social media. Reality: President Samia’s government has severely restricted social media platforms. X (formerly Twitter) and Clubhouse are blocked and only accessible via VPN. The administration enforces the Cyber Crime Act—a repressive law used to blackmail, arrest, and silence dissenting voices online. 2. Claim: Tanzania upholds its constitution, as well as regional and international human rights obligations. Reality: This is blatantly false. Tanzania has violated both domestic and regional human rights laws. The abduction of The People’s President and Agather Atuhaire—who were held incommunicado, tortured, sexually abused, and dumped at the Tanzanian border—is a gross human rights violation. Additionally, Tanzania deported former Kenyan Chief Justice and ex-Justice Minister Martha Karua along with several others—an act in direct violation of East African Community (East African Community) laws and agreements. Tanzania’s actions also contravene the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 3. Claim: Civilians have the right to express themselves. Reality: Opposition leader Tundu Antiphas Lissu was charged with treason simply for expressing the need for electoral reforms under the slogan #NoReformsNoElection. His peaceful campaign was met with arbitrary arrest and a treason charge—an unmistakable sign of political repression. 4. Claim: Tanzania has conducted seven multiparty elections fairly. Reality: Each election cycle has been marred by violence, arrests, and fabricated charges against opposition members. Opposition candidates have been systematically prevented from running, resulting in CCM candidates winning uncontested. In the 2020 election alone, 28 CCM Members of Parliament won unopposed—some of whom now serve as ministers. This is not democracy; it’s manipulation. 5. Claim: The People’s President and Agather Atuhaire failed to disclose the reasons for their visit to Tanzania. Reality: If that were true, they would have been stopped at the airport—not abducted day later. Boniface was followed by police at his hotel around midnight, refused to open the door, and was later apprehended during breakfast. He was taken to an unknown location, tortured, sexually abused, and dumped at the Tanzanian-Kenyan border. These are crimes—not immigration issues. 6. On April 24, 2025, during Tundu Antiphas Lissu’s court appearance, dozens of civilians who went to witness the trial were abducted by police and taken to the Mabwepande and Ununio forests. There, they were tortured—some had their legs, arms, and spines broken. This is a gross violation of basic human rights. It is a disgrace that President Samia’s administration sent this man to stand before the world and lie so openly. UN Human Rights Council has a moral and legal obligation to thoroughly investigate these escalating human rights violations. These cheap lies must not be accepted at face value. Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman

Liberatus Mwang'ombe

33,547 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Press Release 4/6/2026 Finland broke the law of estoppel (watch 3 videos) From November 2024 to date when Finland government arrested, removed and jailed Simon Ekpa, over 3,000 (three thousand) Biafrans have been either killed or forcefully removed by the terrorist state of Nigeria headed by President Tinubu. The killings and forceful removals of innocent Biafrans by Nigeria headed by President Tinubu was what Simon Ekpa was fighting to stop These facts have been confirmed and condemned by world leaders and court rulings from the United States of America, Canada, Kenya, Nigeria etc.; other international organizations such as the UN, OEAS, AEI - Michael Rubin, Amnesty International, Pan African Forum Ltd., and others have reiterated exactly the words and recommendations of Simon Ekpa. After granting estoppel, the party who made a previous representation or promise is legally prevented from contradicting it, ensuring that the initial statement holds binding authority. Finland recognized the position of Simon Ekpa in Biafra, granted visas and gave immigration passes to Biafrans approved by Simon Ekpa, coming to Lahti Finland for Biafra redeclaration, then turned around to arrest Simon Ekpa and other 4 innocent Biafrans in Finland stating that he Simon Ekpa was inciting Biafrans? Knowing fully well that the oppressed (Biafrans) has the right to use any means legally possible to stop the oppressor (Nigeria), and that the right to resist occupation and oppression is regarded as a fundamental aspect of the human right to self- determination; Finland has the blood of innocent Biafra citizens on its hand as a direct consequence of colluding with Nigeria to break the protection they gave to Simon Ekpa This action exposes the lives of innocent Biafrans who looked up to Simon Ekpa for protection to be massacred by the Nigeria state immediately Simon Ekpa was arrested and beyond. This transnational repression that has cost lives of Biafrans will not be forgiven or forgotten. DPM Office of Melania Trump Eric Trump Donald J. Trump Alexander Stubb Huuhkajat Amnesty International Nigeria Amnesty International USA BBC News (World) BBC Breaking News Sky News Robert Spencer Fox News International Human Rights Foundation Benjamin Netanyahu - בנימין נתניהו U.S. Army UN Spokesperson United Nations African Union European Commission European Parliament NATO Bola Ahmed Tinubu Punch Newspapers Sahara Reporters @

Press Release 4/6/2026 Finland broke the law of estoppel (watch 3 videos) From November 2024 to date when Finland government arrested, removed and jailed Simon Ekpa, over 3,000 (three thousand) Biafrans have been either killed or forcefully removed by the terrorist state of Nigeria headed by President Tinubu. The killings and forceful removals of innocent Biafrans by Nigeria headed by President Tinubu was what Simon Ekpa was fighting to stop These facts have been confirmed and condemned by world leaders and court rulings from the United States of America, Canada, Kenya, Nigeria etc.; other international organizations such as the UN, OEAS, AEI - Michael Rubin, Amnesty International, Pan African Forum Ltd., and others have reiterated exactly the words and recommendations of Simon Ekpa. After granting estoppel, the party who made a previous representation or promise is legally prevented from contradicting it, ensuring that the initial statement holds binding authority. Finland recognized the position of Simon Ekpa in Biafra, granted visas and gave immigration passes to Biafrans approved by Simon Ekpa, coming to Lahti Finland for Biafra redeclaration, then turned around to arrest Simon Ekpa and other 4 innocent Biafrans in Finland stating that he Simon Ekpa was inciting Biafrans? Knowing fully well that the oppressed (Biafrans) has the right to use any means legally possible to stop the oppressor (Nigeria), and that the right to resist occupation and oppression is regarded as a fundamental aspect of the human right to self- determination; Finland has the blood of innocent Biafra citizens on its hand as a direct consequence of colluding with Nigeria to break the protection they gave to Simon Ekpa This action exposes the lives of innocent Biafrans who looked up to Simon Ekpa for protection to be massacred by the Nigeria state immediately Simon Ekpa was arrested and beyond. This transnational repression that has cost lives of Biafrans will not be forgiven or forgotten. DPM Office of Melania Trump Eric Trump Donald J. Trump Alexander Stubb Huuhkajat Amnesty International Nigeria Amnesty International USA BBC News (World) BBC Breaking News Sky News Robert Spencer Fox News International Human Rights Foundation Benjamin Netanyahu - בנימין נתניהו U.S. Army UN Spokesperson United Nations African Union European Commission European Parliament NATO Bola Ahmed Tinubu Punch Newspapers Sahara Reporters @

Ngozi Orabueze Deputy Prime Minister/COS USB

18,816 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

In the case of H.E Simon Ekpa, the Finnish court relied on intelligence provided by Nigeria. However, Nigerian intelligence is corrupt, compromised by terrorist influence, and even infiltrated by terrorist recruits. By relying on such tainted information, Finland undermined its own democratic principles and credibility in this matter. - Dr David Nyekorach-Matsanga Finland’s Shame: Trading Human Rights for Nigerian Gas and Blood Money Finland’s handling of the H.E Simon Ekpa's case has stripped away any pretense of neutrality or respect for democratic principles. Instead of upholding the rule of law, Finland has aligned itself with Nigeria’s corrupt and terror-compromised intelligence network; an institution even the Canadian judiciary has described as a terrorist ruling class. By relying on such tainted “evidence,” Finland has not only humiliated its judiciary but also brought shame upon the free world. A Decision Driven by Money, Not Justice Finland publicly tied Ekpa’s case to bilateral relations. While presenting her credentials in Abuja, Finland’s ambassador Sanna Selin said: “Simon Ekpa has been hindering bilateral relations. The cooperation between our two countries is going very well now, and the National Security Adviser has been providing all the evidence.” A fast-moving “criminal” case with significant diplomatic applause from Abuja. Nigerian state media and multiple outlets publicly praised Finland for “intervening” in Ekpa’s case. That praise, paired with the ambassador’s framing (above), deepens the optics that the prosecution aligned with bilateral priorities. - Reliance on Nigeria’s terrorist intelligence. The Finnish court admitted to basing its decision on intelligence from Nigeria. This is indefensible. Nigerian intelligence is not only corrupt, but it has been infiltrated by terrorists and weaponized to crush dissent. Using such sources discredits Finland’s courts and undermines its democratic claims. - Economic payoff in plain sight. Shortly after the unlawful detention of H.E. Simon Ekpa, Wärtsilä Energy, a Finnish firm, was awarded a major gas contract in Lagos. This timing exposes what is really at play: Finland traded away justice for business interests. - Medical projects as diplomatic cover. Finland’s ambassador to Nigeria has now announced plans to build medical facilities in the country. These so-called humanitarian projects are nothing but political sweeteners to cement Finland’s deals with a regime guilty of ethnic cleansing. Why that matters for human rights Labeling dissent as “terrorism” amid a documented pattern of abuses is chilling. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have reported extrajudicial killings and violent repression of pro-Biafra peaceful protesters since 2015; U.S. State Department reporting continues to flag serious violations. In that environment, a European democracy appearing to echo the Nigerian government’s framing of advocacy as “terrorism” risks normalizing repression rather than encouraging due process and de-escalation. Democratic credibility: When an EU state’s envoy explicitly links a defendant to “hindering bilateral relations,” then touts imminent business/health cooperation, it creates pressure on judicial independence; whatever the merits of any charges. That alone undermines fair-trial rights and chills transnational advocacy; Finland’s decision doesn’t just hurt H.E Simon Ekpa, it aims to send a warning shot to all Biafran and African human rights activists abroad that their speech and organizing would be criminalized to please authoritarian states. Why This Is a Global Shame - Criminalizing resistance to genocide. By echoing Nigeria’s narrative, Finland has branded Biafrans resisting ethnic cleansing and genocide as “terrorists.” This is not only false, it is a betrayal of every democratic principle Finland claims to uphold. - Population scale of injustice. There are over 70 million Biafrans; more than ten times the population of Finland; who reject this criminal decision. Finland has trampled on the voices of a nation, siding instead with a state apparatus the world knows is murderous and illegitimate. - Shame upon the free world. Finland has reduced itself from being a respected democracy to a willing partner of a terrorist regime. It has chosen contracts and convenience over conscience and credibility. We hold Finland accountable for betraying justice and aligning itself with terror. Human rights organizations, democratic states, and global civil society must condemn Finland’s complicity, expose the dirty deals behind this decision, and stand with the Biafran people in their struggle against extermination and state-sponsored terror. Even though the Finnish court has acknowledged Biafra’s right to independence, we categorically reject the verdict against our Prime Minister in its entirety. This decision will be appealed, with full confidence that the judiciary will seize the opportunity to cleanse Finland of the stain imposed upon it by Nigeria’s corrupt influence. Fox News Ngozi Orabueze Deputy Prime Minister/COS USB Freedom House Amnesty Finland Amnesty EU Ministry of International Relations & Trade Le Premier ministre Amadou Oury Bah Ministry of Foreign Affairs MFA Finland 🇫🇮 Tibor Nagy Tuomas Malinen Thuso van Zyl 🇿🇦 Michael Johns🇺🇸 Commissioner for Human Rights Universal Rights Group UN Working Group on Enforced Disappearances South African Government BBC News Africa Secretary Marco Rubio Kayleigh McEnany 45 Archived President Donald J. Trump Capitaine Ibrahim TRAORÉ European Commission Council of Europe Rule of Law European External Action Service - EEAS 🇪🇺 European Human Rights Advocacy Centre (EHRAC) EU Agency for Asylum - EUAA Rita Patrício Tanya Lokshina Mairead Elordi European Human Rights Advocacy Centre (EHRAC) Rita Patrício Abdirahman Dahir Adam Johanna Kaprio-Papageorgiou Paavo Teittinen Frank Johansson (frankdj.bsky.social) Leena-Kaisa Mikkola Sanna Selin Journalists for Human Rights (JHR) Tapio Nurminen Rebecca Mistereggen Lara Logan Leena Meri Mari Rantanen

