Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

REPORTING NOTES: FIRST DRAFT | News24 investigative journalist Kyle Cowan on Advocate Andrea Johnson’s appearance at the Madlanga Commission…and why IDAC stands by its decision to prosecute CI head Dumisani Khumalo.

212,013 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

35 Comments

Zintoh Mhlanga's profile picture
Zintoh Mhlanga2 months ago

Shame maàn, these two are trying too hard to prove their stupidity. Not only the publc reduce it to an HR matter, senior advicates and judges too. So who is Cowan ngempela?

MaddoX's profile picture
MaddoX2 months ago

When Mkwanazi gave his briefing you demanded evidence while dismissing these very processes. Yet, you are now advocating the exact same approach. Isn't that ironic or is it simply intentional hypocrisy?. Given your close collaboration with the individuals involved, your objectivity is severely compromised. It would be more appropriate to let us determine the outcome ourselves.

onesix's profile picture
onesix2 months ago

Crucify blacks and coloreds, protect whites and Indians until we take up arms and fight we will always be subjected to this kind of shit.

Frank Miles🌚🇿🇦's profile picture
Frank Miles🌚🇿🇦2 months ago

He's talking kak and he knows it🚮🚮 @News24 has been trying to clean Andrea Johnson and unfortunately she's too far dirty that we can all see. No need for any intellectual to break it down for us. She's bad and terrible at her job

Donald Pump's profile picture
Donald Pump2 months ago

“It needs to go to court” That time there’s no case. “We as journalist know” as if we’ve not been hearing from the investigating officer & prosecutor.

The Rock's profile picture
The Rock2 months ago

These could be the captured journalists Mkhwanazi warned us about.

Sigidi's profile picture
Sigidi2 months ago

Evidence may be presented later, but legally the affidavit that kicks things off has to set out the grounds? Thats what at issue, that people were subsequently arrested by IDAC without grounds. You cannot arrest people and then provide grounds later. Your understanding of what happens appears to be criminal.

Hon Jinja's profile picture
Hon Jinja2 months ago

I will never understand how News24 is supporting IDAC when there is prima facie evidence of Johnsons interference. She has invoked her right not to self incriminate already. News24 reporting standards are heavily biased and contradictory.

Myeka's profile picture
Myeka2 months ago

You’re now proving beyond reasonable doubt that news 24 is for the CROOKS!!

Mr Masinga's profile picture
Mr Masinga2 months ago

There are so many other stories you could work on. Drop this case it's only making you guys look worse.

Phakathwayo Gumede's profile picture
Phakathwayo Gumede2 months ago

This statement sounds and reads like the famous Andrea Johnson's "fake it till you make it" quote. How ironic!

Yandisa ka Ngwane's profile picture
Yandisa ka Ngwane2 months ago

Haha this why cases keep getting struck off the roll. You cant and shouldn't charge someone for evidence that will come later. Collect the meat first and then only charge when case is ripe for trial. This is unethical and a waste of taxpayer money

The Critique's profile picture
The Critique2 months ago

Prosecution based on happiness and zero evidence. According to News24 and IDAC everyone is crazy and they are source of the truth

Melikhaya Pantsi's profile picture
Melikhaya Pantsi2 months ago

Everything she said today will be dismantled piece by piece by Adv Baloyi and Adv Khumalo, relax bafana beNdaba24.

Lucky Zitha🇿🇦's profile picture
Lucky Zitha🇿🇦2 months ago

Mkhwanazi was correct that some of you are beneficiaries of this criminality

Mo's profile picture
Mo2 months ago

State Security Agency should expedite the vetting of each and every journalist in this country as proposed by Genene 🤞🤞

dnoM's profile picture
dnoM2 months ago

We know you guys are just lucken spin doctors ,go out of here 😁

upwards & onwards's profile picture
upwards & onwards2 months ago

Does the evidence now emerging not necessitate a fundamental rethink about the integrity of IDAC? We should surely now be open to that possibility? @CowansView

Thubelihle LaMsibi's profile picture
Thubelihle LaMsibi2 months ago

So Mkhwananzi was very right @SAEditorsForum journalist masquerading as politicians or criminals close this shitty News down glad a lot of people don’t read their nonsense!!!!!!

Nwabisa Mzamo's profile picture
Nwabisa Mzamo2 months ago

“That’s quite a quantum leap in logic”

TigerBrown64's profile picture
TigerBrown642 months ago

Never mind the HR matter. Watch Madlanga commission and listen to Johnsons replies to simple questions. She's the head if IDAC.

Son of the Soil🇵🇸's profile picture
Son of the Soil🇵🇸2 months ago

Bring back shame. This is embarrassing.

ba nicole's profile picture
ba nicole2 months ago

Bro you're mumbling nothing 😂 😑 🤣 it's also good to stop running an agenda atleast give us what you know

KG & Jojo👨‍👧 🇿🇦's profile picture
KG & Jojo👨‍👧 🇿🇦2 months ago

Goodness gracious 🥴what type of nonsense is this? The issue doesn’t start at an issue being in court! It starts with whether on the basis of the evidence presented, a charge sheet is drawn🙄 you don’t get to design your own process as a journalist!

Eric Ndlovu's profile picture
Eric Ndlovu2 months ago

U defending an own goal u muss b ashamed

Mixolo's profile picture
Mixolo2 months ago

📍

Sindane's profile picture
Sindane2 months ago

So you say it's not a HR matter? @News24

mkhwane's profile picture
mkhwane2 months ago

The lies he is spewing with so much confidence is probably why his hair is withering off his head it can’t handle the lies ..

Playa's profile picture
Playa2 months ago

"We as journalists "🤣🤣🤣🤣stay in your lane....journalists.

Lood Louis 🇿🇦 Rebuild SA!🇿🇦 🇿🇦's profile picture
Lood Louis 🇿🇦 Rebuild SA!🇿🇦 🇿🇦2 months ago

Kak. This is all misleading and, frankly very wrong. Here's why: IDAC is a creature of statute. That means that before they can investigate, they must have a statement (complaint/referral) setting out *at least* OBJECTIVELY/REASONABLY) that an offence was committed. Example: A mere allegation on oath that Pieter du Toit or Kyle Cowan committed fraud or possessed child porn with no substantiation does not allow IDAC to START an investigation - even if they find later that these two are liars or pedos. There must be more info: - e.g. where, when, how. The Fadiel Adams statement does NOT do that - it only contains allegations like in this example. Sect 27 requires this: "(a) the nature of the suspicion; **(b) the grounds on which the suspicion is based**; and (c) all other **relevant information** known to the declarant." On their argument, if Fadiel merely says that these journalists committed fraud or possessed child porn WITHOUT ANY GROUNDS, the whole IDAC machinery can be used against them. Of course not. Simple actually. Conclusion: They are talking utter kak. WHY?

sipho's profile picture
sipho2 months ago

You jearnalist thinks as public we are dumb, she has still a long way to go. So relax.

Mnqundu ka Juju Malema's profile picture
Mnqundu ka Juju Malema2 months ago

News24 has turned into a tabloid.

The Numoor🔥🔥🔥's profile picture
The Numoor🔥🔥🔥2 months ago

Credibility sold to an Indian at a discount 😭😭😭😂😂😂😂

Dokhuments's profile picture
Dokhuments2 months ago

I "suspect" they were paid & already spent the money.

truth to the power's profile picture
truth to the power2 months ago

you'll soon be EXPOSED 🚮🚮🚮

Related Videos