Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
🎥 Rep. Eric Burlison on disclosure in Washington: “legacy” reverse-engineering claims + a first site-visit update. Ask YOUR questions for the LIVE AMA w/ Rep. Burlison, James Fox & Leslie Kean (1 question per comment) to be answered on Sat Mar 7 - 1PM ET/10AM PT: Sat Mar 7... show more
18,976 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 0
Нет доступных комментариев
Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста
![🚨 This is important... 🚨 "If you don't clear [Grusch's] record and demonstrate that you're able to make him right. You're sending a message to everybody else...that you're going to get punished if you come forward." ~Rep. Eric Burlison (Burlison is the only MAGA politician who's willing to call out the Trump administration like this, on the UFO topic. It's subtle, but it's there. So what happens if they don't do this for Grusch? What will Burlison say and do? To me, if they don't do this for Grusch, we'll know that the Trump administration isn't serious about Disclosure. And why is he the only MAGA pol wiling to speak like this when it comes to the Trump admin? Where are Rep. Anna Paulina Luna and Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office? We need them to speak up on these types of issues. And I'm only including a minute of what Matt Laslo got from Burlison so people can go support him by clicking on his YT videos and tweets, and subscribe to the only guy in DC who is trying to get us UAP answers from Congress on a daily basis.) Laslo: "What's up with these whispers about Grusch maybe getting his NDA waived?" Rep. Eric Burlison: "It needs to get... Well, he'll waive it. What he needs is his clearances all brought back." (Will Trump issue a SF-312 NDA waiver so Grusch can share a lot more of what he knows with the public?) Dr. Eric Davis to me in July... Davis: "Trump did NOT issue a SF-312 NDA waiver for us whistleblowers to reveal classified information to the public." ~ Laslo: "Are you talking with Stephen Miller and them about that?" Burlison: "Yes, I've been tenacious about that...because, to me, if you don't clear his record and demonstrate that you're able to make him right. You're sending a message to everybody else who might wanna come forward that you're going to get punished if you come forward." (I think we need a lot more in order for whistleblowers to feel comfortable enough to come forward, but this would be a good first step.) Laslo: "Would that be the President himself giving him that waiver? Or, what would that look like?" Burlison: "Yeah, I mean, honestly, the administration... And I've talked to them... They will readily admit that it was probably, they probably went too far with him." (Who are "they"?) Laslo: "Interesting." Burlison: "Yeah, they didn't need to make..." Laslo: "Who would admit that? FBI?" Burlison: "I'm not gonna say, because..yeah. Just out of a level of confidence.." (Great question by Laslo, as we REALLY need to know who admitted that. I'll link to the rest of the interview in the replies. They talk about the FBI, DoE, CIA, and FFRDCs.)](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2095895124970807452/amplify_video_thumb/2095894838357184512/img/aPDjWn3TYacQ1BYX.jpg)