Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Reporter: Why won't the administration either confirm or deny whether or not there were a survivors after that initial first strike? What imminent threat would survivors pose who were clinging presumably to the wreckage of that boat? Leavitt: I think you guys are not listening fully to the statement...

Acyn's profile picture

Acyn

696,137 subscribers

343,027 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Q: “Why won't the administration either confirm or deny or reveal whether or not there were survivors after that initial first strike, and what imminent threat would two survivors pose who were clinging presumably to the wreckage of that boat?” Leavitt: “Admiral Bradley worked well within his authority and the law, directing the engagement to ensure the boat was totally destroyed and the threat to the narcoterrorists, to the United States, was eliminated.”
0:44

Q: “Why won't the administration either confirm or deny or reveal whether or not there were survivors after that initial first strike, and what imminent threat would two survivors pose who were clinging presumably to the wreckage of that boat?” Leavitt: “Admiral Bradley worked well within his authority and the law, directing the engagement to ensure the boat was totally destroyed and the threat to the narcoterrorists, to the United States, was eliminated.”

The Bulwark

70,215 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Weija: Did Admiral Bradley order that second strike because there were still survivors after the initial strike? Leavitt: Again, as I read for you, Admiral Bradley worked well within his authority in the law.
0:52

Weija: Did Admiral Bradley order that second strike because there were still survivors after the initial strike? Leavitt: Again, as I read for you, Admiral Bradley worked well within his authority in the law.

Acyn

25,315 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Q: "Did Admiral Bradley order that second strike because there were still survivors?" Leavitt: "As I read for you, Admiral Bradley worked well within his authority of the law. He directed the engagement to ensure the boat was destroyed and the threat of narcoterrorists to the U.S. was completely eliminated." Q: "So was the initial order from Sec. Hegseth 'everyone be killed' and did that come from President Trump?" Leavitt: "I would reject that the Secretary of War ever said that."
0:43

Q: "Did Admiral Bradley order that second strike because there were still survivors?" Leavitt: "As I read for you, Admiral Bradley worked well within his authority of the law. He directed the engagement to ensure the boat was destroyed and the threat of narcoterrorists to the U.S. was completely eliminated." Q: "So was the initial order from Sec. Hegseth 'everyone be killed' and did that come from President Trump?" Leavitt: "I would reject that the Secretary of War ever said that."

The Bulwark

29,530 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨Karoline Leavitt confirms that the Sec. War did NOT give the order to strike the narco boat a second time, Admiral Bradley did—and he had every right to. "POTUS and Sec. Hegseth has made it clear that presidentially designated narco terrorist groups are subject to LETHAL targeting in accordance with the laws of war. With respect to the strikes in question on 9/2, Sec Hegseth authorized Admiral Bradley to conduct these kinetic strikes. Admiral bradley worked well within his authority and the law directing the engagement to ensure the boat was destroyed and the threat to the United States of America was eliminated." BOOM.
2:30

🚨Karoline Leavitt confirms that the Sec. War did NOT give the order to strike the narco boat a second time, Admiral Bradley did—and he had every right to. "POTUS and Sec. Hegseth has made it clear that presidentially designated narco terrorist groups are subject to LETHAL targeting in accordance with the laws of war. With respect to the strikes in question on 9/2, Sec Hegseth authorized Admiral Bradley to conduct these kinetic strikes. Admiral bradley worked well within his authority and the law directing the engagement to ensure the boat was destroyed and the threat to the United States of America was eliminated." BOOM.

Townhall.com

45,192 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

REPORTER: Does the administration deny that that second strike happened, or did it happen and the administration denies that Hegseth gave the order? LEAVITT: The latter. Secretary Hegseth authorized Admiral Bradley to conduct these kinetic strikes. He worked well within his authority and the law.
1:12

REPORTER: Does the administration deny that that second strike happened, or did it happen and the administration denies that Hegseth gave the order? LEAVITT: The latter. Secretary Hegseth authorized Admiral Bradley to conduct these kinetic strikes. He worked well within his authority and the law.

Aaron Rupar

991,996 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🔴 BREAKING: WH Confirms Second Strike on “Drug Boat” Was Deliberate The Pete Hegseth-led U.S. counter-narcotics campaign in the Caribbean and Pacific, Operation Southern Spear, included a strike on a boat on September 2, 2025, alleged to be smuggling drugs. According to The Washington Post, the initial strike left survivors clinging to the wreckage. The White House has now confirmed that a second, targeted strike was carried out on the boat, ordered by Admiral Frank M. Bradley, commander of U.S. Special Operations Command. That second strike, per the Post’s reporting, killed the remaining crew. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt defended Bradley’s decision, saying he acted “well within his authority and the law… to ensure the boat was destroyed and the threat to the United States was eliminated.”
2:10

🔴 BREAKING: WH Confirms Second Strike on “Drug Boat” Was Deliberate The Pete Hegseth-led U.S. counter-narcotics campaign in the Caribbean and Pacific, Operation Southern Spear, included a strike on a boat on September 2, 2025, alleged to be smuggling drugs. According to The Washington Post, the initial strike left survivors clinging to the wreckage. The White House has now confirmed that a second, targeted strike was carried out on the boat, ordered by Admiral Frank M. Bradley, commander of U.S. Special Operations Command. That second strike, per the Post’s reporting, killed the remaining crew. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt defended Bradley’s decision, saying he acted “well within his authority and the law… to ensure the boat was destroyed and the threat to the United States was eliminated.”

Drop Site

154,635 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Reporter: Admiral Bradley was the one who gave that order for a second strike? Leavitt: And he was well within his authority to do so.
0:23

Reporter: Admiral Bradley was the one who gave that order for a second strike? Leavitt: And he was well within his authority to do so.

Acyn

1,538,399 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Reporter: If it is found that survivors were actually killed while clinging onto that boat, should Secretary Hegseth, Admiral Bradley, or others be punished? Trump: I think you're going to find that this is war, that these people were killing our people by the millions actually.. Reporter: So you support the decision to kill survivors? Trump: I support the decision to knock out the boats, and whoever is piloting those boats, they're guilty of trying to kill people in our country.
1:12

Reporter: If it is found that survivors were actually killed while clinging onto that boat, should Secretary Hegseth, Admiral Bradley, or others be punished? Trump: I think you're going to find that this is war, that these people were killing our people by the millions actually.. Reporter: So you support the decision to kill survivors? Trump: I support the decision to knock out the boats, and whoever is piloting those boats, they're guilty of trying to kill people in our country.

Acyn

527,980 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

CNN: Sources telling CNN the admiral who formerly called for the second strike on the alleged drug boat in the caribbean, told lawmakers that the survivors were waving at something in the air before the second strike, although they say it is unclear whether they were surrendering or asking a U.S. Aircraft for help. We are also learning that, Admiral Bradley told lawmakers that the boat was going to meet a larger vessel heading to Suriname.
0:51

CNN: Sources telling CNN the admiral who formerly called for the second strike on the alleged drug boat in the caribbean, told lawmakers that the survivors were waving at something in the air before the second strike, although they say it is unclear whether they were surrendering or asking a U.S. Aircraft for help. We are also learning that, Admiral Bradley told lawmakers that the boat was going to meet a larger vessel heading to Suriname.

Acyn

616,108 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Reporter: There are survivors from the latest boat strike. What happens to them? Rubio: We are not prepared to announce details. Reporter: How are there survivors if these are meant to be lethal attacks? Trump: That was a drug carrying submarine. This was not an innocent group of people
1:15

Reporter: There are survivors from the latest boat strike. What happens to them? Rubio: We are not prepared to announce details. Reporter: How are there survivors if these are meant to be lethal attacks? Trump: That was a drug carrying submarine. This was not an innocent group of people

Acyn

923,213 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Abby Phillip: “Here's the main issue. Is it legal… if there are survivors clinging to whatever, is it legal to then strike them again?” Batya Ungar-Sargon: “The question is not actually that… No, Abby. Is the whole thing hangs on whether the boat is still a military target or not?” “Because if it was a military target, there were people on it when they hit it the first time.” Abby Phillip: “The issue when it comes to the legality of the second strike, not the first one strike… It's what happens to survivors.” Batya Ungar-Sargon: “No, it's not, Abby. That's wrong... The question is not the existence of the survivors. It's whether the boat is still a legitimate military target.”
1:04

Abby Phillip: “Here's the main issue. Is it legal… if there are survivors clinging to whatever, is it legal to then strike them again?” Batya Ungar-Sargon: “The question is not actually that… No, Abby. Is the whole thing hangs on whether the boat is still a military target or not?” “Because if it was a military target, there were people on it when they hit it the first time.” Abby Phillip: “The issue when it comes to the legality of the second strike, not the first one strike… It's what happens to survivors.” Batya Ungar-Sargon: “No, it's not, Abby. That's wrong... The question is not the existence of the survivors. It's whether the boat is still a legitimate military target.”

RedWave Press

115,833 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Reporter: Was there a change in policy after the strike on September 2nd? "The Washington Post" is reporting that these two survivors were killed after a second strike. In October, two people were rescued. Leavitt: Not to my knowledge
0:28

Reporter: Was there a change in policy after the strike on September 2nd? "The Washington Post" is reporting that these two survivors were killed after a second strike. In October, two people were rescued. Leavitt: Not to my knowledge

Acyn

27,490 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Hegseth: I watch that first strike live. At the Department of War, we got a lot of things to do so I not stick around. Couple of hours later, I learned that commander had made -- which he had the complete authority to do, he made the correct decision to sink the boat and eliminated the threat. And it was the right call. We have his back. Reporter: So you did not see the survivors after that first strike? Hegseth: I did not personally see survivors. The thing was on fire. This is what is called the fog of war. This is what you in the press don’t understand. You sit in your air conditioned offices and you plant fake stories in The Washington Post not based in any truth at all
2:01

Hegseth: I watch that first strike live. At the Department of War, we got a lot of things to do so I not stick around. Couple of hours later, I learned that commander had made -- which he had the complete authority to do, he made the correct decision to sink the boat and eliminated the threat. And it was the right call. We have his back. Reporter: So you did not see the survivors after that first strike? Hegseth: I did not personally see survivors. The thing was on fire. This is what is called the fog of war. This is what you in the press don’t understand. You sit in your air conditioned offices and you plant fake stories in The Washington Post not based in any truth at all

Acyn

680,809 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Karl: Was there an imminent threat posed by those people that were clinging to the wreckage of a boat that had already been struck? Noem: That entire story is based on anonymous sources. We see the press and we see that rag use anonymous sources to print things that aren't true, that are lies, not based in reality.
1:34

Karl: Was there an imminent threat posed by those people that were clinging to the wreckage of a boat that had already been struck? Noem: That entire story is based on anonymous sources. We see the press and we see that rag use anonymous sources to print things that aren't true, that are lies, not based in reality.

Acyn

149,085 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Q: "The Pentagon's Law of War manual…says 'Orders to fire upon the shipwrecked would be clearly illegal.' Given that, how was that follow up strike on the two survivors legal?" Tom Cotton: "They were not incapacitated… They were sitting or standing on top of a capsized boat."
1:25

Q: "The Pentagon's Law of War manual…says 'Orders to fire upon the shipwrecked would be clearly illegal.' Given that, how was that follow up strike on the two survivors legal?" Tom Cotton: "They were not incapacitated… They were sitting or standing on top of a capsized boat."

The Bulwark

252,852 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

White House confirms SECOND STRIKE on alleged narco-boat Hegseth didn’t order the survivors killed, but admiral who did was 'well within his authority to do so', spox says
1:43

White House confirms SECOND STRIKE on alleged narco-boat Hegseth didn’t order the survivors killed, but admiral who did was 'well within his authority to do so', spox says

RT

24,741 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Q: If it's found that survivors were actually killed while clinging onto that boat, should Sec. Hegseth, Admiral Bradley, or others be punished? TRUMP: I think you're gonna find that this is war. That these people were killing our people by the millions, actually.
0:33

Q: If it's found that survivors were actually killed while clinging onto that boat, should Sec. Hegseth, Admiral Bradley, or others be punished? TRUMP: I think you're gonna find that this is war. That these people were killing our people by the millions, actually.

Aaron Rupar

138,782 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Host: In a September 2nd strike, Pete Hegseth gave a verbal command to kill everybody on the boat. And we don't know who was on that boat. But after the missile hit, 2 survivors were seen clinging to the wreckage. The commander then ordered a second strike to comply with Hegseth's instructions. They knew that that was an illegal action, that it could constitute a war crime.
3:17

Host: In a September 2nd strike, Pete Hegseth gave a verbal command to kill everybody on the boat. And we don't know who was on that boat. But after the missile hit, 2 survivors were seen clinging to the wreckage. The commander then ordered a second strike to comply with Hegseth's instructions. They knew that that was an illegal action, that it could constitute a war crime.

FactPost

253,633 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Trump & Hegseth are lying to the American people because Admiral Bradley admitted to Lawmakers that after the first strike the men on the boat were waving for help or to surrender,but they struck them anyway & they were headed to Suriname not the U.S.since it’s the opposite way
0:35

Trump & Hegseth are lying to the American people because Admiral Bradley admitted to Lawmakers that after the first strike the men on the boat were waving for help or to surrender,but they struck them anyway & they were headed to Suriname not the U.S.since it’s the opposite way

Suzie rizzio

31,463 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Watters: It takes two strikes to knock the boat down… how is that a war crime? Jessica: If there are people who were shipwrecked, which is what these two survivors were— Watters: They are not survivors, they are terrorists… We're supposed to send a helicopter to rescue him? And then give him first-aid?
1:08

Watters: It takes two strikes to knock the boat down… how is that a war crime? Jessica: If there are people who were shipwrecked, which is what these two survivors were— Watters: They are not survivors, they are terrorists… We're supposed to send a helicopter to rescue him? And then give him first-aid?

Acyn

362,282 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад