Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Rep. Andy Harris: "A continuing resolution doesn't increase spending, but it also gives the administration the ability to tweak funding. Those Biden-era programs that aren't very favorable like USAID obviously are subject to rescission." (Yeah, that's the whole problem!)

Aaron Rupar

1,032,090 subscribers

178,058 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Comedy News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Protesters interrupt a House hearing on USAID spending, demanding that funding be restored to PEPFAR, but "the funding was restored" says Rep. Brian Mast.

Protesters interrupt a House hearing on USAID spending, demanding that funding be restored to PEPFAR, but "the funding was restored" says Rep. Brian Mast.

Fox News

213,116 views • 1 year ago

Congress needs to learn how to pass a budget on time. We are still operating under a Biden-era spending deal 9 months into the Trump Administration. Going from one "continuing resolution" to the next is what creates the constant risk of a shutdown.

Congress needs to learn how to pass a budget on time. We are still operating under a Biden-era spending deal 9 months into the Trump Administration. Going from one "continuing resolution" to the next is what creates the constant risk of a shutdown.

Kevin Kiley

10,831 views • 10 months ago

We're seeing a manifestation of what the Biden-Harris administration does best - steal from the taxpayers and give to those who aren't worthy of it.

We're seeing a manifestation of what the Biden-Harris administration does best - steal from the taxpayers and give to those who aren't worthy of it.

Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office

56,577 views • 1 year ago

Biden/Harris administration took so much money from Medicare for the green new deal that the premiums for seniors are going to go up. But that's not all... They're going to make it look like it's Trumps fault.

Biden/Harris administration took so much money from Medicare for the green new deal that the premiums for seniors are going to go up. But that's not all... They're going to make it look like it's Trumps fault.

Shipwreck

375,879 views • 1 year ago

Rep. Andy Harris: "My gut feeling is that if there is something in there about Donald Trump, the Biden DOJ would've released it." (Sounds like a great reason to release the files!)

Rep. Andy Harris: "My gut feeling is that if there is something in there about Donald Trump, the Biden DOJ would've released it." (Sounds like a great reason to release the files!)

Aaron Rupar

62,368 views • 9 months ago

Washington is collecting more money than ever. But it's also spending the most. So it’s not a revenue problem—it’s a spending problem. 60% of Americans believe that spending limits should accompany any debt limit increase. That's exactly what Republicans are fighting for.

Washington is collecting more money than ever. But it's also spending the most. So it’s not a revenue problem—it’s a spending problem. 60% of Americans believe that spending limits should accompany any debt limit increase. That's exactly what Republicans are fighting for.

Kevin McCarthy

2,318,420 views • 3 years ago

Q: Does the administration guarantee that all furloughed federal workers will get back pay? LEAVITT: This is something we are very much open to discussing with Democrats as part of the discussions about the continuing resolution (That's not a yes!)

Q: Does the administration guarantee that all furloughed federal workers will get back pay? LEAVITT: This is something we are very much open to discussing with Democrats as part of the discussions about the continuing resolution (That's not a yes!)

Aaron Rupar

41,786 views • 9 months ago

House Speaker Mike Johnson is pushing Republicans to pass yet another "continuing resolution" to keep funding government AT CURRENT LEVELS until September. That means that all the "cuts" by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) are just smoke and mirrors, as the Trump Administration will be spending at the levels of the Biden and even Obama Administrations! Watch Ron Paul & Daniel McAdams below:

House Speaker Mike Johnson is pushing Republicans to pass yet another "continuing resolution" to keep funding government AT CURRENT LEVELS until September. That means that all the "cuts" by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) are just smoke and mirrors, as the Trump Administration will be spending at the levels of the Biden and even Obama Administrations! Watch Ron Paul & Daniel McAdams below:

Ron Paul

352,401 views • 1 year ago

Ryan Graves on Fox News with Martha MacCallum "It seems like the different branches of the government aren't communicating very well on this problem... I find it hard to believe that the Biden administration can continue this policy of cognitive dissonance on this topic."

Ryan Graves on Fox News with Martha MacCallum "It seems like the different branches of the government aren't communicating very well on this problem... I find it hard to believe that the Biden administration can continue this policy of cognitive dissonance on this topic."

Americans for Safe Aerospace

83,160 views • 1 year ago

Watching House Republicans is like watching a football team whose best play is the punt and the block. Last I checked, Republicans actually have a majority in the House of Representatives! But you wouldn’t know it because we are all too willing to continue the policy choices of Joe Biden and the spending levels of Nancy Pelosi instead of showing the will and the courage to say that this woke and weaponized government should be DEFANGED! We should REJECT this Continuing Resolution. We should pass single-subject spending bills and vote for the spending cuts that this country desperately needs.

Watching House Republicans is like watching a football team whose best play is the punt and the block. Last I checked, Republicans actually have a majority in the House of Representatives! But you wouldn’t know it because we are all too willing to continue the policy choices of Joe Biden and the spending levels of Nancy Pelosi instead of showing the will and the courage to say that this woke and weaponized government should be DEFANGED! We should REJECT this Continuing Resolution. We should pass single-subject spending bills and vote for the spending cuts that this country desperately needs.

Former Congressman Matt Gaetz

694,840 views • 2 years ago

The Biden admin had the remarkable ability to try to "fix" something that wasn’t broken—and, in the process, take it apart, loosen a few screws, and do real damage. Thankfully, the Senate passed my resolution to undo a cumbersome Biden-era rule that hurts small community banks.

The Biden admin had the remarkable ability to try to "fix" something that wasn’t broken—and, in the process, take it apart, loosen a few screws, and do real damage. Thankfully, the Senate passed my resolution to undo a cumbersome Biden-era rule that hurts small community banks.

John Kennedy

154,230 views • 1 year ago

🚨 Rep. Byron Donalds gives details on what is going to happen to Hunter Biden: "The problem is that when you're under oath you either have to plead the fifth or you have to tell the truth. Hunter Biden doesn't want to do that because if he told the truth it would confirm what we already know—We're going to file contempt of congress charges against Hunter Biden. That's going to pass in the House."

🚨 Rep. Byron Donalds gives details on what is going to happen to Hunter Biden: "The problem is that when you're under oath you either have to plead the fifth or you have to tell the truth. Hunter Biden doesn't want to do that because if he told the truth it would confirm what we already know—We're going to file contempt of congress charges against Hunter Biden. That's going to pass in the House."

Benny Johnson

413,475 views • 2 years ago

NOW: Sen. Ron Johnson blasts House Republicans for failing to codify DOGE spending cuts into law. No one else is asking the question—but Senator Ron Johnson is sounding the alarm. “I would ask the question: where are the rescission packages so we can codify the DOGE savings?” “I’m listening to Elon Musk over the weekend, pretty disappointed in this House package as well.” “If I were him and all the work he put into DOGE, and yeah, we maybe stop spending the money, but I don’t know if they can eliminate it by impoundment—that’s going to be subject to the courts.” “We need to actually incorporate that into rescission packages so we can eliminate that, that spending DOGE found out.” “Again, I am not sure all DOGE savings were strictly discretionary. Maybe some of that is in mandatory spending as well, but we’re not getting the information from the administration.” “And we certainly haven’t gotten a rescission package yet.” “Well DOGE was brilliant, and that was a combination of Elon Musk and President Trump—but where’s President Trump been in terms of putting pressure on the House to actually codify those rescissions?”

NOW: Sen. Ron Johnson blasts House Republicans for failing to codify DOGE spending cuts into law. No one else is asking the question—but Senator Ron Johnson is sounding the alarm. “I would ask the question: where are the rescission packages so we can codify the DOGE savings?” “I’m listening to Elon Musk over the weekend, pretty disappointed in this House package as well.” “If I were him and all the work he put into DOGE, and yeah, we maybe stop spending the money, but I don’t know if they can eliminate it by impoundment—that’s going to be subject to the courts.” “We need to actually incorporate that into rescission packages so we can eliminate that, that spending DOGE found out.” “Again, I am not sure all DOGE savings were strictly discretionary. Maybe some of that is in mandatory spending as well, but we’re not getting the information from the administration.” “And we certainly haven’t gotten a rescission package yet.” “Well DOGE was brilliant, and that was a combination of Elon Musk and President Trump—but where’s President Trump been in terms of putting pressure on the House to actually codify those rescissions?”

Vigilant Fox 🦊

86,836 views • 1 year ago

.John Avlon: "Sorry, the military doesn't have access to the state of the intelligence?" Rep. Moulton: That's right, very senior Pentagon planners will not have access to this intelligence because of how [the Administration] has reclassified it. That's a very dangerous move to protect the lies of Hegeseth and Trump."

.John Avlon: "Sorry, the military doesn't have access to the state of the intelligence?" Rep. Moulton: That's right, very senior Pentagon planners will not have access to this intelligence because of how [the Administration] has reclassified it. That's a very dangerous move to protect the lies of Hegeseth and Trump."

The Bulwark

106,693 views • 3 months ago

On CNN, Russ Vought briefly mentioned an important but rarely used statutory process provided to a president, known as a “pocket” rescission. Once you understand what a pocket rescission is, you’ll understand it as the smoothest path towards attaining the vast majority of DOGE cuts. Normally, when a rescission package is submitted to Congress, as one will likely be tomorrow, a president has the statutory authority to withhold those funds for 45 days (measured in days that Congress isn’t in recess. ) We should fully support that rescission package because if all or some of it fails, or Congress doesn’t act on the package within those 45 days, the package fails and we lose the ability to use the rescission process to attain those cuts later. On the other hand, a “pocket” rescission is a rescissions package submitted within 45 days of the end of the fiscal year. If a rescission package is submitted within that window, the statutory authority of a president to withhold those funds take us past September 30th, the end of the fiscal year. At that point, the budget authority to expend fy25 funds lapses. The rescission is therefore automatic. Once you understand this, it’s the the ideal strategy for attaining the DOGE cuts because it gives Congress the ability to affirm the process by voting in support of the rescission, but it also moves forward automatically. It’s a win-win. But it requires that the rescission packages be submitted after roughly August 18th. Demanding more DOGE cuts NOW, and urging movement on them now, jeopardizes the process. We should be asking for all future rescissions packages on DOGE cuts to wait until AFTER roughly August 18th.

On CNN, Russ Vought briefly mentioned an important but rarely used statutory process provided to a president, known as a “pocket” rescission. Once you understand what a pocket rescission is, you’ll understand it as the smoothest path towards attaining the vast majority of DOGE cuts. Normally, when a rescission package is submitted to Congress, as one will likely be tomorrow, a president has the statutory authority to withhold those funds for 45 days (measured in days that Congress isn’t in recess. ) We should fully support that rescission package because if all or some of it fails, or Congress doesn’t act on the package within those 45 days, the package fails and we lose the ability to use the rescission process to attain those cuts later. On the other hand, a “pocket” rescission is a rescissions package submitted within 45 days of the end of the fiscal year. If a rescission package is submitted within that window, the statutory authority of a president to withhold those funds take us past September 30th, the end of the fiscal year. At that point, the budget authority to expend fy25 funds lapses. The rescission is therefore automatic. Once you understand this, it’s the the ideal strategy for attaining the DOGE cuts because it gives Congress the ability to affirm the process by voting in support of the rescission, but it also moves forward automatically. It’s a win-win. But it requires that the rescission packages be submitted after roughly August 18th. Demanding more DOGE cuts NOW, and urging movement on them now, jeopardizes the process. We should be asking for all future rescissions packages on DOGE cuts to wait until AFTER roughly August 18th.

Wade Miller

18,683 views • 1 year ago

#BREAKING — MTG says she will read the List of Powerful Men involved with underage Girls in relationship with Jeffrey Epstein on the House Floor When asked if Trump is not implicated in the Epstein Files, what is being protected? “I have no idea, but it seems like very rich and powerful men are being protected. I’ll get on anybody’s resolution to release those files… according to the victims, there’s a list of men, they’re afraid of lawsuits.” She says it’s not just the Trump administration that has failed to release these files, it was also the Biden administration, the Obama administration

#BREAKING — MTG says she will read the List of Powerful Men involved with underage Girls in relationship with Jeffrey Epstein on the House Floor When asked if Trump is not implicated in the Epstein Files, what is being protected? “I have no idea, but it seems like very rich and powerful men are being protected. I’ll get on anybody’s resolution to release those files… according to the victims, there’s a list of men, they’re afraid of lawsuits.” She says it’s not just the Trump administration that has failed to release these files, it was also the Biden administration, the Obama administration

MJTruthUltra

661,452 views • 9 months ago