正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
Reporter: Since when is a UN resolution non-binding? StateSpox Miller: Though this resolution lacks non-binding provisions and new requirements, it should be implemented Reporter: That makes no sense Miller: It doesn’t require anyone to do anything, but it should be respected
8 条评论

Lucky Me2 年前
Sickening double talk.

Ricky Spanishhh🦹🏾♂️2 年前
Lol basically the order should be respected, but they’re not gonna respect it🤣🤣

poordart2 年前
These people must realize completely rewriting the rules of international law for some but not others is gonna be extremely bad in the future, and make them meaningless

DC2 年前
I think they got bad advice. Some US government attorneys messed up. Non-binding was the wrong wording. The resolution is binding but does not specify enforcement measures. That is what Matt Miller is attempting to say and that is accurate.

MaKin2 年前
All security council resolutions are legally binding

Stephen Young2 年前
The 'Rule-based Order' rhetoric from the US all seems a bit hollow these days...perhaps it always was.

johnjohn17762 年前
This circus show has to stop! It's beyond embarrassing

ALI #ToriesPartiedWhilePeopleDied2 年前
Its BINDING

