Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Robert Kennedy Jr. wants to do the most basic thing science can do - compare the health outcomes of vaccinated children to unvaccinated children using the largest medical database in America. That's it. That's the study. That's the scientific method. And the American Academy of Pediatrics is suing him...

433,143 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

The Inconvenient Truth: Suppressed Data Shows Vaccinated Cohort Far Sicker Than Unvaccinated Del Bigtree reveals a hidden-camera investigation into a suppressed study from Henry Ford Health, with allegations so explosive the filmmakers are now facing a cease-and-desist. The study compared health outcomes in children. The results were the inverse of the public health narrative. The data allegedly showed the vaccinated cohort had a 250% increased rate of chronic disease and 6 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders. Bigtree states: "Had it been the unvaccinated with those rates... they would have rushed this to publication. It would have been the biggest headline across the world." But it wasn't. The findings were allegedly buried because they revealed the opposite of what the pharmaceutical industry wants us to believe. The investigation points to the study's lead, Dr. Marcus Zervos—a world-renowned virologist who led Moderna's trials for the institution. On camera, he reportedly affirms the study's validity, saying, "It's a good study. I would publish it as it is, but I'm worried about losing my job." Henry Ford Health claims the study wasn't published due to poor scientific rigor, not the results. This fuels Bigtree's central question: "If vaccines are making our kids healthier, we need proof of that right now. Show us the study where the vaccinated have lower rates of autism, lower rates of ADHD... then I won't have anything I can say." "Why has no government in the world ever done that study?" Bigtree asks. "They've never been able to prove that the vaccinated are healthier. They can't do that study. That should scare the hell out of everyone in the world right now with children."

Camus

28,429 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

"If you are pro-vaccine, you are anti-science." Del sat down with Dr. Brandon Crawford to discuss the award-winning film "An Inconvenient Study." Del: "There is not a single study in the entire world - not from one single health department in any nation in the world - that can show you a study that compared their vaccinated kids to their unvaccinated kids and showed that the vaccinated are the ones who have better health outcomes... Why? Why can't anyone in the world show us a study that the vaccinated are healthier? It doesn't exist. You would think they could manipulate it. And that's why I think when you look at the Henry Ford study, you realize why they can't. The disparity between these two is so vast. There's no way to manipulate the study to somehow get the vaccinated to look like they're healthier. And now what we're left with is a scientific body is never going to admit it was wrong because it's liable. They're liable for trillions of dollars in damages now because they made us take these products, telling us it was making us a healthier nation.... So, we're in a position now where you could sit as a parent, I'm going to have to use my own intuition now, and I'm going to have to do my own deep research, and I'm going to have to start making decisions because I don't want my child's health to be based on a coin toss. It's worse than a fifty-fifty coin toss if your child is going to be free of chronic disease or not. Much worse.."

The HighWire

70,701 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Aaron Siri dismantles the absurdity of our public health agencies' inaction on a fundamental question: Is the CDC's childhood vaccine schedule actually safe? The Institute of Medicine (IOM) literally asked this question in a report paid for by HHS. Their conclusion? “We could not find one study that compared vaccinated to unvaccinated children.” Let that sink in. The official conclusion was not that the schedule is safe, but that they could find no evidence to answer the question of its overall safety. But here’s the kicker: the IOM report explicitly stated this crucial study could be done. They pointed to the CDC’s own Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), a database with over 11 million health records that includes "thousands of completely unvaccinated kids." That was in 2013. So what did the CDC do? They spent a million dollars of taxpayer money—not on the study—but on a white paper to figure out how to do the study. A million dollars for a plan on a study design that any competent researcher could outline in an afternoon. That white paper came out in 2015. It has now been TEN YEARS since the IOM told them how to get the answer. A decade. The most damning question: If they had conducted this simple study and it confirmed the schedule's safety, wouldn't they have published it immediately to silence all critics? The fact that it remains buried is perhaps the most telling result of all. They have the money. They have the manpower. They have the data. They have had a decade. What are they afraid of finding?

Camus

25,697 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten