正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Robert Kraft should cancel Ed Sheeran’s Gillette Stadium dates on September 25 and 26, and replace it with a NOVA Fundraiser featuring: Noa Kirel David Draiman 🟦🇺🇸🇮🇱✡️☮️ Dana International Omer Adam Static and Ben El Offer Nissim Stephane Legar Eden Golan Yuval Raphael Noam Bettan Alon Ohel John Ondrasik...

25,897 次观看 • 1 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗥𝗘𝗪 𝗕𝗥𝗜𝗗𝗚𝗘𝗡: Democracy Is Under Threat Like Never Before, and It’s Coming from Our Own Institutions “The very concept of the democracy that we’ve taken for granted all of our lives is under threat as it never has been before,” lamented Andrew Bridgen at the Citizen’s Initiative against the WHO pandemic treaty. “And it’s not just in my country; it’s not across Europe. It is across the whole of the world. It’s not from external armies mounding up on our borders this time, but it is from the corruption and the decay of our own institutions are allowing this to happen.” He continued. “Public health and the decisions surrounding it now exist as a monopoly of the WHO, headed up by bureaucrats in Geneva, whose leadership has been embroiled in scandal after scandal. And the majority of the influence on the WHO now is by external entities. And indeed, as has been mentioned, one of the richest men in the world [Bill Gates] has a massive influence over the WHO ... So, it’s basically pay-to-play.” “Any parliament that decides to abdicate its responsibilities to its constituents does not deserve the name of being a parliament and does not deserve a seat in any elected assembly. We have no right to relinquish our sovereignty [to the WHO], the sovereignty of our nations, because it’s not mine to give away, it’s not any of [ours] to give away. Sovereignty always belongs to the people, and every election should be returned back to the people, where they will again decide who they allow to represent them.” ------------------------------ Share if you care. And follow (The Vigilant Fox 🦊) for more newsworthy clips.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

350,925 次观看 • 3 年前

Ed Sheeran should be ashamed. Fans are speaking out against his unforgivable support for the jihadists who massacred over 1,000 Jews on October 7. Here is one example of the messages posted online: This is unforgivable. On October 7, 2023, hundreds of terrorists stormed the Nova music festival in southern Israel. They poured onto the grounds and slaughtered the crowd. People were hunted through the fields, shot, burned and murdered en masse. Hundreds of Jews were killed. It was the most savage massacre of Jews since the Holocaust. The pain still sits with an entire people. Now the British pop star packing stadiums on his Loop Tour lets his opening act, American rapper Macklemore, walk onto the MetLife stage in a keffiyeh, shout “Free Palestine (judenfrei!!!),” condemn Israel for stopping Hamas and call Israel’s retaliation a genocide. The flag and symbols raised at that show are not a call for peace. They are the banner of the same jihadist movement whose Gazan terrorists wore those colors while they invaded Nova and butchered Jews. Sheeran is not asking for peace. He is lending his stage to the claim that the killers of October 7 were stopped too soon—that they failed to finish what Hitler failed to finish. He is making a spectacle of our dead and turning Jewish trauma into an opening-act sensation, as if a pop stadium were a Nazi youth rally and Jewish presence the problem to be erased. Jewish fans should not have to hide a Star of David to sit through a concert. Nova survivors should not walk into an arena and see the flag of their murderers treated as entertainment. Shame on Ed Sheeran!

Liza Rosen

49,137 次观看 • 1 天前

Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED: “Do not forget Syria. Keep in mind it was this same Ed Miliband who as leader of the Labour Party voted alongside the Tories and others to delay our action against Assad in Syria, which delayed the resolution of that conflict for roughly five years with multiple thousands of deaths in the meanwhile. It was a tragic decision made under Cameron. Parliament, if you recall, rejected the attempted action in Syria. And it led to horrific consequences. Of course, eventually it required Trump’s first term to come along to resolve the situation in Syria. We did eventually join the American coalition and managed to push back against Assad. The eventual result was Assad was overthrown by the Syrian people. Ed Miliband, as was confirmed even by former Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who has many of his own faults, but on this point of Syria he posted out an article that was in The Telegraph, reminding people of this, that Ed Miliband was among the faction that voted down our attempted joining of that coalition early to defend the Syrian people against the tyrant Assad. Now that Assad has been overthrown and the new government of Syria led by Prime Minister Ahmad al-Shara is making progress in stabilising that country but, as well, in its own diplomatic recognition around the world. That criticism, the particular criticism of Ed Miliband being on the wrong side of the Syria debate resonates now a lot more. And it wouldn’t have been relevant if not for Andy Burnham, having resurrected that man in a post-liberated Syria context as somebody who was on the wrong side of the Syria civil war. And now he’s in charge of our country’s foreign policy. And we now have relations with the new Syria government, who will know and remember Ed Miliband’s position against them in supporting their tyrant Assad when he was quelling the popular Syrian uprising.”

أبو عمّار

15,995 次观看 • 1 个月前

Since I’m already here in the Outro: Tear hole and have been for about 12 hours now. I may as well use this opportunity to point out one of the very distinct reasons Outro: Tear evokes such visceral reactions from all us who hear it. The meaning behind it is defintely one of the reasons. But another is the structure of the song itself. Outro: Tear is not one song with 3 verses saying the same thing. It’s 3 different reactions changing hands as the song moves from Namjoon to Yoongi to Hoseok. And along with the lyrics, the melody is doing the same thing. It’s weaving from Namjoon’s conflict to Yoongi’s despair to Hoseok’s fear. It’s 3 different reactions in response to the same inevitable end. Namjoon’s reaction being internal interrogation of his self. His relationship with identity has always been threaded through questions of sincerity. Kim Namjoon vs RM. Leader vs person. The person carrying everybody versus the person who is also exhausted and frightened and occasionally has absolutely no idea what he’s doing. It’s inward conflict. Was it real? Was the goodbye always inevitable because of his own insincerity him? Then yoongi comes in with his verse that says, fine. Destroy it. His reaction is pure rage. And it’s not rage at the people who are important to him. No. It’s rage at the fact it has come to this. So he wants it all scorched. Bc if all of it has to go, then he wants it gone completely. No lingering. No halves. No hope. And then Hoseok’s verse. His whole verse is grappling with fear through his words. But it’s also fear as a physiological language. It’s one of the truly unique things about his verse. How the melody literally starts with hard breaths. You can hear it in the song. Gasping. Forcing. Almost choking. And then his flow breaks out of its contained rhythm. He’s panicking. He’s fearful bc “ending” was always just a concept. But now it’s here in present time. He spends the final verse driving his body and the song towards a state that feels increasingly unsustainable. The breaths are shorter, his delivery gets more frantic, rhythm breaking out of confinement, and then his repetitions like geol geol geol and byeong byeong byeong lose structure within the song and becomes a fixation almost. So now you as the listener who has been experiencing that transition from conflict to rage and despair and now to fear and panic, you are naturally expecting a sort of resolve. But it doesn’t happen. What does happen is the song quite literally cuts. The composition of the flow itself finally does what it’s meant to do. It ends without allowing for a resolve. That part. That abrupt end. That is why Outro: Tear has that reaction on us all. Because the very last thing you experience with the song is an interruption. All of that confusion and pain and rage and fear carries with you into Hoseok’s verse where as the panic crescendos, you expect him to arrive emotionally somewhere. But he doesn’t. He is still inside the panic when the song takes him away from you. So now you’re the one left holding all of that with you. That’s what’s almost cruel about the song itself. There’s no completion. Hoseok’s verse just escalates and escalates and then cuts. That’s it. You don’t get closure. You don’t get the emotional luxury of watching the pain taper away. The songs just rips from you.

Livheartt⁷ met hobi | ㉧㉣㉣ | 🦢🤍

57,938 次观看 • 14 天前

DOUGLAS MURRAY: IT’S TIME TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE TAKEOVER OF BRITAIN! He’s Had Enough. The British People Have Every Right To Defend Their Traditions, Holy Places, And Holy Days Without Being Branded Far-Right Extremists In a powerful and unapologetic exchange on Piers Morgan’s show, Douglas Murray strikes back against the constant barrage of insults and defamation directed at ordinary Britons who simply want to protect their own culture and heritage. He makes it crystal clear that the public should no longer silently endure being smeared for daring to stand up for what belongs to them. “The British public should not endlessly be putting up with being insulted and defamed. My belief is we have a right to stand up for our traditions and a right to stand up for our holy places and our holy days,” Murray declares with conviction. He then lays bare the outrageous double standard that has poisoned public discourse: “People will say the people who defend it are far right extremists, by the way something they would never say against the people, the other way around, who had defaced the Cenotaph.” This selective outrage is no longer tolerable. While British identity, history, and sacred symbols face daily erosion under waves of unchecked immigration and cultural replacement, defenders of the nation are vilified, yet those who attack its monuments are excused or ignored. He draws a firm line in the sand: Britain is being taken over, and the time for passive acceptance has ended. It’s time to push back boldly and unapologetically before it’s too late.

Imtiaz Mahmood

135,801 次观看 • 4 个月前

Who Do You Think The 3rd Person Is? Bill Gates? Klaus Schwab? Someone Else? “Nostradamus saw in his future three men that he called antichrists. One was Napoleon, the second one was Hitler, and the third one is the one that is to come, who is said to be the worst of all, because he will learn from the mistakes of the others. A very dangerous person. He didn't like the term antichrist. He said it was a Christian term, and it was not exactly what he meant. But he said, if you think of Christ as representing people, humanity, then antichrist is someone who does terrible things against humanity, against people. And it can be the type of personality like Genghis Khan or Attila the Hun, the type that doesn't care anything about what it's doing, it only wants power. So this is what he meant by an Antichrist. But the third one, he gave us a great deal of information about him because he wanted us to do something to stop the man. He said in the Bible, in the book of Revelation and other books in the Old Testament, the people saw the same things that he saw their symbolism they could understand in their time, but they all saw the same thing. And the man he refers to as the Antichrist is the number 666 in the Book of Revelation, called the Beast. Of course he said 666 also refers to his connection to his computers. So there's a lot more to it. But he has been predicted as far back as Bible times. So he said he has a destiny to fulfill. He has to come, but after he comes, what happens after that is in the hands of mankind. Do we allow it to go through the worst case scenarios or can we lessen it? That's the point fulfill. We were given a lot of information about this man because he is so important. We have his horoscope. He was born on February the 4th, 1962 in Jerusalem, but he's not Jewish. And his parents were killed during the Israeli war and when he was about six or seven years old, and he was raised by his uncle. His uncle is a very evil man, and we have had many people see him, and we have in my work, and we had one woman who was able to put together a police composite picture of the uncle and of the antichrist. She was a psychic who had worked with police on many cases, so she knew how to do the police composite kits. But the uncle took the young boy him as his own. What the young boy doesn't know was that the uncle had his parents killed, so he could have him for himself. And he has gotten together a very powerful group of rich Arabs in the Middle East, and they've been taking care of this young boy and grooming him for the role he is to take. It's a very powerful group of people that control everything that happens in the Middle East. They're the puppet masters behind the scenes. Nusrat Dhamma said, by the time seven puppets arise in the Middle East, you will realize what is happening that they are not the real leaders of the countries, but they are the puppets being manipulated by the puppet masters behind the scenes. The young Antichrist went to college in Egypt, and we were working on this at the same time he was in college, so we were shown several scenes of him in college. We knew where he was living. We had all this information.”

Wall Street Apes

1,338,694 次观看 • 2 年前

Buttigieg: So let me ask you a version of the question that I asked everybody when I was running around this state eight years ago, when nobody could say my name right, which is: What’s it going to be like the first time the sun comes up over this country and the current president has permanently left the political scene? It’s an appealing thing to remember that that day will come, but it also represents a huge challenge. Because what do we do then? Then what? The answer to that is what we’ve got to hold in our minds right now to campaign and to win—and, most importantly, to govern. Because we need to immediately get to work to build something better. Like a political system where everyone’s vote counts the same, and the person who gets the most votes wins the election. It looks like a Supreme Court that is legitimate and trustworthy in the eyes of the American people. It looks like a Congress composed of representatives who actually represent the people they serve, capable of standing up to abuses from other parts of the government. And it means state and federal governments capable of standing up for people’s rights. The right to live your life as you see fit, so long as you’re not hurting anyone else. The right to carry a sign or write an op-ed or criticize your government. The right to make your own health care decisions. The right to be who you are and love who you love and raise your family in peace. That’s what it looks like. And it’s not too much to ask. And it’s not too much to ask for public integrity.

Acyn

286,114 次观看 • 1 个月前