Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Republicans had no problem giving ICE a $70 BILLION slush fund…but when it comes to spending just a small fraction of that on feeding hungry families, they say we’ve run out of money. It’s disgusting.

Rep. Jim McGovern

163,924 subscribers

27,634 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Comedy News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Holy shit, Rep. Jeffries just UNLOADED on Republicans for giving billionaires huge tax breaks at the expense of healthcare for seniors and kids, and a $70 billion slush fund to deadly ICE thugs. Republicans only care about trump. Dems care about Americans. November is coming.

Holy shit, Rep. Jeffries just UNLOADED on Republicans for giving billionaires huge tax breaks at the expense of healthcare for seniors and kids, and a $70 billion slush fund to deadly ICE thugs. Republicans only care about trump. Dems care about Americans. November is coming.

BrooklynDad_Defiant!☮️

29,483 views • 2 months ago

ICYMI: Senate Republicans passed Trump’s bill giving ICE another $70 billion. Insanity. When it comes to the House next week, I’ll be voting no.

ICYMI: Senate Republicans passed Trump’s bill giving ICE another $70 billion. Insanity. When it comes to the House next week, I’ll be voting no.

Congresswoman Yassamin Ansari

24,462 views • 2 months ago

PabloReports: What do you make of this $1.7 billion slush fund that Trump is proposing for Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, and pardoned fraudsters? Raskin: It’s illegal, unconstitutional, and outrageous. Congress controls the spending of money from the federal government, and we never voted to establish a $1.7 billion fund to pay off insurrectionists and his extremist private militias, and we would never spend money on that. So it needs to be blocked. It’s an absolute corruption and prostitution of the Judgment Fund.

PabloReports: What do you make of this $1.7 billion slush fund that Trump is proposing for Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, and pardoned fraudsters? Raskin: It’s illegal, unconstitutional, and outrageous. Congress controls the spending of money from the federal government, and we never voted to establish a $1.7 billion fund to pay off insurrectionists and his extremist private militias, and we would never spend money on that. So it needs to be blocked. It’s an absolute corruption and prostitution of the Judgment Fund.

Acyn

233,759 views • 3 months ago

Connecticut Republicans are demanding transparency in NGO funding ‘For years, Democrats have treated earmarks like a political slush fund - handing out millions with little vetting, no transparency, and zero accountability” They say CT Democrats are sending money out of state, “They have no problem handing out a quarter million dollars to organizations that don't already registered with the state of Connecticut.” “This is taxpayer money. This is hard-earned money of the people of this state. Someone has got to get a grip on this” All Democrats do is launder taxpayer money and nobody ever goes to jail

Connecticut Republicans are demanding transparency in NGO funding ‘For years, Democrats have treated earmarks like a political slush fund - handing out millions with little vetting, no transparency, and zero accountability” They say CT Democrats are sending money out of state, “They have no problem handing out a quarter million dollars to organizations that don't already registered with the state of Connecticut.” “This is taxpayer money. This is hard-earned money of the people of this state. Someone has got to get a grip on this” All Democrats do is launder taxpayer money and nobody ever goes to jail

Wall Street Apes

39,443 views • 10 months ago

PabloReports: What do you make of this $1.7 billion slush fund that Trump is proposing from the IRS for January 6th insurrectionists and pardoned fraudsters? Johnson: That is the most outrageous proposal I’ve heard come out of this administration. Giving him a $1.7 billion fund to reward his friends—it’s just in-your-face corruption.

PabloReports: What do you make of this $1.7 billion slush fund that Trump is proposing from the IRS for January 6th insurrectionists and pardoned fraudsters? Johnson: That is the most outrageous proposal I’ve heard come out of this administration. Giving him a $1.7 billion fund to reward his friends—it’s just in-your-face corruption.

Acyn

12,278 views • 3 months ago

Elite universities say they need to prioritize donors, but they don't. Harvard has a $50 billion endowment, and it could use that money to be a school instead of a hedge fund. Schools should use their money to be places of learning, not centers of power for billionaires.

Elite universities say they need to prioritize donors, but they don't. Harvard has a $50 billion endowment, and it could use that money to be a school instead of a hedge fund. Schools should use their money to be places of learning, not centers of power for billionaires.

More Perfect Union

64,896 views • 2 years ago

Washington is collecting more money than ever. But it's also spending the most. So it’s not a revenue problem—it’s a spending problem. 60% of Americans believe that spending limits should accompany any debt limit increase. That's exactly what Republicans are fighting for.

Washington is collecting more money than ever. But it's also spending the most. So it’s not a revenue problem—it’s a spending problem. 60% of Americans believe that spending limits should accompany any debt limit increase. That's exactly what Republicans are fighting for.

Kevin McCarthy

2,318,420 views • 3 years ago

AOC to Julian Andreone of Drop Site News on slush fund: It’s corruption. The judge basically said they wanted to dismiss the case, so they created this contrived settlement in order to enrich themselves. Andreone: Do you think Democrats would have a little bit more of a leg to stand on regarding corruption if they didn’t take corporate PAC money and trade stocks? AOC: Everyone in this place takes corporate money—Republicans and Democrats. I’m glad I don’t. Corporate money in this place just corrupts the whole system. We’ve got to take it out.

AOC to Julian Andreone of Drop Site News on slush fund: It’s corruption. The judge basically said they wanted to dismiss the case, so they created this contrived settlement in order to enrich themselves. Andreone: Do you think Democrats would have a little bit more of a leg to stand on regarding corruption if they didn’t take corporate PAC money and trade stocks? AOC: Everyone in this place takes corporate money—Republicans and Democrats. I’m glad I don’t. Corporate money in this place just corrupts the whole system. We’ve got to take it out.

Acyn

24,258 views • 3 months ago

.Rep. Jamie Raskin: "“This is not his first slush fund. The Board of Peace is nothing but a global slush fund for Donald Trump. He took $1.5 billion from the State Department. That was money that was set aside for disaster relief around the world. He gave it to the Board of Peace. He took a billion from the Saudis. He took a billion from the UAE, took a billion from the Qataris.”

.Rep. Jamie Raskin: "“This is not his first slush fund. The Board of Peace is nothing but a global slush fund for Donald Trump. He took $1.5 billion from the State Department. That was money that was set aside for disaster relief around the world. He gave it to the Board of Peace. He took a billion from the Saudis. He took a billion from the UAE, took a billion from the Qataris.”

BTC Clips

82,395 views • 2 months ago

Trump on The Fed: The new ceiling had no opulence to it or they fixed the ceiling. But I would say that all I need is a good plaster and a can of paint and they spent 3.9 billion and I spent a lot of money, too. I would say 3.8 billion less, you know?

Trump on The Fed: The new ceiling had no opulence to it or they fixed the ceiling. But I would say that all I need is a good plaster and a can of paint and they spent 3.9 billion and I spent a lot of money, too. I would say 3.8 billion less, you know?

Acyn

213,420 views • 1 year ago

JAW DROPPING Justin Trudeau was caught giving away $8 BILLION through another slush fund. The Liberals said this money would lower emissions - but Canada's Environment Commissioner revealed most of the money was handed out without a promise to reduce emissions. Watch this 👇

JAW DROPPING Justin Trudeau was caught giving away $8 BILLION through another slush fund. The Liberals said this money would lower emissions - but Canada's Environment Commissioner revealed most of the money was handed out without a promise to reduce emissions. Watch this 👇

Dan Mazier

75,858 views • 2 years ago

Stephen Miller on Trump's taxpayer-funded insurrectionist slush fund: "This settlement is just a small measure of the justice they are owed"

Stephen Miller on Trump's taxpayer-funded insurrectionist slush fund: "This settlement is just a small measure of the justice they are owed"

Aaron Rupar

1,180,886 views • 2 months ago

Older video but just a reminder on Demoncrats out of control deficit spending. All that money and they didn’t fix anything.

Older video but just a reminder on Demoncrats out of control deficit spending. All that money and they didn’t fix anything.

Santa Trump.. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

20,462 views • 10 days ago

Trump started a war. Working families get the bill. And Stephen Miller gets a $70 billion blank check for ICE?? It makes no sense. I will vote NO on the Republicans' garbage budget.

Trump started a war. Working families get the bill. And Stephen Miller gets a $70 billion blank check for ICE?? It makes no sense. I will vote NO on the Republicans' garbage budget.

Senator Patty Murray

83,557 views • 3 months ago

The rich don’t spend the money they have, and the poor don’t have money to spend. This is a problem when 70% of the economy relies on consumer spending. Closing our staggering wealth gap isn’t just the right thing to do. It’s essential to save our economy from collapse.

The rich don’t spend the money they have, and the poor don’t have money to spend. This is a problem when 70% of the economy relies on consumer spending. Closing our staggering wealth gap isn’t just the right thing to do. It’s essential to save our economy from collapse.

Robert Reich

308,763 views • 3 years ago

Phillip: That's what some people voted for because they wanted him to spend money here instead of 11 billion dropping bombs elsewhere in the world Jennings: I'm sorry but we've spent more money in this country on Somali fraud in Minnesota than we've spent on this war so far. Phillip: That’s not true Jennings: 19 Billion Phillip: It’s not 19 billion. By no estimate it’s 19 billion…. 11 billion is a lot of money. And it's a lot of money… it could fund hunger programs here in the United States…it could fund health care. Jennings: What percentage of our national budget is 11 billion? Boykin: It could fund the entire CDC budget

Phillip: That's what some people voted for because they wanted him to spend money here instead of 11 billion dropping bombs elsewhere in the world Jennings: I'm sorry but we've spent more money in this country on Somali fraud in Minnesota than we've spent on this war so far. Phillip: That’s not true Jennings: 19 Billion Phillip: It’s not 19 billion. By no estimate it’s 19 billion…. 11 billion is a lot of money. And it's a lot of money… it could fund hunger programs here in the United States…it could fund health care. Jennings: What percentage of our national budget is 11 billion? Boykin: It could fund the entire CDC budget

Acyn

353,113 views • 5 months ago

Absolute bombshell. A US Congressman refuses to fund the unauthorized war in Iran, exposing that the Pentagon was given a $150 billion slush fund and still cannot pass a basic audit. They have no idea where the money is going!

Absolute bombshell. A US Congressman refuses to fund the unauthorized war in Iran, exposing that the Pentagon was given a $150 billion slush fund and still cannot pass a basic audit. They have no idea where the money is going!

Furkan Gözükara

233,728 views • 4 months ago

BREAKING Today, I moved a motion demanding the Liberal government release details on their $8 BILLION Net Zero Accelerator slush fund. Canada's independent Environment Commissioner caught the Liberals giving away BILLIONS of tax dollars to mega-corporations — in the name of emission reductions — with no commitment to reduce ANY emissions. Shockingly, over 70% of recipients received money with no guarantee of emission reductions. Justin Trudeau is forcing Canadians to foot the bill for his $8 BILLION Net Zero Accelerator slush fund, while refusing to disclose how the money is being spent. The Liberals claim the money is needed to 'reduce' emissions but can't prove how many emissions will be reduced, if any. Canadians deserve answers. More to come.

BREAKING Today, I moved a motion demanding the Liberal government release details on their $8 BILLION Net Zero Accelerator slush fund. Canada's independent Environment Commissioner caught the Liberals giving away BILLIONS of tax dollars to mega-corporations — in the name of emission reductions — with no commitment to reduce ANY emissions. Shockingly, over 70% of recipients received money with no guarantee of emission reductions. Justin Trudeau is forcing Canadians to foot the bill for his $8 BILLION Net Zero Accelerator slush fund, while refusing to disclose how the money is being spent. The Liberals claim the money is needed to 'reduce' emissions but can't prove how many emissions will be reduced, if any. Canadians deserve answers. More to come.

Dan Mazier

15,568 views • 1 year ago