正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Reporter: Since when is a UN resolution non-binding? StateSpox Miller: Though this resolution lacks non-binding provisions and new requirements, it should be implemented Reporter: That makes no sense Miller: It doesn’t require anyone to do anything, but it should be respected

294,128 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

8 条评论

Lucky Me 的头像
Lucky Me2 年前

Sickening double talk.

Ricky Spanishhh🦹🏾‍♂️ 的头像
Ricky Spanishhh🦹🏾‍♂️2 年前

Lol basically the order should be respected, but they’re not gonna respect it🤣🤣

poordart 的头像
poordart2 年前

These people must realize completely rewriting the rules of international law for some but not others is gonna be extremely bad in the future, and make them meaningless

DC 的头像
DC2 年前

I think they got bad advice. Some US government attorneys messed up. Non-binding was the wrong wording. The resolution is binding but does not specify enforcement measures. That is what Matt Miller is attempting to say and that is accurate.

MaKin 的头像
MaKin2 年前

All security council resolutions are legally binding

Stephen Young 的头像
Stephen Young2 年前

The 'Rule-based Order' rhetoric from the US all seems a bit hollow these days...perhaps it always was.

johnjohn1776 的头像
johnjohn17762 年前

This circus show has to stop! It's beyond embarrassing

ALI #ToriesPartiedWhilePeopleDied 的头像
ALI #ToriesPartiedWhilePeopleDied2 年前

Its BINDING

相关视频