Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

REPORTER: "If the response is in hitting bridges, electrical infrastructure, how would that NOT BE A WAR CRIME?" HEGSETH: "Precisely the kind of disingenuous question that I’m used to from the media"

TheSaviour's profile picture

The Saviour

447,251 subscribers

45,923 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

ЮморНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

REPORTER: If the response is hitting bridges and electrical infrastructure, how is that not a war crime? HEGSETH: That's precisely the kind of disingenuous question I'm used to from the media -- impugning the motives of the folks on our side
1:10

REPORTER: If the response is hitting bridges and electrical infrastructure, how is that not a war crime? HEGSETH: That's precisely the kind of disingenuous question I'm used to from the media -- impugning the motives of the folks on our side

Aaron Rupar

1,669,828 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

REPORTER: "If the response is in hitting bridges, electrical infrastructure, how would that not be a war crime?” Secretary of War Pete Hegseth "That's precisely the kind of disingenuous question that I'm used to from the media, impugning the motives of the folks on our side who are incredibly professional and incredibly effective!"
1:06

REPORTER: "If the response is in hitting bridges, electrical infrastructure, how would that not be a war crime?” Secretary of War Pete Hegseth "That's precisely the kind of disingenuous question that I'm used to from the media, impugning the motives of the folks on our side who are incredibly professional and incredibly effective!"

DOW Rapid Response

546,287 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Q: You just mentioned you planned to hit Iran and strike them hard tonight. If the response is hitting bridges and infrastructure, how would that not be a war crime targeting civilian infrastructure? Hegseth: That is precisely the kind of disingenuous question I am used to from the media.
0:37

Q: You just mentioned you planned to hit Iran and strike them hard tonight. If the response is hitting bridges and infrastructure, how would that not be a war crime targeting civilian infrastructure? Hegseth: That is precisely the kind of disingenuous question I am used to from the media.

Headquarters

364,007 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 WOW! SecWar Pete Hegseth just MIC DROPPED a Fake News reporter preemptively accusing the US military of "war crimes" REPORTER: "If the response is in hitting bridges, electrical infrastructure, how would that not be a war crime?!" HEGSETH: "That's precisely the kind of disingenuous question that I'm used to from the media, impugning the motives of the folks on our side who are incredibly professional and incredibly effective!" "We will hit them hard on OUR terms, on the targets that improve the environment for us to operate in and undermine the capabilities that Iran wants to have."
1:04

🚨 WOW! SecWar Pete Hegseth just MIC DROPPED a Fake News reporter preemptively accusing the US military of "war crimes" REPORTER: "If the response is in hitting bridges, electrical infrastructure, how would that not be a war crime?!" HEGSETH: "That's precisely the kind of disingenuous question that I'm used to from the media, impugning the motives of the folks on our side who are incredibly professional and incredibly effective!" "We will hit them hard on OUR terms, on the targets that improve the environment for us to operate in and undermine the capabilities that Iran wants to have."

Eric Daugherty

954,945 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Reporter: "Is the ending of this war also contingent upon Iran selecting a leader that the president finds acceptable? If so, how is that not the definition of a regime change war?" Leavitt: *doesn't answer* Reporter: "You're not exactly addressing my question."
2:07

Reporter: "Is the ending of this war also contingent upon Iran selecting a leader that the president finds acceptable? If so, how is that not the definition of a regime change war?" Leavitt: *doesn't answer* Reporter: "You're not exactly addressing my question."

The Bulwark

793,892 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

REPORTER: How would it not be a war crime to strike Iran's bridges and power plants? TRUMP: They are animals
0:42

REPORTER: How would it not be a war crime to strike Iran's bridges and power plants? TRUMP: They are animals

RT

155,592 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Mark Levin defends bombing bridges and other infrastructure in Iran: "It's called hitting dual-use infrastructure! We've done it in every single war that I can think of! That's not a war crime!"
0:40

Mark Levin defends bombing bridges and other infrastructure in Iran: "It's called hitting dual-use infrastructure! We've done it in every single war that I can think of! That's not a war crime!"

Chris Menahan 🇺🇸

10,418 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Mark Levin is demanding that President Trump target civil infrastructure in Iran, claiming such actions would not be war crimes. Levin argues that targeting civilian infrastructure is not a war crime but justified. "We've done it in every single war that I can think of." "That's not a war crime."
0:40

Mark Levin is demanding that President Trump target civil infrastructure in Iran, claiming such actions would not be war crimes. Levin argues that targeting civilian infrastructure is not a war crime but justified. "We've done it in every single war that I can think of." "That's not a war crime."

Shadow of Ezra

122,742 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🇮🇷🇺🇸⚡️– Reporter: How would it not be a war crime to strike Iran’s bridges and power plants? Trump: They’re animals.
0:28

🇮🇷🇺🇸⚡️– Reporter: How would it not be a war crime to strike Iran’s bridges and power plants? Trump: They’re animals.

MonitorX

493,325 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Interesting video from then Speaker of Parliament Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani in 1987, in response to a question from a foreign reporter about Iran closing the Strait of Hormoz after Kuwait asked the US Navy to get involved in the ongoing tanker war: "We never said we're just going to casually go and close the Strait of Hormoz. We would prefer the Strait of Hormoz is not closed. If the Strait of Hormoz is closed it causes us harm too. We will also suffer damage. We have always emphasized that we will close the Strait of Hormoz when the Persian Gulf cannot be used by us. If the Persian Gulf cannot be used by us then we will also make the Persian Gulf not usable for others. This is our policy. The people that have deprived us from that Gulf, they must also be deprived. And if we reach that day our threat is firm and we will close it, but we hope the world is wise enough not to bring that day and we consider it quite unlikely that day will happen."
1:00

Interesting video from then Speaker of Parliament Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani in 1987, in response to a question from a foreign reporter about Iran closing the Strait of Hormoz after Kuwait asked the US Navy to get involved in the ongoing tanker war: "We never said we're just going to casually go and close the Strait of Hormoz. We would prefer the Strait of Hormoz is not closed. If the Strait of Hormoz is closed it causes us harm too. We will also suffer damage. We have always emphasized that we will close the Strait of Hormoz when the Persian Gulf cannot be used by us. If the Persian Gulf cannot be used by us then we will also make the Persian Gulf not usable for others. This is our policy. The people that have deprived us from that Gulf, they must also be deprived. And if we reach that day our threat is firm and we will close it, but we hope the world is wise enough not to bring that day and we consider it quite unlikely that day will happen."

Alireza Talakoubnejad

22,341 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Reporter: He made a variety of comments suggesting that he should be involved in picking the new Iranian leader. Is the ending of this war also contingent on Iran selecting a leader that the president finds acceptable? And if so, how is that not the definition of a regime change war? Leavitt:
2:07

Reporter: He made a variety of comments suggesting that he should be involved in picking the new Iranian leader. Is the ending of this war also contingent on Iran selecting a leader that the president finds acceptable? And if so, how is that not the definition of a regime change war? Leavitt:

Acyn

46,008 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🔥MIC DROP! Karoline Leavitt is NOT TAKING ANY SH*T from these FAKE NEWS reporters! A NYT reporter tried to question why Trump didn't phone Putin in front of the other world leaders, saying that it's disrespectful. Leavitt left his jaw on the floor with the response, "With all due respect, only a reporter from New York Times would ask a question like that."
1:20

🔥MIC DROP! Karoline Leavitt is NOT TAKING ANY SH*T from these FAKE NEWS reporters! A NYT reporter tried to question why Trump didn't phone Putin in front of the other world leaders, saying that it's disrespectful. Leavitt left his jaw on the floor with the response, "With all due respect, only a reporter from New York Times would ask a question like that."

Gunther Eagleman™

850,729 просмотров • 1 год назад

Reporter: “With respect to House Minority Leader Hakeem Jefferies’ statement that the Iran mission will end in failure. What kind of message does that send to our enemies?” War Secretary Hegseth: “Well, I’ve been through that movie before with Democrats rooting against the country. Our generation saw that in our battlefields.” “It's pretty unprecedented and unfortunate that it would occur 4 days in.” “He's been privy to briefs we've provided. He knows how effective this has been. He's being disingenuous, which we're used to.”
0:48

Reporter: “With respect to House Minority Leader Hakeem Jefferies’ statement that the Iran mission will end in failure. What kind of message does that send to our enemies?” War Secretary Hegseth: “Well, I’ve been through that movie before with Democrats rooting against the country. Our generation saw that in our battlefields.” “It's pretty unprecedented and unfortunate that it would occur 4 days in.” “He's been privy to briefs we've provided. He knows how effective this has been. He's being disingenuous, which we're used to.”

RedWave Press

558,250 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Bash: Do you believe if the president goes down that road and attacks infrastructure—would you consider that a war crime? Blumenthal: The clear answer is yes
1:01

Bash: Do you believe if the president goes down that road and attacks infrastructure—would you consider that a war crime? Blumenthal: The clear answer is yes

Acyn

178,731 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

REPORTER: "You changed the Department of Defense to the Department of War. Would you consider changing the name again to the Department of Peace?" SEC. HEGSETH: "It's a great question, actually. You go from defense to war because you want to be proactive about peace through strength." "When you fight a war the right way, the idea is on the other side, you bring about peace. That is what we'd like to see the most." "We are the guarantor of the safety and security, not just of our country, but of a lot of people in this world."
0:51

REPORTER: "You changed the Department of Defense to the Department of War. Would you consider changing the name again to the Department of Peace?" SEC. HEGSETH: "It's a great question, actually. You go from defense to war because you want to be proactive about peace through strength." "When you fight a war the right way, the idea is on the other side, you bring about peace. That is what we'd like to see the most." "We are the guarantor of the safety and security, not just of our country, but of a lot of people in this world."

Fox News

1,375,389 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Reporter: Why did you fire General George in the middle of a war? Hegseth: *ignores question*
0:33

Reporter: Why did you fire General George in the middle of a war? Hegseth: *ignores question*

Acyn

52,089 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Karl: "The president said today that he would knock out every single power plant and every single bridge in Iran. He's not just talking about those that are supporting the military infrastructure…That wouldn't be a war crime?" Mike Waltz: "That would be an escalatory ladder."
2:06

Karl: "The president said today that he would knock out every single power plant and every single bridge in Iran. He's not just talking about those that are supporting the military infrastructure…That wouldn't be a war crime?" Mike Waltz: "That would be an escalatory ladder."

The Bulwark

56,021 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад