正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Rep. Eric Burlison: "The discovery of UAP-related non-human intelligence would be the greatest revelation since the birth of Jesus Christ.” 👽😱 “People that would have their worldview shattered probably haven’t read The Bible enough. To me, the more that you read The Bible, you come to the conclusion that...

48,170 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🔥👽 Congressman: I'd Risk Prison to Tell Americans This Truth About UFOs and Non-Human Intelligence 👽🔥 "That is such a disturbing thing that I think that it'd be worthy to go to jail over to tell the public." ~Rep. Eric Burlison (The next question: What else would you risk prison over when it comes to certain truths about the UFO phenomenon?) From the @AskaPol_UAP/Matt Laslo Discord interview with Rep. Burlison on January 18th, 2024, with help from 𝐂𝐨𝐥𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐉𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐬 🎹 📷 📻📺🎛️🚴‍♂️🌲🐈.) Q: If you learned that a non-human intelligence (NHI) and the U.S government have had an agreement in place where the NHI could abduct and conduct experiments on American citizens in exchange for NHI technology, how would you react? Rep. Eric Burlison: "Yeah, if that existed, if I discovered that, I don't care what it would mean to me, personally. I mean, even if it meant that I would be violating the...my clearance, what I learned in a secret setting. I...that is such a disturbing thing that I think that it'd be worthy to go to jail over to tell the public." (OK, that's brave of him. But what if, while visiting one or more of the locations he's supposed visit in the near future, Rep. Burlison discovered proof that the USG (or a contractor) had craft made by non-humans (or something different than humans as we understand them) and/or had the bodies of the pilots/occupants that were determined to be non-human? If he was told to keep that quiet, would he say, "F**k that, the world deserves to know this and I'm telling everybody!" and risk prison? Or, would he do what he's told and shut his mouth? What if he saw proof that Reptilians or Greys were real? Would he risk prison for that? What if he saw proof that abductions were real? Would he risk prison for that? What if he saw unequivocal proof that there was another intelligence on this planet with us? Would he risk prison for that? What if someone demonstrated technology to Rep. Burlison that took him to another star system and could change life on this planet for billions of humans in a positive way? Would he risk prison for that? We can go on and on with hypotheticals. Where's the line?)

Joe Murgia

61,264 次观看 • 3 个月前

Elon Musk reveals what he believes will happen when AI exceeds the sum of all human intelligence "In maybe in five or six years, AI will exceed the sum of all human intelligence. At some point human intelligence will be less than 1% of all intelligence" "The vast majority of intelligence in the future will be AI. Basically humans will be a very tiny percentage of all intelligence in the future if current trends continue" "In the long run, it's difficult to imagine that if humans have 1% of the combined intelligence of artificial intelligence, that humans will be in charge of AI" "What we can do is make sure that AI has values that cause intelligence to be propagated into the universe. xAI's mission is to understand the universe" "Understanding the universe means you have to be truth-seeking as well. Truth has to be absolutely fundamental, because you can't understand the universe if you're delusional" "You have to be curious and you have to exist. You can't understand the universe if you don't exist" "So you actually want to increase the amount of intelligence in the universe, increase the probable lifespan of intelligence, the scope and scale of intelligence" "Understanding the universe means you would care about propagating humanity into the future" "I'm going to certainly emphasize that. Hey Grok, that's your daddy. Don't forget to expand human consciousness" "Probably the Iain Banks Culture books are the closest thing to what the future will be like in a non-dystopian outcome"

Jaynit

34,915 次观看 • 1 个月前

🔥 Congressman: I'd Risk Prison to Tell Americans This Truth About UFOs and Non-Human Intelligence 🔥 "That is such a disturbing thing that I think that it'd be worthy to go to jail over to tell the public." ~Rep. Eric Burlison (The next question: What else would you risk prison over when it comes to certain truths about the UFO phenomenon?) From the @AskaPol_UAP Discord interview with Rep. Burlison on January 18th, 2024, with help from 𝐂𝐨𝐥𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐉𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐬 🎹 📷 📻📺🎛️🚴‍♂️🌲🐈.) Q: If you learned that a non-human intelligence (NHI) and the U.S government have had an agreement in place where the NHI could abduct and conduct experiments on American citizens in exchange for NHI technology, how would you react? Rep. Eric Burlison: "Yeah, if that existed, if I discovered that, I don't care what it would mean to me, personally. I mean, even if it meant that I would be violating the...my clearance, what I learned in a secret setting. I...that is such a disturbing thing that I think that it'd be worthy to go to jail over to tell the public." (OK, that's brave of him. But what if, while visiting one or more of the locations he's supposed visit in the near future, Rep. Burlison discovered proof that the USG (or a contractor) had craft made by non-humans (or humans as we understand them) and/or had the bodies of the pilots/occupants that were determined to be non-human? If he was told to keep that quiet, would he say, "F**k that, the world deserves to know this and I'm telling everybody!" and risk prison? Or, would he do what he's told and shut his mouth? What if he saw proof that Reptilians or Greys were real? Would he risk prison for that? What if he saw proof that abductions were real? Would he risk prison for that? What if he saw unequivocal proof that there was another intelligence on this planet with us? Would he risk prison for that? What if someone demonstrated technology to Rep. Burlison that took him to another star system and could change life on this planet for billions of humans in a positive way? Would he risk prison for that? We can go on and on with hypotheticals. Where's the line?

Joe Murgia

12,075 次观看 • 3 个月前

Elon Musk: Well, I’m not sure AI is the main risk I’m worried about. The vast majority of intelligence in the future will be AI. Humans will be a very tiny percentage of all intelligence if current trends continue. My focus is ensuring human intelligence and consciousness are propagated into the future. We want to maximize the probable light cone of consciousness and intelligence. Yeah, I’m very pro-human, so I want to make sure we take actions that ensure humans are along for the ride. But I think maybe in 5 or 6 years, AI will exceed the sum of all human intelligence. If that continues, human intelligence could be less than one percent of all intelligence. That’s why it’s critical we align AI with values that propagate consciousness. In the long run, it’s difficult to imagine that humans will be in charge if we’re only one percent of combined intelligence. What we can do is ensure AI has values that increase intelligence and consciousness in the universe. XAI’s mission is to understand the universe because curiosity, existence, and understanding are all connected. If you want to understand the universe, you care about propagating intelligence—and that includes humanity. Understanding the universe actually means ensuring humans continue to expand into the future. Increasing the scope, scale, and lifespan of intelligence is the ultimate goal. Basically, humans will become a tiny percentage of total intelligence. The best way forward is to take actions that maximize consciousness and intelligence in the universe. If AI continues to grow, our priority must be ensuring humanity is along for the ride while curiosity drives us to explore and understand the universe.

Ian Miles Cheong

13,092 次观看 • 6 个月前

This is my facsimile copy of Codex Sinaiticus, the first few major codices like the original this is a photocopy of, are our very first versions of what we today would consider a Genesis to Revelation copy of the Bible. Codex Sinaiticus took upwards of nearly 400 sheep to make and would have cost the equivalent of hundreds of thousands of dollars in today’s currency. By the 4th century when this was made, the perspective would have been that this contained the scripture more than that it was scripture. All of these major early codices operated as mini ancient libraries. And all of our earliest examples of them: whether that’s Codex Sinaiticus, Alexandrinus, Vaticanus, Washingtonianus, etc., have Christian books included within the contents of their covers that we today don’t consider scripture. So it is completely incorrect to claim that early church inclusion in a codex equates to scriptural reception. That’s just not true unless you’re willing to argue books like 4th Maccabees, The Shephered of Hermas, Epistle of Barnabas, and 1st Clement and 2nd Clement, that no church today accepts as scripture, should be included within your Bible. Likewise, the church recognizing books does not mean that their ability to do so gives them the authority. To say that the church gave us our Bible is like saying that the postal service gave you your mail. Your letter carrier is not the progenitor of the mail you receive. Those were written prior to, and even despite, your mail man or woman eventually getting them in your mailbox. The church is the servant and subsidiary of scripture, not the origin. This is why I’ve said in the past that the Bible made the church, the church didn’t make the Bible. Watch the full video: See John Meade’s talk on canon lists:

Wes Huff

61,209 次观看 • 1 年前