Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨🇺🇸 REP. MASSIE: THE INTELLIGENCE ASPECT AROUND EPSTEIN GOES EVEN DEEPER THAN PEOPLE THINK "There's two reasons he's flipped. One, his rich and powerful friends who've donated to him or go to his dinner parties, he doesn't want to embarrass them, and they may in fact not even be...

158,991 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

WATCH: Victor Davis Hanson drops what might be the clearest, most damning explanation yet for Epstein’s real role.....and why those files still aren’t public. Victor Davis Hanson has a gift for cutting through the noise. In this conversation with Glenn Beck, he laid out exactly what he thinks Epstein was really doing, and why the files remained buried. Beck asked him: “What do you think this is really about?” Hanson replied: “I think it's pretty clear now that Epstein had no talent other than blackmail. And he was not a financier, he a captain of finance at all.” “What he did is he invited very powerful people to his island or his New York home, filmed them and then he bribed them.” Beck pressed: “So why isn't it being exposed?” That’s when Hanson delivered the single most likely—and explosive—explanation. “I think there are people within the establishment—I don't know if they partook in the his sick things he was doing—but they have some association with him and they gave him money to invest when there was no reason to hire someone like that.” “He got a half a billion dollars somehow, from people who were mainstream establishmentarians on the basis that he was going to blackmail them.” “I think those names are numerous and I think the Trump administration thought, well we're going to release this and there's some crazy people that we don't care about, are going to be embarrassed....and then all the sudden, they got a lot of calls.” “Said, why are you doing this? I didn't do this, I went down to the island once, I was on a plane, I didn't touch anybody.” “There's a lot of people who were very powerful who were giving him money or were trafficking with him, not necessarily all them engaging in what he was doing, but just the association with him.” “And I think they're putting pressure on people. I really do.”

Vigilant Fox 🦊

496,559 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

.Jack Posobiec on the "two-movies-one-screen" phenomenon regarding the current Minneapolis situation: "When you talk to the people there, they are not even aware that the other 'movie' exists." For those who don't know, the "two-movies-one-screen" phenomenon means that two people (or two groups of people) are observing the same data, but processing the information so differently that they reach entirely different conclusions about reality. From the psychoanalytic point of view, I think there is something deeper here. What Jack says about the people who are "not even aware that the other 'movie' exists" is very interesting - this is not even cognitive dissonance ("I see the other movie, but it makes me uncomfortable"), but rather dissociation ("I don't even see the other movie, it isn't even playing"). Cognitive dissonance may involve more mature, neurotic-level defense mechanisms such as rationalization or reaction formation (I see the other movie, but I counter-react to it by twisting it), while dissociation is itself a more primitive, near-psychotic mechanism that cuts off the unbearable part of reality ("I don't even see the other movie at all"). In dissociation (negative hallucination), their mind is deleting the data before it can even be processed and there's a failure in reality testing which makes it a near-psychotic experience. Although there may not be a total psychotic breakdown and complete lack of reality testing in this case: these people may function quite well in their casual work environment and they can be perfectly rational when talking about the weather. They can be successful lawyers or doctors while remaining crazy about political reality - some psychoanalysts call it "encapsulated psychosis."

Wojciech Pawelczyk

262,480 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Victor Davis Hanson: Elon Musk is a Renaissance man, a Da Vinci of our age—and Democrats hate that. “Elon Musk represents everything [Democrats] are not. He's a Renaissance man of the 21st century. He reinvented social media. He's saving NASA from itself. He created the whole EV industry, basically single-handedly. Let's not even get into the AI, the tunnels and all the other things he does. So, he's a Renaissance man. He's a Da Vinci of our age, and they hate that. This election is starting to come down to the people who lecture us and say, you can't do things, can't do this, can't do that, got to think this way, must be this way, to the people who are getting tired of being lectured. They say we can do stuff, and we're going to do stuff. And one side says, you should be ashamed of who you are. Your Constitution was flawed, it got worse, now it's even the worst of all, you should be guilty of who you are. And the other side says, you know, I'm tired of that. Our civilization has nothing to apologize for. We're better than any other alternative, and we don't have to be perfect to be good. So, I think people were getting to an inflection point, like you pointed out, and you can feel it. You can feel it in the country that people are getting tired of this. And the people, the real people who want to do things and are optimistic and think things are going to get better are going to not vote for them, they don't want to. They don't want their message anymore, their habit. The jig's up. I really believe that.” Victor Davis Hanson with Laura Ingraham on Fox News, October 16, 2024

ELON CLIPS

1,622,396 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce