正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

[RG911Team] This Dubai skyscraper on fire will never completely collapse. That’s because modern steel framed skyscrapers are designed to resist fire. Which means that WTC Building 7 collapsed from something other than fire on 9/11. Controlled demolition is the prime suspect.

772,101 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

11 条评论

Kevin S. 的头像
Kevin S.1 年前

Yeah. Steel framed buildings don't turn to jelly and collapse because of an office fire. We didn't see it then, because you have to accept that your government tells huge lies to you. Back then we didn't realize it.

EastVanNucksFan 的头像
EastVanNucksFan1 年前

It’s borderline comical, at this point, that people still believe WTC 7 imploded due to fire. If that building was rigged to implode, what do you think caused WTC 1 and 2 to completely implode?

Investors.com 的头像
Investors.com1 年前

Port Of Los Angeles Warns 'Difficult Decisions' Ahead As Shipments From China Cease

SlayerDave789 的头像
SlayerDave7891 年前

💯😎

Brian Cooper 的头像
Brian Cooper1 年前

Today has been the greatest day for all lies to be exposed!

BlackApple 的头像
BlackApple1 年前

Absolutely agree, but what techniq could have been used to conceal the core support detonations? One would expect chain flashes along with window breaks, unless this was expected and somehow prevented.

My Background 的头像
My Background1 年前

Only an idiot believes its collapse had anything to do with the planes (other than being plan A of a two-plan mission, where plan B consisted of a controlled demolition).

Albert Einstein HATED present day Israel 的头像
Albert Einstein HATED present day Israel1 年前

Israel did it.

Fabrizzio Calavera 的头像
Fabrizzio Calavera1 年前

Not only WTC building 7 but also both towers.

Jan Winnicki 的头像
Jan Winnicki1 年前

It's not suspect. Larry Silverstein admitted himself, that they had to "pull it".

Kelly M🦍🦍 的头像
Kelly M🦍🦍1 年前

Tower 1 and 2? Was there even a fire in building 7?

相关视频