Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Republican Senate Candidate Derek Dooley: Mike, you’re under an ethics investigation by your Republican colleagues for abusing taxpayer money… Why did you not cooperate with the investigation for over four months? And how can hardworking Georgians trust you going forward? Mike Collins: Well, you know… H–here’s the thing… We... show more

Team Ossoff

21,666 subscribers

127,727 views • 17 days ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

A typical D.C. politician under an ethics investigation for abusing taxpayer dollars isn’t going to beat Jon Ossoff. What Mike Collins doesn’t say is his Republican colleagues narrowed down thousands of cases to only four that warranted further investigation—and two of those involve Mike. That’s not a “nothing burger”. That’s a gift to Ossoff and the Democrats this fall if Collins is our nominee.

A typical D.C. politician under an ethics investigation for abusing taxpayer dollars isn’t going to beat Jon Ossoff. What Mike Collins doesn’t say is his Republican colleagues narrowed down thousands of cases to only four that warranted further investigation—and two of those involve Mike. That’s not a “nothing burger”. That’s a gift to Ossoff and the Democrats this fall if Collins is our nominee.

Derek Dooley

242,375 views • 3 months ago

Posting this from WKRN because Marsha Blackburn is counting on journalists not asking the RIGHT questions in following up on my story about the ethics investigation of her office last year. NO ONE is saying that she was disciplined by the Senate Ethics Committee - so she is denying a claim that no one has made. That’s because the Senate Ethics Committee has not disciplined one of their own in many, many years. Instead, when it finds wrongdoing, the Ethics Committee usually makes the senators fix the problem and promise to never do it again! Here are the right questions: If this ethics investigation was politically motivated as you claim, why not release your correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee to prove that the committee investigated and found nothing? If you refuse to release correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee, why should votes not assume that you are hiding something? @ There was an ethics complaint against you last year for voting for legislation from which you could profit. Will you release any correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee about that complaint? There was an ethics complaint against you in 2021 for using your position to help an aide get out of a traffic ticket. Will you release any correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee about that complaint? ONE MORE NOTE: No journalist should accept an interview with Marsha Blackburn under the condition that they not ask about the ethics investigation.

Posting this from WKRN because Marsha Blackburn is counting on journalists not asking the RIGHT questions in following up on my story about the ethics investigation of her office last year. NO ONE is saying that she was disciplined by the Senate Ethics Committee - so she is denying a claim that no one has made. That’s because the Senate Ethics Committee has not disciplined one of their own in many, many years. Instead, when it finds wrongdoing, the Ethics Committee usually makes the senators fix the problem and promise to never do it again! Here are the right questions: If this ethics investigation was politically motivated as you claim, why not release your correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee to prove that the committee investigated and found nothing? If you refuse to release correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee, why should votes not assume that you are hiding something? @ There was an ethics complaint against you last year for voting for legislation from which you could profit. Will you release any correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee about that complaint? There was an ethics complaint against you in 2021 for using your position to help an aide get out of a traffic ticket. Will you release any correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee about that complaint? ONE MORE NOTE: No journalist should accept an interview with Marsha Blackburn under the condition that they not ask about the ethics investigation.

Phil Williams

74,771 views • 1 month ago

Cassidy on what he said to Trump: "You have not told the American people what's going on. It was supposed to last for four weeks, it's lasted four months. Our original objectives have not been achieved. And I want to know what's going on. He did not particularly care for my comments."

Cassidy on what he said to Trump: "You have not told the American people what's going on. It was supposed to last for four weeks, it's lasted four months. Our original objectives have not been achieved. And I want to know what's going on. He did not particularly care for my comments."

Aaron Rupar

589,122 views • 2 months ago

Garcia: He just said that the Epstein investigation is basically in the past, that he’s not going to address it moving forward, and that all the documents were released. I mean, that’s just a bold-faced lie. We know they’ve only released about 50% of the total documents. How can you say the investigation is over when there haven’t been any convictions, and when they’re refusing to actually meet with the survivors? And so, I’m very concerned about Todd Blanche.

Garcia: He just said that the Epstein investigation is basically in the past, that he’s not going to address it moving forward, and that all the documents were released. I mean, that’s just a bold-faced lie. We know they’ve only released about 50% of the total documents. How can you say the investigation is over when there haven’t been any convictions, and when they’re refusing to actually meet with the survivors? And so, I’m very concerned about Todd Blanche.

Acyn

78,810 views • 5 months ago

He wants you know why you’re not honoring the DOGE-style audit of TPUSA that Charlie wanted, Erika Kirk. Can you answer that question (and why you’re taking TPUSA MORE into the Pro-Israel cause when Charlie had turned on it)? Or are you going to play the grieving widow card?

He wants you know why you’re not honoring the DOGE-style audit of TPUSA that Charlie wanted, Erika Kirk. Can you answer that question (and why you’re taking TPUSA MORE into the Pro-Israel cause when Charlie had turned on it)? Or are you going to play the grieving widow card?

Ginny Robinson

33,548 views • 7 months ago

🚨 NEW: Fox’s Jason Chaffetz SPARS with Bill Cassidy over whether he regrets his vote to convict President Trump in the 2nd impeachment trial. Chaffetz: “Knowing what you know now about the farce that was put forward to the American people and congress, would you still vote to actually convict Donald Trump?” Cassidy: “Reporters always love to ask that question. I’m a doctor, give me all the information you can and I make a decision and move on. I don’t keep going back ‘what happened five years ago’.” Chaffetz: “You’ve just touted everything you’ve done for the last five years! Why can’t you answer the question?” Cassidy: “If I can finish..” Chaffetz: “No, I want you to answer this question: “Would you vote to convict knowing what you know now? It’s a simple question.” Cassidy: “Jason, you may go back and flagellate yourself over decisions in the past. I do not. I move on. I’m not just talking about the present, but the future.”

🚨 NEW: Fox’s Jason Chaffetz SPARS with Bill Cassidy over whether he regrets his vote to convict President Trump in the 2nd impeachment trial. Chaffetz: “Knowing what you know now about the farce that was put forward to the American people and congress, would you still vote to actually convict Donald Trump?” Cassidy: “Reporters always love to ask that question. I’m a doctor, give me all the information you can and I make a decision and move on. I don’t keep going back ‘what happened five years ago’.” Chaffetz: “You’ve just touted everything you’ve done for the last five years! Why can’t you answer the question?” Cassidy: “If I can finish..” Chaffetz: “No, I want you to answer this question: “Would you vote to convict knowing what you know now? It’s a simple question.” Cassidy: “Jason, you may go back and flagellate yourself over decisions in the past. I do not. I move on. I’m not just talking about the present, but the future.”

TV News Now

376,409 views • 3 months ago

Jason Chaffetz really going after Senator Cassidy on his vote to convict President Trump Chaffetz: Knowing what you know now about the farce that was put forward, would you still vote to convict Donald Trump? Cassidy: I'm a doctor. You give me all the information, I make a decision and move on. I don’t keep on going back on what happened five years ago. Chaffetz: You just touted everything you’ve done for the past five years! Why can’t you answer that question? Cassidy: You may go back and flagellate yourself over decisions in the past, I do not.

Jason Chaffetz really going after Senator Cassidy on his vote to convict President Trump Chaffetz: Knowing what you know now about the farce that was put forward, would you still vote to convict Donald Trump? Cassidy: I'm a doctor. You give me all the information, I make a decision and move on. I don’t keep on going back on what happened five years ago. Chaffetz: You just touted everything you’ve done for the past five years! Why can’t you answer that question? Cassidy: You may go back and flagellate yourself over decisions in the past, I do not.

Acyn

283,289 views • 3 months ago

Bill O’Reilly just delivered a brutally blunt warning to any Republican thinking about distancing themselves from President Trump before the midterms. “If you try, you’re going to get SLAUGHTERED.” VITTERT: “Is there room for Republicans to move away from Trump?” O’REILLY: “No.” [Scoffs] “That’s the answer to that question, no.” “He’s the ship, you’re either going to sail with it or go down with it.” “What Rove is talking about is that he wants the individual people running for office in November to be better campaigners, to connect with the voters in an emotional way.” “And of course, that would be best for the Republican Party if that were to happen.” “But if you think you can cut loose the most charismatic populist president last 50 years… you’re crazy.” “You can’t. And if you try, you’re going to get slaughtered.”

Bill O’Reilly just delivered a brutally blunt warning to any Republican thinking about distancing themselves from President Trump before the midterms. “If you try, you’re going to get SLAUGHTERED.” VITTERT: “Is there room for Republicans to move away from Trump?” O’REILLY: “No.” [Scoffs] “That’s the answer to that question, no.” “He’s the ship, you’re either going to sail with it or go down with it.” “What Rove is talking about is that he wants the individual people running for office in November to be better campaigners, to connect with the voters in an emotional way.” “And of course, that would be best for the Republican Party if that were to happen.” “But if you think you can cut loose the most charismatic populist president last 50 years… you’re crazy.” “You can’t. And if you try, you’re going to get slaughtered.”

Overton

159,053 views • 4 months ago

We watched the Michigan Senate debate on hasanabi’s broadcast and Dr. Abdul El-Sayed’s answer to this question was a masterclass: "There is no left or right. Most people out there aren't asking, 'Where do I fit on the left right spectrum?'. They're asking, 'Can I afford my groceries? What's going to happen if I get sick or my kid gets sick? Why does my kids’ school look the same way it did 30 years ago when I went there?’ And the answer to that question is that for too long politicians, on both sides of the aisle, have taken the same corporate corrupting money. I'm the only candidate on this stage, frankly the only candidate running for US Senate, who has never taken a dime of that money. Which is why, the real issue is about the people locking you out of your politics vs the people being locked out, and I will stand always on the side of the people who are locked out. That’s the pathway in our politics that I think all of us can get on. It's not red. It's not blue. It's not Democrat. It's not Republican. It's America. Government of the people, by the people and for the people."

We watched the Michigan Senate debate on hasanabi’s broadcast and Dr. Abdul El-Sayed’s answer to this question was a masterclass: "There is no left or right. Most people out there aren't asking, 'Where do I fit on the left right spectrum?'. They're asking, 'Can I afford my groceries? What's going to happen if I get sick or my kid gets sick? Why does my kids’ school look the same way it did 30 years ago when I went there?’ And the answer to that question is that for too long politicians, on both sides of the aisle, have taken the same corporate corrupting money. I'm the only candidate on this stage, frankly the only candidate running for US Senate, who has never taken a dime of that money. Which is why, the real issue is about the people locking you out of your politics vs the people being locked out, and I will stand always on the side of the people who are locked out. That’s the pathway in our politics that I think all of us can get on. It's not red. It's not blue. It's not Democrat. It's not Republican. It's America. Government of the people, by the people and for the people."

palki 🌹

20,786 views • 2 months ago

Tucker Carlson is—to put it bluntly—transing himself into a leftist. Tucker announced that he is leaving the Republican Party. "I would not support the Republican Party. There's no chance I would support the Republican Party. I'm not going to support the Democratic Party. I don't know what I'm going to do. But at this point, you know, how could you support, how could I or any American voters support a political party that's not loyal to the United States? That puts the interests of a foreign country above those of its own citizens. Like, that's, that's, you know, it's not possible to vote for people like that." Here's the point that needs to be made about that statement by Tucker Carlson. He said he would not support the Republican Party, nor is he going to support the Democrat Party and that's where I would challenge everyone to pause our thinking for a moment. If you refuse to vote for the Republican candidate, then you are, in effect, joining the Democrats. This is not some abstention that gives you moral high ground, because you don't 100% agree with the Republicans, or 100% agree with the Democrats, so you can't in good conscience, cast your vote because it might feel like an implicit endorsement of things that you don't agree with. No, no, no. If you do not vote for a Republican, you are, in effect, giving your opponent, the Democrats, a vote. Surrendering your vote gives your opponent an increased chance of winning because we are in a binary system. Either their values will prevail, or our values will prevail. So, if you refuse to vote for a Republican because you have even a significant policy disagreement with that politician, then you are effectively voting for racism against white people because that's what the Democrats stand for—wokeness, DEI, and ESG. I have never met a politician, read about a politician, or studied a politician with whom I agree 100% of the time. Disagreeing with a president on one policy is not a reason to blow up the rest of our agenda and, effectively, join the enemy—even if you claim you're not joining the enemy. Again, you don't have to agree with a politician on every policy in order to cast your vote for him, support him, or to be part of this general political party apparatus through which he is able to challenge the communists and anti-American zealots who are trying to take us down. So, I'm sorry to see Tucker leave the Republican Party. That makes me sad.

Tucker Carlson is—to put it bluntly—transing himself into a leftist. Tucker announced that he is leaving the Republican Party. "I would not support the Republican Party. There's no chance I would support the Republican Party. I'm not going to support the Democratic Party. I don't know what I'm going to do. But at this point, you know, how could you support, how could I or any American voters support a political party that's not loyal to the United States? That puts the interests of a foreign country above those of its own citizens. Like, that's, that's, you know, it's not possible to vote for people like that." Here's the point that needs to be made about that statement by Tucker Carlson. He said he would not support the Republican Party, nor is he going to support the Democrat Party and that's where I would challenge everyone to pause our thinking for a moment. If you refuse to vote for the Republican candidate, then you are, in effect, joining the Democrats. This is not some abstention that gives you moral high ground, because you don't 100% agree with the Republicans, or 100% agree with the Democrats, so you can't in good conscience, cast your vote because it might feel like an implicit endorsement of things that you don't agree with. No, no, no. If you do not vote for a Republican, you are, in effect, giving your opponent, the Democrats, a vote. Surrendering your vote gives your opponent an increased chance of winning because we are in a binary system. Either their values will prevail, or our values will prevail. So, if you refuse to vote for a Republican because you have even a significant policy disagreement with that politician, then you are effectively voting for racism against white people because that's what the Democrats stand for—wokeness, DEI, and ESG. I have never met a politician, read about a politician, or studied a politician with whom I agree 100% of the time. Disagreeing with a president on one policy is not a reason to blow up the rest of our agenda and, effectively, join the enemy—even if you claim you're not joining the enemy. Again, you don't have to agree with a politician on every policy in order to cast your vote for him, support him, or to be part of this general political party apparatus through which he is able to challenge the communists and anti-American zealots who are trying to take us down. So, I'm sorry to see Tucker leave the Republican Party. That makes me sad.

Liz Wheeler

83,512 views • 2 months ago

CNN was just forced to read on air why the Georgia prosecutor dropped the entire election case against President Trump. And their viewers are not going to like what they heard...especially the part where he said: “contesting an election is not unlawful.” A direct hit to the narrative they have been peddling for years. “He is saying that they are not going to move forward with this case.” “And he summarized it in part by saying that he made this decision by examining the case file, examining what the jury had been presented, and also considerations of the law.” “You know, he says that, you know, contesting an election is not unlawful. But, you know, and that is part of the reasons for why he decided not to move forward with the charges at this point.”

CNN was just forced to read on air why the Georgia prosecutor dropped the entire election case against President Trump. And their viewers are not going to like what they heard...especially the part where he said: “contesting an election is not unlawful.” A direct hit to the narrative they have been peddling for years. “He is saying that they are not going to move forward with this case.” “And he summarized it in part by saying that he made this decision by examining the case file, examining what the jury had been presented, and also considerations of the law.” “You know, he says that, you know, contesting an election is not unlawful. But, you know, and that is part of the reasons for why he decided not to move forward with the charges at this point.”

Overton

1,057,581 views • 9 months ago

Senator Senator Mark Kelly asks Pete Hegseth if he stands by his statement that he would provide no quarter and no mercy to the enemy. Hegseth refuses to answer a simple “yes” or “no” question. Senator Kelly: “I’m going to give you one more chance to address a question here… Your quote was ‘we will keep on pushing, keep advancing, no quarter, no mercy for our enemies,’ and yesterday you did not clarify if you stand by this statement.” Hegseth: [non-answer] Senator Kelly: “You are the Secretary of Defense. The things you say matter and your response here, right now, makes it clear to the American people exactly why you are not right for this job.”

Senator Senator Mark Kelly asks Pete Hegseth if he stands by his statement that he would provide no quarter and no mercy to the enemy. Hegseth refuses to answer a simple “yes” or “no” question. Senator Kelly: “I’m going to give you one more chance to address a question here… Your quote was ‘we will keep on pushing, keep advancing, no quarter, no mercy for our enemies,’ and yesterday you did not clarify if you stand by this statement.” Hegseth: [non-answer] Senator Kelly: “You are the Secretary of Defense. The things you say matter and your response here, right now, makes it clear to the American people exactly why you are not right for this job.”

Ed Krassenstein

767,780 views • 4 months ago

Why did Hitler just get elected? Scott Adams "Some of you are going to wake up and find out that people in your life, let's say young people, who are supporting Kamala Harris, are going to wonder, Why did Hitler just get elected? And you're going to have to answer that question. So rather than answering it yourself, I thought I would do it for you, and then you can just show the video to the young people in your family. How is it that everybody knew he was Hitler. Everybody knew. We all saw it. We saw him trying to steal democracy with our own eyes and stuff. So, so how can he possibly get elected? I give you the answer to that" 1.5x speed

Why did Hitler just get elected? Scott Adams "Some of you are going to wake up and find out that people in your life, let's say young people, who are supporting Kamala Harris, are going to wonder, Why did Hitler just get elected? And you're going to have to answer that question. So rather than answering it yourself, I thought I would do it for you, and then you can just show the video to the young people in your family. How is it that everybody knew he was Hitler. Everybody knew. We all saw it. We saw him trying to steal democracy with our own eyes and stuff. So, so how can he possibly get elected? I give you the answer to that" 1.5x speed

jay plemons

227,827 views • 1 year ago

Ossoff: That's the debate that Georgians deserve. See, they deserve to have a debate where we would ask Congressman Mike Collins why he voted for this disastrous war in Iran, why he voted to double health insurance premiums for more than a million Georgians, why he voted for the Trump tariffs that are making everything more expensive. Instead, the State of Georgia has to grapple with the fact that the sitting member of Congress and candidate for Senate has extensive and growing well-documented ties to white nationalism and neo-Nazi ideology. And so, again, let me be very clear that the congressman needs to hold this press conference today. No more hiding. No more running away. No more refusing to answer questions. No more hiding his office's communications. Will he release, in full, his office's communications with these white supremacists? He needs to answer that question today.

Ossoff: That's the debate that Georgians deserve. See, they deserve to have a debate where we would ask Congressman Mike Collins why he voted for this disastrous war in Iran, why he voted to double health insurance premiums for more than a million Georgians, why he voted for the Trump tariffs that are making everything more expensive. Instead, the State of Georgia has to grapple with the fact that the sitting member of Congress and candidate for Senate has extensive and growing well-documented ties to white nationalism and neo-Nazi ideology. And so, again, let me be very clear that the congressman needs to hold this press conference today. No more hiding. No more running away. No more refusing to answer questions. No more hiding his office's communications. Will he release, in full, his office's communications with these white supremacists? He needs to answer that question today.

Team Ossoff

10,388 views • 15 days ago

OMG LOL Collins: You've called Hilton unethical and dishonest and said that he swindled his way into the Republican side. Bianco: I've don’t think I’ve ever used the word swindle. I don't know if you were quoting something. Collins: It's a quote from you to The Atlantic. Bianco: I've never used the word swindle. Collins: But you're denying that you said these quotes? Bianco: I would never use the word swindled, but the context—yes, I have said that. Collins: Because this says it's from an interview with KBAK that happened in April of this year, where you said he's trying to figure out how he can manipulate californians to put him in this position at a time when we know that California Democrats have failed and we are going to vote for a Republican governor, and he has swindled his way into the Republican side, even though he's not. Bianco: I probably did say that.

OMG LOL Collins: You've called Hilton unethical and dishonest and said that he swindled his way into the Republican side. Bianco: I've don’t think I’ve ever used the word swindle. I don't know if you were quoting something. Collins: It's a quote from you to The Atlantic. Bianco: I've never used the word swindle. Collins: But you're denying that you said these quotes? Bianco: I would never use the word swindled, but the context—yes, I have said that. Collins: Because this says it's from an interview with KBAK that happened in April of this year, where you said he's trying to figure out how he can manipulate californians to put him in this position at a time when we know that California Democrats have failed and we are going to vote for a Republican governor, and he has swindled his way into the Republican side, even though he's not. Bianco: I probably did say that.

Acyn

1,567,022 views • 4 months ago

Ossoff: A few years back this degenerate political staffer named Brandon Phillips had been convicted of multiple crimes for some brutal violence. A few months later he was arrested again for an armed altercation, and again a few years later for animal cruelty. This kid was such a mess that he had to resign from the Trump campaign. But Mike Collins saw Brandon and thought he would make a great chief of staff. Fast forward four years, and as we speak both Brandon and Mike are under active federal investigation for illegally funneling it will tax dollars to Brandon's girlfriend

Ossoff: A few years back this degenerate political staffer named Brandon Phillips had been convicted of multiple crimes for some brutal violence. A few months later he was arrested again for an armed altercation, and again a few years later for animal cruelty. This kid was such a mess that he had to resign from the Trump campaign. But Mike Collins saw Brandon and thought he would make a great chief of staff. Fast forward four years, and as we speak both Brandon and Mike are under active federal investigation for illegally funneling it will tax dollars to Brandon's girlfriend

Acyn

242,160 views • 2 months ago

#SudikshaKonanki | #JoshuaRiibe was interrogated again. I have translated the interrogation for y’all. Sudiksha Konanki: Joshua Riibe Evades Key Questions with the Same Answer Eight Times Punta Cana. – Joshua Steven Riibe, the last person to see the young Sudiksha Konanki, was interviewed by the Public Ministry, and in at least eight occasions, he stated that he could not answer a question, following the advice of his lawyers. Sudiksha Konanki disappeared on the 6th of this month at the beach. She was a guest at the RIU República hotel in Punta Cana. Throughout the interview, not always consecutively, here are the eight questions he refused to answer, according to a document with his statements obtained exclusively by Noticias SIN: can we verify that everything you have said corresponds to the truth? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 2.Could you tell us what you commented to your friend Carter Joseph when he asked about the missing girl, Sudiksha Konanki? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 3.What do you think about Sudiksha’s disappearance? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 4.Did Sudiksha know how to swim or not? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” you remember if Sudiksha made any gesture or screamed while she was in the sea? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 6.Did you inform the authorities or the hotel about what happened with you and the girl on the beach? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 7.Did you tell your friend what happened with you and the girl on the beach? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” do you feel about this situation? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.”

#SudikshaKonanki | #JoshuaRiibe was interrogated again. I have translated the interrogation for y’all. Sudiksha Konanki: Joshua Riibe Evades Key Questions with the Same Answer Eight Times Punta Cana. – Joshua Steven Riibe, the last person to see the young Sudiksha Konanki, was interviewed by the Public Ministry, and in at least eight occasions, he stated that he could not answer a question, following the advice of his lawyers. Sudiksha Konanki disappeared on the 6th of this month at the beach. She was a guest at the RIU República hotel in Punta Cana. Throughout the interview, not always consecutively, here are the eight questions he refused to answer, according to a document with his statements obtained exclusively by Noticias SIN: can we verify that everything you have said corresponds to the truth? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 2.Could you tell us what you commented to your friend Carter Joseph when he asked about the missing girl, Sudiksha Konanki? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 3.What do you think about Sudiksha’s disappearance? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 4.Did Sudiksha know how to swim or not? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” you remember if Sudiksha made any gesture or screamed while she was in the sea? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 6.Did you inform the authorities or the hotel about what happened with you and the girl on the beach? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 7.Did you tell your friend what happened with you and the girl on the beach? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” do you feel about this situation? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.”

𝕏 🕵🏻‍♀️🦋L̤̮E̤̮G̤̮🅰️C̤̮Y̤̮🦋🕵🏻‍♀️ 𝕏

104,132 views • 1 year ago