Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Right now Mamdani is doubling down hard on the “grassroots Muslim” image because he’s just been exposed as part of the corrupt elite tied to the Epstein–Clinton–Soros network in the recent Epstein file release. That was behind his recent Muslim and Prophet recent performance. This is his first real...

207,148 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Zohran Mamdani says he draws inspiration from Prophet Muhammad and the Hijra (the migration from Mecca to Medina). As a Muslim, I’m telling you: believe him. He is being completely honest. But let me give you the full story of the Hijra so you understand the real context. Okay, let’s look at the story the way it’s actually taught and revealed in the Qur’an. In Mecca, Prophet’s hometown, the Prophet was persecuted and labeled a threat by his more powerful tribe members. In Mecca, the revelations are all about spirituality, kindness, humanity, returning to the pure monotheism of Ibrahim (Abraham). Be patient, be moral, worship One God. Muhammad had one wife, no army, no power, just preaching. Then comes the Hijra to Medina. Everything changes. Don’t forget: there were plenty of Christians and Jews living in Medina at that time. Now the verses change direction: permission for multiple wives and infinite sex slaves, detailed rules for dividing war booty (including women captives), commands to fight those who refuse to submit to Allah/Islam, and, most importantly , taking wealth from Jewish tribes in Medina who resisted becoming Muslim (like the well-known Khaybar war: their forts were taken, their wealth was seized, women were taken as captives/booty). This is how the Prophet “returned the favor” to the people of Medina for welcoming him. Christians submitted quickly and appeased him to stay alive , but the Jews did not. Islam literally means “submission” in Arabic. The religion as a complete system, with laws, conquests, and political power , really takes shape only in Medina. After building an army and seizing wealth from the Jews, the Prophet marched back and attacked Mecca. This time his own tribe members submitted and became Muslim. Look at this verse about exactly that moment: (Surah Al-Hujurat 49:14) When they said “We have believed the faith” Allah instructed the Prophet to reply: “You have not believed, but say ‘We have submitted (aslamnā)’ ,for faith (īmān) has not yet entered your hearts…” So even inside Islam there is a clear distinction: “Muslim” = someone who submits / surrenders (often because of fear, pressure, or seeing who holds the power) while a true “believer” (mu’min) is someone who has real faith. So when Zohran says he’s inspired by that story… yes ,believe him when Muslims tell you who they are and what actually inspires them. The Mecca phase is the soft, public-relations version. The Medina phase is where the real program begins. This is where Mamdani is standing, a muslim, gained power, expect the “shift “. I’m not sure non-muslim Newyorkers should be thrilled about it, but many Muslims in the West ,especially in New York , certainly are. P.S. 1: It’s interesting to watch Mamdani’s reaction to being exposed as part of the corrupt Epstein/Democrat elite: he just doubles down harder on the “grassroots Muslim” facade. Yeah, of course , a failed rapper with a bachelor’s degree in African studies suddenly comes out of nowhere and becomes mayor of the biggest city in the world… all because he was “inspired by his faith.” Epstein were no Muslim, but he was also very deeply inspired by Prophet, just like Mamdani to the point he had Ka’aba clothes shipped to him from UAE. 2. Feel free to validate the info in this post by Grok :)

Ida Turan 🇮🇷 ایده توران

55,377 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

A lot has been said about Nick Fuentes over his take on Epstein and the files. Here’s his actual take, in his own words, on what he thinks the real scandal is. “Are these emails with Bill Gates and Jeffery Epstein real? Because if they are, then that means Epstein had extraordinary blackmail leverage over Bill Gates, one of the richest people in the world.” “If Epstein had a similar relationship with Howard Lutnick, Donald Trump, or Bill Clinton. You know, that’s a big problem. Because that would seem to suggest these people are compromised. By who? For what purpose?” “To the extent that there was pedophilia or underaged sexual abuse, not justifying it, that was only in the furtherance of another crime. You understand the difference?” “Jefferey Epstein was pimping girls out to blackmail his clients. You understand? The sex trafficking, the sexual abuse of underaged girls, these were crimes committed in the furtherance of extortion. To compromise powerful people. That is actually the larger question. Are you prepared to ask that question?” “I see people squealing and screaming pedophile protector…I understand that…let’s say we nail someone for sleeping with a 16 year old or a 15 year old. It’s a crime. It’s disturbing. But the next question is, who paid for the blackmail? Is that person compromised? And if they were compromised, what were they ordered to do and by who?” “That is the scandal here.” “The real thing is we need to get the FBI to investigate but they’ll never do that.” “This is hanging over Trump’s head like a dagger. So if Trump doesn’t bring us to war with Iran, the dagger falls. If Trump doesn’t play ball with the Israeli lobby or the billionaires, the dagger falls.” “No matter how you cut it, this is a catastrophe for Trump. And you wonder, what’s going on there?…what else is out there that we don’t know about?” “Really it’s a story about sex abuse in the service of political compromise, political blackmail.”

Fractured Light

388,286 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Sex Spy! The late Jeffrey Epstein was a Mossad spy. This is the main reason he was doomed to die. The moment he was arrested by the law, The Israelis quickly decided he was done for. Epstein ran a scheme called a “honey trap”, Where he would secretly film some powerful chap, In bed with a woman who was not his wife, So that he could blackmail this man, for the rest of his life. Jeffrey Epstein was a rich fellow, without any debts, So he didn’t need money, he wanted state secrets. But he never required this secret intel for himself, He wanted it for Mossad, who helped make him his wealth. Now if you still have doubts, let Mama tell you some more, About Robert Maxwell, who was a Mossad spy before. Robert like Epstein had a very mysterious death, Working for Mossad can certainly put a cork in your breath! Robert fell off a boat, when he went for a sail. Just like Jeffrey Epstein, he was about to go to jail. Robert had a daughter who is the famous Ghislaine, Who continued his spying, and was part of the chain. Ghislaine and Epstein worked hand in hand for the same cause, Both spying for Israel in the espionage wars. This is why no one wants you to know about the detail, Because it’s never been about some bad men going to jail. With Presidents, and directors of the CIA, Going to his island, where they weren’t ashamed to play, That’s not embarrassing, that’s a security breach. Now do you wonder why they ended Jeffrey Epstein’s speech? Its all about the failure of the US intel community, To catch what was in front of their eyes, what we can all see. It’s also about Israel, an ally, spying on their best friend, This is the real reason, Jeffrey Epstein’s life had to end. Don’t forget that it wasn’t just these men the Israelis used. It was this ally who encouraged young girls to be abused! What does this mean for the US and its special relationship? Abusing young girls to spy on you, can’t be brushed under the carpet! Subscribe and Follow Mama on Rumble:

TheMamaSchwabParody

132,193 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Wolff: Now Epstein’s explanation for why this friendship ended is as follows. In 2004, Epstein believed himself to be the high bidder on a piece of real estate in Palm Beach—a house. His bid was $36 million. He took his friend Trump around to see the house, to advise him on how to move the swimming pool. Trump thereupon went around Epstein’s back and bid $40 million for the house—and got the property. Epstein, who was well acquainted and in fact deeply involved with Trump’s scattered finances, understood that he didn’t have $40 million to pay for this house. Now, if that was the case, it was someone else’s $40 million. At the time, Epstein believed this to be the $40 million of a Russian oligarch by the name of Rybolovlev. Less than two years later, this same house that Trump had bought for $40 million was sold for $95 million—and it was in fact sold to Mr. Rybolovlev. This is all a red flag of money laundering. And what Epstein did—and he was furious about losing this house—I mean, there’s something about these guys, these men, that nothing rouses them so much as a real estate betrayal. Epstein, after this—the sale of this house, after Trump went around his back, got this house—Epstein began to threaten with lawsuits, with going to the press and saying that Trump was a frontman for a money laundering deal. Trump panics at this point, and Epstein believed—that it was Trump who went to the police and, as Epstein said, dropped the dime on him. That is to say, informed the police of what was going on. And an investigation began, and all of Epstein’s legal problems for the next 15 years began to unfold. This story about this piece of real estate and their falling out was first published in June 2019. It’s published actually in my book Siege, the second book I had written about the Trump White House. Epstein had recounted this story to me. I put it in this book. Epstein, at that moment, was in Paris. He read the book. He called me with some alarm, and he said he was afraid that he might have said too much. Three weeks later, he returned to the United States from Paris and was promptly arrested on the tarmac of Teterboro Airport in New Jersey when his plane landed.

Acyn

1,617,630 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

I’ve seen a lot of people accuse Saudi Arabia of fabricating the moon sighting. Below is proof that it wasn’t. The first video is the exact moment the moon was sighted. The second video is the official testifying before a judge about the set up and what he saw exactly. He says "At 6:11pm (precisely) we saw an opening in the sky, and we all saw the moon and around the opening was all clouds" There is also a picture but it is against the Sunnah to share proof when a testimony is given by a Muslim so I refuse to share it in case we set a precedent to always share a picture and that would be a big error. A testimony of a Muslim is enough as we see from the Hadith of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم It was narrated that Ibn 'Abbaas رضي الله عنه said: A Bedouin came to the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم and said, I have seen the new moon tonight. He said, "Do you bear witness that there is no god except Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah?" He said, Yes. He said, "Get up, O Bilaal, and announce to the people that they should fast tomorrow." [at Tirmidhi: 691 Abu Dawood: [2340], an Nasaa'i: [2112] Ibn Maajah: [1652]. Shaykh al Albaani رحمه الله said: So we see from the Hadith that he, صلى الله عليه وسلم، instructed Bilaal to announce to the people that they would fast the next day. So the Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم was content with the testimony of this man, whom he did not know, on the basis that he bore witness that there is no God but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, i.e. he knew that he was a Muslim, but he did not check on him any further and he did not try to find out how intelligent and smart he was, as was the case in the first Hadith in which the witness was 'Abd Allah ibn 'Umar ibn al Khattab رضي الله عنه. Yet despite that he accepted his testimony. This Hadith makes things easier for people, and what this means is that the judge should be content with the witness as he appears to be, without needing to find people who know this man and can testify that he is of good character, as was the habit of judges since time immemorial. Rather it is sufficient to know that he is a Muslim. This man was a Bedouin of whom the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم had no prior knowledge and he was content that he uttered the Shahaadatayn before him. So he was a Muslim with the same rights and duties as any other, and based on his testimony and the fact that he was a Muslim he said: O Bilaal, announced to the people that they should fast tomorrow. [At Ta laaq 'ala Kitaab Bulugh al Maraam, (audio tape), Hadith 5, Kitaab al Siyaam] This Hadith is evidence for the principle that a Muslim is to be regarded as being of good character unless proven otherwise. Al San'aani رحمه الله said concerning what we learn from the hadeeth of Ibn 'Abbaas رضي الله عنه: It indicates that the basic principle with regard to the Muslims is that they are of good character, because the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم did not ask the Bedouin for anything except the Shahaadah. [Subul as Salaam by as San'aani: 2/153] And Allah knows best.

ابن البخاري

245,087 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

UK Islamic Scholar Abu Waleed Says Christians Will Lose Their Honor, Their Dignity, and Even Their Wives, Under Islamic Rule Abu Waleed: “The holy Prophet said, don’t greet the Jews and the Christians before they greet you, and when you meet any of them on the roads, force them to go on a narrower side of it. Imam Malik said the same thing as well. In fact, what would have been a qatab, he said that if there was to be another nabi after me, it would be in his own charter. His own charter, not the charter of the United Nations, in his charter with the people of Sham, with those Christians of Sham, it was written that kafir and Muslim are not allowed to wear the same clothes as one another. If a Muslim comes out on the day of Eid and sees a kafir (Infidel/ non Muslim) with nice clothes, the kafir has to take his clothes off and give them to the Muslim. The kafir, when he walks in the street, has to wear a red belt around his neck, shave his forehead, and wear two mismatched shoes. He is not allowed to walk on the pavement but must walk in the middle of the road, riding on a mule, and this applies to adults, not children. In this way, Islam would cause the child to turn Muslim. A kafir child, growing up under these rules, would ask his father, “Dad, why is your forehead shaved?” “Because these Muslims make me do it.” “Why can’t you ride like the Muslims?” “Why do you always give away your clothes when asked? Why do you have to get down from your horse?” They are allowed to have their churches, but not to ring their bells. And if a Muslim, for example, after enjoying a nice evening out, doesn’t want to upset his wife, he can knock on the church door and demand lodging. John must put him up for the night, feed him, and let him sleep there. What wife could live under such circumstances? What dishonor is this, when Abdul Ghafoor comes every Friday night to sleep in their home? Sunnah is to look after the guest, so the Muslim sleeps on the bed while John is pushed to the floor. Tracy, John’s wife, looks on—her husband with his forehead shaved, red belt, and mismatched shoes, while Amir Katab stands there with a big beard, Chechen hat, military jacket, gun, and boots. Who looks more attractive? John just let him in for a kebab, but he lost his wife as well. And so, everyone becomes Muslim. That, my dear brothers, is the Islamic State.”

Open Source Intel

252,449 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

A Muslim family's home was smashed in Walsall this week. Their car too. Their children were inside. They reported it. One family. No response. It is not the first time this town has been the address. Last October, a Sikh woman was followed home from the bus in Walsall. A man forced his way in. He raped her, repeatedly calling her an effing Muslim bitch. She told him she was not Muslim. It did not matter. The hostility doesn't check. It sees a face and decides. John Ashby. Jailed for life. This week, in Parliament, Shockat Adam MP stood up and named it. He told the House his children are kicking every ball of England's World Cup campaign — and that as a Muslim parent, he is afraid for their safety in this country. He listed why. The Sikh woman in Walsall, raped as an "effing Muslim bitch." No condemnation from a Minister at the despatch box. The Unite the Kingdom march openly calling for Muslims to be expelled. No ministerial statement. Five Muslim men stabbed on the streets of Edinburgh. No statement. No COBRA. No solidarity. Then he asked: "What does this silence say to my children?" The Prime Minister said he wants his children to feel safe, and that an attack on one is an attack on all. He did not name Walsall. He did not name Edinburgh. He did not name the march. He did not say the word. Now look at what this country does when it decides a threat is real. 29 April 2026. Two Jewish men stabbed in Golders Green. COBRA convened the same day. The Prime Minister visited the scene. Threat level raised to severe. A 100-officer task force deployed. This was the right response. It was correct. The threat was real. Antisemitism is real. The state moved. In Walsall, a family's home and car were destroyed with their children inside. No COBRA. No statement. No task force. No one will even name it. We are not asking for less protection for anyone. We are asking for the same. So when the children in that house ask if they are safe, there is an answer. West Midlands Police Report: Keep us alive: Substack: IG: Islamophia Exists

IslamophobiaUK

22,605 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

It's one thing for Massie and Tucker to engage in wild speculation about Epstein before an audience of millions. Ho hum. But what's really galling here is that Tucker intimates Trump had Epstein "murdered." Tucker then proceeds to misstate basic facts to support his wildly inflammatory intimation. - Contrary to what Tucker states as though it were established fact, Epstein was not "brought back" to the United States from France in July 2019. He flew back on his own accord to Teterboro airport, unaware that he'd been indicted by a Grand Jury and US marshals were waiting to arrest him. - Epstein was not "re-arrested for crimes he'd already been convicted of" in July 2019. Federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York expressly had to concoct a *new* set of crimes to charge Epstein with, so as to circumvent the 2007-2008 federal Non-Prosecution Agreement. Hence, while they charged Epstein for conduct that purportedly took place during the same period that his previous charged offenses were alleged to have taken place -- roughly 2002-2005 -- the 2019 charges included a new federal nexus, by alleging interstate crimes in New York, in addition to Florida. Epstein was federally charged with New York-based offenses for which he was never charged in 2006-2008. - Tucker seems to believe he knows for certain that Epstein was "murdered." That's possible, at least -- but if he's so unwaveringly certain of this, can he please at some point identify the evidence underlying his certainty? I realize most people do not know, and do not necessarily even need to know, these granular details, especially the legal technicalities. But if you're going to intimate that the SITTING PRESIDENT had someone murdered in prison, is it too much to ask that you first have a grasp of the basic facts? Tucker and Massie just don't care.

Michael Tracey

47,252 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce