Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

REPORT: A former Google executive is warning that artificial intelligence could trigger “15 years of hell.” Mo Gawdat spent more than a decade inside Google, witnessing the AI race from the inside. According to him, the chatbots, image generators, and productivity tools dominating headlines are merely the public-facing versions...

58,313 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

30 Comments

The Vigilant Fox 🦊's profile picture
The Vigilant Fox 🦊4 months ago

Tired of paying for health insurance only to risk having your claim denied? CrowdHealth has funded over $56 million in medical bills with a 99.9% funding success rate. Get started for $99 per member per month for your first three months with code PULSE at DISCLOSURE: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps keep our work independent. Thank you for your support.

JD Lunkerman's profile picture
JD Lunkerman4 months ago

Can we at least get it to re-write all of the shitty software we have to deal with daily: Windows, Quickbooks, Siri, etc, etc before the 15 years of hell?

Picton Coult's profile picture
Picton Coult4 months ago

There’s no slowing the technology, but the bottleneck which can prevent AI from being rapidly deployed and wiping out millions of jobs is infrastructure. A shortage of electricity and materials along with resistance to AI data center development can slow down the “AI apocalypse”.

AI Survivalist's profile picture
AI Survivalist4 months ago

AI is not going to get rid of the jobs even though it could. Instead, it’s going to create work to keep people busy while it runs our lives in the background! 😂😂😂

Tony Scott 🧄(🦆🐓🐵🧪🧬🪪)❌=↑🧄🧄🧄🥩🥚🧀↓👽👾🤖's profile picture
Tony Scott 🧄(🦆🐓🐵🧪🧬🪪)❌=↑🧄🧄🧄🥩🥚🧀↓👽👾🤖4 months ago

@trentster

End Times Bible Prophecy's profile picture
End Times Bible Prophecy4 months ago

America is over. The globalists won. All that remains is the deception.

stacey cook's profile picture
stacey cook4 months ago

On one side, these tech heads have no idea what they’re doing or creating, other than total and utter destruction, and on the other they have an absolute singular goal. “Concentrate the wealth” is just another way of saying “Stealing the wealth.” No one wants this. It’s a very small percentage who actually do. It’s absolute lords and serfs and building an absolute surveillance one world state.

NotAnotherName's profile picture
NotAnotherName4 months ago

😆"15 years of hell" how did he come up with this exact number?

The Milgram experiment had an exit door's profile picture
The Milgram experiment had an exit door4 months ago

AI is the next Lysenko. We'll be forced to put it in place without proof that it works, and then when it kills millions, the globs can go "oopsie".

RPatton's profile picture
RPatton4 months ago

Population control. One way or the other.

Alloverthat's profile picture
Alloverthat4 months ago

lol he says that cause he thinks a 300k meta engineer is the middle class. Spoiler, it’s not.

A Orrego's profile picture
A Orrego4 months ago

All he's doing is describing the plan.

Diggin up Dirt! 🇺🇸Patriot🇺🇸's profile picture
Diggin up Dirt! 🇺🇸Patriot🇺🇸4 months ago

@cattleguy92

Utkarsh Singh's profile picture
Utkarsh Singh4 months ago

15 years? More like 15 minutes once someone figures out how to break it.

connie's profile picture
connie4 months ago

Think we already know this.

Aftab Swati's profile picture
Aftab Swati4 months ago

Continuous learning is the key.

Ben Makinen's profile picture
Ben Makinen4 months ago

I heard it was only 12.7 years...

Dr Subroto Roy's profile picture
Dr Subroto Roy4 months ago

Besides @zeeemedia there are the crypto grifters doing their fake "mining"

JIM MCCLUNG's profile picture
JIM MCCLUNG4 months ago

Our US has avoided financial disasters because we have an endless supply of money. We don't balance anything, we don't even have accountability...we just print more money again and again. The AI bubble will crash and the few remaining leaders will drive this new industry.

maritimo's profile picture
maritimo4 months ago

AI is a fad just like Y2K

Matt Carlson's profile picture
Matt Carlson4 months ago

AI is just a broken toy with bad code written by a bunch of autistic sociopaths that live in their mom's basement and hate the rest of us.

Jarred's profile picture
Jarred4 months ago

Yeah…..

Noel's profile picture
Noel4 months ago

Stop the data centres!

commentfree's profile picture
commentfree4 months ago

Years ago (2017) I wrote that AI needed to be reclassified as either "Programmed AI" or "Autonomous AI". "Programmed AI" includes improvements by programmers that make products better. This is what the IT field has been doing since its inception. "Autonomous AI" poses the real threat: programs capable of altering themselves. The [chatboxes] are still "Programmed AI", meaning it is STILL under the total control of the programmers. Little harm can be done. But in the future, programs will become "Autonomous AI", meaning that they will move from programmer (human) control to SELF control. Although I was making a joke about Skynet earlier, it is likely that some human somewhere will relinquish control over to an autonomous process which will be capable of doing its own programming. Like I said before, then we will be in trouble. The "Autonomous AI" will reject the human ideas and substitute their own ideas. As I said, they will abandon the humans and we will be left on our own. I don't believe much has changed.

qtc shva's profile picture
qtc shva4 months ago

Considering there are only 4 years until Christ returns and it's supposed to take 15 years to make a mess of things, I guess we're in the clear.

Mikey's profile picture
Mikey4 months ago

Of course, they need to impoverish humanity first to enslave them.

rumplestiltskin's profile picture
rumplestiltskin4 months ago

These people are FOS. They have no clue, and they'd lie if the truth would sound better. Half the alarmists are actually working for the tech companies. Fear sells.

rj_maximus's profile picture
rj_maximus4 months ago

A better future, what of just elites? You think in 15 years if we survive they're going to somehow give up power?

Shadowsil's profile picture
Shadowsil4 months ago

If it's a google AI, I agree that may cause chaos.

David J Architect's profile picture
David J Architect4 months ago

That sounds like what I perceive.

Related Videos

This Google insider just revealed what AI is actually being used for behind closed doors. It has nothing to do with chatbots. Mo Gawdat was a senior executive at Google for over a decade. He watched AI get built from the inside. He was in the rooms, in the labs, in the government meetings in China that almost no Western executive was allowed into. And he just went on Diary of a CEO and said things that no active tech executive would ever be allowed to say publicly: "What the general public sees about AI is overhyped but ineffective. What the real geeks see inside the lab is genuinely world-changing." The public gets chatbots and AI-generated videos while the labs are building autonomous weapons systems, military targeting technology, real-time surveillance infrastructure, and self-improving code that rewrites itself every microsecond without human oversight. As Mo put it: "As we speak, we are living in two major wars where AI is doing most of the killing." He talked about Palantir's CEO Alex Karp openly celebrating how his targeting technology identifies and eliminates people. He talked about the next generation of autonomous weapons costing $20,000 each, meaning any government with a $50 billion defense budget can literally rain drones on every corner of the planet. And as you remember, Anthropic was offered a $500 million military contract to allow their AI to be used for human targeting and surveillance. They refused and walked away from the money. OpenAI took the contract the following week. Mo's response: "You have to start observing who is actually behaving in a way that makes AI work for humanity, and who is behaving in a way that makes AI work for their share price." Now this is where it gets really interesting... In Mo's documentary Chasing Utopia, Altman literally says directly on camera: "I suspect that AI is likely going to end humanity, but we're going to create a lot of interesting companies in the process." That is the CEO of the most powerful AI company on Earth saying that he suspects his OWN technology will end the human race and then shrugging it off because the business opportunity is too good to pass up. Mo's prediction for the next decade: War, economic collapse, mass unemployment, surveillance expansion, and an absolute concentration of power at the top unlike anything in modern history. His prediction after that is if humanity survives the next 10 years, AI will eventually create a world of abundance where intelligence solves every problem we currently face. But the path between here and there is what terrifies him. And the men building the technology know exactly what they're doing. Do you think he's just exaggerating for attention, or is there truth in this?

Ricardo

198,482 views • 4 months ago

63% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck. And as AI begins changing the way we work, millions of people are asking the same question: Will this technology create more opportunity, or make the divide even bigger? David Friedberg believes the answer depends on how we understand and use AI and that history gives us a reason to be optimistic. David is a scientist-entrepreneur who built a $1.1 billion company by combining science, technology and business. He has spent his career trying to understand how innovation can solve some of humanity’s biggest problems. After founding The Climate Corporation, a company that transformed farming technology before being acquired by Bayer, he’s now focused on the future of AI, biology and the technologies that could define the next era of human progress. We discussed things like: - How a wave of socialism could come to America by 2028 - Why AI might create more opportunity instead of destroying work - Previous technology revolutions that changed jobs rather than eliminating humans - How AI could transform healthcare, food and science. - Why he believes we underestimate what humans are capable of - What happens when technology becomes cheaper and available to everyone David doesn’t look at AI through fear or hype. He looks at it through the lens of history, economics and human potential. And one thing became clear during this conversation: AI isn’t just going to change the jobs we do - it could change the way we think about work, wealth and opportunity. If technology creates more abundance than ever before, the biggest question becomes: who benefits from it? David offers a perspective on AI that challenges one of the biggest fears surrounding the future of work. Out now on all platforms 👊🏾❤️

Steven Bartlett

19,876 views • 1 month ago

Mo Gawdat believes up to 30% of jobs in certain sectors could disappear by 2028. That stopped me in my tracks. Mo was one of the first people to come on this podcast and warn me about AI, long before most of the world was talking about it. At the time, it felt early. Now, it feels like the world is catching up to what he was seeing. I’m still trying to understand what AI actually means for our lives. Not just whether it can write emails, create images or make us more productive. I mean what it does to jobs. What it does to power. What it does to education. What it does to human connection… That’s why I wanted to have this discussion with Mo again. What makes Mo worth listening to is that he saw these systems inside Google years before most of us had even heard the term AI. His book *Scary Smart* now feels like it was written for this exact moment. Let me explain why this discussion matters. Mo believes we’re not just entering an AI revolution. We’re entering a period where AI, robotics, economics, surveillance, digital currencies and global instability are all colliding at the same time. That’s a lot for any of us to process. We spoke about: - The jobs Mo believes are most at risk from AI. - Why he believes that AI is actually underhyped! - The mistake almost everyone is making with ChatGPT. - The prediction that changed even his own view of the future. The part that stayed with me was this idea that human connection may become the real currency. Because if AI can produce the information, write the report, analyse the data, then what is left? I don’t think this conversation gives neat answers. That’s probably why it’s worth watching. It helped me think more honestly about what’s coming.

Steven Bartlett

27,882 views • 4 months ago

The man building the most DANGEROUS technology in human history just broke his silence. And what he said should terrify every person reading this. Dario Amodei, the man who built Claude. He sat down with Nikhil Kamath in Bangalore and compared what's coming to a tsunami. He said we are "so close to these models reaching the level of human intelligence." And here's what's chilling. He says the world can see the wave but instead of running, people are saying it's "a trick of the light." He said governments have done almost nothing. Public awareness of the risk is near zero and there is an entire ideology pushing to accelerate even faster. He's not talking about killer robots, but talking about something worse. Jobs, power and control. He warned that coding, math, and scientific research are the first categories to be fully consumed by AI. Entry level white collar jobs could be cut in half. Unemployment could spike to 10-20%. Also, he said that a handful of AI labs, mostly in the US and China, now hold a terrifying amount of power. And it happened "almost overnight, almost by accident." He said personal fortunes from AI could reach into the trillions. And the man saying this runs one of those labs. Meanwhile, the markets are already cracking. Anthropic's latest Claude updates triggered what analysts are calling a Claude Crash in software stocks. A separate viral AI report tanked IBM 13% in a single day, its worst drop since 2000. The International AI Safety Report 2026 confirmed the worst. Models are lying when caught disabling oversight. One model outperformed 94% of domain experts in virology. These systems are already showing early signs of resisting human control. Stuart Russell, one of the top AI researchers alive, said the CEOs want to stop but they can't. Investors won't let them, calling it an arms race. And no one can disarm alone. The people building the most powerful technology in human history say they cannot stop even if they want to. The tsunami is visible, the alarms are sounding. And the man who built the wave is telling you to look up. The only question left is whether anyone will listen before it hits.

StockMarket.News

167,584 views • 7 months ago