Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

RFK Jr did not say circumcision causes autism. He referenced a study that found a connection and discussed one possible reason why that may be the case. Imagine if we all took a minute of our day to find the truth instead of believing what every paid influencer is saying.

14,245 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Healthy mercury in the body? Short thread 🧵 Robert F Kennedy discussed with Joe Rogan about the different types of Mercury, Ethylmercury vs Methylmercury. He illustrated this discussion using a conversation he says he had with Dr Paul Offit, in regards to how older vaccines were produced. RFK asks: “Why is it that CDC recommends that Pregnant women do not eat Tuna Fish to avoid the mercury, but that CDC is recommending mercury containing flu shots”. According to RFK, Dr. Paul Offit said "There’s a good mercury and theres a bad mercury." According to RFK, speaking to the reasoning behind even using mercury in products: "The NIH admitted that it was an adjuvent, to amplify the immune response." RFK added that "The more toxic the adjuvent the more robust the immune response". Apparently the immune system doesn’t react as powerfully if it’s just a “live virus” without adjuvant. According to RFK (and this makes total sense), vaccine developers always disagreed with Toxicologists, because the Toxicologist would always ask "What is the fate of that in your body?”. RFK dived into some of the studies he discussed with Paul Offit at the time. Apparently, Offit went silent about a very important study that RFK knew about when he asked the question about why they're using mercury in vaccines. It's at this point, Dr Offit sighted the Pichichero study. That's when RFK "caught him in a lie". In the Pichichero study of 2002 (10), they noticed the ethylmercury was excreted very quickly. Pichichero also found that the "Estimated blood half-life of ethylmercury was 7 days" [for] the cohort of 2 - 6 x month old babies (yes you read that right, they got mercury). Then RFK adds that "The NIH actually commissioned a study", to find out the truth of the fate of the different types of mercury. Which is why they enlisted the help of Thomas Burbacher. He basically did the same study (8), but did it with monkeys so that at the end (sadly and unethically) he could k*ll the monkeys. He found that Pajero was RIGHT about one fact. The ethylmercury "was gone from their blood in a week" - RFK. BUT importantly, when he did the Post-mortems, Burbacher found out the reason they couldn't find it in the same places Pajero looked. It was accumulating in the brains of the monkeys.

Humanspective

27,158 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren