正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Roald Dahl’s children’s books have been edited to remove language which could be deemed offensive. Julia: “People who can't cope with what's written down should spend their days not reading bedtime stories but under a duvet because real life is far too frightening." Julia Hartley-Brewer

93,312 次观看 • 3 年前 •via X (Twitter)

11 条评论

TheCynicalBrit 🇬🇧🦕 的头像
TheCynicalBrit 🇬🇧🦕3 年前

@JuliaHB1

Jane Sykes 的头像
Jane Sykes3 年前

@JuliaHB1 I have all his books and wouldn’t dream of buying a doctored version !

Q 的头像
Q3 年前

@JuliaHB1 It’s all a complete nonsense.

lieutenant Colonel Kojak Slaphead The 3rd 的头像
lieutenant Colonel Kojak Slaphead The 3rd3 年前

@JuliaHB1 There shouldn't be any censorship of speech or words because words can't physically hurt anyone. If the easily offended lefty snowflakes have a problem with Roald Dahl books then nobody is forcing them to read those books. Stop the woke censorship.

🌱🌤𝕂𝕚𝕡𝕡𝕖𝕣𝕖𝕝𝕝𝕚🌸🌻 的头像
🌱🌤𝕂𝕚𝕡𝕡𝕖𝕣𝕖𝕝𝕝𝕚🌸🌻3 年前

@JuliaHB1 Well said Julia 👏

Alexander Boldizar 的头像
Alexander Boldizar2 年前

People tell me, "Don't read the reviews." But then I'd miss the rollercoaster.

Jayne M 的头像
Jayne M3 年前

@JuliaHB1 How/why are the family letting them do this? Sacrilege! They should remain as written and those who are offended or can’t cope with them can avoid them! It’s wrong to change an author’s words when he has no say!

Mic Grift 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇪🇺 的头像
Mic Grift 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇪🇺3 年前

@JuliaHB1 Julia choosing not to remember the bowdlerisation of Shakespeare. But, maybe that was before desperate right wing operators had to open up culture war fronts, as distraction dogwhistles (?), across the UK and US.

Paul Watson 💙 的头像
Paul Watson 💙3 年前

@JuliaHB1 Think it is you who should not read the re-written books The originals are still available Freedom of choice

Against Community Standards 的头像
Against Community Standards3 年前

@JuliaHB1 Ridiculous. Sanitisation. What next? Censoring 1984 to avoid offending tyrants?

George Cooper 的头像
George Cooper3 年前

@JuliaHB1 Well done as always Julia.

相关视频

Julia Hartley-Brewer PRESSES Peter Tatchell on Trans Women “How Can You Be a Woman If You’re a Man?” Julia Hartley-Brewer: There’s no such thing as a trans child. Do you genuinely believe children can be born in the wrong body? Peter Tatchell: I believe there are children who genuinely believe they are not Julia: But they aren’t born in the wrong body. What do they need to be treated for? Peter: If they’re genuinely trans, which they are in 99% of cases. Julia: What’s that statistic from? Where does the 99% figure come from? Peter: We know from the evidence that puberty blockers have benefited thousands of young people Julia: No, we don’t. That’s not what the studies say. Peter: You keep interrupting me. Don’t be rude, Julia. Julia: Then stop saying things that aren’t true. Peter: Hundreds of thousands of young people have gone through trans treatments successfully and happily around the world. Julia: There’s no adequate follow-up research to make that claim. Did you actually read the Cass Review? Peter: Yes. And Cass did not say young people should be denied puberty blockers or hormone treatment. She said they should be used cautiously. Julia: A large proportion of children who think they’re trans either turn out to be gay and/or are autistic. Isn’t that a strong argument against giving children irreversible treatment? Peter: That’s why the process is slow and rigorous. Nobody goes into a clinic and gets treatment the next day. It can take years. Julia: That simply isn’t true for everyone. Let’s move to another issue. After the Supreme Court judgment, some organisations have said they’ll continue allowing people to access single-sex spaces based on gender identity. If the ruling says biological sex matters, are they right to continue? Peter: There are two important issues: women’s rights and trans people’s rights. We need to reconcile both. Biological sex is a reality, but gender identity is different and, in my view, equally valid. Julia: No. Women are defined by biological sex. Someone who is biologically male can believe they’re a woman, but that doesn’t make them a woman in law or reality. Peter: The Supreme Court didn’t define biological sex Julia: It was very clear that women are defined by biological sex. We know what biological sex is. So how can you be a woman if you’re a man?

Jeff

26,877 次观看 • 26 天前