Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Republicans in Congress refused to exercise their constitutional duty to stop Trump’s unconstitutional tariffs, so I am glad the Supreme Court finally recognized these tariffs; as illegal taxes. The American people, small businesses and farmers have paid the price for Trump’s Tariff war which wasn't based on economics or... show more

Rep. Teresa Leger Fernández

24,512 subscribers

12,708 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Spanberger: His reckless trade policies have forced American families to pay more than $1,700 each in tariff costs. Even though the supreme court struck these tariffs down, the damage to the American people has been done. Meanwhile, the president is planning for new tariffs, another massive tax hike on you and your family and Republicans in congress—they remain unwilling to assert their constitutional authority to stop him. They're making your life harder. They're making your life more expensive.

Spanberger: His reckless trade policies have forced American families to pay more than $1,700 each in tariff costs. Even though the supreme court struck these tariffs down, the damage to the American people has been done. Meanwhile, the president is planning for new tariffs, another massive tax hike on you and your family and Republicans in congress—they remain unwilling to assert their constitutional authority to stop him. They're making your life harder. They're making your life more expensive.

Acyn

109,315 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Mike Pence is rooting for the Supreme Court to strike down President Trump’s tariffs: “American businesses and American consumers pay American tariffs.” American businesses don’t pay tariffs if they hire American workers and make their products here in the U.S.

Mike Pence is rooting for the Supreme Court to strike down President Trump’s tariffs: “American businesses and American consumers pay American tariffs.” American businesses don’t pay tariffs if they hire American workers and make their products here in the U.S.

johnny maga

628,618 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Everyone — including Donald Trump — knows that these tariffs are hurting the American people. It’s time for the President to adhere to the Supreme Court and stop inflicting pain on our families, farmers, and small businesses.

Everyone — including Donald Trump — knows that these tariffs are hurting the American people. It’s time for the President to adhere to the Supreme Court and stop inflicting pain on our families, farmers, and small businesses.

Josh Shapiro

26,436 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Trump’s tariffs are a nearly $2,000 tax on American families. The Senate is taking action by repealing his corrupt tariffs on Brazil, and we will vote to stop his tariffs on Canada next. The House needs to return to work and reverse these tariff taxes and actually lower costs.

Trump’s tariffs are a nearly $2,000 tax on American families. The Senate is taking action by repealing his corrupt tariffs on Brazil, and we will vote to stop his tariffs on Canada next. The House needs to return to work and reverse these tariff taxes and actually lower costs.

Amy Klobuchar

57,914 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Tariffs are taxes. The power to tax is a power vested in Congress, not the President, that’s rooted in the history and founding of this nation dating back to the revolution. More on Supreme Court arguments in the cases challenging Trump’s illegal tariffs on MeidasTouch's Legal AF:

Tariffs are taxes. The power to tax is a power vested in Congress, not the President, that’s rooted in the history and founding of this nation dating back to the revolution. More on Supreme Court arguments in the cases challenging Trump’s illegal tariffs on MeidasTouch's Legal AF:

Rob Bonta

69,179 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

#BREAKING: Lawrence: “…the Trump administration says filings for tariff refunds totaling approximately $128 billion have been accepted for processing and approximately $100 billion in refunds have been completed. After losing in the court of International Trade and then in the United States Supreme Court on his tariffs, Donald Trump decided to REIMPOSE illegal and unconstitutional tariffs using a DIFFERENT rationale in federal law—section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. Donald Trump cited that provision in trade law in imposing his new tariffs on 60 countries claiming that those countries used forced labor as the reason for the tariffs.”🙄

#BREAKING: Lawrence: “…the Trump administration says filings for tariff refunds totaling approximately $128 billion have been accepted for processing and approximately $100 billion in refunds have been completed. After losing in the court of International Trade and then in the United States Supreme Court on his tariffs, Donald Trump decided to REIMPOSE illegal and unconstitutional tariffs using a DIFFERENT rationale in federal law—section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. Donald Trump cited that provision in trade law in imposing his new tariffs on 60 countries claiming that those countries used forced labor as the reason for the tariffs.”🙄

Emoluments Clause

36,050 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

Tonight in the Rules committee, Republicans snuck in a provision so the House can’t vote against Trump’s tariffs for the next 5 months. Families and small businesses are suffering. Republicans want to literally try to stop time and ignore reality.

Tonight in the Rules committee, Republicans snuck in a provision so the House can’t vote against Trump’s tariffs for the next 5 months. Families and small businesses are suffering. Republicans want to literally try to stop time and ignore reality.

Rep. Teresa Leger Fernández

64,983 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Trump’s reckless and illegal tariffs—imposed without congressional authority—are a nationwide sales tax on the American people. Congressional Republicans have allowed him to do this. But enough is enough. That’s why we voted to reclaim Congress’ authority so we can debate, vote on, and stop these tariffs. Costs are rising, but House Democrats are fighting to make life more affordable.

Trump’s reckless and illegal tariffs—imposed without congressional authority—are a nationwide sales tax on the American people. Congressional Republicans have allowed him to do this. But enough is enough. That’s why we voted to reclaim Congress’ authority so we can debate, vote on, and stop these tariffs. Costs are rising, but House Democrats are fighting to make life more affordable.

Congresswoman Sarah McBride

77,290 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Trump’s tariffs are paid out of the pockets of American taxpayers. It is a tax on YOU. I stood with families and businesses in Upstate NY to say: Enough is enough—I will be forcing a vote to END Trump’s destructive trade war.

Trump’s tariffs are paid out of the pockets of American taxpayers. It is a tax on YOU. I stood with families and businesses in Upstate NY to say: Enough is enough—I will be forcing a vote to END Trump’s destructive trade war.

Chuck Schumer

20,177 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Emmerson Mnangagwa’s knee-jerk capitulation to Donald Trump’s trade tariffs has become the butt of jokes on American comedy shows. Mnangagwa is the SADC chairman. SADC has tariff protocols that address how to deal with countries outside the region collectively. The SADC Protocol on Trade aims to harmonise tariff policies among member states and eliminate barriers to intra-regional trade. However, Mnangagwa ignored this and removed tariffs on all American goods without even negotiating with America or consulting his colleagues in the region. Trump’s trade advisor, Peter Navarro, said Mnangagwa’s move could be inconsequential.

Emmerson Mnangagwa’s knee-jerk capitulation to Donald Trump’s trade tariffs has become the butt of jokes on American comedy shows. Mnangagwa is the SADC chairman. SADC has tariff protocols that address how to deal with countries outside the region collectively. The SADC Protocol on Trade aims to harmonise tariff policies among member states and eliminate barriers to intra-regional trade. However, Mnangagwa ignored this and removed tariffs on all American goods without even negotiating with America or consulting his colleagues in the region. Trump’s trade advisor, Peter Navarro, said Mnangagwa’s move could be inconsequential.

Hopewell Chin’ono

129,097 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

President Trump slapped hardworking Americans with nearly $200 billion in new taxes with his unconstitutional and chaotic tariffs. The last thing New Hampshire families and small businesses should have to deal with right now is another expensive and senseless invoice from the President. I am fighting back in Congress and the courts because YOU deserve better.

President Trump slapped hardworking Americans with nearly $200 billion in new taxes with his unconstitutional and chaotic tariffs. The last thing New Hampshire families and small businesses should have to deal with right now is another expensive and senseless invoice from the President. I am fighting back in Congress and the courts because YOU deserve better.

Congresswoman Maggie Goodlander

17,339 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

"I think few people in American history have done more to screw over farmers than Donald Trump has in a very compressed period of time." Catherine Rampell tells Tim Miller that Trump’s tariffs, deportations, and food aid cuts have left farm country paying the price for his “golden age.”

"I think few people in American history have done more to screw over farmers than Donald Trump has in a very compressed period of time." Catherine Rampell tells Tim Miller that Trump’s tariffs, deportations, and food aid cuts have left farm country paying the price for his “golden age.”

The Bulwark

45,629 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Businesses in America have moved quickly and are now demanding refunds for the tariffs they paid after the pronouncement by the United States Supreme Court that Donald Trump’s tariffs were illegal. So this is how the tariffs worked. If you imported goods from South Africa and there was an illegal 30 percent tariff on them, the company importing the goods from South Africa would have had to pay that 30 percent tariff to the American government and then pass that cost on to the consumer. For instance, if an American company ordered a bottle of wine from South Africa and there was a 30 percent tariff on it, which the Supreme Court has now pronounced illegal, and that bottle cost US$1 to import, once it reached America the importer would have to add the 30 percent tariff, taking the cost to US$1.30. The importing company would then add its own margin, say another US$0.30 as profit. Ordinarily, without the tariff, that bottle might have retailed at around US$1.30, but because of the additional 30 percent tariff, it would end up costing the consumer about US$1.60. In effect, the 30 percent tariff was passed directly on to the consumer through higher retail prices. What American businesses are now saying is that they want that 30 percent tariff refunded. So the company that imported the bottle of wine from South Africa and sold it for US$1.60, comprising 30 percent tariff and 30 percent profit, now wants the tariff component returned to them. How consumers themselves will be reimbursed, if at all, remains unclear, and that is likely to become the next area of legal and commercial contestation. Meanwhile, American media is reporting that Donald Trump has gone into meltdown after the Supreme Court delivered this important ruling, which many had already predicted because it was clear to numerous legal experts that the tariffs were unlawful. Only his most loyal supporters insisted that the court would uphold them. The decision has triggered not only political shockwaves in Washington but also significant financial and legal consequences, as businesses begin positioning themselves to recover the money improperly collected by Trump’s government.

Businesses in America have moved quickly and are now demanding refunds for the tariffs they paid after the pronouncement by the United States Supreme Court that Donald Trump’s tariffs were illegal. So this is how the tariffs worked. If you imported goods from South Africa and there was an illegal 30 percent tariff on them, the company importing the goods from South Africa would have had to pay that 30 percent tariff to the American government and then pass that cost on to the consumer. For instance, if an American company ordered a bottle of wine from South Africa and there was a 30 percent tariff on it, which the Supreme Court has now pronounced illegal, and that bottle cost US$1 to import, once it reached America the importer would have to add the 30 percent tariff, taking the cost to US$1.30. The importing company would then add its own margin, say another US$0.30 as profit. Ordinarily, without the tariff, that bottle might have retailed at around US$1.30, but because of the additional 30 percent tariff, it would end up costing the consumer about US$1.60. In effect, the 30 percent tariff was passed directly on to the consumer through higher retail prices. What American businesses are now saying is that they want that 30 percent tariff refunded. So the company that imported the bottle of wine from South Africa and sold it for US$1.60, comprising 30 percent tariff and 30 percent profit, now wants the tariff component returned to them. How consumers themselves will be reimbursed, if at all, remains unclear, and that is likely to become the next area of legal and commercial contestation. Meanwhile, American media is reporting that Donald Trump has gone into meltdown after the Supreme Court delivered this important ruling, which many had already predicted because it was clear to numerous legal experts that the tariffs were unlawful. Only his most loyal supporters insisted that the court would uphold them. The decision has triggered not only political shockwaves in Washington but also significant financial and legal consequences, as businesses begin positioning themselves to recover the money improperly collected by Trump’s government.

Hopewell Chin’ono

42,592 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨 IT'S OFFICIAL: President Trump is now having to launch a $166 BILLION TARIFF REFUND program The Supreme Court made an absolutely HORRIBLE ruling! Businesses who paid tariffs can now re-claim funds: "The Trump administration is scheduled to implement a refund system for businesses that paid tariffs, which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled were illegal." "Refunds total roughly $166 billion. U.S. and Customs Border Protection says importers and their brokers were eligible to begin claiming refunds through an online portal."

🚨 IT'S OFFICIAL: President Trump is now having to launch a $166 BILLION TARIFF REFUND program The Supreme Court made an absolutely HORRIBLE ruling! Businesses who paid tariffs can now re-claim funds: "The Trump administration is scheduled to implement a refund system for businesses that paid tariffs, which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled were illegal." "Refunds total roughly $166 billion. U.S. and Customs Border Protection says importers and their brokers were eligible to begin claiming refunds through an online portal."

Eric Daugherty

954,543 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Tariffs are taxes, and that means that it's Congress's job to decide whether they are appropriate. When the Supreme Court struck down Donald Trump's unconstitutional tariffs yesterday, it showed yet again that Republicans in Congress are too scared of Donald Trump to do their job and stand up for you--and say no to the tariffs that have been driving up costs for hardworking Americans. If you send me to Congress, I will stand up to Donald Trump and I will stand up for you. Join me at

Tariffs are taxes, and that means that it's Congress's job to decide whether they are appropriate. When the Supreme Court struck down Donald Trump's unconstitutional tariffs yesterday, it showed yet again that Republicans in Congress are too scared of Donald Trump to do their job and stand up for you--and say no to the tariffs that have been driving up costs for hardworking Americans. If you send me to Congress, I will stand up to Donald Trump and I will stand up for you. Join me at

J.P. Cooney

10,822 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Lawyer who argued against Trump's tariffs at Supreme Court reacts to ruling: ‘I am focused on what the decision today is about which is it's saying very simply, in America in our constitutional system tariffs are taxes, and taxes are set by the Congress of the United States, not by the president. You can't just alter them at will up 150% for some countries down to 10% for others and the like. You've got to follow the rules set out by Congress.’

Lawyer who argued against Trump's tariffs at Supreme Court reacts to ruling: ‘I am focused on what the decision today is about which is it's saying very simply, in America in our constitutional system tariffs are taxes, and taxes are set by the Congress of the United States, not by the president. You can't just alter them at will up 150% for some countries down to 10% for others and the like. You've got to follow the rules set out by Congress.’

The Lead CNN

97,719 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten