Reporter: Since when is a UN resolution non-binding? StateSpox Miller: Though this resolution lacks non-binding provisions and new requirements, it should be implemented Reporter: That makes no sense Miller: It doesn’t require anyone to do anything, but it should be respected

Sickening double talk.

Lol basically the order should be respected, but they’re not gonna respect it🤣🤣

These people must realize completely rewriting the rules of international law for some but not others is gonna be extremely bad in the future, and make them meaningless

I think they got bad advice. Some US government attorneys messed up. Non-binding was the wrong wording. The resolution is binding but does not specify enforcement measures. That is what Matt Miller is attempting to say and that is accurate.

All security council resolutions are legally binding

The 'Rule-based Order' rhetoric from the US all seems a bit hollow these days...perhaps it always was.

This circus show has to stop! It's beyond embarrassing

Its BINDING