Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

REPORT: The UK is now using terrorist-tracking AI to hunt anti-migrant protesters—proving once again that “hate speech” laws are just censorship rebranded. Software originally built to stop ISIS is now targeting Brits who speak out against asylum hotels or expose two-tier policing. A bombshell report from The Telegraph reveals...

VigilantFox's profile picture

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,970,210 subscribers

54,068 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Anti-Privacy and Censorship Bills Pro-Censorship & Pro-Israel lawmakers, Josh Gottheimer (D) & Elise Stefanik (R) introduced a new bill to infringe on privacy by requiring age verification thru ID for all operating systems so every device you use can be traced to your ID. The removal of anonymity online will enable another bill, the Stop Hate Act, also introduced by Gottheimer to be traced back to each individual so they can be punished. The Stop Hate Act requires Social Media companies to report disinformation and terrorism which they define to include anti-Zionism. It’s no coincidence that two of the most pro-Israel shills in Congress have introduced these bills. These individuals aren’t just staunchly pro-Israel. They are coached by Israeli operatives with talking points and bills. This is yet another attempt to punish speech that is critical of Israel.
2:43

Anti-Privacy and Censorship Bills Pro-Censorship & Pro-Israel lawmakers, Josh Gottheimer (D) & Elise Stefanik (R) introduced a new bill to infringe on privacy by requiring age verification thru ID for all operating systems so every device you use can be traced to your ID. The removal of anonymity online will enable another bill, the Stop Hate Act, also introduced by Gottheimer to be traced back to each individual so they can be punished. The Stop Hate Act requires Social Media companies to report disinformation and terrorism which they define to include anti-Zionism. It’s no coincidence that two of the most pro-Israel shills in Congress have introduced these bills. These individuals aren’t just staunchly pro-Israel. They are coached by Israeli operatives with talking points and bills. This is yet another attempt to punish speech that is critical of Israel.

GenXGirl

32,408 views • 5 months ago

REPORT: The war for your mind is already underway. And the biggest threat to truth isn’t censorship—it’s cash. Across the digital landscape, “independent” voices are being quietly bought—some for six figures—and most won’t tell you who’s signing the checks. New disclosures expose a disturbing pattern: covert campaigns bankrolled by undisclosed foreign and corporate interests, targeting American audiences through influencers. These operations offer luxury perks, cash payments, and prepackaged narratives—carefully designed to shape public opinion without leaving fingerprints. This isn’t organic. And it’s no accident. Influencers who once questioned authority are now parroting establishment lines, skipping the censorship battles that silence real dissidents. You’re not watching grassroots resistance. You’re watching a rebrand. So before you repeat that viral talking point, ask yourself: did they come to that view on their own—or were they paid to sell it? Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial's full report. It names names. 👇
7:40

REPORT: The war for your mind is already underway. And the biggest threat to truth isn’t censorship—it’s cash. Across the digital landscape, “independent” voices are being quietly bought—some for six figures—and most won’t tell you who’s signing the checks. New disclosures expose a disturbing pattern: covert campaigns bankrolled by undisclosed foreign and corporate interests, targeting American audiences through influencers. These operations offer luxury perks, cash payments, and prepackaged narratives—carefully designed to shape public opinion without leaving fingerprints. This isn’t organic. And it’s no accident. Influencers who once questioned authority are now parroting establishment lines, skipping the censorship battles that silence real dissidents. You’re not watching grassroots resistance. You’re watching a rebrand. So before you repeat that viral talking point, ask yourself: did they come to that view on their own—or were they paid to sell it? Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial's full report. It names names. 👇

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

52,552 views • 8 months ago

Censorship is not the solution. Albanese needs to deal with the failures of our immigration policy and intelligence agencies. Hate Crime laws were introduced into Parliament last year. The ones introduced this week will be just as ineffective. At the time I said they were unnecessary because State Governments deal with violent crimes. The new laws did nothing to stop the Bondi terror attack. As pointed out in the speech, the laws were designed to crack down psychological acts not violent acts. In particular the threshold for committing a crime was reduced from “intent” to “carelessness.” This makes the Hate Crime laws dangerous because they threaten freedom of speech by allowing the government to censor or punish individuals for expressing opinions that might be deemed offensive. Such laws are often vague and subjective, leading to potential abuse and selective enforcement. This creates a chilling effect where people fear speaking openly, stifling debate and free expression. Instead of combating hate, these laws can be weaponized to silence dissent and suppress unpopular viewpoints, ultimately undermining democratic values and individual liberties. Last year, People First was one of a few parties that stood in defence of open discourse, free speech, and the democratic principles that underpin our society. If you would like to help push back against government overreach please sign up today at or
3:27

Censorship is not the solution. Albanese needs to deal with the failures of our immigration policy and intelligence agencies. Hate Crime laws were introduced into Parliament last year. The ones introduced this week will be just as ineffective. At the time I said they were unnecessary because State Governments deal with violent crimes. The new laws did nothing to stop the Bondi terror attack. As pointed out in the speech, the laws were designed to crack down psychological acts not violent acts. In particular the threshold for committing a crime was reduced from “intent” to “carelessness.” This makes the Hate Crime laws dangerous because they threaten freedom of speech by allowing the government to censor or punish individuals for expressing opinions that might be deemed offensive. Such laws are often vague and subjective, leading to potential abuse and selective enforcement. This creates a chilling effect where people fear speaking openly, stifling debate and free expression. Instead of combating hate, these laws can be weaponized to silence dissent and suppress unpopular viewpoints, ultimately undermining democratic values and individual liberties. Last year, People First was one of a few parties that stood in defence of open discourse, free speech, and the democratic principles that underpin our society. If you would like to help push back against government overreach please sign up today at or

Gerard Rennick

26,393 views • 8 months ago

REPORT: A bombshell out of the UK has just exposed that officials hid vaccine death data because they feared the public would become “distressed or angry.” The outrage grew even sharper once it emerged that the same data was quietly handed to pharmaceutical companies while the people who were vaccinated were kept completely in the dark. According to The Telegraph, the UK Health Security Agency blocked anonymized records that could show how closely vaccination dates aligned with death dates. Officials admitted the numbers might reveal a link devastating to bereaved families, yet the dataset was still shared privately with vaccine makers. Meanwhile, campaigners spent two years filing FOIs and were denied every time. The fallout is hitting as anger rises in the US. Many expected RFK Jr. to expose the truth about the shots, but Dr. Steven Hatfill says powerful insiders have shut down reforms and pushed out key health-freedom allies. Online, people are questioning whether RFK Jr.’s statements are even coming from him. If this is what the UK is admitting, what are American agencies hiding? The truth may be far darker than anyone expects. Watch the full report: 👇
15:36

REPORT: A bombshell out of the UK has just exposed that officials hid vaccine death data because they feared the public would become “distressed or angry.” The outrage grew even sharper once it emerged that the same data was quietly handed to pharmaceutical companies while the people who were vaccinated were kept completely in the dark. According to The Telegraph, the UK Health Security Agency blocked anonymized records that could show how closely vaccination dates aligned with death dates. Officials admitted the numbers might reveal a link devastating to bereaved families, yet the dataset was still shared privately with vaccine makers. Meanwhile, campaigners spent two years filing FOIs and were denied every time. The fallout is hitting as anger rises in the US. Many expected RFK Jr. to expose the truth about the shots, but Dr. Steven Hatfill says powerful insiders have shut down reforms and pushed out key health-freedom allies. Online, people are questioning whether RFK Jr.’s statements are even coming from him. If this is what the UK is admitting, what are American agencies hiding? The truth may be far darker than anyone expects. Watch the full report: 👇

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

207,229 views • 10 months ago

REPORT: Canada is moving to criminalize Bible verses—scrapping protections for “sincere religious expression” under a sweeping new hate speech law. Quoting scripture “in good faith” may no longer protect you in court. Bill C-9, backed by Trudeau’s Liberals and the Bloc, strips out the one clause that shielded believers from prosecution. This comes after a radical imam called for “Zionist aggressors” to be killed—then claimed it was just a prayer. Prosecutors agreed. No charges. Rather than confront that, lawmakers are targeting verses that teach love and forgiveness. Critics say the goal isn’t equality—it’s the erasure of Christianity. They warn this is the gateway to a “One World Religion,” where unelected elites decide what faith survives. What’s really being banned here—hate speech, or the Christian values that built Western civilization? Watch the full report:👇
8:46

REPORT: Canada is moving to criminalize Bible verses—scrapping protections for “sincere religious expression” under a sweeping new hate speech law. Quoting scripture “in good faith” may no longer protect you in court. Bill C-9, backed by Trudeau’s Liberals and the Bloc, strips out the one clause that shielded believers from prosecution. This comes after a radical imam called for “Zionist aggressors” to be killed—then claimed it was just a prayer. Prosecutors agreed. No charges. Rather than confront that, lawmakers are targeting verses that teach love and forgiveness. Critics say the goal isn’t equality—it’s the erasure of Christianity. They warn this is the gateway to a “One World Religion,” where unelected elites decide what faith survives. What’s really being banned here—hate speech, or the Christian values that built Western civilization? Watch the full report:👇

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

116,928 views • 9 months ago

Today the Federal Government in conjunction with the Coalition and with no resistance from One Nation passed a bill against Hate Speech. They gagged debate again and rammed the laws through with no scrutiny where we could ask questions. This is a direct attack on Free Speech. For the third parliamentary week in a row the major parties have devoted Parliament to controlling you, not serving you, by shutting you down. The Misinformation Law, the Online Safety Bill and now Hate Speech are all designed to censor people and push back on government overreach. The hate speech law is dangerous because it threatens freedom of speech by allowing the government to censor or punish individuals for expressing opinions that might be deemed offensive. Such laws are often vague and subjective, leading to potential abuse and selective enforcement. This creates a chilling effect where people fear speaking openly, stifling debate and free expression. Instead of combating hate, these laws can be weaponized to silence dissent and suppress unpopular viewpoints, ultimately undermining democratic values and individual liberties. People First stood in defence of open discourse, free speech, and the democratic principles that underpin our society. Upholding these values will foster trust and preserve the liberties that Australians hold dear. I am disappointed that One Nation did not stand with me on this issue. These laws extend to all people including children. When a motion was moved to exclude children under 14 from these laws, Malcolm Roberts voted against it. Children should not be penalised for the actions or thoughts of their parents. I challenge Malcolm and Pauline to debate me on the reasons why they support this law. It is government overreach plain and simple. There are already state laws against violence and inciting violence. Under the constitution, the States are responsible for policing crime not the Federal Government. There is no need for these laws. They will only be used to censor you. #auspol
2:19

Today the Federal Government in conjunction with the Coalition and with no resistance from One Nation passed a bill against Hate Speech. They gagged debate again and rammed the laws through with no scrutiny where we could ask questions. This is a direct attack on Free Speech. For the third parliamentary week in a row the major parties have devoted Parliament to controlling you, not serving you, by shutting you down. The Misinformation Law, the Online Safety Bill and now Hate Speech are all designed to censor people and push back on government overreach. The hate speech law is dangerous because it threatens freedom of speech by allowing the government to censor or punish individuals for expressing opinions that might be deemed offensive. Such laws are often vague and subjective, leading to potential abuse and selective enforcement. This creates a chilling effect where people fear speaking openly, stifling debate and free expression. Instead of combating hate, these laws can be weaponized to silence dissent and suppress unpopular viewpoints, ultimately undermining democratic values and individual liberties. People First stood in defence of open discourse, free speech, and the democratic principles that underpin our society. Upholding these values will foster trust and preserve the liberties that Australians hold dear. I am disappointed that One Nation did not stand with me on this issue. These laws extend to all people including children. When a motion was moved to exclude children under 14 from these laws, Malcolm Roberts voted against it. Children should not be penalised for the actions or thoughts of their parents. I challenge Malcolm and Pauline to debate me on the reasons why they support this law. It is government overreach plain and simple. There are already state laws against violence and inciting violence. Under the constitution, the States are responsible for policing crime not the Federal Government. There is no need for these laws. They will only be used to censor you. #auspol

Gerard Rennick

177,814 views • 1 year ago

🚨 'I want to warn you, Mr. Speaker… I may read today from a very dangerous book.' That book? The Bible. A book the government now wants to treat as hate speech. Watch my full speech on Bill C-9 here. 👇 Etched into the very rock of Centre Block, just steps from the House of Commons, are more than two dozen Scriptures. Our national motto 'From Sea to Sea' comes straight from Psalms. How can a nation literally carved from biblical truths now seek to criminalize those truths through Bill C-9? In this full speech, I expose how the Liberals' Faustian bargain with the Bloc removes long-standing good-faith protections for sincere religious expression, ignores centuries of Western commitment to fearless speech, and replaces debate with 'just trust us.' The antidote to hatred is not censorship. It is more speech. More truth. More freedom. Freedom is the sure possession of those alone who have the courage to defend it. Will you defend it?
10:09

🚨 'I want to warn you, Mr. Speaker… I may read today from a very dangerous book.' That book? The Bible. A book the government now wants to treat as hate speech. Watch my full speech on Bill C-9 here. 👇 Etched into the very rock of Centre Block, just steps from the House of Commons, are more than two dozen Scriptures. Our national motto 'From Sea to Sea' comes straight from Psalms. How can a nation literally carved from biblical truths now seek to criminalize those truths through Bill C-9? In this full speech, I expose how the Liberals' Faustian bargain with the Bloc removes long-standing good-faith protections for sincere religious expression, ignores centuries of Western commitment to fearless speech, and replaces debate with 'just trust us.' The antidote to hatred is not censorship. It is more speech. More truth. More freedom. Freedom is the sure possession of those alone who have the courage to defend it. Will you defend it?

Jacob Mantle

74,758 views • 6 months ago

Governments Are Creating A Fake Hate Panic To Censor, Interfere In Elections, And Imprison Their Political Enemies It's alarming what's happening in the US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, Scotland, Brazil, and the EU The US and other governments around the world are hyping hate in order to weaponize the government against their political enemies. Ever since the 2019 shooting in New Zealand, governments have been using so-called hate speech, fake news, and misinformation as justifications for censorship. In Ireland, the government is pushing hate speech legislation that would allow police to invade homes and seize phones and computers. In Canada, Justin Trudeau is pushing legislation that would allow the government to sentence individuals to life in prison for things they said. And it was recently revealed that the Biden White House worked with one of the leading groups that hype hate, the Center for Countering Digital Hate, to demand Facebook and other social media platforms to remove content and people they don't like. The Biden administration also endorsed the "Christchurch Call to Action to Eliminate Terrorist and Violent Extremist Content Online," which governments created in 2019 to justify censorship. This focus on so-called hatred, harmful content, and extremist content is extremely dangerous. What one person thinks is extreme, another person may view as common sense. For the government to decide what is extreme is a way of labeling someone as a potential terrorist threat. We saw this clearly with the Trudeau government's suppression of the Canadian trucker protests in Ottawa, in which people's bank accounts were frozen simply for supporting the anti-vaccine mandate. The same could happen in the United States. There is no reliable connection between people's beliefs and violence. Attempting to stop violence by censoring speech is totalitarian and Orwellian. It effectively criminalizes speech and creates a whole new category of pre-crime, like that depicted in the dystopian film, "Minority Report." So why are governments doing this?
1:54

Governments Are Creating A Fake Hate Panic To Censor, Interfere In Elections, And Imprison Their Political Enemies It's alarming what's happening in the US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, Scotland, Brazil, and the EU The US and other governments around the world are hyping hate in order to weaponize the government against their political enemies. Ever since the 2019 shooting in New Zealand, governments have been using so-called hate speech, fake news, and misinformation as justifications for censorship. In Ireland, the government is pushing hate speech legislation that would allow police to invade homes and seize phones and computers. In Canada, Justin Trudeau is pushing legislation that would allow the government to sentence individuals to life in prison for things they said. And it was recently revealed that the Biden White House worked with one of the leading groups that hype hate, the Center for Countering Digital Hate, to demand Facebook and other social media platforms to remove content and people they don't like. The Biden administration also endorsed the "Christchurch Call to Action to Eliminate Terrorist and Violent Extremist Content Online," which governments created in 2019 to justify censorship. This focus on so-called hatred, harmful content, and extremist content is extremely dangerous. What one person thinks is extreme, another person may view as common sense. For the government to decide what is extreme is a way of labeling someone as a potential terrorist threat. We saw this clearly with the Trudeau government's suppression of the Canadian trucker protests in Ottawa, in which people's bank accounts were frozen simply for supporting the anti-vaccine mandate. The same could happen in the United States. There is no reliable connection between people's beliefs and violence. Attempting to stop violence by censoring speech is totalitarian and Orwellian. It effectively criminalizes speech and creates a whole new category of pre-crime, like that depicted in the dystopian film, "Minority Report." So why are governments doing this?

Michael Shellenberger

826,975 views • 2 years ago

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried This Week #10 – UK government BUSTED in a secret plot to extract personal data from 2 billion iPhone users. They were this close to your “encrypted” data. This story begins when the UK govt hit Apple with a secret gag order, forcing them to either backdoor encrypted data for billions of users or face criminal charges if they refused to comply. Apple couldn’t even talk about it. The order demanded Apple create a vulnerability in its iCloud encryption, which would have given the UK government a back door to financial information, health records, and private conversations—not just of UK citizens but of two billion iPhone users worldwide. Remember, the UK government has already tried to threaten and extradite individuals outside the UK for violating British censorship laws—including US citizens over their online posts. So what happens when governments push to punish you not just for what you say publicly but for what you say privately? Rather than handing over the data of 2 billion iPhone users to the UK government, Apple chose to pull its Advanced Data Protection (ADP) in the UK—removing the option for UK users to enable encryption. Existing UK users must now disable encryption, and new users won’t have the option at all. US citizens and people in other countries remain unaffected by the UK government’s dystopian push to surveil and censor speech—for now. The UK government was this close to surveilling you, too—but luckily, Sayer Ji, Elon Musk, and The Wall Street Journal exposed this privacy nightmare. In another disturbing development, Imran Ahmed of the CCDH—one of the leading architects of the UK’s war on speech—is being awarded for his Orwellian efforts with a $300,000 prize this May. Sayer Ji has put together a petition to oppose this absurd aggrandizement of someone who has worked tirelessly to annihilate personal freedoms and silence dissenting voices. You can sign that petition here: (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)
38:07

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried This Week #10 – UK government BUSTED in a secret plot to extract personal data from 2 billion iPhone users. They were this close to your “encrypted” data. This story begins when the UK govt hit Apple with a secret gag order, forcing them to either backdoor encrypted data for billions of users or face criminal charges if they refused to comply. Apple couldn’t even talk about it. The order demanded Apple create a vulnerability in its iCloud encryption, which would have given the UK government a back door to financial information, health records, and private conversations—not just of UK citizens but of two billion iPhone users worldwide. Remember, the UK government has already tried to threaten and extradite individuals outside the UK for violating British censorship laws—including US citizens over their online posts. So what happens when governments push to punish you not just for what you say publicly but for what you say privately? Rather than handing over the data of 2 billion iPhone users to the UK government, Apple chose to pull its Advanced Data Protection (ADP) in the UK—removing the option for UK users to enable encryption. Existing UK users must now disable encryption, and new users won’t have the option at all. US citizens and people in other countries remain unaffected by the UK government’s dystopian push to surveil and censor speech—for now. The UK government was this close to surveilling you, too—but luckily, Sayer Ji, Elon Musk, and The Wall Street Journal exposed this privacy nightmare. In another disturbing development, Imran Ahmed of the CCDH—one of the leading architects of the UK’s war on speech—is being awarded for his Orwellian efforts with a $300,000 prize this May. Sayer Ji has put together a petition to oppose this absurd aggrandizement of someone who has worked tirelessly to annihilate personal freedoms and silence dissenting voices. You can sign that petition here: (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,159,058 views • 1 year ago

NEW: Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar vows new “hate speech” laws in response to the Dublin riots after a migrant stabbed multiple people. What a coward. The news comes as UFC legend Conor McGregor has come out swinging against Ireland's loose migration policy, saying the migrants should "never be here in the first place." “There is grave danger among us in Ireland that should never be here in the first place, and there has been zero action done to support the public in any way, shape or form with this frightening fact. NOT GOOD ENOUGH,” he said. Varadkar is now using the riots to push anti-free speech laws through. “I think it’s now very obvious to anyone who might have doubted it that our incitement hatred legislation is just not up to date. It’s not up to date for the social media age and we need that legislation through and we need it through within a matter of weeks because it’s not just the platforms who have a responsibility here.” “There’s also the individuals who post messages and images online that stir up hatred and violence and we need to be able to use laws to go after them individually as well.”
0:26

NEW: Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar vows new “hate speech” laws in response to the Dublin riots after a migrant stabbed multiple people. What a coward. The news comes as UFC legend Conor McGregor has come out swinging against Ireland's loose migration policy, saying the migrants should "never be here in the first place." “There is grave danger among us in Ireland that should never be here in the first place, and there has been zero action done to support the public in any way, shape or form with this frightening fact. NOT GOOD ENOUGH,” he said. Varadkar is now using the riots to push anti-free speech laws through. “I think it’s now very obvious to anyone who might have doubted it that our incitement hatred legislation is just not up to date. It’s not up to date for the social media age and we need that legislation through and we need it through within a matter of weeks because it’s not just the platforms who have a responsibility here.” “There’s also the individuals who post messages and images online that stir up hatred and violence and we need to be able to use laws to go after them individually as well.”

Collin Rugg

625,817 views • 2 years ago

🚨IS STARMER COMPROMISED? FROM FREE SPEECH DEFENDER TO JAILING PEOPLE FOR SOCIAL MEDIA POSTS 🤔🔒 What Happened To The Uk Prime Minister And Why His Stance On Social Media Arrests Flipped So Dramatically In 2012, as Director of Public Prosecutions, Keir Starmer proudly declared himself a guardian of free speech. In that now-infamous video he insisted: “Where a communication is merely offensive... principles of free speech require a high threshold, and dictate that a prosecution is unlikely to be in the public interest.” Today, Prime Minister Starmer presides over a regime that has racked up around 12,000 arrests tied solely to social media posts. The numbers are so grotesque that even Russia and China suddenly look like bastions of free speech by comparison. The hypocrisy is breathtaking. Many on X are no longer asking politely — they’re outright declaring that Starmer has been compromised. Whether it’s political cowardice, shadowy external influence, or naked authoritarian instinct, the man who once set a high bar for prosecution now jails people for hurting feelings online. He still trots out the same tired lines about “protecting children” and preventing disorder after the 2024 riots. But the latest escalation is his determined push for brand-new laws specifically targeting “Islamophobic” content. Critics say this is not about hate — it’s about criminalising legitimate public concern and dissent over mass migration, the rapid demographic changes, growing Islamic influence in public life, grooming gang scandals that were long ignored, and the general state of the country. What many see as valid political criticism and free debate is now being re-labelled as illegal “Islamophobia” to shut it down. What started as emergency measures after unrest has quietly morphed into a broader, relentless expansion of censorship dressed up in ever-changing justifications. The old Keir is nowhere to be seen. The contrast is damning.
1:20

🚨IS STARMER COMPROMISED? FROM FREE SPEECH DEFENDER TO JAILING PEOPLE FOR SOCIAL MEDIA POSTS 🤔🔒 What Happened To The Uk Prime Minister And Why His Stance On Social Media Arrests Flipped So Dramatically In 2012, as Director of Public Prosecutions, Keir Starmer proudly declared himself a guardian of free speech. In that now-infamous video he insisted: “Where a communication is merely offensive... principles of free speech require a high threshold, and dictate that a prosecution is unlikely to be in the public interest.” Today, Prime Minister Starmer presides over a regime that has racked up around 12,000 arrests tied solely to social media posts. The numbers are so grotesque that even Russia and China suddenly look like bastions of free speech by comparison. The hypocrisy is breathtaking. Many on X are no longer asking politely — they’re outright declaring that Starmer has been compromised. Whether it’s political cowardice, shadowy external influence, or naked authoritarian instinct, the man who once set a high bar for prosecution now jails people for hurting feelings online. He still trots out the same tired lines about “protecting children” and preventing disorder after the 2024 riots. But the latest escalation is his determined push for brand-new laws specifically targeting “Islamophobic” content. Critics say this is not about hate — it’s about criminalising legitimate public concern and dissent over mass migration, the rapid demographic changes, growing Islamic influence in public life, grooming gang scandals that were long ignored, and the general state of the country. What many see as valid political criticism and free debate is now being re-labelled as illegal “Islamophobia” to shut it down. What started as emergency measures after unrest has quietly morphed into a broader, relentless expansion of censorship dressed up in ever-changing justifications. The old Keir is nowhere to be seen. The contrast is damning.

J Stewart

517,626 views • 6 months ago

Remember when Fauci told everyone to social distance “6 feet”? He literally made it up. As bad as that lie was, it was nothing compared to what a British “nonprofit” did to silence people who purport “anti-vaccine” content. In 2021, the CCDH wrote a report that said 65% of vaccine “disinformation” comes from just 12 people, which included RFK Jr., Dr. Joseph Mercola, Ty and Charlene Bollinger (The Truth About Vaccines), and others. They were labeled the “Disinformation Dozen.” The media amplified the report and broadcast it to the world. The White House cited it while pressuring social media companies to take those 12 accounts down. The reality? They literally made it up—just like Fauci made up six feet. Facebook later revealed that those 12 accounts only contributed to “0.05 PERCENT of all views of vaccine-related content on our platform.” That's a far cry from 65%. The numbers didn’t matter. The damage was already done, and those twelve accounts never had the same reach again. And it was all triggered by a bogus, fabricated report. But now the tables are turning, and the censors are being taken to court. Ty and Charlene Bollinger (The Truth About Vaccines) didn’t just write a “strongly worded” letter, as Pam Bondi would say. They filed a nearly 400-page federal lawsuit naming the State Department, the FBI, the Center for Countering Digital Hate, and major Big Tech platforms in a coordinated effort to erase lawful speech as “misinformation.” “Make no mistake. Our case will set legal precedent in America,” Ty Bollinger says. Now it’s your turn to decide whether free speech will be treated as a God-given right or a “privilege.” Watch the film. Support the legal fight. Put the censors on trial. Make them answer in court for what they did. WATCH THE FILM: SUPPORT THE FIGHT:
1:51

Remember when Fauci told everyone to social distance “6 feet”? He literally made it up. As bad as that lie was, it was nothing compared to what a British “nonprofit” did to silence people who purport “anti-vaccine” content. In 2021, the CCDH wrote a report that said 65% of vaccine “disinformation” comes from just 12 people, which included RFK Jr., Dr. Joseph Mercola, Ty and Charlene Bollinger (The Truth About Vaccines), and others. They were labeled the “Disinformation Dozen.” The media amplified the report and broadcast it to the world. The White House cited it while pressuring social media companies to take those 12 accounts down. The reality? They literally made it up—just like Fauci made up six feet. Facebook later revealed that those 12 accounts only contributed to “0.05 PERCENT of all views of vaccine-related content on our platform.” That's a far cry from 65%. The numbers didn’t matter. The damage was already done, and those twelve accounts never had the same reach again. And it was all triggered by a bogus, fabricated report. But now the tables are turning, and the censors are being taken to court. Ty and Charlene Bollinger (The Truth About Vaccines) didn’t just write a “strongly worded” letter, as Pam Bondi would say. They filed a nearly 400-page federal lawsuit naming the State Department, the FBI, the Center for Countering Digital Hate, and major Big Tech platforms in a coordinated effort to erase lawful speech as “misinformation.” “Make no mistake. Our case will set legal precedent in America,” Ty Bollinger says. Now it’s your turn to decide whether free speech will be treated as a God-given right or a “privilege.” Watch the film. Support the legal fight. Put the censors on trial. Make them answer in court for what they did. WATCH THE FILM: SUPPORT THE FIGHT:

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

64,043 views • 6 months ago