In the case of H.E Simon Ekpa, the Finnish court relied on intelligence provided by Nigeria. However, Nigerian intelligence is corrupt, compromised by terrorist influence, and even infiltrated by terrorist recruits. By relying on such tainted information, Finland undermined its own democratic principles and credibility in this matter. - Dr David Nyekorach-Matsanga Finland’s Shame: Trading Human Rights for Nigerian Gas and Blood Money Finland’s handling of the H.E Simon Ekpa's case has stripped away any pretense of neutrality or respect for democratic principles. Instead of upholding the rule of law, Finland has aligned itself with Nigeria’s corrupt and terror-compromised intelligence network; an institution even the Canadian judiciary has described as a terrorist ruling class. By relying on such tainted “evidence,” Finland has not only humiliated its judiciary but also brought shame upon the free world. A Decision Driven by Money, Not Justice Finland publicly tied Ekpa’s case to bilateral relations. While presenting her credentials in Abuja, Finland’s ambassador Sanna Selin said: “Simon Ekpa has been hindering bilateral relations. The cooperation between our two countries is going very well now, and the National Security Adviser has been providing all the evidence.” A fast-moving “criminal” case with significant diplomatic applause from Abuja. Nigerian state media and multiple outlets publicly praised Finland for “intervening” in Ekpa’s case. That praise, paired with the ambassador’s framing (above), deepens the optics that the prosecution aligned with bilateral priorities. - Reliance on Nigeria’s terrorist intelligence. The Finnish court admitted to basing its decision on intelligence from Nigeria. This is indefensible. Nigerian intelligence is not only corrupt, but it has been infiltrated by terrorists and weaponized to crush dissent. Using such sources discredits Finland’s courts and undermines its democratic claims. - Economic payoff in plain sight. Shortly after the unlawful detention of H.E. Simon Ekpa, Wärtsilä Energy, a Finnish firm, was awarded a major gas contract in Lagos. This timing exposes what is really at play: Finland traded away justice for business interests. - Medical projects as diplomatic cover. Finland’s ambassador to Nigeria has now announced plans to build medical facilities in the country. These so-called humanitarian projects are nothing but political sweeteners to cement Finland’s deals with a regime guilty of ethnic cleansing. Why that matters for human rights Labeling dissent as “terrorism” amid a documented pattern of abuses is chilling. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have reported extrajudicial killings and violent repression of pro-Biafra peaceful protesters since 2015; U.S. State Department reporting continues to flag serious violations. In that environment, a European democracy appearing to echo the Nigerian government’s framing of advocacy as “terrorism” risks normalizing repression rather than encouraging due process and de-escalation. Democratic credibility: When an EU state’s envoy explicitly links a defendant to “hindering bilateral relations,” then touts imminent business/health cooperation, it creates pressure on judicial independence; whatever the merits of any charges. That alone undermines fair-trial rights and chills transnational advocacy; Finland’s decision doesn’t just hurt H.E Simon Ekpa, it aims to send a warning shot to all Biafran and African human rights activists abroad that their speech and organizing would be criminalized to please authoritarian states. Why This Is a Global Shame - Criminalizing resistance to genocide. By echoing Nigeria’s narrative, Finland has branded Biafrans resisting ethnic cleansing and genocide as “terrorists.” This is not only false, it is a betrayal of every democratic principle Finland claims to uphold. - Population scale of injustice. There are over 70 million Biafrans; more than ten times the population of Finland; who reject this criminal decision. Finland has trampled on the voices of a nation, siding instead with a state apparatus the world knows is murderous and illegitimate. - Shame upon the free world. Finland has reduced itself from being a respected democracy to a willing partner of a terrorist regime. It has chosen contracts and convenience over conscience and credibility. We hold Finland accountable for betraying justice and aligning itself with terror. Human rights organizations, democratic states, and global civil society must condemn Finland’s complicity, expose the dirty deals behind this decision, and stand with the Biafran people in their struggle against extermination and state-sponsored terror. Even though the Finnish court has acknowledged Biafra’s right to independence, we categorically reject the verdict against our Prime Minister in its entirety. This decision will be appealed, with full confidence that the judiciary will seize the opportunity to cleanse Finland of the stain imposed upon it by Nigeria’s corrupt influence. Fox News Ngozi Orabueze Deputy Prime Minister/COS USB Freedom House Amnesty Finland Amnesty EU Ministry of International Relations & Trade Le Premier ministre Amadou Oury Bah Ministry of Foreign Affairs MFA Finland 🇫🇮 Tibor Nagy Tuomas Malinen Thuso van Zyl 🇿🇦 Michael Johns🇺🇸 Commissioner for Human Rights Universal Rights Group UN Working Group on Enforced Disappearances South African Government BBC News Africa Secretary Marco Rubio Kayleigh McEnany 45 Archived President Donald J. Trump Capitaine Ibrahim TRAORÉ European Commission Council of Europe Rule of Law European External Action Service - EEAS 🇪🇺 European Human Rights Advocacy Centre (EHRAC) EU Agency for Asylum - EUAA Rita Patrício Tanya Lokshina Mairead Elordi European Human Rights Advocacy Centre (EHRAC) Rita Patrício Abdirahman Dahir Adam Johanna Kaprio-Papageorgiou Paavo Teittinen Frank Johansson (frankdj.bsky.social) Leena-Kaisa Mikkola Sanna Selin Journalists for Human Rights (JHR) Tapio Nurminen Rebecca Mistereggen Lara Logan Leena Meri Mari Rantanen

United States of Biafra Government

33,322 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce