Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Rep. Brandon Gill masterfully highlights the stark difference between Pete Hegseth's and Graham Platner's tattoos, successfully prompting SPLC Interim President and CEO Bryan Fair to condemn Platner's Nazi tattoo: Fair: "We oppose Nazis." Gill: "I agree, we oppose Nazis. Do you think if somebody got a Nazi tattoo on...

49,590 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

.Jason Rantz on Seattle Red on Graham Platner... "Number one, this is a guy who the Democratic base chose before the primary season even took place, really took place, and there was actually a vote. So, there was plenty of time to go with someone who doesn't have a Nazi tattoo. To your point, like, they're making a choice. I think if this was someone with a KKK tattoo, the Democratic Party would not be embracing it the same way. This is a different Democratic Party and its relationship to Jews and Israel. It just is, and I think that they're willing to give up certain kinds of morals that they used to hold, all because they've been deeply broken by the threat of Donald Trump, in their eyes. This is not someone who's just deeply flawed. He has a Nazi tattoo. He has a Nazi tattoo. And I think that that goes far beyond someone who is simply flawed. None of this started during Donald Trump either. I think that when it comes to the sexting and whatnot, I don't think people care anymore. I think they should. But that's not a Trump thing. I seem to recall a certain President who was in the Oval Office had sex with an intern" "But Eric Swalwell is a good example of this. The story that came out was everyone knew this was the quiet secret everyone knew, so they allowed it to continue for a very long time, regardless of his potential victims. I think that's the real issue here. It is just beyond bizarre that the Democrats are still defending him."

Curtis Houck

25,039 views • 1 month ago