Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Reporter: Since when is a UN resolution non-binding? StateSpox Miller: Though this resolution lacks non-binding provisions and new requirements, it should be implemented Reporter: That makes no sense Miller: It doesn’t require anyone to do anything, but it should be respected

294,084 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

8 Kommentare

Profilbild von Lucky Me
Lucky Mevor 2 Jahren

Sickening double talk.

Profilbild von Ricky Spanishhh🦹🏾‍♂️
Ricky Spanishhh🦹🏾‍♂️vor 2 Jahren

Lol basically the order should be respected, but they’re not gonna respect it🤣🤣

Profilbild von poordart
poordartvor 2 Jahren

These people must realize completely rewriting the rules of international law for some but not others is gonna be extremely bad in the future, and make them meaningless

Profilbild von DC
DCvor 2 Jahren

I think they got bad advice. Some US government attorneys messed up. Non-binding was the wrong wording. The resolution is binding but does not specify enforcement measures. That is what Matt Miller is attempting to say and that is accurate.

Profilbild von MaKin
MaKinvor 2 Jahren

All security council resolutions are legally binding

Profilbild von Stephen Young
Stephen Youngvor 2 Jahren

The 'Rule-based Order' rhetoric from the US all seems a bit hollow these days...perhaps it always was.

Profilbild von johnjohn1776
johnjohn1776vor 2 Jahren

This circus show has to stop! It's beyond embarrassing

Profilbild von ALI #ToriesPartiedWhilePeopleDied
ALI #ToriesPartiedWhilePeopleDiedvor 2 Jahren

Its BINDING

Ähnliche Videos