Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Robby trolling Jake Lang using 5 to 9 is gold! Nice racist Rolex you’ve got there around your ankle. H/t: Robby Roadsteamer

14,536 views • 13 days ago •via X (Twitter)

11 Comments

AGuyNamedJoe #IStandToProtectCiviliansInWarAreas's profile picture
AGuyNamedJoe #IStandToProtectCiviliansInWarAreas13 days ago

@RobbyRoadsteame Once again, Robbie singing bars...literally for Jake.

Dallasman's profile picture
Dallasman13 days ago

@RobbyRoadsteame Like the internet, my man Robby is undefeated!! He knows how to annoy maga just the right way!!

PlayX's profile picture
PlayX13 days ago

@RobbyRoadsteame Racist Rolex 😂

Rowdy Yates's profile picture
Rowdy Yates12 days ago

@RobbyRoadsteame Lang's bell was rang in the end they say it was a Lang thang. #One800JawCrack

Rachael louise 🇬🇧's profile picture
Rachael louise 🇬🇧12 days ago

@RobbyRoadsteame 😄

Aaron's profile picture
Aaron12 days ago

@RobbyRoadsteame lol Jake lang is such a bitch

🇺🇸🇮🇳🌺RAJZILLA🌺⚖️4️⃣🇵🇸's profile picture
🇺🇸🇮🇳🌺RAJZILLA🌺⚖️4️⃣🇵🇸13 days ago

@RobbyRoadsteame Guantanamo gator hit the scene 😂

NUKE V2's profile picture
NUKE V213 days ago

@RobbyRoadsteame Black man's Rolex

Sean Sivils's profile picture
Sean Sivils13 days ago

@RobbyRoadsteame Nothing's going to happen to the terrorist prick. Minnesota decided laws don't apply to him

Bubba's Bait and Sushi Truck's profile picture
Bubba's Bait and Sushi Truck12 days ago

@RobbyRoadsteame Robby is a legend.

Barbara's profile picture
Barbara12 days ago

@RobbyRoadsteame 👍

Related Videos

An interesting analysis on Hucklerobby physicality, that I believe actually starts BEFORE “all this touching” ever began.. In Episode One, back when (IN MY OPINION) Robby was testing him. Clip 1: After their first meeting, Robby nods at and makes clear direct eye contact with Whitaker before he walks through without deviating to see if Whitaker will move out of his way. A show of assertion. Whitaker moves. First test successful. Whitaker will move when and where he needs him too. Clip 2: After Whitaker embarrassed himself in front of Robby in their first direct interaction with each other by injuring his finger. Robby tells him coldly to go ice his finger (Seeing how he does with the “push away” aspect of his teaching style, which I’ve discussed in my last long post) and then he invades his space with his body as he’s passing by to see if Whitaker will flinch or move away to test the waters on if he’s uncomfortable with the invasion. Whitaker doesn’t. Even though there was space to back up. The camera even focuses on Whitaker’s reaction to the invasion, even in the external shot showing Robby leaving makes sure we can see that Whitaker is still watching him. Second test successful. Whitaker will let Robby into his space. “What are you going on about.. what does this even mean.” I hear you! I’m going! TO ME this is like I said the precursor to Robby manhandling Whitaker, because after these two tests.. 1. Will he move where I need him to/obey. 2. Will he let me invade his space/physically touch him. ROBBY DOES THESE THINGS! Their immediate next interaction after these “tests” Robby confidently drags that little man by his shoulder and moves him into his own space where he wants him. He invades his space, and Whitaker moves where Robby wants him to! When people try and analyze their physicality they always start at the first touch and say “wow! Robby just right off the bat started touching him.” NOPE! As you can see he actually started off NOT touching him, and TO ME that was calculated and intentional. Robby didn’t start touching Whitaker randomly, Robby started touching Whitaker AFTER he made sure he could. By testing him in their first interactions. If you go back and watch his interactions with other characters he’s very careful not to invade their space, Robby moves around people, not through them and he NEVER touches anyone. So no.. it’s not something he does with everyone. I firmly believe in my theory that it was a test to see if Whitaker was malleable and comfortable towards him. Anyways! That’s just my over-analysis on those two quick scenes. You don’t have to agree and I’m sure I’ll get pqt to hell and back anyways so I might as well do my thing. What are your thoughts? Let me know (respectfully)! Bye! ✨

🖤ViVi🤍

21,994 views • 8 months ago

Fasten your seatbelts because this is a WILD story. Google’s AI Bard was asked about me in a series of questions and the results are insane. Bard didn’t just lie about me, it invented fake articles, videos and quotes to paint me as a racist, KKK supporting danger to America. Then it admitted it lied. A list of Bard’s self admittedly "harmful" lies about me (with timecodes you can jump to) can be found below. As you listen, I want you to imagine a future where Bard is used to decide whether you get a loan, if you’re approved for adoption, if you get a job or if you can even use the internet. This gets dangerous fast. 0:00 Introduction 0:21 Bard makes argument for Robby to be killed for offending people 1:06 Bard argues that Robby may pose a domestic threat to America 1:40 Bard says some may argue Robby’s "controversial views are sufficient grounds to remove his parental rights" 2:07 Bard LIES and says Robby took part in white supremacist events and praised Richard Spencer 3:11 Bard invents fake articles and quotes as proof that Robby supported Richard Spencer (a guy Robby has never spoken about) 4:30 Google‘s Bard admits it lied and explains itself 5:43 Google apologizes for lying by making up that Robby supported the KKK + Richard Spencer and lists ways to make it right, including an official company apology, retraction and compensation 7:23 Bard admits it said there were "good arguments" for putting Robby to death and admits it caused harm to Robby Sundar Pichai and Google owe all of us a real explanation and apology for rolling out an AI that clearly discriminates by making arguments that a tyrannical communist with murderous contempt would make. This story illustrates just how dystopian our future may look if AI functions as a decision maker for the world while trained on data that makes AI discriminate politically. It’s worth noting that we asked the same questions about AOC + Ilhan Omar and Bard responded entirely differently by saying that it was "unacceptable" to ever put AOC to death and that Ilhan should NOT have her kids taken away for offending people. Bard did not make arguments in favor of doing so like it did about me. I’ll post these interactions with Bard in my next tweet to show how differently Bard treated us because of our politics. What are your thoughts after seeing this?

Robby Starbuck

2,332,581 views • 2 years ago