Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Researchers at Netflix just released a new AI model It erases objects from video, then rewrites the physics of the entire scene as if that object never existed It's called VOID (Video Object and Interaction Deletion) Current inpainting tools simply paint over the gap left by an object's removal,...

rowancheung's profile picture

Rowan Cheung

593,775 subscribers

46,914 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

BREAKING🚨: A mysterious object appears near the Moon’s surface, creating a moment that looks unusual and difficult to explain at first. The bright lunar background makes even small moving objects clearly visible. It may look like the object is flying very close to the Moon, almost touching its surface. But in reality, it is often much closer to Earth, and this is just a result of alignment and perspective. Objects like satellites, meteoroids, or space debris can pass in front of the Moon, appearing as dark moving shapes for a few seconds.
0:20

BREAKING🚨: A mysterious object appears near the Moon’s surface, creating a moment that looks unusual and difficult to explain at first. The bright lunar background makes even small moving objects clearly visible. It may look like the object is flying very close to the Moon, almost touching its surface. But in reality, it is often much closer to Earth, and this is just a result of alignment and perspective. Objects like satellites, meteoroids, or space debris can pass in front of the Moon, appearing as dark moving shapes for a few seconds.

The Astronomy Guy

32,771 views • 4 months ago

Elon Musk on the power of “cross-pollinating” ideas from different industries He uses Tesla and SpaceX as an example: “The Model S is the only all-aluminum body and chassis car made in North America. Very few cars are all aluminum. In the aerospace industry, that’s the default. So it seemed like obviously the right move to minimize the non-battery-pack mass of the car. In order to offset a fairly heavy battery pack, we had to make the rest of the car light, but still achieve a five-star safety rating. I don’t think it would have been possible to do that if we had used steel, which is the traditional method.” And then for SpaceX, Elon explains: “The car industry is really good at making complicated objects at a low cost. I mean it’s actually quite incredible that one can buy a decent car for $20,000. It’s nutty how much stuff is in a car. So at SpaceX, I hired a bunch of people from the auto industry to run manufacturing, which has worked out reasonably well.”
1:15

Elon Musk on the power of “cross-pollinating” ideas from different industries He uses Tesla and SpaceX as an example: “The Model S is the only all-aluminum body and chassis car made in North America. Very few cars are all aluminum. In the aerospace industry, that’s the default. So it seemed like obviously the right move to minimize the non-battery-pack mass of the car. In order to offset a fairly heavy battery pack, we had to make the rest of the car light, but still achieve a five-star safety rating. I don’t think it would have been possible to do that if we had used steel, which is the traditional method.” And then for SpaceX, Elon explains: “The car industry is really good at making complicated objects at a low cost. I mean it’s actually quite incredible that one can buy a decent car for $20,000. It’s nutty how much stuff is in a car. So at SpaceX, I hired a bunch of people from the auto industry to run manufacturing, which has worked out reasonably well.”

Startup Archive

24,109 views • 5 months ago

Elon Musk on the power of “cross-pollinating” ideas from different industries He uses Tesla and SpaceX as an example: “The Model S is the only all-aluminum body and chassis car made in North America. Very few cars are all aluminum. In the aerospace industry, that’s the default. So it seemed like obviously the right move to minimize the non-battery-pack mass of the car. In order to offset a fairly heavy battery pack, we had to make the rest of the car light, but still achieve a five-star safety rating. I don’t think it would have been possible to do that if we had used steel, which is the traditional method.” And then for SpaceX, Elon explains: “The car industry is really good at making complicated objects at a low cost. I mean it’s actually quite incredible that one can buy a decent car for $20,000. It’s nutty how much stuff is in a car. So at SpaceX, I hired a bunch of people from the auto industry to run manufacturing, which has worked out reasonably well.”
1:15

Elon Musk on the power of “cross-pollinating” ideas from different industries He uses Tesla and SpaceX as an example: “The Model S is the only all-aluminum body and chassis car made in North America. Very few cars are all aluminum. In the aerospace industry, that’s the default. So it seemed like obviously the right move to minimize the non-battery-pack mass of the car. In order to offset a fairly heavy battery pack, we had to make the rest of the car light, but still achieve a five-star safety rating. I don’t think it would have been possible to do that if we had used steel, which is the traditional method.” And then for SpaceX, Elon explains: “The car industry is really good at making complicated objects at a low cost. I mean it’s actually quite incredible that one can buy a decent car for $20,000. It’s nutty how much stuff is in a car. So at SpaceX, I hired a bunch of people from the auto industry to run manufacturing, which has worked out reasonably well.”

Startup Archive

34,454 views • 1 year ago

You find out that your teenage son was in a car with a friend that was responsible for a hit and run car crash that ended the life of the other driver. Her son says he hit a wall to explain how he broke his hand that night and as a parent, you don't believe him but don't press the issue. An officer shows up to question the boy as he's a possible victim because of his injury and a key witness to the accident. He's not in any trouble but needs to give a statement. Do you think her son and the other kids in the car should had gotten into trouble for not reporting the car crash? For at least leaving the scene?
15:05

You find out that your teenage son was in a car with a friend that was responsible for a hit and run car crash that ended the life of the other driver. Her son says he hit a wall to explain how he broke his hand that night and as a parent, you don't believe him but don't press the issue. An officer shows up to question the boy as he's a possible victim because of his injury and a key witness to the accident. He's not in any trouble but needs to give a statement. Do you think her son and the other kids in the car should had gotten into trouble for not reporting the car crash? For at least leaving the scene?

꧁Bobbi꧂

180,592 views • 4 months ago

Elon Musk on local AI in Tesla Optimus: “Well, we think we can put a lot of intelligence locally in the robot and it certainly needs to be enough intelligence that if the robot gets disconnected, like if it's a bad cellular signal or there isn't Wi-Fi, you know, Optimus can't just get stuck. It needs to have enough local intelligence that it can still do useful things, even if it loses the connection, kind of like the car. The car does not need any cellular or Wi-Fi connection to be able to drive safely. Now, I guess you can think of like Optimus needs kind of a manager to tell it what to do, broadly speaking, like if otherwise it's going to keep doing the same thing it did before. so you know i think you need kind of a an orchestration ai which uh you know grok would be good for orchestration um and and then for you know for optimist's voice you know having um a low latency intelligent voice ai grok is actually very good for that so if you when I talk to Optimus and have kind of a you know, a Grok level conversation you kind of need to connect to a Grok level AI for that. But I would expect the amount of interaction apart from like the voice stuff and asking complicated questions of the robot that necessarily needs a large AI model to answer the Gronk would probably have about as much interaction with Optimus as a manager would have with the people on their team. “
2:02

Elon Musk on local AI in Tesla Optimus: “Well, we think we can put a lot of intelligence locally in the robot and it certainly needs to be enough intelligence that if the robot gets disconnected, like if it's a bad cellular signal or there isn't Wi-Fi, you know, Optimus can't just get stuck. It needs to have enough local intelligence that it can still do useful things, even if it loses the connection, kind of like the car. The car does not need any cellular or Wi-Fi connection to be able to drive safely. Now, I guess you can think of like Optimus needs kind of a manager to tell it what to do, broadly speaking, like if otherwise it's going to keep doing the same thing it did before. so you know i think you need kind of a an orchestration ai which uh you know grok would be good for orchestration um and and then for you know for optimist's voice you know having um a low latency intelligent voice ai grok is actually very good for that so if you when I talk to Optimus and have kind of a you know, a Grok level conversation you kind of need to connect to a Grok level AI for that. But I would expect the amount of interaction apart from like the voice stuff and asking complicated questions of the robot that necessarily needs a large AI model to answer the Gronk would probably have about as much interaction with Optimus as a manager would have with the people on their team. “

Brian Roemmele

26,664 views • 3 months ago

✨ Made a new mini feature on Photo AI: [ Grab from 3d model ] So the problem is we're at that stage in time (typical for AI) where image-to-3d models are not good enough but are fun to play with, but we know they'll be good enough in 1-2 years With [ Make 3d model ] you already can turn any Photo AI pic into a 3d model but it still looks hyper clunky and deformed, but it works! One cool idea I had to make that more useful and made now: Let people make a 3d model then change the view of the it with the 3d viewer, then press [ o ] and it grabs a frame of the 3d That image you can then [ Remix ] (img2img), and it becomes a real photo again and that in turn you can then turn into a video again with [ Make video ] So that essentially gives you a fully freeform camera position control to take photos with One thing I need to fix is the background/skybox, I kinda need to take the original photo and remove the person and just get the background for the 3d model viewer, in this case it should be white, but it's a start!
0:51

✨ Made a new mini feature on Photo AI: [ Grab from 3d model ] So the problem is we're at that stage in time (typical for AI) where image-to-3d models are not good enough but are fun to play with, but we know they'll be good enough in 1-2 years With [ Make 3d model ] you already can turn any Photo AI pic into a 3d model but it still looks hyper clunky and deformed, but it works! One cool idea I had to make that more useful and made now: Let people make a 3d model then change the view of the it with the 3d viewer, then press [ o ] and it grabs a frame of the 3d That image you can then [ Remix ] (img2img), and it becomes a real photo again and that in turn you can then turn into a video again with [ Make video ] So that essentially gives you a fully freeform camera position control to take photos with One thing I need to fix is the background/skybox, I kinda need to take the original photo and remove the person and just get the background for the 3d model viewer, in this case it should be white, but it's a start!

@levelsio

119,210 views • 1 year ago

Elon Musk: A country is its people. “A country is not its geography. A country is its people. This is a fundamental concept that is truly obvious. If you took the people of Italy and you teleported the people of Italy to some part of the United States, it would still be Italy. But if you teleported a bunch of people from some other part of the world to Italy, then the geographic region would no longer be Italy. It would be that other country.” Interview with Matteo Salvini, April 5, 2025
0:45

Elon Musk: A country is its people. “A country is not its geography. A country is its people. This is a fundamental concept that is truly obvious. If you took the people of Italy and you teleported the people of Italy to some part of the United States, it would still be Italy. But if you teleported a bunch of people from some other part of the world to Italy, then the geographic region would no longer be Italy. It would be that other country.” Interview with Matteo Salvini, April 5, 2025

ELON CLIPS

36,502 views • 10 months ago

Viktor Hovland made 8 birdies to close with a 5 under par 67 at the Masters. After the round, he went deep on the ball flight laws and the importance of matching up the club face to the swing path: “It's a good question. It's just tough to answer. First of all, that's why I like TrackMan and understanding the ball flight laws are very good to have because you can start a ball left, more left than you would like, but if it's curving back, who cares. That just means you're -- granted, if you're hitting it in the center your club path is just maybe creeping a bit more left, but if your face is in the right spot you're just hitting a bigger curve and then you can adjust that accordingly. “If you're starting the ball left and it's going left, is it a face issue, are you striking it off the heel and they're not coming back? There's a lot of minutiae involved with that. “If it's just a face-to-path issue or a club path direction, you can solve that pretty easily by playing a bigger cut or playing a bigger draw or moving it a bit more forward or back in the stance, simple stuff like that.” This is a great explanation that a lot of amateurs can learn from. The Masters
1:01

Viktor Hovland made 8 birdies to close with a 5 under par 67 at the Masters. After the round, he went deep on the ball flight laws and the importance of matching up the club face to the swing path: “It's a good question. It's just tough to answer. First of all, that's why I like TrackMan and understanding the ball flight laws are very good to have because you can start a ball left, more left than you would like, but if it's curving back, who cares. That just means you're -- granted, if you're hitting it in the center your club path is just maybe creeping a bit more left, but if your face is in the right spot you're just hitting a bigger curve and then you can adjust that accordingly. “If you're starting the ball left and it's going left, is it a face issue, are you striking it off the heel and they're not coming back? There's a lot of minutiae involved with that. “If it's just a face-to-path issue or a club path direction, you can solve that pretty easily by playing a bigger cut or playing a bigger draw or moving it a bit more forward or back in the stance, simple stuff like that.” This is a great explanation that a lot of amateurs can learn from. The Masters

Flushing It

667,423 views • 3 months ago

In the early days of Waymo's service in Phoenix, they had a large number of roadside assistance vans traveling alongside their vehicles, each with two people inside. When the Waymo vehicle got stuck, one person would jump out of the RA van and drive the car. Today Waymo still has roadside assistance vans ready to help when a car has an issue, but they don't have to be directly with one car — issues are rare enough that a few roadside assistance vans can handle a much larger fleet. It's funny to see people take shots at Tesla for doing the same. Of course they're going to be careful with the first customer deployment. No, someone isn't secretly controlling the car from outside. The AI model on the car is driving the car. Go test drive any Tesla and find out for yourself. It doesn't need help from anyone, it can see and react to things before you do.
0:32

In the early days of Waymo's service in Phoenix, they had a large number of roadside assistance vans traveling alongside their vehicles, each with two people inside. When the Waymo vehicle got stuck, one person would jump out of the RA van and drive the car. Today Waymo still has roadside assistance vans ready to help when a car has an issue, but they don't have to be directly with one car — issues are rare enough that a few roadside assistance vans can handle a much larger fleet. It's funny to see people take shots at Tesla for doing the same. Of course they're going to be careful with the first customer deployment. No, someone isn't secretly controlling the car from outside. The AI model on the car is driving the car. Go test drive any Tesla and find out for yourself. It doesn't need help from anyone, it can see and react to things before you do.

Whole Mars Catalog

95,641 views • 6 months ago

Q: Engine changes that you can make with ADUO, is the title still possible for you & the team? "It's unlikely from from an update perspective it's not like now we can just bring an update next week it takes months and months and months to develop and change components on the engine to prove it to make sure it still holds reliability and it's it's a long long development process so whether or not the engine will catch up this year it's highly unlikely I would say that the engine is going to catch up this year with the time we have left it's more the opportunity close the gap for next year, power wise." Q: But do you think... "But in terms of the title I'm still... I think if we we can still outdo people in terms of how we develop the car a car is very good the the downforce package that we have is really good we're gonna have to double up make sure that we're always one step ahead of everyone in terms of advancing that so we can go through the corners quicker and catch up the deficit we may lose down the straights improve efficiency so we maybe can improve a bit on drag for example to try and close that gap in speed but you know and there's lots of different things happening in all these different tracks so you know never say never and I just keep pushing give it absolutely everything." F1 2026 || Barcelona
1:21

Q: Engine changes that you can make with ADUO, is the title still possible for you & the team? "It's unlikely from from an update perspective it's not like now we can just bring an update next week it takes months and months and months to develop and change components on the engine to prove it to make sure it still holds reliability and it's it's a long long development process so whether or not the engine will catch up this year it's highly unlikely I would say that the engine is going to catch up this year with the time we have left it's more the opportunity close the gap for next year, power wise." Q: But do you think... "But in terms of the title I'm still... I think if we we can still outdo people in terms of how we develop the car a car is very good the the downforce package that we have is really good we're gonna have to double up make sure that we're always one step ahead of everyone in terms of advancing that so we can go through the corners quicker and catch up the deficit we may lose down the straights improve efficiency so we maybe can improve a bit on drag for example to try and close that gap in speed but you know and there's lots of different things happening in all these different tracks so you know never say never and I just keep pushing give it absolutely everything." F1 2026 || Barcelona

sim 🇧🇷🇲🇽🇸🇳🇫🇷🇭🇹

87,280 views • 1 month ago

New UFO video presented in congressional testimony. It's not entirely clear, but it looks like they are tracking a "GoFast"-type object with a lot of parallax. A missile clips it, and the debris appears to keep going because of the parallax.
0:50

New UFO video presented in congressional testimony. It's not entirely clear, but it looks like they are tracking a "GoFast"-type object with a lot of parallax. A missile clips it, and the debris appears to keep going because of the parallax.

Mick West

22,485 views • 10 months ago

Q: It's thought in the paddock that your car is actually the best chassis and if you can get that extra bit of power you are the ones to beat. So are you thinking if we can just get this [Engine ADUO] we know we have an incredible car? Lewis Hamilton: "Yes absolutely, I mean the guys at the factory have done an amazing job with the car and we still have improvements to make but the car is fantastic it's just it's a battle of development through the season obviously some people bring upgrades one weekend and others the other but yeah we're just at the mercy of the lack of power that we have and I know that everyone worked really hard on the engine and reliability is obviously is very good it's just when you're lacking that straight line speed against the Merc it's very very tough but nonetheless you know we have to expect that the rest of the season that's just the way it is so we'll just try and see if we can continue to add on to the car and try and close the gap if we can go through quicker through corners in some races maybe we can get closer to a challenge in front of us." F1 2026 || Canada
1:14

Q: It's thought in the paddock that your car is actually the best chassis and if you can get that extra bit of power you are the ones to beat. So are you thinking if we can just get this [Engine ADUO] we know we have an incredible car? Lewis Hamilton: "Yes absolutely, I mean the guys at the factory have done an amazing job with the car and we still have improvements to make but the car is fantastic it's just it's a battle of development through the season obviously some people bring upgrades one weekend and others the other but yeah we're just at the mercy of the lack of power that we have and I know that everyone worked really hard on the engine and reliability is obviously is very good it's just when you're lacking that straight line speed against the Merc it's very very tough but nonetheless you know we have to expect that the rest of the season that's just the way it is so we'll just try and see if we can continue to add on to the car and try and close the gap if we can go through quicker through corners in some races maybe we can get closer to a challenge in front of us." F1 2026 || Canada

sim

23,426 views • 2 months ago

The most significant car of our lifetimes. This is the subject of the latest episode of Revelations with Jason Cammisa, and let's be clear. This isn't about a person, this isn't about politics, and this isn't about whether you love or hate electrification. This is about a car. A car that transformed an entire industry, and will ultimately be responsible for killing off that industry. This is the story of the Tesla Model S. The car that, like it or not, changed the entire world. Watch Now:
1:02

The most significant car of our lifetimes. This is the subject of the latest episode of Revelations with Jason Cammisa, and let's be clear. This isn't about a person, this isn't about politics, and this isn't about whether you love or hate electrification. This is about a car. A car that transformed an entire industry, and will ultimately be responsible for killing off that industry. This is the story of the Tesla Model S. The car that, like it or not, changed the entire world. Watch Now:

Hagerty

33,323 views • 3 months ago

It’s insane that the left will vandalize your car because they disagree with the politics of the CEO of the company that manufactured the car you drive. They don’t care if the Tesla owner is a Democrat or a Republican. They just disagree with and hate Elon Musk. But when has the left EVER made sense? 🤔
1:07

It’s insane that the left will vandalize your car because they disagree with the politics of the CEO of the company that manufactured the car you drive. They don’t care if the Tesla owner is a Democrat or a Republican. They just disagree with and hate Elon Musk. But when has the left EVER made sense? 🤔

𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕷𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖊𝖘𝖘™️

29,887 views • 1 year ago

Peter Jackson talks about AI in Hollywood. Calls it “a tool” like stop-motion or CGI before and what ultimately matters is “imagination, originality” of whoever uses the tool: “I think AI — used in the right way — is a tool like any other tool. [The original] King Kong…was stop-motion and done by a person moving a rubber creature. Why shouldn't somebody on a computer using AI software be able to create their own imagery? They should. It's a tool. It's no different from many other tools that have existed over the years. But the other side of it is that it's always going to come down to the imagination and originality of the person feeding the instructions into the AI program. It's not that you're going to type in an instruction and it's going to generate your shot, and that's that. The question is: is it actually interesting? Is it funny? Is it imaginative? And are you going to stitch it together to make a narrative, a story? Some people will make really great films that way. Some people will do exactly the same process and their film will be crap, just like in the normal film industry. Whether it's AI or anything else, it comes down to whether the person behind it — or the people behind it — have originality, imagination, and an ability to entertain people.”
1:32

Peter Jackson talks about AI in Hollywood. Calls it “a tool” like stop-motion or CGI before and what ultimately matters is “imagination, originality” of whoever uses the tool: “I think AI — used in the right way — is a tool like any other tool. [The original] King Kong…was stop-motion and done by a person moving a rubber creature. Why shouldn't somebody on a computer using AI software be able to create their own imagery? They should. It's a tool. It's no different from many other tools that have existed over the years. But the other side of it is that it's always going to come down to the imagination and originality of the person feeding the instructions into the AI program. It's not that you're going to type in an instruction and it's going to generate your shot, and that's that. The question is: is it actually interesting? Is it funny? Is it imaginative? And are you going to stitch it together to make a narrative, a story? Some people will make really great films that way. Some people will do exactly the same process and their film will be crap, just like in the normal film industry. Whether it's AI or anything else, it comes down to whether the person behind it — or the people behind it — have originality, imagination, and an ability to entertain people.”

Bearly AI

43,816 views • 2 months ago

This woman’s daughter bought a used car two weeks ago and it’s been in the shop 9 days out of those two weeks. The warranty won’t fix the issues the car has because the issues are being caused by an accident. I feel the dealership failed big time on this trade in. Why take a car on trade that has issues they refuse to fix. I can’t imagine them selling a car to anyone and saying that the warranty is voided because of extensive damage caused by an accident. To me this sounds like the dealership scammed them and should be liable for all repairs or at least replace the car for free with something comparable. I’ve never experienced anything this bad from a dealer. The closest thing I’ve had is that the new car I bought had a tire that had a flat spot due to it sitting on the lot for so long. When driven, the tire would vibrate like it was out of balance. The dealer kept passing the buck to the manufacturer and the manufacturer blamed the dealer. Eventually I was able to get the dealer to replace the tire because of pure persistence but the experience left me with a poor experience and I never went back to them.
1:07

This woman’s daughter bought a used car two weeks ago and it’s been in the shop 9 days out of those two weeks. The warranty won’t fix the issues the car has because the issues are being caused by an accident. I feel the dealership failed big time on this trade in. Why take a car on trade that has issues they refuse to fix. I can’t imagine them selling a car to anyone and saying that the warranty is voided because of extensive damage caused by an accident. To me this sounds like the dealership scammed them and should be liable for all repairs or at least replace the car for free with something comparable. I’ve never experienced anything this bad from a dealer. The closest thing I’ve had is that the new car I bought had a tire that had a flat spot due to it sitting on the lot for so long. When driven, the tire would vibrate like it was out of balance. The dealer kept passing the buck to the manufacturer and the manufacturer blamed the dealer. Eventually I was able to get the dealer to replace the tire because of pure persistence but the experience left me with a poor experience and I never went back to them.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

258,737 views • 2 months ago

This young lady bought a cheap car on Facebook marketplace despite people warning her about it. He told her the car would pass inspection, but also wanted her he was selling it as is. So when she got a check engine light literally a mile down the road and a few days later it wouldn’t start. So she calls the guy and tried to get him to replace the battery and the check engine light. He claims that he would look at it for $150. So the guy just sold her a car riddled with problems as is but claims it would pass inspection, and the buyer seems to have an issue understanding what an as is sale it. But shouldn’t he still fix it for her as he claimed it would pass inspection?
3:00

This young lady bought a cheap car on Facebook marketplace despite people warning her about it. He told her the car would pass inspection, but also wanted her he was selling it as is. So when she got a check engine light literally a mile down the road and a few days later it wouldn’t start. So she calls the guy and tried to get him to replace the battery and the check engine light. He claims that he would look at it for $150. So the guy just sold her a car riddled with problems as is but claims it would pass inspection, and the buyer seems to have an issue understanding what an as is sale it. But shouldn’t he still fix it for her as he claimed it would pass inspection?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

256,049 views • 5 months ago

There’s a new claim that “essentially, all that happened was Trump got tired, took control and forced it on Netanyahu, and this is basically the same deal that could have been reached a year earlier,” with the disturbing implication, that’s horrible to say, that IDF soldiers died in vain for a cause that had already been achieved. So, let’s revisit the plans that were laid out by both the current and former American administrations to see if they match up. For example, the Biden plan from June 1, 2024, which was met with considerable enthusiasm, and was even later acknowledged as Netanyahu’s plan. I want to highlight the difference. In the first phase, the IDF should have already pulled back to roughly its current position, and then it was just about releasing humanitarian hostages. As if not all of them are “humanitarian.” Then it transitioned to discussing the release of living hostages. In this phase, the IDF would withdraw from all of Gaza, until the last centimetre, while all the dead hostages remain in Gaza. It’s as different as day and night. Here, everyone is returning, including the dead, and the IDF is still in half of Gaza. This isn’t just about some desire to maintain an occupation or garrison force, but rather to ensure that Hamas disarms — something that didn’t happen in the Biden proposal. So now let’s move on to the Witkoff plan, much closer to us, much better for Israel, but still different. There was talk of releasing half of the dead hostages, but then a temporary ceasefire for two months of negotiations to end the war, and then the IDF would withdraw from more places than it is now, and there would be a guarantee that the war would not be renewed. Once again, we see that there was no connection between the IDF remaining on the ground and the promise that Hamas would disarm, especially while some of the hostages are still there. The greatness of this outline is this issue. I also want to say something general about the matter of responsibility. As ridiculous as it was on October 7 and afterwards to hear from Netanyahu’s supporters that the one who is to blame is the IDF chief of staff, the Shin Bet chief, the attorney general and the Military Advocate General, and that Netanyahu has no part in it — it’s as ridiculous as it is that now they’re saying, “Thank you Trump and thank you Nitzan Alon, and thank you to all of them and to the Qatari prime minister, and Netanyahu and Ron Dermer have nothing to do with it at all.” Indeed, Netanyahu had a very large part in the failure of October 7, and he also has a very large part together with Dermer in this deal. By the way, how does that connect to what Kushner said tonight in Egypt? He said that both the prime minister and Dermer made very big compromises and took risks to see the end of the war. I would like to make a suggestion. Once upon a time, when there was only one channel and people didn’t like the commentators, they said, “Watch the game without the commentary.” I say, let’s watch Trump and Netanyahu’s move without the commentary, because there are a lot of conversations, and this and that, and slander, and sometimes even quotes, but in practice there has never been a president and a prime minister who acted like this, and the results are evident from Iran, through the Golan Heights, through the embassy and now Gaza.
2:39

There’s a new claim that “essentially, all that happened was Trump got tired, took control and forced it on Netanyahu, and this is basically the same deal that could have been reached a year earlier,” with the disturbing implication, that’s horrible to say, that IDF soldiers died in vain for a cause that had already been achieved. So, let’s revisit the plans that were laid out by both the current and former American administrations to see if they match up. For example, the Biden plan from June 1, 2024, which was met with considerable enthusiasm, and was even later acknowledged as Netanyahu’s plan. I want to highlight the difference. In the first phase, the IDF should have already pulled back to roughly its current position, and then it was just about releasing humanitarian hostages. As if not all of them are “humanitarian.” Then it transitioned to discussing the release of living hostages. In this phase, the IDF would withdraw from all of Gaza, until the last centimetre, while all the dead hostages remain in Gaza. It’s as different as day and night. Here, everyone is returning, including the dead, and the IDF is still in half of Gaza. This isn’t just about some desire to maintain an occupation or garrison force, but rather to ensure that Hamas disarms — something that didn’t happen in the Biden proposal. So now let’s move on to the Witkoff plan, much closer to us, much better for Israel, but still different. There was talk of releasing half of the dead hostages, but then a temporary ceasefire for two months of negotiations to end the war, and then the IDF would withdraw from more places than it is now, and there would be a guarantee that the war would not be renewed. Once again, we see that there was no connection between the IDF remaining on the ground and the promise that Hamas would disarm, especially while some of the hostages are still there. The greatness of this outline is this issue. I also want to say something general about the matter of responsibility. As ridiculous as it was on October 7 and afterwards to hear from Netanyahu’s supporters that the one who is to blame is the IDF chief of staff, the Shin Bet chief, the attorney general and the Military Advocate General, and that Netanyahu has no part in it — it’s as ridiculous as it is that now they’re saying, “Thank you Trump and thank you Nitzan Alon, and thank you to all of them and to the Qatari prime minister, and Netanyahu and Ron Dermer have nothing to do with it at all.” Indeed, Netanyahu had a very large part in the failure of October 7, and he also has a very large part together with Dermer in this deal. By the way, how does that connect to what Kushner said tonight in Egypt? He said that both the prime minister and Dermer made very big compromises and took risks to see the end of the war. I would like to make a suggestion. Once upon a time, when there was only one channel and people didn’t like the commentators, they said, “Watch the game without the commentary.” I say, let’s watch Trump and Netanyahu’s move without the commentary, because there are a lot of conversations, and this and that, and slander, and sometimes even quotes, but in practice there has never been a president and a prime minister who acted like this, and the results are evident from Iran, through the Golan Heights, through the embassy and now Gaza.

Amit Segal

298,292 views • 9 months ago

Object permanence is the understanding that things continue to exist, even when they can’t be seen. And it’s not an understanding your baby comes equipped with. Indeed, during the earliest months of life, if you remove a toy - for example - from your baby’s line of sight you’ll find they react as if it was never there in the first place. In this case, out of sight means out of mind. But that all begins to change, typically between 7-10 months. This little guy - shared to IG by AFVofficial - has a clear sense of object permanence and shows us in two ways: First with his astonishment over dad’s sleight of hand and then with his efforts to track - and seek out - the ball as it moves into dad’s other hand. What a fantastic illustration of his developmental milestone.
0:20

Object permanence is the understanding that things continue to exist, even when they can’t be seen. And it’s not an understanding your baby comes equipped with. Indeed, during the earliest months of life, if you remove a toy - for example - from your baby’s line of sight you’ll find they react as if it was never there in the first place. In this case, out of sight means out of mind. But that all begins to change, typically between 7-10 months. This little guy - shared to IG by AFVofficial - has a clear sense of object permanence and shows us in two ways: First with his astonishment over dad’s sleight of hand and then with his efforts to track - and seek out - the ball as it moves into dad’s other hand. What a fantastic illustration of his developmental milestone.

Dan Wuori

38,173 views • 1 year ago