Response To Simon Dixon (BIP-110 and Bitcoin Hard Forks)

You are a very confused person.

Cope harder shitcoiner.

It's a false equivalence from Dixon. BCH/BSV required expanding node resource requirements. There has never been a Bitcoin hard fork whose objective was to minimize node resource requirements, fire miners that try to capture Bitcoin, and push SPAM demand off Bitcoin.

I fail to understand how a new coin will attract all the necessary capital and network effects that have taken btc 16 years to acquire…..

USD has lots of network effects too, but captured coins are worth stacking

I apologize if you’ve already addressed this but your intention is to sell your btc and buy the forked coin?

I’m going to slowly DCA out of CoreCoin and keep my Bitcoin Blake and probably buy or mine a bit more. But certainly not anywhere close to my whole net worth because odds of success for Blake are low. Odds of CoreCoin winning are lower than Blake

@awbitcoin I thought you had a significant portion of your net worth in BTC, if you DCA out and keep Blake, where is most of your net worth going into now?

@awbitcoin Probably stocks and real estate, unless I can find a better solution. I'll be buying some more Bitcoin Blake2B as well, but expect it to be cheap

Response To Simon Dixon (BIP-110 and Bitcoin Hard Forks)

Simon is great

Taco-Bell-Diarrhea-Coin University

Your meme game is weak

Dang it I thought that one was better

It’s ok, let me see if I can come up with a better one that will really insult me

🙏 🤝

Core coin/bitcoin is vulnerable now that the economic centralized nodes are in control along with the miners. They have no defense against government intervention. It was the distribution of pleb nodes that created an impenetrable network. @SimonDixonTwitt is wrong 😕

A very clear response, Matthew. Thank you for all you do. Praying for God's protection over this fork and all involved. The fight isn't over.

i thought you quit bitcoin? why are you still here?

hello...i am medically retarded... do u think i would be a good fit for your university?

Well stated. I felt Simon was off on this one too.

Why should miners adopt a proposal that's only (overtly) supported by max 20% of the plebs/nodes ? 80% did not care about it nor signal for it, hence did not support it. I was a fan of your videos, but I see quite some mental gymnastics in your recent ones.

Note that Dixon's article is also full of circular reasoning. It's just a low quality piece. He should really ChatGPT QC it before releasing. I'd think twice before taking any strategic advice on finances from this man.

Tug war… BTC core values, or just Wall Street big money!

"Blake" is a TERRIBLE name. It will never catch on

That's why I'm going to call it "Bitcoin"

🤔 ... I'm in over my head

You better put all your money in your new shitcoin and show proof.

Are you still here?

You hard forked yourself. Good riddance. 🤣

I'm confused and just can't follow anymore....

@SimonDixonTwitt What if you're wrong, Simon? What if you're wrong, Matt?

How can you be so delusional? Luke coin is a shitcoin and and you 100% choose the Craig wright Bsv route. Exact same words, exact same reasoning. Thankfully bitcoin is way to resistant to be changed by neither of you two

Haven't listened yet but this needed doing 👏

It is difficult to get Simon to understand, when his livelihood depends upon his not understanding it!

solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u

You've went full retard

While I respect you and your videos have been a great help to me, creating a competing coin isn't the solution. You're just resetting it and redoing it again. And even if it is successful, in 15 yrs it will arrive at exactly the same situation we're in now.

It's one thing to recognize a hard fork is inevitable, due to conflicting interests The more interesting question is the timing One can start with a more economically/reputationally viable chain by fighting on a different hill Provoke 'Core' to over-react

Liar

@SimonDixonTwitt

Mr.Hodl @MrHodl · 6 Oct 2025 Prediction: The person we know as @mattkratter will quietly rage quit within 3 years. We will never see him again