Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Robin & Viviana couldn’t keep their hands off each other after filming, so they took the “Shaggin Wagon” up to Mt. Charleston 🔥 Teasing quickly turns into deep kissing, pussy eating, and Viviana ruining Robin’s pussy 💦 ✝ROBIN 'Mommy' COFFINS✝ Viviana Rose🥀 Top 0.65% on OF Link Here 👇

Bluedotxxx's profile picture

Blue.XXX

8,562 subscribers

20,153 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

NSFW
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

According to Terry Gilliam, Robin Williams' character in "'The Fisher King' (1991) is in many ways the closest one to Robin, just that range — the madness, the damage, the pain, the sweetness, the outrageousness. That was the role I think that stretched him to the limits." Gilliam considered the filming of this important scene in the movie to be easy as far as effects were concerned, but as for acting, it was very hard as Robin Williams was tearing himself out emotionally. About how Robin Williams approached the scene, Gilliam said, "The interesting thing about Robin in all of those scenes was that he always wanted to do another take. He felt he had even more anguish and pain to spill out of the character. And I had to really stop him. I had to say, ‘Robin, you’ve reached a point here, way beyond what we expected. We’ve got what we needed. Now you’re just hurting yourself. That happened a couple of times while we were shooting this scene. The most worrisome moment for me was after he’s been chased by the Red Knight, when he’s running through the streets, and then he comes to the river, where the teenage punks arrive and knife him. We had to do other things on that night shoot, too, and things were going very slowly. Suddenly, we realized that we had like an hour until the dawn [would arrive]. The last shot we had to do was Robin running at the end of this scene, in this hysterical state. You can even see the light ever so slightly beginning to come on the river in the background. But Robin was so angry because it was such a crucial moment, and he felt he’d been cheated of his ability to really give this moment his all. And Robin was an incredibly strong guy: When he’d worked himself into this state of madness for the part, nobody could approach him. The first assistant, the stunt guy … nobody wanted to get near him. They were terrified. So, I had to go up there and tell him, ‘Robin, what we have here is very good. And if we look at the rushes and it isn’t, I promise you I will reshoot it.’ And I had to hug him basically, and hold him. I could feel these muscles that were so tense and so strong, they felt like they could easily r!p my he@d off. But that’s what was so extraordinary about him — how he would commit everything and more to what he had to do." ("Terry Gilliam Breaks Down a Particularly Hard Night With Robin Williams on The Fisher King", Bilge Ebiri, Vulture, 2014) P.S: Remembering the great American actor, Robin Williams, on his 75th birthday!
1:13

According to Terry Gilliam, Robin Williams' character in "'The Fisher King' (1991) is in many ways the closest one to Robin, just that range — the madness, the damage, the pain, the sweetness, the outrageousness. That was the role I think that stretched him to the limits." Gilliam considered the filming of this important scene in the movie to be easy as far as effects were concerned, but as for acting, it was very hard as Robin Williams was tearing himself out emotionally. About how Robin Williams approached the scene, Gilliam said, "The interesting thing about Robin in all of those scenes was that he always wanted to do another take. He felt he had even more anguish and pain to spill out of the character. And I had to really stop him. I had to say, ‘Robin, you’ve reached a point here, way beyond what we expected. We’ve got what we needed. Now you’re just hurting yourself. That happened a couple of times while we were shooting this scene. The most worrisome moment for me was after he’s been chased by the Red Knight, when he’s running through the streets, and then he comes to the river, where the teenage punks arrive and knife him. We had to do other things on that night shoot, too, and things were going very slowly. Suddenly, we realized that we had like an hour until the dawn [would arrive]. The last shot we had to do was Robin running at the end of this scene, in this hysterical state. You can even see the light ever so slightly beginning to come on the river in the background. But Robin was so angry because it was such a crucial moment, and he felt he’d been cheated of his ability to really give this moment his all. And Robin was an incredibly strong guy: When he’d worked himself into this state of madness for the part, nobody could approach him. The first assistant, the stunt guy … nobody wanted to get near him. They were terrified. So, I had to go up there and tell him, ‘Robin, what we have here is very good. And if we look at the rushes and it isn’t, I promise you I will reshoot it.’ And I had to hug him basically, and hold him. I could feel these muscles that were so tense and so strong, they felt like they could easily r!p my he@d off. But that’s what was so extraordinary about him — how he would commit everything and more to what he had to do." ("Terry Gilliam Breaks Down a Particularly Hard Night With Robin Williams on The Fisher King", Bilge Ebiri, Vulture, 2014) P.S: Remembering the great American actor, Robin Williams, on his 75th birthday!

DepressedBergman

31,441 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

So recently I had Candace Owens on my show. Since the Zionist propaganda machine is extremely predictable on x, I was waiting for all the trolls, fake accounts, and bots to come after her and me. I never back down from a fight. I believe in speaking the truth without attacking anyone. That’s why I don’t troll people or spam their posts, I simply don’t care enough to do that. But when they troll me, I respond hard and they don’t like it. And of course, as soon as the interview was released, Israeli/deep-state Zionist trolls swarmed the internet the same names the same texts. But this time they learned that Elizabeth fires back with responses they can’t handle, so they started blocking me from being able to reply. SO BRAVE! lol They also have zero creativity and keep copying the exact same message from each other. On top of that, they are incredibly uneducated in geography. Here are two bots who posted the exact same thing in Russian (I'm Georgian born different language different country but hey who cares about the facts right?). I suspect this is Israeli Mossad bots trying their best to intimidate me but It’s just so hilarious. They chose to write in Russian “We are watching you Elizabeth.” so here’s a video response from me:
0:24

So recently I had Candace Owens on my show. Since the Zionist propaganda machine is extremely predictable on x, I was waiting for all the trolls, fake accounts, and bots to come after her and me. I never back down from a fight. I believe in speaking the truth without attacking anyone. That’s why I don’t troll people or spam their posts, I simply don’t care enough to do that. But when they troll me, I respond hard and they don’t like it. And of course, as soon as the interview was released, Israeli/deep-state Zionist trolls swarmed the internet the same names the same texts. But this time they learned that Elizabeth fires back with responses they can’t handle, so they started blocking me from being able to reply. SO BRAVE! lol They also have zero creativity and keep copying the exact same message from each other. On top of that, they are incredibly uneducated in geography. Here are two bots who posted the exact same thing in Russian (I'm Georgian born different language different country but hey who cares about the facts right?). I suspect this is Israeli Mossad bots trying their best to intimidate me but It’s just so hilarious. They chose to write in Russian “We are watching you Elizabeth.” so here’s a video response from me:

ELIZABETH LANE

75,825 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

There is new life in the Refaat Alareer Camp. Alhamdulillah. We recently welcomed 3 new members to our camp families, 3 new blessings in Zeina, Saed, and Qamar. The Sameer Project celebrated their good health and the resilience they represent with a newborn bathing ceremony, bringing together the women and the kids of the camp to wish blessings, strength, and protection on the infants and their mothers. Water was infused with rose peddles, they were cleaned, and then sweets were passed out for all to enjoy! Resistance through joy, resistance through ensuring the Palestinian identity continues on. We gave each mother baby formula and a packet of diapers. These and the tray of sweets totaled $213 after 11% commission. Support these newborns and the others that The Sameer Project are so lucky to have witnessed enter into this world by donating to our Refaat Alareer Camp Campaign link. And may they grow up to live in a liberated, free, Palestine. Other ways to donate include: (Paypal option, please make sure to add a message saying "Camp") (Venmo option, please make sure to add a message saying "Camp")
0:58

There is new life in the Refaat Alareer Camp. Alhamdulillah. We recently welcomed 3 new members to our camp families, 3 new blessings in Zeina, Saed, and Qamar. The Sameer Project celebrated their good health and the resilience they represent with a newborn bathing ceremony, bringing together the women and the kids of the camp to wish blessings, strength, and protection on the infants and their mothers. Water was infused with rose peddles, they were cleaned, and then sweets were passed out for all to enjoy! Resistance through joy, resistance through ensuring the Palestinian identity continues on. We gave each mother baby formula and a packet of diapers. These and the tray of sweets totaled $213 after 11% commission. Support these newborns and the others that The Sameer Project are so lucky to have witnessed enter into this world by donating to our Refaat Alareer Camp Campaign link. And may they grow up to live in a liberated, free, Palestine. Other ways to donate include: (Paypal option, please make sure to add a message saying "Camp") (Venmo option, please make sure to add a message saying "Camp")

The Sameer Project

17,493 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

I'm 4/4 on my $CHOMP predictions because I see the narrative, I understand base chain on a deep level. You can see the signs in the sands too. The next steps for $CHOMP is to ascend to the top 5 memecoins on base chain. Right now, that mark stands at 40m mcap. From 2m mcap just a month ago, to 20m this month.. Chomp grinded through the noise and rose from the bottom. I held $BRETT and $TOSHI through their retraces and rode them to new heights on base chain becoming top 3 memecoins each. I'm once again telling you right here right now Chomp is next up. Expect to see more and more large whales sell some of their largest bags to ape into Chomp. You have to understand the logic here because it's very important. - If you are in something at 150m+, unless the momentum is like Brett level, you will not get many Xs - The likelihood chomp pumps out 10-100x+ off of 15m is much higher than say 150m+. Savvy traders and whales know this, that's why some recent massive 6 figure apes are not surprising. They see the Base Messiah, they see the prophecies have all come true and they begin to believe as well... Chomp is coming for the base chain establishment... Study the signs ✍️
0:28

I'm 4/4 on my $CHOMP predictions because I see the narrative, I understand base chain on a deep level. You can see the signs in the sands too. The next steps for $CHOMP is to ascend to the top 5 memecoins on base chain. Right now, that mark stands at 40m mcap. From 2m mcap just a month ago, to 20m this month.. Chomp grinded through the noise and rose from the bottom. I held $BRETT and $TOSHI through their retraces and rode them to new heights on base chain becoming top 3 memecoins each. I'm once again telling you right here right now Chomp is next up. Expect to see more and more large whales sell some of their largest bags to ape into Chomp. You have to understand the logic here because it's very important. - If you are in something at 150m+, unless the momentum is like Brett level, you will not get many Xs - The likelihood chomp pumps out 10-100x+ off of 15m is much higher than say 150m+. Savvy traders and whales know this, that's why some recent massive 6 figure apes are not surprising. They see the Base Messiah, they see the prophecies have all come true and they begin to believe as well... Chomp is coming for the base chain establishment... Study the signs ✍️

Penn

10,488 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

── Title: 《婚后引力》 Starring: Yue Yuting × Charon Yue Yuting is soo stunning here! The moment she puts on those glasses, all I want to yell is MOMMY 😍 And Charon is back in his husband mode~ The tension and chemistry are sooo intense 🔥 The story follows two clear-headed, mature souls who enter a family-arranged marriage, slowly lowering their defenses as they navigate rules and boundaries and eventually choose each other. They even have a dedicated calendar to check off their intimate activities 😭 and those check marks gradually turn into little marks of love After being taken advantage of in a past relationship, she no longer really believes in love. Little by little, he teaches her to trust and love again. She loves feeling valued and taken seriously, and he’s sooo good at giving her that—always respecting her and giving her the sense of security she deserves.
2:46

── Title: 《婚后引力》 Starring: Yue Yuting × Charon Yue Yuting is soo stunning here! The moment she puts on those glasses, all I want to yell is MOMMY 😍 And Charon is back in his husband mode~ The tension and chemistry are sooo intense 🔥 The story follows two clear-headed, mature souls who enter a family-arranged marriage, slowly lowering their defenses as they navigate rules and boundaries and eventually choose each other. They even have a dedicated calendar to check off their intimate activities 😭 and those check marks gradually turn into little marks of love After being taken advantage of in a past relationship, she no longer really believes in love. Little by little, he teaches her to trust and love again. She loves feeling valued and taken seriously, and he’s sooo good at giving her that—always respecting her and giving her the sense of security she deserves.

biee🎐*:.⋆°

21,769 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale on why he and Peter Thiel intentionally named the company after a Lord of the Rings artifact that everyone remembers as dangerous "When we're creating this, we said, this is a dangerous thing to create. But we believe it's a worthy thing to create" "It took a lot of courage. There's a lot of different things we could have worked on. We could have made a lot of money doing a lot of other things" "We had to eliminate up to 10,000 terrorists that might not have gotten eliminated" "We worked with all sorts of amazing groups in the government alongside them with the technology. And we helped protect civil liberties and make sure the government watchers are being watched" "Of course, you create this technology. If it gets into the wrong hands and they turn off the audit trails, who knows what bad could be done with it. So there's good and bad here"
0:51

Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale on why he and Peter Thiel intentionally named the company after a Lord of the Rings artifact that everyone remembers as dangerous "When we're creating this, we said, this is a dangerous thing to create. But we believe it's a worthy thing to create" "It took a lot of courage. There's a lot of different things we could have worked on. We could have made a lot of money doing a lot of other things" "We had to eliminate up to 10,000 terrorists that might not have gotten eliminated" "We worked with all sorts of amazing groups in the government alongside them with the technology. And we helped protect civil liberties and make sure the government watchers are being watched" "Of course, you create this technology. If it gets into the wrong hands and they turn off the audit trails, who knows what bad could be done with it. So there's good and bad here"

Jaynit

12,577 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

In 1966, those Ibo majors who planned the Ibo coup were very foolish and reckless. The reason is that the Ibos dominated every sector in Nigeria. There was no reason to take up arms against your own government. The events of 1966 are the cause of the suffering the Ibos experience today, said the Ohaneze secretary. By 1965, the Ibos had infused themselves into every sector in Nigeria since their fellow Ibo man was in power. Even in Lagos, “Yorubaland,” the Ibos took over many sectors, sidelining the Yorubas, extending all the way to Ibadan and other regions of Nigeria. But the greed of the Ibo people always overpowered their sense of reason. Nnamdi Azikwe was greedy and wanted to be in charge of Yorubaland before Awolowo fought back. Azikwe, an Ibo man, was in power, but greed did not let the Ibos rest, they wanted more. They desired all the power of other regions to be centralized in one person who controlled it. They planned a coup, killed Yoruba leaders, Hausa-Fulani leaders, and spared their own Ibo leaders. After that, they put an Ibo man in charge of the country as head of state. The Ibos then dissolved the regional system of government, which allowed each region to govern itself. The Ibos cancelled it and brought all power to the center and who was at the center? An Ibo man. The North quickly realized what was going on and countered with a coup. they took power from the Ibos and kept the system Ibos planned the coup to change “ power in central “. The Ibos did not like this, so they asked to leave Nigeria since their plan had failed. The North said, “Oh, now you want to leave after killing our leaders?” The Biafra war then broke out, and the Ibos lost again. That system of Governemnt the Ibos planned the coup for is what Nigeria still uses today. The same Ibos are the ones complaining to this day! They brought the problems Nigeria faces today and still they cry every day about being victims. Have they learned from their mistakes of the 60s? No. Just look at their recent behaviors.
0:45

In 1966, those Ibo majors who planned the Ibo coup were very foolish and reckless. The reason is that the Ibos dominated every sector in Nigeria. There was no reason to take up arms against your own government. The events of 1966 are the cause of the suffering the Ibos experience today, said the Ohaneze secretary. By 1965, the Ibos had infused themselves into every sector in Nigeria since their fellow Ibo man was in power. Even in Lagos, “Yorubaland,” the Ibos took over many sectors, sidelining the Yorubas, extending all the way to Ibadan and other regions of Nigeria. But the greed of the Ibo people always overpowered their sense of reason. Nnamdi Azikwe was greedy and wanted to be in charge of Yorubaland before Awolowo fought back. Azikwe, an Ibo man, was in power, but greed did not let the Ibos rest, they wanted more. They desired all the power of other regions to be centralized in one person who controlled it. They planned a coup, killed Yoruba leaders, Hausa-Fulani leaders, and spared their own Ibo leaders. After that, they put an Ibo man in charge of the country as head of state. The Ibos then dissolved the regional system of government, which allowed each region to govern itself. The Ibos cancelled it and brought all power to the center and who was at the center? An Ibo man. The North quickly realized what was going on and countered with a coup. they took power from the Ibos and kept the system Ibos planned the coup to change “ power in central “. The Ibos did not like this, so they asked to leave Nigeria since their plan had failed. The North said, “Oh, now you want to leave after killing our leaders?” The Biafra war then broke out, and the Ibos lost again. That system of Governemnt the Ibos planned the coup for is what Nigeria still uses today. The same Ibos are the ones complaining to this day! They brought the problems Nigeria faces today and still they cry every day about being victims. Have they learned from their mistakes of the 60s? No. Just look at their recent behaviors.

Nononsense

26,826 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

As he was struggling to break into Hollywood, Matt Damon read about how Quentin Tarantino did it: Essentially, he got a big-name actor (Harvey Keitel) to want to star in Tarantino’s first movie (Reservoir Dogs) then leveraged that to get the movie funded. “And so,” Damon said, “We wrote ‘Good Will Hunting’ and that part that Robin [Williams] eventually took—we called it ‘the Harvey Keitel part.’” “Ben [Affleck] and I wrote the movie specifically because we wanted the parts as actors…But we knew [we needed] a big-name actor who could get us some money because Ben and I were worth nothing. And so we wrote ‘the Harvey Keitel part’ really open-ended. So we could adjust it: if Morgan Freeman or Denzel Washington wanted to come in and play it—we could make that character from Roxbury [a neighborhood in Boston], and we could explore the historic racial tension in Boston. If Meryl Streep took the part—instead of a father-son relationship, we could make it a mother-son relationship. So we really left it open-ended because we wanted to cast as wide a net as possible because we were just trying to get the movie made.” “And then once we got Robin to sign up to do it, that’s really what got us a green light to make it…He changed our lives.” Takeaway 1: In one of my favorite talks, "Runnin' Down A Dream," the venture capitalist Bill Gurley explains that while studying the career trajectories of three of his heroes—the restauranteur Danny Meyer, the coach Bobby Knight, and the musician Bob Dylan—he noticed a pattern: They studied the career trajectories of the icons in their respective industries. Like Damon, they studied how others successfully got their foot in the door then climbed to top of their profession. And then, they took similar steps towards doing the same. Coincidentally, Tarantino did this too. He made scrap books for each of his favorite filmmakers: Brian De Palma, Howard Hawks, Douglas Sirk, and Martin Scorsese. "I was like a film historian," Tarantino said. "I was obsessed with studying how they did it, the evolution of their careers." "Greatness isn't random," as Gurley puts it. Instead, it's usually a predictable step along a studied path of strategically modified emulation and, of course, determination. Takeaway 2: In the clip above, Damon goes on to explain that, not only did Robin Williams sign on to be in "Good Will Hunting," he also went off script and improvised one of the most iconic lines ("Son of a bitch, he stole my line") in the movie. It reminded me of something Pixar co-founder Ed Catmull writes in his book, Creativity. Inc.: "Getting the right people is more important than getting the right idea…If you give a good idea to a mediocre team, they will screw it up. If you give a mediocre idea to a brilliant team, they will either fix it or throw it away and come up with something better." - - - “Bob Dylan said, 'I'm a musical expeditionary.' I looked up 'expeditionary'—it's to travel for scientific research or exploration. And that's what Dylan did...For hours upon hours upon hours, he studied what other artists did. He was a mimic. He was studying, studying, studying.” — Bill Gurley Follow Billy Oppenheimer for more content like this!
2:07

As he was struggling to break into Hollywood, Matt Damon read about how Quentin Tarantino did it: Essentially, he got a big-name actor (Harvey Keitel) to want to star in Tarantino’s first movie (Reservoir Dogs) then leveraged that to get the movie funded. “And so,” Damon said, “We wrote ‘Good Will Hunting’ and that part that Robin [Williams] eventually took—we called it ‘the Harvey Keitel part.’” “Ben [Affleck] and I wrote the movie specifically because we wanted the parts as actors…But we knew [we needed] a big-name actor who could get us some money because Ben and I were worth nothing. And so we wrote ‘the Harvey Keitel part’ really open-ended. So we could adjust it: if Morgan Freeman or Denzel Washington wanted to come in and play it—we could make that character from Roxbury [a neighborhood in Boston], and we could explore the historic racial tension in Boston. If Meryl Streep took the part—instead of a father-son relationship, we could make it a mother-son relationship. So we really left it open-ended because we wanted to cast as wide a net as possible because we were just trying to get the movie made.” “And then once we got Robin to sign up to do it, that’s really what got us a green light to make it…He changed our lives.” Takeaway 1: In one of my favorite talks, "Runnin' Down A Dream," the venture capitalist Bill Gurley explains that while studying the career trajectories of three of his heroes—the restauranteur Danny Meyer, the coach Bobby Knight, and the musician Bob Dylan—he noticed a pattern: They studied the career trajectories of the icons in their respective industries. Like Damon, they studied how others successfully got their foot in the door then climbed to top of their profession. And then, they took similar steps towards doing the same. Coincidentally, Tarantino did this too. He made scrap books for each of his favorite filmmakers: Brian De Palma, Howard Hawks, Douglas Sirk, and Martin Scorsese. "I was like a film historian," Tarantino said. "I was obsessed with studying how they did it, the evolution of their careers." "Greatness isn't random," as Gurley puts it. Instead, it's usually a predictable step along a studied path of strategically modified emulation and, of course, determination. Takeaway 2: In the clip above, Damon goes on to explain that, not only did Robin Williams sign on to be in "Good Will Hunting," he also went off script and improvised one of the most iconic lines ("Son of a bitch, he stole my line") in the movie. It reminded me of something Pixar co-founder Ed Catmull writes in his book, Creativity. Inc.: "Getting the right people is more important than getting the right idea…If you give a good idea to a mediocre team, they will screw it up. If you give a mediocre idea to a brilliant team, they will either fix it or throw it away and come up with something better." - - - “Bob Dylan said, 'I'm a musical expeditionary.' I looked up 'expeditionary'—it's to travel for scientific research or exploration. And that's what Dylan did...For hours upon hours upon hours, he studied what other artists did. He was a mimic. He was studying, studying, studying.” — Bill Gurley Follow Billy Oppenheimer for more content like this!

Billy Oppenheimer

8,483,157 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Kimmy Kimm narrates how her entire a6ult indu$try career started after a performer randomly reached out to her on TikTok saying She drove to Miami same day and the VERY next day, She got into her very first scene which was a thr66søme that all6g6dly left her with a Cut down there. 👀🔥 “They put us in a stack, Basically just two girls laying on top of each other and the guy going back and forth between each girl and so he’s doing that and then I feel like a sharp pain and I’m like what’s happening, I scream a little bit but the guy filming was like what’s wrong? Cause I screamed and I was like something just really hurt and the guy was like oh I just slip on some lu6e and I was like omg and I didn’t even wanna look down there but I knew that something was wrong because I just kept on going and it hurt more than anything I’ve ever felt in my life so I clean up and go home.”
3:02

Kimmy Kimm narrates how her entire a6ult indu$try career started after a performer randomly reached out to her on TikTok saying She drove to Miami same day and the VERY next day, She got into her very first scene which was a thr66søme that all6g6dly left her with a Cut down there. 👀🔥 “They put us in a stack, Basically just two girls laying on top of each other and the guy going back and forth between each girl and so he’s doing that and then I feel like a sharp pain and I’m like what’s happening, I scream a little bit but the guy filming was like what’s wrong? Cause I screamed and I was like something just really hurt and the guy was like oh I just slip on some lu6e and I was like omg and I didn’t even wanna look down there but I knew that something was wrong because I just kept on going and it hurt more than anything I’ve ever felt in my life so I clean up and go home.”

GEO ✪

25,353 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🆘🚨LESS THAN 48 HOURS! JESSY #A2245240DIES ON WEDNESDAY 4/15 🚨🚨 Her story is tragic. What was meant to be a happily ever after quickly ended up leading to a possibly expedited death. 💔 Jessy first arrived at the shelter with her best bud, Woody after being surrendered together in November. During that time, Jessy was a regular in playgroup with other large pups, described as a helper/ greeter dog. Volunteers adored her for her sweet nature and love of belly rubs. She was bathed by the groomer and didn't have a single bad behavior note from staff her entire stay. She was the BEST girl. 2 weeks ago, Jessy and Woody took their freedom walk TOGETHER. A shepherd rescue pulled the duo and they headed to a foster to start the next chapter of their life! We were thrilled. Sadly, things took a turn for the worse quickly. The rescue claims they advised the fosters on decompression, not taking Jessy and Woody out to public places until they had time to acclimate. The fosters took them to the beach with other off leash dogs within a few days of getting them. 😞 Woody got in a fight with one dog. No one was injured. A few days later, Jessy was being walked around the foster's property and an off leash small dog approached her and she hurt the dog (who ended up passing away at the vet). The fosters said they couldn't keep them. The rescue wiped their hands of them (despite collecting pledges for them 🤯) and surrendered them back to the shelter. People offered to help with training. The rescue refused. Didn't want them anymore. Now Jessy is sentenced to death on WEDNESDAY 4/15 and must be RESCUED by 8AM that day. (Woody was adopted) Please help her. She doesn't deserve this. She's waiting at South LA Shelter. JESSY #A2245240 7 yrs old, 74 Ibs The shelter is open Tuesday-Friday 8am-5pm and Saturday & Sundays 11am-5pm. Mondays for emergencies only. SLA / Chesterfield Square Animal Shelter 1850 W. 60th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90047 1-323-565-2160 or 1.323.565.2161 Rescues please email: catherine.lee@lacity.org jasmine.poblano@lacity.org matthew.spease@lacity.org raneshia.mccruter@lacity.org roman.rincon@lacity.org
1:15

🆘🚨LESS THAN 48 HOURS! JESSY #A2245240DIES ON WEDNESDAY 4/15 🚨🚨 Her story is tragic. What was meant to be a happily ever after quickly ended up leading to a possibly expedited death. 💔 Jessy first arrived at the shelter with her best bud, Woody after being surrendered together in November. During that time, Jessy was a regular in playgroup with other large pups, described as a helper/ greeter dog. Volunteers adored her for her sweet nature and love of belly rubs. She was bathed by the groomer and didn't have a single bad behavior note from staff her entire stay. She was the BEST girl. 2 weeks ago, Jessy and Woody took their freedom walk TOGETHER. A shepherd rescue pulled the duo and they headed to a foster to start the next chapter of their life! We were thrilled. Sadly, things took a turn for the worse quickly. The rescue claims they advised the fosters on decompression, not taking Jessy and Woody out to public places until they had time to acclimate. The fosters took them to the beach with other off leash dogs within a few days of getting them. 😞 Woody got in a fight with one dog. No one was injured. A few days later, Jessy was being walked around the foster's property and an off leash small dog approached her and she hurt the dog (who ended up passing away at the vet). The fosters said they couldn't keep them. The rescue wiped their hands of them (despite collecting pledges for them 🤯) and surrendered them back to the shelter. People offered to help with training. The rescue refused. Didn't want them anymore. Now Jessy is sentenced to death on WEDNESDAY 4/15 and must be RESCUED by 8AM that day. (Woody was adopted) Please help her. She doesn't deserve this. She's waiting at South LA Shelter. JESSY #A2245240 7 yrs old, 74 Ibs The shelter is open Tuesday-Friday 8am-5pm and Saturday & Sundays 11am-5pm. Mondays for emergencies only. SLA / Chesterfield Square Animal Shelter 1850 W. 60th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90047 1-323-565-2160 or 1.323.565.2161 Rescues please email: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

RoCo🇬🇧God Save The King🇬🇧

12,481 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

People Are Learning Red Lobster Didn’t Go Bankrupt Because Of Endless Shrimp, They Were Attacked By Wall Street For Their Land Here’s the full story “The only reason Red Lobster's going into bankruptcy is because a hedge fund wanted them to go into bankruptcy.” “The media will never stop covering for hedge funds while making it seem like every problem is the fault of the American people. Like, I'd be willing to bet you think Red Lobster went into bankruptcy because of endless shrimp. You know, the endless shrimp promotion they had. Because that's what the media's told you. They've been telling you repeatedly that the reason Red Lobster went into bankruptcy was that they had the endless shrimp combo and the greedy American people just took advantage of it. That's not what happened. No, what happened was a hedge fund bought Red Lobster and as a condition of the sale, they made therm split up their land and their restaurants. Because up until that point, Red Lobster actually owned all of the land that their restaurants were located on. And then once they made them split that up, the hedge funds made the leases on that land so expensive that the Red Lobsters couldn't possibly continue to operate. So Red Lobster had to keep trying new and new things to try to make enough money to pay these leases. And it was never enough to be able to afford what the hedge fund wanted to charge them. So now they're going into bankruptcy. But the media is not talking about that and the American people were the problem. That Red Lobster made terrible marketing decisions and the American people took advantage of it. But make no mistake, the only reason Red Lobster's going into bankruptcy is because a hedge fund wanted them to go into bankruptcy. They wanted to put Red Lobster out of business so they could take the land that the Red Lobsters were on. Because Red Lobster has some amazing locations across the United States. And now the hedge fund is going to be able to sell off all the little pieces of Red Lobster, completely shutting them down and just have the land all to themselves. And look, I don't like that hedge funds are allowed to do that. Investors are allowed to f*ck over another company. But what shouldn't be happening is the media being complicit and trying to hide that fact. It's not just the hedge funds, it's not just the government, it's also the media. Absolutely f*cking nobody is on our side. Absolutely nobody is giving us the true facts except for each other.”
2:01

People Are Learning Red Lobster Didn’t Go Bankrupt Because Of Endless Shrimp, They Were Attacked By Wall Street For Their Land Here’s the full story “The only reason Red Lobster's going into bankruptcy is because a hedge fund wanted them to go into bankruptcy.” “The media will never stop covering for hedge funds while making it seem like every problem is the fault of the American people. Like, I'd be willing to bet you think Red Lobster went into bankruptcy because of endless shrimp. You know, the endless shrimp promotion they had. Because that's what the media's told you. They've been telling you repeatedly that the reason Red Lobster went into bankruptcy was that they had the endless shrimp combo and the greedy American people just took advantage of it. That's not what happened. No, what happened was a hedge fund bought Red Lobster and as a condition of the sale, they made therm split up their land and their restaurants. Because up until that point, Red Lobster actually owned all of the land that their restaurants were located on. And then once they made them split that up, the hedge funds made the leases on that land so expensive that the Red Lobsters couldn't possibly continue to operate. So Red Lobster had to keep trying new and new things to try to make enough money to pay these leases. And it was never enough to be able to afford what the hedge fund wanted to charge them. So now they're going into bankruptcy. But the media is not talking about that and the American people were the problem. That Red Lobster made terrible marketing decisions and the American people took advantage of it. But make no mistake, the only reason Red Lobster's going into bankruptcy is because a hedge fund wanted them to go into bankruptcy. They wanted to put Red Lobster out of business so they could take the land that the Red Lobsters were on. Because Red Lobster has some amazing locations across the United States. And now the hedge fund is going to be able to sell off all the little pieces of Red Lobster, completely shutting them down and just have the land all to themselves. And look, I don't like that hedge funds are allowed to do that. Investors are allowed to f*ck over another company. But what shouldn't be happening is the media being complicit and trying to hide that fact. It's not just the hedge funds, it's not just the government, it's also the media. Absolutely f*cking nobody is on our side. Absolutely nobody is giving us the true facts except for each other.”

Wall Street Apes

2,191,009 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Paul Krugman is now calling for a “thorough purging of the United States” of MAGA. He wants "a deMAGAfication...similar to the denazification" of Germany. And somehow, that's "not going over the top." Let’s take him at his word. What did denazification look like? Imagine this: Everyone gets a form in the mail with 131 questions. You're forced to disclose who you voted for, who you gave money to, what groups you belonged to, what religions you held, where you've worked, where you've traveled, and so on. Maybe you voted for Trump because you wanted lower taxes or didn't want a Democrat. It never occurred to you that you would have to ACCOUNT for your Constitutionally protected vote. The government then uses that form to sort you into a category: - Major Offender (straight to prison, possibly the death penalty) - Offender (up to 10 years imprisonment) - Lesser Offender (Placed on probation for 2–3 years with restrictions) - Follower (Fines, surveillance, employment/travel restrictions, and loss of some political rights) - Exonerated (you're free to go; no Trump support here) But that's not even the worst part. You could get a certificate that clears your name. But for that, you would need people to testify for you. That turns every relationship you have into a transaction. People start to sell out others just to keep their name clear. Neighbors who used to borrow each other's ladders are now informing on each other because if they don’t, they’re on the list. All in the name of "justice." That isn't justice, that's a machine that turns citizens into somebody else's judge. It's the very authoritarianism that people like Paul Krugman claim to oppose.
5:44

Paul Krugman is now calling for a “thorough purging of the United States” of MAGA. He wants "a deMAGAfication...similar to the denazification" of Germany. And somehow, that's "not going over the top." Let’s take him at his word. What did denazification look like? Imagine this: Everyone gets a form in the mail with 131 questions. You're forced to disclose who you voted for, who you gave money to, what groups you belonged to, what religions you held, where you've worked, where you've traveled, and so on. Maybe you voted for Trump because you wanted lower taxes or didn't want a Democrat. It never occurred to you that you would have to ACCOUNT for your Constitutionally protected vote. The government then uses that form to sort you into a category: - Major Offender (straight to prison, possibly the death penalty) - Offender (up to 10 years imprisonment) - Lesser Offender (Placed on probation for 2–3 years with restrictions) - Follower (Fines, surveillance, employment/travel restrictions, and loss of some political rights) - Exonerated (you're free to go; no Trump support here) But that's not even the worst part. You could get a certificate that clears your name. But for that, you would need people to testify for you. That turns every relationship you have into a transaction. People start to sell out others just to keep their name clear. Neighbors who used to borrow each other's ladders are now informing on each other because if they don’t, they’re on the list. All in the name of "justice." That isn't justice, that's a machine that turns citizens into somebody else's judge. It's the very authoritarianism that people like Paul Krugman claim to oppose.

Glenn Beck

51,988 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

At my aunts old Chinese buffet that was located inside of a Howard Johnson, we had an issue with theft. People would come in and enjoy the buffet but we noticed the ones with backpacks and big purses would have ziploc bags and Tupperware in their backpacks and purses. My aunt and uncle are very reasonable people, the price they charge for the buffet is the price customers pay to enjoy it while they are there. No carry out boxes are permitted to take anything home. The restaurant even has a sign that prohibits these items and the sign says to leave them in your hotel room or in your car. When my aunt and uncle left for vacation they had me fill in to run the restaurant for them. I had a group of 6 teenagers come into the restaurant from the hotel. I chit chatted with them being friendly and they said they were in town for a softball tournament. I didn’t seat them, one of the waiters did so I didn’t notice anything strange. But when they all got up to get food they always got huge heaping plates of food, they repeatedly went to get more food. On one occasion I noticed a black backpack tucked into the booth between the seat and the wall. I checked the cameras and yes, they took turns eating and when they thought nobody was looking they would dump the food into a bag in their backpack. I saw a huge plate of crab legs disappear, a plate of crab Rangoon and chicken wings was next. On their way to pay I said something to them. I mentioned I saw what they were doing and to avoid an issues I would be charging them double. I felt that was fair because that was the price of a Togo buffet. They were embarrassed, I was expecting an argument but they said they wanted extra food for when they got hungry at night after their game. I wanted to be lenient and just give it to them but if I did that for one person I would have to do it for all and it would costs the restaurant too much for food costs. But they did end up paying the double price and to be fair to them I did give them each a Togo container since I charged them for it. I told them to dump their food into it and if they had extra room in the Togo box they can grab more food. I managed to diffuse the situation and turned it into something positive, I feel that was more than fair.
3:26

At my aunts old Chinese buffet that was located inside of a Howard Johnson, we had an issue with theft. People would come in and enjoy the buffet but we noticed the ones with backpacks and big purses would have ziploc bags and Tupperware in their backpacks and purses. My aunt and uncle are very reasonable people, the price they charge for the buffet is the price customers pay to enjoy it while they are there. No carry out boxes are permitted to take anything home. The restaurant even has a sign that prohibits these items and the sign says to leave them in your hotel room or in your car. When my aunt and uncle left for vacation they had me fill in to run the restaurant for them. I had a group of 6 teenagers come into the restaurant from the hotel. I chit chatted with them being friendly and they said they were in town for a softball tournament. I didn’t seat them, one of the waiters did so I didn’t notice anything strange. But when they all got up to get food they always got huge heaping plates of food, they repeatedly went to get more food. On one occasion I noticed a black backpack tucked into the booth between the seat and the wall. I checked the cameras and yes, they took turns eating and when they thought nobody was looking they would dump the food into a bag in their backpack. I saw a huge plate of crab legs disappear, a plate of crab Rangoon and chicken wings was next. On their way to pay I said something to them. I mentioned I saw what they were doing and to avoid an issues I would be charging them double. I felt that was fair because that was the price of a Togo buffet. They were embarrassed, I was expecting an argument but they said they wanted extra food for when they got hungry at night after their game. I wanted to be lenient and just give it to them but if I did that for one person I would have to do it for all and it would costs the restaurant too much for food costs. But they did end up paying the double price and to be fair to them I did give them each a Togo container since I charged them for it. I told them to dump their food into it and if they had extra room in the Togo box they can grab more food. I managed to diffuse the situation and turned it into something positive, I feel that was more than fair.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

326,344 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

I don't need to see the trailer, I'll be there. So I'll take this opportunity to tell you about the combat scene between the Atreides, Harkonnen and Sardaukkar and how it's a great example of characterisation through action, authentic melee combat and attention to detail. Here's my full breakdown: The Atreides scream their family's name as a war cry, which implies the house has reinforced a sense of pride or belonging in their men. This does wonders wonders for morale and loyalty, hence why despite the odds these soldiers stand to fight. The Harkonnen come in chanting to pump themselves up or/andestablish the march's rythm but no battle cry to invoke the Harkonnen family. This could be seen as a sign of discipline (historically, being silent within formation was a sign of that) but given what we see immediately after and what we know about how the Harkonnen treat their men we can infer that it comes from a place of fear, not professionalism. The Atreides form up in 2 lines, and whilst this is simply all the men they have, they perfectly block the entrance and I have reason to believe this is how they would normally deploy. One rank wields a knife/short sword and one wields a spear and they show off their coordination with a dance/stance swtich at the beggning. Both pressumably support each other by working at different ranges. The Harkonnen form in deep squadrons all wielding the same long top heavy sword, and simply run into the fight. They rely on numbers and brute strenght, they're clearly nowhere as effective but their officers can afford the casualties. The Atreides march down the stairs (note that they keep cohesion). People have criticised that this loses them the high ground, but the goal is to either secure the door and close it and/or to prevent the harkonnen from pushing them into the open where they can be encircled. Attacking is also much better for your morale (and worse for your enemies') than waiting. If they managed to break the first Harkonnen squadron they'd rout into their comrades, and this could help them distort the general advance. Attacking helps build that momentum, as it prevents the enemy soldiers from backing off at will. Either way they're gaining time for the family to escape, this is a smart way to actively defend a position. At this point the Sardaukkar drop in complete silence. No chant, war cry or formation. They individually walk into the fight and slaughter the Atreides who's formation is now disorganised. They relied on timing and individual skill. All of this in less than 50 seconds.
0:48

I don't need to see the trailer, I'll be there. So I'll take this opportunity to tell you about the combat scene between the Atreides, Harkonnen and Sardaukkar and how it's a great example of characterisation through action, authentic melee combat and attention to detail. Here's my full breakdown: The Atreides scream their family's name as a war cry, which implies the house has reinforced a sense of pride or belonging in their men. This does wonders wonders for morale and loyalty, hence why despite the odds these soldiers stand to fight. The Harkonnen come in chanting to pump themselves up or/andestablish the march's rythm but no battle cry to invoke the Harkonnen family. This could be seen as a sign of discipline (historically, being silent within formation was a sign of that) but given what we see immediately after and what we know about how the Harkonnen treat their men we can infer that it comes from a place of fear, not professionalism. The Atreides form up in 2 lines, and whilst this is simply all the men they have, they perfectly block the entrance and I have reason to believe this is how they would normally deploy. One rank wields a knife/short sword and one wields a spear and they show off their coordination with a dance/stance swtich at the beggning. Both pressumably support each other by working at different ranges. The Harkonnen form in deep squadrons all wielding the same long top heavy sword, and simply run into the fight. They rely on numbers and brute strenght, they're clearly nowhere as effective but their officers can afford the casualties. The Atreides march down the stairs (note that they keep cohesion). People have criticised that this loses them the high ground, but the goal is to either secure the door and close it and/or to prevent the harkonnen from pushing them into the open where they can be encircled. Attacking is also much better for your morale (and worse for your enemies') than waiting. If they managed to break the first Harkonnen squadron they'd rout into their comrades, and this could help them distort the general advance. Attacking helps build that momentum, as it prevents the enemy soldiers from backing off at will. Either way they're gaining time for the family to escape, this is a smart way to actively defend a position. At this point the Sardaukkar drop in complete silence. No chant, war cry or formation. They individually walk into the fight and slaughter the Atreides who's formation is now disorganised. They relied on timing and individual skill. All of this in less than 50 seconds.

The Late Knight Show

63,124 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

💥A Stunning Admission. Somewhere, Harry Reid is Smiling💥 "Nobody knows what they are, we have to find out. We do not believe they are U.S. military drones or the military would have told us that." ~Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer ~ Chuck Schumer: "We're here today because...it's not a bird, it's not a plane, it's a drone." (Superman joke falls flat and he's telling everybody he knows these are drones.) Schumer: "And when it comes to drones, people in the New York area and all across the country have more questions than answers. We've seen lots of recent sightings in New York, New Jersey, Long Island, Staten Island, so, it's remarkable, with all these sightings over the last while, why do we have more questions than answers?" (Drones, drones, drones. It's clear he knows these are drones, right? That is, until the questions start coming from the media.) Schumer: "Well, we're here today for three reasons: First, to push a new but unclassified tech into wide use, the so-called Robin. [Second,] to get answers on these drones, and also to announce that I am going to help pass, and I'm gonna co-sponsor legislation that will combat these drones in a better way by allowing local police departments and state police departments to help the Feds in sighting these drones, which so many have requested. "If the technology exists for a drone to make it up into the sky, there certainly is the technology that can track the craft with precision and determine what the heck is going on! And that's what the Robin does. Today we're asking the DHS, the Department of Homeland Security, to deploy special detection systems like the Robin, which use, not a linear line of sight, but 360-degree technology that has a much better chance of detecting these drones. And we're asking DHS to bring them to the New York New Jersey area." (CBS News dot com has more on the Robin. Here's how Robin Radar Systems works Siete Hamminga, the CEO and founder of Robin Radar Systems, explained how his devices operate. "Our capability is really providing situational awareness," Hamminga said. Hamminga says with the help of AI, Robin uses unique radar technology from the ground to track drones within a five-kilometer -- or just over three-mile -- radius. "If you have a 360-degree view, a 3D picture of where the drone is flying, you could also see the flight path and you may find out where the drone came from or where it lands, and that is usually the place where your operators stand," Hamminga said. "I'm a firm believer that the systems [that] do track and detect drones will become the safety standard in all the prisons, airports, harbors, nuclear power plants and border security, critical infrastructures in general, so I think we 'ain't seen nothing yet,' as you say in the United States," Hamminga said. (It's safe to assume that the U.S. Navy has some pretty advanced tech and they still couldn't determine where the "drones" came from, where they landed and who was operating them in the 2019 West Coast incidents. So, I'm skeptical that the Robin will be successful here. Read more about the 2019 West Coast incidents: ) ~~~End CBS News Excerpt~~~ Schumer: "Our local people who have questions about these drones should not have to shake an eight ball to get an answer. They want real answers, and the Robin can supply those answers, and that's why we want them here." (Joke number two, about the Magic 8 Ball, also fell flat. He needs a new speech writer.) Reporter: "Sir, as the author of The UAP amendment in the 2024 National Defense Authorization Act... " Schumer: "Yes!" Reporter: "...you among anybody should be calling these what they are. We don't know they're drones, correct? They are UAPs. Why aren't they being called UAPs?" (Yes! Really want to find out who this guy is so we can thank him!) Schumer: "Be[cause] we don't know if there are UAPs, we don't know what they are. That's what we're trying to find out." (Pretty sure he meant to say, "We don't know if they are UAPs. Lester Nare said that, "we’re witnessing a masterclass in how not to handle public messaging." This is a prime example of that. Schumer calls them drones throughout the presser, but the first time he's challenged on that he admits they don't know what they are. Then why did he (or his speechwriter) not just add the word, "apparent" every time he said drones? "These, apparent, drones are making people uneasy." Probably because he didn't expect to be asked about UAP. Nice job, unnamed reporter!) Reporter: "They're unidentified, of course." Schumer: "Nobody knows what they are, we have to find out. We don't believe they're...no, we do not believe they are U.S. military drones, or the military would have told us that." (Nobody knows. This is a stunning admission from the Senate Majority Leader. Somewhere, Harry Reid is smiling. If you're somebody not into UAP, you might be saying to yourself, "Wait, obviously these are drones. Why is Schumer saying nobody knows what they are?" And I would say. "Read John Keel and look up the supposed ability of UAP to take any form it chooses and to mimic our tech. Dr. Eric Davis has written about the idea (Cash/Landrum) and Dr. Colm Kelleher has spoken about it in various interviews.") Reporter: "Have you spoken with top government leaders about the possibilities involved with non-human intelligence?" Schumer: "Look, we have spoken with top government leaders about finding the answers to what these are. We don't know what they are." (Schumer didn't laugh or make a face when asked about non-human intelligence and that's an example of the amazing progress we've made in the last seven years. Also, when it comes to mentioning NHI, the reporter using the word, "possibilities" was important as it didn't force Schumer into a corner.) Reporter: (Indecipherable) Schumer: "No more, sir, let other people, okay?" Reporter: "Okay." (People are going to say Schumer cut off the NHI guy but that's just standard press conference etiquette. You don't get to keep asking as many questions as you want. Let's see what Robin can do. And if there are still no answers, the next press conference from Schumer is going to be very interesting.)
2:51

💥A Stunning Admission. Somewhere, Harry Reid is Smiling💥 "Nobody knows what they are, we have to find out. We do not believe they are U.S. military drones or the military would have told us that." ~Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer ~ Chuck Schumer: "We're here today because...it's not a bird, it's not a plane, it's a drone." (Superman joke falls flat and he's telling everybody he knows these are drones.) Schumer: "And when it comes to drones, people in the New York area and all across the country have more questions than answers. We've seen lots of recent sightings in New York, New Jersey, Long Island, Staten Island, so, it's remarkable, with all these sightings over the last while, why do we have more questions than answers?" (Drones, drones, drones. It's clear he knows these are drones, right? That is, until the questions start coming from the media.) Schumer: "Well, we're here today for three reasons: First, to push a new but unclassified tech into wide use, the so-called Robin. [Second,] to get answers on these drones, and also to announce that I am going to help pass, and I'm gonna co-sponsor legislation that will combat these drones in a better way by allowing local police departments and state police departments to help the Feds in sighting these drones, which so many have requested. "If the technology exists for a drone to make it up into the sky, there certainly is the technology that can track the craft with precision and determine what the heck is going on! And that's what the Robin does. Today we're asking the DHS, the Department of Homeland Security, to deploy special detection systems like the Robin, which use, not a linear line of sight, but 360-degree technology that has a much better chance of detecting these drones. And we're asking DHS to bring them to the New York New Jersey area." (CBS News dot com has more on the Robin. Here's how Robin Radar Systems works Siete Hamminga, the CEO and founder of Robin Radar Systems, explained how his devices operate. "Our capability is really providing situational awareness," Hamminga said. Hamminga says with the help of AI, Robin uses unique radar technology from the ground to track drones within a five-kilometer -- or just over three-mile -- radius. "If you have a 360-degree view, a 3D picture of where the drone is flying, you could also see the flight path and you may find out where the drone came from or where it lands, and that is usually the place where your operators stand," Hamminga said. "I'm a firm believer that the systems [that] do track and detect drones will become the safety standard in all the prisons, airports, harbors, nuclear power plants and border security, critical infrastructures in general, so I think we 'ain't seen nothing yet,' as you say in the United States," Hamminga said. (It's safe to assume that the U.S. Navy has some pretty advanced tech and they still couldn't determine where the "drones" came from, where they landed and who was operating them in the 2019 West Coast incidents. So, I'm skeptical that the Robin will be successful here. Read more about the 2019 West Coast incidents: ) ~~~End CBS News Excerpt~~~ Schumer: "Our local people who have questions about these drones should not have to shake an eight ball to get an answer. They want real answers, and the Robin can supply those answers, and that's why we want them here." (Joke number two, about the Magic 8 Ball, also fell flat. He needs a new speech writer.) Reporter: "Sir, as the author of The UAP amendment in the 2024 National Defense Authorization Act... " Schumer: "Yes!" Reporter: "...you among anybody should be calling these what they are. We don't know they're drones, correct? They are UAPs. Why aren't they being called UAPs?" (Yes! Really want to find out who this guy is so we can thank him!) Schumer: "Be[cause] we don't know if there are UAPs, we don't know what they are. That's what we're trying to find out." (Pretty sure he meant to say, "We don't know if they are UAPs. Lester Nare said that, "we’re witnessing a masterclass in how not to handle public messaging." This is a prime example of that. Schumer calls them drones throughout the presser, but the first time he's challenged on that he admits they don't know what they are. Then why did he (or his speechwriter) not just add the word, "apparent" every time he said drones? "These, apparent, drones are making people uneasy." Probably because he didn't expect to be asked about UAP. Nice job, unnamed reporter!) Reporter: "They're unidentified, of course." Schumer: "Nobody knows what they are, we have to find out. We don't believe they're...no, we do not believe they are U.S. military drones, or the military would have told us that." (Nobody knows. This is a stunning admission from the Senate Majority Leader. Somewhere, Harry Reid is smiling. If you're somebody not into UAP, you might be saying to yourself, "Wait, obviously these are drones. Why is Schumer saying nobody knows what they are?" And I would say. "Read John Keel and look up the supposed ability of UAP to take any form it chooses and to mimic our tech. Dr. Eric Davis has written about the idea (Cash/Landrum) and Dr. Colm Kelleher has spoken about it in various interviews.") Reporter: "Have you spoken with top government leaders about the possibilities involved with non-human intelligence?" Schumer: "Look, we have spoken with top government leaders about finding the answers to what these are. We don't know what they are." (Schumer didn't laugh or make a face when asked about non-human intelligence and that's an example of the amazing progress we've made in the last seven years. Also, when it comes to mentioning NHI, the reporter using the word, "possibilities" was important as it didn't force Schumer into a corner.) Reporter: (Indecipherable) Schumer: "No more, sir, let other people, okay?" Reporter: "Okay." (People are going to say Schumer cut off the NHI guy but that's just standard press conference etiquette. You don't get to keep asking as many questions as you want. Let's see what Robin can do. And if there are still no answers, the next press conference from Schumer is going to be very interesting.)

Joe Murgia

85,009 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr