Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

[Repost] - Please don't go. By EXAMPLE via Rednote SOURCE: #リバース1999 #Reverse1999 #重返未来1999 #리버스1999

17,172 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Dear Andrej Karpathy, Update on this. Earlier this month The Innovation Game (𝔦, 𝔦) announced a new SOTA routing algorithm had been collaboratively developed and submitted to The Innovation Game. The algorithm demonstrated the largest single perfomance jump in the modern history of the field on standard academic benchmarks: This success is a powerful proof of concept. I believe the wider implications will also interest you. As you know, the "Source" in AI is algorithms and data. These algorithms are typically for "hard to solve but easy to verify" problems. Remarkably, this allows the creation of a market for pricing improvements to these algorithms (roughly, the market is created by "racing" the algorithms, to see which can produce proof-of-work fastest). Availability of a market mechanism means open development of the algorithms can be funded by capturing a portion of the value they generate, and allocating it back to algorithm developers. The allocation is efficient, naturally integrating information (such as hardware availability) through revealed preferences. Importantly, market allocation is also "impersonal", which mitigates the risk to community cohesion that has historically afflicted Open Source projects offering monetary reward. Note: That a market for pricing code could extend Open Source to areas requiring monetary reward was (as far as I know) first suggested by Eric Raymond in 1999 Eric S. Raymond : Conclusion: The structure of Open Source AI means it can operate commercially. For example, value captured via Open Source "dual licensing", with allocation of the value by a market generated by proof-of-work. I'd love to hear your thoughts on this. Please see for more detail.

John Fletcher (𝔦, 𝔦)

38,752 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

One thing I can't stand about normies (antis and tourists) who hate on anime/Japanese art/smut is how they openly goon to characters like Raven and Starfire, let me remind you: Raven (Sladed) is from the show called Teen Titans... she's a teenager aka a minor but nobody cares, people call characters like Rebecca (Cyberpunk) "Lolitas" because she's SHORT despite the fact she's 20 years old (an adult) meanwhile they openly goon to characters like 2B (NieR: Automata) 2B is 3 years old which utterly shuts down the "3000 yo dragon" (false gotcha) meme. That's when you realize that literally all these people care about is looks, they're the type of people who watched CREEPY AF films like Poor Things (2023) where a mad scientist (Godwin) put a fetus/newborn baby brain into an adult body (Bella) I don't even want to go into detail (I have not seen it) but "Bella" ends up discovering "adult pleasure" operating under their own logic I bet you these people would think its okay because all they would see is someone who LOOKS a certain way. (you have zero knowledge of the procedure) And that's the IRONY of it all—the term "Lolita" is a direct reference to the infamous (highly successful) novel Lolita (1955) in which a man becomes infatuated with a young teenage girl—(regardless of how you feel) the entire term is MISTRANSLATED, the actual definition is something like "cute, elegant, doll-like etc." likewise the term "Lolita Complex" just means "guys with a specific type" it DOES NOT refer to age itself but Fashion/AESTHETICS. (Google Search: Gothic Lolita) (there's your proof) Note: The term itself is very similar to Oedipus/Electra complex—just because you have a "mommy" or "daddy" thing, doesn't mean you're going to bang your parents (that's insane) 99.99% of people with weird/taboo kinks/fetishes are just pervs who never actually do anything bad—the entire anti/tourist argument falls apart. EXAMPLE: Netflix actually asked Studio Trigger (Cyberpunk 2077 animators) to "Remove Rebecca" from the anime because "she looks too much like a kid" and in response the studio replied "Loli must stay," this wasn't because Rebecca was a kid (20 yo adult) its LITERAL PROOF that the term Lolita isn't necessarily about age, its about AESTHETICS, body type and LOOKS—not Western bad faith interpretations—the Japanese invented these terms. I cannot stand this entire "argument/debate" (its based on false premises) many anime fans, cartoon watchers, gamers (and people in general) have been engaging with different media/shows/characters since we were little kids ourselves (ex. how many people still like Misty?) because at the end of the day these things are FICTION I do not care about FICTIONAL CHARACTERS, that being said, even IF you feel strongly about this subject—IT STILL MUST BE DEFENDED FOR ONE SIMPLE REASON. FREE SPEECH. Freedom expression REQUIRES you defend things even if (especially if) you find them morally ABHORRENT "disgusting" or wrong—I know it sucks, but art, expression, speech, religion, assembly, press etc. were all enshrined in the US CONSTITUTION for a REASON, look no further than countries like the UK for what happens when YOU give a SINGLE INCH to the Government in what you can and cannot express, say, paint, draw, make, etc. You get hell on Earth, you get arrested for buying an anime pillowcase, you get thrown in PRISON with the worst of the worst, because why? You watched the "wrong" anime? Played the wrong game? NEXT THEY'LL SAY: Violent video games are the real cause of all these mass tragedies and atrocities and people being harmed—ban violent video games. (you see this everywhere) Internet ID, Mass Surveillance, going to prison FOR POSTING MEMES OR SAYING SPICY WORDS (or even criticizing the government) THAT'S THE FUTURE ANTIS/TOURISTS WANT. CENSORSHIP NEVER ENDS AT JUST THE THINGS YOU DON'T LIKE—IT NEVER DOES. I AM SICK OF THE BAD FAITH ARGUMENTS. Just because someone defends Lolita (smut or not) doesn't mean they "jork it" to anime girls—that's like saying if enjoy violent video games (where you kill people) that means you must be a deranged SERIAL KILLER—most anti/tourist logic are built up logical fallacy which falls apart the MOMENT you use basic logic. (or compare it to video games) I AM SICK OF PROJECTION. The vast majority of "Lolita" characters aren't even REMOTELY "gooner" material or sexualized AT ALL, if YOU see an underage character in an anime/game/cartoon etc. and your first thought is: "wow what total goonbait" that says WAY MORE ABOUT YOU than it does "Fans" of anything (Self Report) much less anime. And lastly I'm sick and tired of all these UNDERAGE ZOOMERS and actual minors online, if you are underage, GET OFF THE INTERNET, we don't need YOUR OPINIONS on ANY of this (you're just a kid) and you honestly SHOULD NOT be on Social Media: Most of you (and honestly a lot of people) have NO IDEA what they're talking about—MEDIA LITERACY is at an ALL TIME LOW—most people CAN BARELY READ. FINALE: If you respond to this post saying something like "too long didn't read" (or muh book) congratulations, not only are you STUPID (and ignorant) you just proved me 100% CORRECT—nobody can actually prove me wrong or defeat my arguments because I am talking TOTAL COMMON SENSE. If you have seen Sladed (or anything similar) even once and enjoyed it, or gooned to Raven from Teen Titans (or ANY other similar character) you are a blatant, utter HYPOCRITE who (by your own logic) deserves the worst of the worst, lets see if you TRULY practice what you PREACH. (otherwise, please just stop being dumb) Sorry for the rant, I'm so tired of retards.

MR. OBVIOUS

26,410 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten