正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Revisiting our long-awaited conversation with SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce. For years, Commissioner Peirce has remained one of the most intellectually rigorous and independent voices within the SEC on questions of digital assets. She has repeatedly challenged the tendency to treat technological experimentation as a regulatory threat by default, arguing...

71,587 次观看 • 22 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Why the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission appears to be an even bigger culprit than FINRA in the $MMTLP Fiasco is... The SEC suspected that Brda and Palikaras were guilty of a scheme since at least September 2021. A scheme that according to the SEC, means that neither man should be able to run or presumably be involved with a publicly traded company if found guilty of the charges filed 3 years after the initial subpoenas. So if investors needed to be protected from Brda & Palikaras, how does the SEC justify allowing investors to invest in $MMAT & $MMTLP (TRCH also if the SEC suspected a scheme leading up to the reverse merger), and also making effective the S1 for the Next Bridge Hydrocarbons spin-off? How is it that the SEC has shared oversight of the Options Clearing Corporation (OCC), but they haven't lifted a finger to show the party(s) responsible for getting options started in TRCH directly before the reverse merger? Coincidentally, the SEC has oversight of FINRA, but the SEC hasn't formally addressed the many ways FINRA violated their Rule 6490 when processing the MMTLP Corporate Action, Nor have they lifted a finger to show the party(s) responsible for getting MMTLP tradeable. It's almost like the SEC tried to enact their own form of justice to punish Brda and Palikaras for the alleged scheme, but at the same time, investors were treated like justifiable casualties. This is only part 1 of 5, full video 🎥 linked in the quote post below. Paul Atkins Hester Peirce

Rare DD

10,801 次观看 • 10 个月前