Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🇺🇸 Reports from U.S. sailors describe an increasingly brutal deployment: extended time at sea, months away from families and food reduced largely to canned supplies. Former Navy SEAL Matt Bracken says the morale impact could become a serious operational problem. “You’re basically living inside a steel box.” The bigger...

119,260 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Jason
Jason1 месяц назад

Uh maybe don't join the Navy then! Lol. Tired of this fake ass outrage... Sailors have been doing this shit for decades and it's only gotten easier with modern electronics, FaceTime, and the Internet!

Фото профиля HUMANFROMPLANETEARTH
HUMANFROMPLANETEARTH1 месяц назад

"Kill Babies & Die For Israel, Yankee"

Фото профиля GraceWithGlory
GraceWithGlory1 месяц назад

LOL - Seriously, you THINK anyone "cares"???

Фото профиля Tha Duece
Tha Duece1 месяц назад

Oh poor babies have to do the job they volunteered to do funny how that works they sit around on bases doing nothing but draining tax payers pockets and then complain when they have to earn check they should all be stripped of benefits and kicked out

Фото профиля Bill
Bill1 месяц назад

Seriously folks. It’s war. Man the fuck up.

Фото профиля JonasG
JonasG1 месяц назад

Weak they/thems.

Фото профиля Catherine Anne Harri
Catherine Anne Harri1 месяц назад

Hang in there guys💪🏼🦾 You are sooo needed and appreciated. A thankful American.❤️🇺🇸

Фото профиля Jahbreez
Jahbreez1 месяц назад

The sailors aren’t complaining about “hardship.” They’re describing a system that’s burning through human capital faster than it can replace it. Living for 200+ days in a steel box on canned rations while the mission keeps getting extended isn’t toughness — it’s a readiness time bomb. Logistics, rotation policy, and actual resupply have to match the operational tempo, or the Navy will pay for it in retention and performance long before the next crisis.

Фото профиля Jahbreez
Jahbreez1 месяц назад

The sailors aren’t complaining about “hardship.” They’re describing a system that’s burning through human capital faster than it can replace it. Living for 200+ days in a steel box on canned rations while the mission keeps getting extended isn’t toughness — it’s a readiness time bomb. Logistics, rotation policy, and actual resupply have to match the operational tempo, or the Navy will pay for it in retention and performance long before the next crisis.

Фото профиля _heat_enjoyer
_heat_enjoyer1 месяц назад

The CO gotta pull a Captain Crozier at this point for the welfare of his sailors.

Похожие видео

🇺🇸🇮🇷 America is fighting Iran like it has years to win, but it may only have weeks before the global economy starts collapsing around it. Most people are still comparing Iran to Iraq, Afghanistan or Vietnam, and former U.S Navy SEAL Matt Bracken says that's a fatal mistake. In those wars, America could spend years burning money, munitions and lives before eventually deciding to leave. This war doesn't give Washington that luxury, because every week it continues, the world economy loses more oxygen. The U.S can't simply fight for another decade and then fly home, because the battlefield isn't confined to Iran; it's the entire global trading system, and that's before you even get to the military economics. Every inexpensive drone and ballistic missile forces the U.S and its allies to launch interceptors worth millions of dollars: it's an exchange ratio that heavily favours Iran. Even if Washington succeeded in turning Iran into a failed state, Matt argues the price could be catastrophic. For more than a century, U.S and British strategy was built around controlling the world's sea lanes and preventing the great powers of Eurasia from consolidating. Now, he argues, America's foreign policy has done the opposite. Russia, China and Iran are drawing closer together. At the same time, cheap long-range missiles and drones are pushing the U.S Navy farther away from hostile coastlines. America once projected power deep into Asia with gunboats, but today, Matt argues, even non-state actors can force billion-dollar warships to keep their distance. Matt Bracken

Mario Nawfal

309,186 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷🇾🇪 Americas old way of waging war may no longer work. Matt Bracken thinks the most important question surrounding the next phase of the Iran war isn’t where America strikes. It’s whether America can still fight the way it used to. A major U.S. air campaign requires aircraft moving between bases, tankers positioning for refueling and carriers getting within range. Bracken argues that choreography is now almost impossible to conceal. Satellites, phones and other surveillance can expose preparations long before the aircraft arrive, while ballistic missiles can reach regional bases far faster than U.S. jets can reach their targets. That is why he doubts another major attack on Iran is the most likely move. If Washington wants a more achievable military objective, Bracken thinks Yemen presents one possibility: use Djibouti as a staging ground and attempt to cut off increasingly extended Houthi forces along the Red Sea. But there’s a problem there too. Djibouti itself would become a missile target. For decades, America could establish a forward base, fly in C-130s and C-17s, build up aircraft and troops, and assume the enemy lacked the ability to seriously threaten the logistical hub behind the operation. Bracken says that assumption is finished. “𝘕𝘰𝘣𝘰𝘥𝘺'𝘴 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘶𝘴. 𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘥𝘢𝘺 𝘪𝘴 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳.” His point is broader than Yemen. The U.S. still possesses extraordinary military power. But the infrastructure required to concentrate that power is increasingly visible, increasingly targetable and increasingly difficult to protect. The old playbook assumed America could safely build the hammer before swinging it. The enemy can now hit the hand holding it. Matt Bracken

Mario Nawfal

317,719 просмотров • 17 дней назад