正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Robinhood CEO: “Tokenization is like a freight train. It can’t be stopped and will eventually eat the entire financial system” Vlad Tenev finds stablecoins to be a useful analogy to explain the benefits of tokenizing real world assets like equities and real estate: “For stablecoins in the US, we...

Etherealize_io's profile picture

Etherealize

33,546 subscribers

52,608 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术财经
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Tokenized stocks are a win for everyone. For people that already hold stocks, it makes them more useful - much faster to send, trade 24/7, etc. But there are also lots of people in the world that don’t have easy access to US stocks. In a lot of countries, wealthy people may be able to get a brokerage, but ~4B people in the world don’t have ways to access US investments, so they’re stuck holding cash and low quality investments. Tokenized stocks will change this by opening up the best markets to the world.
0:54

Tokenized stocks are a win for everyone. For people that already hold stocks, it makes them more useful - much faster to send, trade 24/7, etc. But there are also lots of people in the world that don’t have easy access to US stocks. In a lot of countries, wealthy people may be able to get a brokerage, but ~4B people in the world don’t have ways to access US investments, so they’re stuck holding cash and low quality investments. Tokenized stocks will change this by opening up the best markets to the world.

Brian Armstrong

308,565 次观看 • 14 天前

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev says tokenization of real world assets is an unstoppable “freight train” coming to major markets. “It can't be stopped and I think eventually it'll eat the whole global financial system.” “It's going to be a big market and I think we'll be at the frontier.” Source: Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev on CNBC International
1:51

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev says tokenization of real world assets is an unstoppable “freight train” coming to major markets. “It can't be stopped and I think eventually it'll eat the whole global financial system.” “It's going to be a big market and I think we'll be at the frontier.” Source: Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev on CNBC International

a16z

92,023 次观看 • 7 个月前

Adam Curry nicely breaks down how Stablecoins work, Tether, and the likely future of the US Digital Dollar system. (Worth a watch if you don't know about this subject) "A stablecoin is a digital dollar thats pegged to the dollar so it's always a dollar. It's already being used all over the internet and the world. The only reason it's worth a dollar is because the stablecoin company that creates it has debt and paper to back it up. They buy America's debt, they buy treasury bonds or T-bills that pay a dividend that gives interest, and for each dollar they've bought in treasury they can create stablecoins. If you look at the company Tether they've bought more of the US debt than most countries. They have $160B worth of US debt. For each of those dollars they have a stablecoin. There's like 50 people in the company. They have $160B at 4% interest annually, they're making BANK just for holding this debt. I think that President Trump is very smart in seeing that we can flood the world with our stablecoin and we get a 2-for-1. We create a dollar of debt and we create another dollar that can be used all over the world as a reserve currency and that should result in some new monetary system that we need to come up with to have our dollar valued properly but also still remain the reserve currency and remain a strong export country. We don't make anything that we sell abroad, we can't all serve each other burgers and fries -- we have to build something. All of that went overseas. There's something big coming, and it has to happen. Trump is a meta guy. He's going to re-finance the country. It'll be digital and he Bitcoiners don't like this because they want Bitcoin to be the one currency that everyone uses but its now more like a digital gold that's much easier to move around. It's useful but it isn't money or currency the way it was originally intended -- but it is still very important and will be part of the US' strategic reserve. It looks to me like Stablecoins and Tether in particular will be the future of the US dollar payments. A lot of people on the right are afraid of being controlled on a grid because you can stop stablecoins -- but it seems there's no way of getting around some form of a digital dollar. I still like Bitcoin as a backup to protect from that control."
4:51

Adam Curry nicely breaks down how Stablecoins work, Tether, and the likely future of the US Digital Dollar system. (Worth a watch if you don't know about this subject) "A stablecoin is a digital dollar thats pegged to the dollar so it's always a dollar. It's already being used all over the internet and the world. The only reason it's worth a dollar is because the stablecoin company that creates it has debt and paper to back it up. They buy America's debt, they buy treasury bonds or T-bills that pay a dividend that gives interest, and for each dollar they've bought in treasury they can create stablecoins. If you look at the company Tether they've bought more of the US debt than most countries. They have $160B worth of US debt. For each of those dollars they have a stablecoin. There's like 50 people in the company. They have $160B at 4% interest annually, they're making BANK just for holding this debt. I think that President Trump is very smart in seeing that we can flood the world with our stablecoin and we get a 2-for-1. We create a dollar of debt and we create another dollar that can be used all over the world as a reserve currency and that should result in some new monetary system that we need to come up with to have our dollar valued properly but also still remain the reserve currency and remain a strong export country. We don't make anything that we sell abroad, we can't all serve each other burgers and fries -- we have to build something. All of that went overseas. There's something big coming, and it has to happen. Trump is a meta guy. He's going to re-finance the country. It'll be digital and he Bitcoiners don't like this because they want Bitcoin to be the one currency that everyone uses but its now more like a digital gold that's much easier to move around. It's useful but it isn't money or currency the way it was originally intended -- but it is still very important and will be part of the US' strategic reserve. It looks to me like Stablecoins and Tether in particular will be the future of the US dollar payments. A lot of people on the right are afraid of being controlled on a grid because you can stop stablecoins -- but it seems there's no way of getting around some form of a digital dollar. I still like Bitcoin as a backup to protect from that control."

BitcoinSapiens ⚡️

18,451 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨NEW: Adam Curry nicely breaks down how Stablecoins work, Tether, and the likely future of the US Digital Dollar system. (Worth a watch if you don't know about this subject) "A stablecoin is a digital dollar thats pegged to the dollar so it's always a dollar. It's already being used all over the internet and the world. The only reason it's worth a dollar is because the stablecoin company that creates it has debt and paper to back it up. They buy America's debt, they buy treasury bonds or T-bills that pay a dividend that gives interest, and for each dollar they've bought in treasury they can create stablecoins. If you look at the company Tether they've bought more of the US debt than most countries. They have $160B worth of US debt. For each of those dollars they have a stablecoin. There's like 50 people in the company. They have $160B at 4% interest annually, they're making BANK just for holding this debt. I think that President Trump is very smart in seeing that we can flood the world with our stablecoin and we get a 2-for-1. We create a dollar of debt and we create another dollar that can be used all over the world as a reserve currency and that should result in some new monetary system that we need to come up with to have our dollar valued properly but also still remain the reserve currency and remain a strong export country. We don't make anything that we sell abroad, we can't all serve each other burgers and fries -- we have to build something. All of that went overseas. There's something big coming, and it has to happen. Trump is a meta guy. He's going to re-finance the country. It'll be digital and he Bitcoiners don't like this because they want Bitcoin to be the one currency that everyone uses but its now more like a digital gold that's much easier to move around. It's useful but it isn't money or currency the way it was originally intended -- but it is still very important and will be part of the US' strategic reserve. It looks to me like Stablecoins and Tether in particular will be the future of the US dollar payments. A lot of people on the right are afraid of being controlled on a grid because you can stop stablecoins -- but it seems there's no way of getting around some form of a digital dollar. I still like Bitcoin as a backup to protect from that control." Great breakdown Adam Curry - curryirc.com
4:51

🚨NEW: Adam Curry nicely breaks down how Stablecoins work, Tether, and the likely future of the US Digital Dollar system. (Worth a watch if you don't know about this subject) "A stablecoin is a digital dollar thats pegged to the dollar so it's always a dollar. It's already being used all over the internet and the world. The only reason it's worth a dollar is because the stablecoin company that creates it has debt and paper to back it up. They buy America's debt, they buy treasury bonds or T-bills that pay a dividend that gives interest, and for each dollar they've bought in treasury they can create stablecoins. If you look at the company Tether they've bought more of the US debt than most countries. They have $160B worth of US debt. For each of those dollars they have a stablecoin. There's like 50 people in the company. They have $160B at 4% interest annually, they're making BANK just for holding this debt. I think that President Trump is very smart in seeing that we can flood the world with our stablecoin and we get a 2-for-1. We create a dollar of debt and we create another dollar that can be used all over the world as a reserve currency and that should result in some new monetary system that we need to come up with to have our dollar valued properly but also still remain the reserve currency and remain a strong export country. We don't make anything that we sell abroad, we can't all serve each other burgers and fries -- we have to build something. All of that went overseas. There's something big coming, and it has to happen. Trump is a meta guy. He's going to re-finance the country. It'll be digital and he Bitcoiners don't like this because they want Bitcoin to be the one currency that everyone uses but its now more like a digital gold that's much easier to move around. It's useful but it isn't money or currency the way it was originally intended -- but it is still very important and will be part of the US' strategic reserve. It looks to me like Stablecoins and Tether in particular will be the future of the US dollar payments. A lot of people on the right are afraid of being controlled on a grid because you can stop stablecoins -- but it seems there's no way of getting around some form of a digital dollar. I still like Bitcoin as a backup to protect from that control." Great breakdown Adam Curry - curryirc.com

Autism Capital 🧩

364,914 次观看 • 1 年前

The Trump admin is GASLIGHTING us re: no CBDCs They know they can't do CBDCs because of the Constitution, so they're backdooring them with stablecoins Iain Davis explains— "the idea of a [CBDC] is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system" "CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it" "That's not going to work in the US because... it's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote... to coin money" "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work-round" "So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank" "stablecoins... slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency" "Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose, as central bank digital currency" This clip of Iain Davis (InThisTogether), author of The Technocratic Dark State, is taken from a Flashlights podcast (Flashlights Podcast) episode posted to Rumble on May 17, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "It's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote, it says this in the Constitution, to coin money. So the power to coin money is overseen by the people. "Now the idea of a central bank digital currency is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system. That's CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it. "That's not going to work in the US because even though Congress, you know, Congress is the, is the dog which is wagged by the tail in this of the Fed, the Fed, you know, the Fed tells Congress what to do, not the other way round. But theoretically it could be the other way round. And theoretically the people could assert their control over the Fed if they only knew about it, which, not many people do, but they could do it, right? It's in the US Constitution. "Now that's a problem if you're going to embark on a global transformation of the entire international monetary and financial system when your leading reserve currency is the US dollar. So that's, you know, that could all go wrong very badly. "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work round. How are you, how are you going to do which for the, you know, I, for many years, well, since central bank digital currency has been something that I've been looking at, I couldn't figure out why the US wasn't more enthusiastic about central bank digital currency. "Because it's the type of thing that the US administrations are usually right up— You know, they're really gung ho about that kind of centralized control of everything. That's right up their alley. So why, why don't they like it? And then it was the work of John Titus who pointed out this problem that they've got in the US with the Constitution that made me look at that and think, right. And then I started investigating that further. And he's right about that. That is a problem. "But then they obviously need some sort of workaround. How are they going to have. Because the main point of central bank digital currency from the surveillance and control aspect is that we will all need digital identity in order to access our digital wallets, which will contain the currency and the currency and the wallets and our, digital identities will all be programmable so conditions can be set on everything that we do. "Every transaction we make will be subject to condition through some sort of smart contract probably, which will control it. Right. So you know, if you say the wrong thing or you know, you, you just write the wrong thing online, you could be punished by algorithm by controlling your access to money... "And so the key to that is central bank— the programmability of central bank digital currency. But obviously that's not going to, may not work. There's a good chance that won't work in the United States which has got the US dollar reserve is an important currency. "So what are you going to do? So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank. So or in the case of stablecoins, a non-bank, a non-bank institution like Tether. So it's not a bank. "But you can use stablecoins for exactly the same. They slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency. Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose as central bank digital currency or the other version, the commercial bank version is deposit tokens. Any of those will do. "Now in the US they've gone down the stablecoin route so they can issue the stablecoins which will be backed by US Treasuries, just like the dollar or just like any kind of dollar instrument will be one to one convertible for the US dollar. So the stablecoins are effectively the US dollar in, in digital form. "But instead of calling it a central bank digital currency, they call it issued by, it wouldn't have to be issued by the Fed. They call it a stablecoin, which is issued by a company like Tether or you know, someone like that. So it's the same system but using a workaround. And that workaround came with the Genius Act which, which came from an executive order that Trump made when he first came to office. "Because the Americans, quite rightly when they were electing their president, were concerned about central bank digital currency. I mean anyone that understands what it is should be terrified of it. So they didn't want it, and Trump promised that they wouldn't have it. Probably. I don't know whether he knew, but certainly the gaggle of technocrats that were around him knew that they weren't going down that path. Anyway, no chance of the US introducing it because of these problems we've just outlined."
6:11

The Trump admin is GASLIGHTING us re: no CBDCs They know they can't do CBDCs because of the Constitution, so they're backdooring them with stablecoins Iain Davis explains— "the idea of a [CBDC] is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system" "CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it" "That's not going to work in the US because... it's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote... to coin money" "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work-round" "So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank" "stablecoins... slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency" "Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose, as central bank digital currency" This clip of Iain Davis (InThisTogether), author of The Technocratic Dark State, is taken from a Flashlights podcast (Flashlights Podcast) episode posted to Rumble on May 17, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "It's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote, it says this in the Constitution, to coin money. So the power to coin money is overseen by the people. "Now the idea of a central bank digital currency is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system. That's CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it. "That's not going to work in the US because even though Congress, you know, Congress is the, is the dog which is wagged by the tail in this of the Fed, the Fed, you know, the Fed tells Congress what to do, not the other way round. But theoretically it could be the other way round. And theoretically the people could assert their control over the Fed if they only knew about it, which, not many people do, but they could do it, right? It's in the US Constitution. "Now that's a problem if you're going to embark on a global transformation of the entire international monetary and financial system when your leading reserve currency is the US dollar. So that's, you know, that could all go wrong very badly. "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work round. How are you, how are you going to do which for the, you know, I, for many years, well, since central bank digital currency has been something that I've been looking at, I couldn't figure out why the US wasn't more enthusiastic about central bank digital currency. "Because it's the type of thing that the US administrations are usually right up— You know, they're really gung ho about that kind of centralized control of everything. That's right up their alley. So why, why don't they like it? And then it was the work of John Titus who pointed out this problem that they've got in the US with the Constitution that made me look at that and think, right. And then I started investigating that further. And he's right about that. That is a problem. "But then they obviously need some sort of workaround. How are they going to have. Because the main point of central bank digital currency from the surveillance and control aspect is that we will all need digital identity in order to access our digital wallets, which will contain the currency and the currency and the wallets and our, digital identities will all be programmable so conditions can be set on everything that we do. "Every transaction we make will be subject to condition through some sort of smart contract probably, which will control it. Right. So you know, if you say the wrong thing or you know, you, you just write the wrong thing online, you could be punished by algorithm by controlling your access to money... "And so the key to that is central bank— the programmability of central bank digital currency. But obviously that's not going to, may not work. There's a good chance that won't work in the United States which has got the US dollar reserve is an important currency. "So what are you going to do? So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank. So or in the case of stablecoins, a non-bank, a non-bank institution like Tether. So it's not a bank. "But you can use stablecoins for exactly the same. They slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency. Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose as central bank digital currency or the other version, the commercial bank version is deposit tokens. Any of those will do. "Now in the US they've gone down the stablecoin route so they can issue the stablecoins which will be backed by US Treasuries, just like the dollar or just like any kind of dollar instrument will be one to one convertible for the US dollar. So the stablecoins are effectively the US dollar in, in digital form. "But instead of calling it a central bank digital currency, they call it issued by, it wouldn't have to be issued by the Fed. They call it a stablecoin, which is issued by a company like Tether or you know, someone like that. So it's the same system but using a workaround. And that workaround came with the Genius Act which, which came from an executive order that Trump made when he first came to office. "Because the Americans, quite rightly when they were electing their president, were concerned about central bank digital currency. I mean anyone that understands what it is should be terrified of it. So they didn't want it, and Trump promised that they wouldn't have it. Probably. I don't know whether he knew, but certainly the gaggle of technocrats that were around him knew that they weren't going down that path. Anyway, no chance of the US introducing it because of these problems we've just outlined."

Sense Receptor

13,996 次观看 • 1 个月前

I will continue to participate in the song production a lot. It is my job and my music. I think that if I do it myself and get the results so that you can understand the song, it will be more convincing and you will like it. And if I do that, I think you will be proud of me.
0:35

I will continue to participate in the song production a lot. It is my job and my music. I think that if I do it myself and get the results so that you can understand the song, it will be more convincing and you will like it. And if I do that, I think you will be proud of me.

아란

67,173 次观看 • 11 个月前

Avichal Garg on why he’s bullish ETH “What ETH has that is very difficult to reproduce is credible neutrality. And if you think there’s going to be a global financial system settlement layer, I think that is the critical thing — that trust and neutrality is basically irreproducible… ETH has that.” “For me the turning point for ETH was when the United States decided to seize Russian assets and weaponize the dollar… If you’re Germany, France, India, Turkey, Brazil, or most of the world, you’re looking at the world and saying, I don’t think I want to be allied with the Chinese — India certainly doesn’t — but now I’m worried that if I ally with the US and then they want me to do something and I don’t do it, they’re just going to take all my money? What you want is a US dollar denominated system that the US cannot single-handedly decide to boot you from and where the United States cannot just take all your assets. That’s literally what Ethereum is.” “[Ethereum is] a US dollar denominated system, that nobody in the world controls, that anybody can mutually agree to transact upon, where the United States can’t steal your assets — and there are ways to structure synthetic dollar assets that are not sitting in US banks, just like the Eurodollar system. What is that worth? I think that’s worth a lot of money.” “If you’re any bank, country, or central bank, [Ethereum] is the only place you can do that. Now how does that get valued? Does that mean ETH becomes a store of value as the endogenous backing asset for the thing which can be used as collateral? We tend to think that those things are true, and we’ve written about this.” “You can go talk to anybody on Wall Street. Where are they building? Everybody’s trying to build on ETH. Where’s Coinbase building? Where’s Robinhood building? Where’s SoFi building? Underneath it all, all of the activity for that sort of behavior — geopolitically, central bank level, important behavior — is happening right now in this space [on Ethereum], and I think it will take some time for people to appreciate and underwrite that.” “In 10 years people will look around and be like, ‘Oh wow, that’s really important, and I should own a piece of that.’ I don’t know when it rerates, but I think at some point people will get their heads around that there is something unique to this thing that nobody else will be able to reproduce, and that thing is valuable.” Source: Empire 🟪 (Jun 2026) Read our report "Why Permissionless Infrastructure Wins" below 👇
5:37

Avichal Garg on why he’s bullish ETH “What ETH has that is very difficult to reproduce is credible neutrality. And if you think there’s going to be a global financial system settlement layer, I think that is the critical thing — that trust and neutrality is basically irreproducible… ETH has that.” “For me the turning point for ETH was when the United States decided to seize Russian assets and weaponize the dollar… If you’re Germany, France, India, Turkey, Brazil, or most of the world, you’re looking at the world and saying, I don’t think I want to be allied with the Chinese — India certainly doesn’t — but now I’m worried that if I ally with the US and then they want me to do something and I don’t do it, they’re just going to take all my money? What you want is a US dollar denominated system that the US cannot single-handedly decide to boot you from and where the United States cannot just take all your assets. That’s literally what Ethereum is.” “[Ethereum is] a US dollar denominated system, that nobody in the world controls, that anybody can mutually agree to transact upon, where the United States can’t steal your assets — and there are ways to structure synthetic dollar assets that are not sitting in US banks, just like the Eurodollar system. What is that worth? I think that’s worth a lot of money.” “If you’re any bank, country, or central bank, [Ethereum] is the only place you can do that. Now how does that get valued? Does that mean ETH becomes a store of value as the endogenous backing asset for the thing which can be used as collateral? We tend to think that those things are true, and we’ve written about this.” “You can go talk to anybody on Wall Street. Where are they building? Everybody’s trying to build on ETH. Where’s Coinbase building? Where’s Robinhood building? Where’s SoFi building? Underneath it all, all of the activity for that sort of behavior — geopolitically, central bank level, important behavior — is happening right now in this space [on Ethereum], and I think it will take some time for people to appreciate and underwrite that.” “In 10 years people will look around and be like, ‘Oh wow, that’s really important, and I should own a piece of that.’ I don’t know when it rerates, but I think at some point people will get their heads around that there is something unique to this thing that nobody else will be able to reproduce, and that thing is valuable.” Source: Empire 🟪 (Jun 2026) Read our report "Why Permissionless Infrastructure Wins" below 👇

Etherealize

41,111 次观看 • 20 天前

VASSY: Do you think the threat of the US leaving NATO is real? STUBB: No, because it is in the self-interest of the US to stay in. But I do think there's going to be a shift of burden, 60-40 to 40-60 US–Europe and Canada.
0:39

VASSY: Do you think the threat of the US leaving NATO is real? STUBB: No, because it is in the self-interest of the US to stay in. But I do think there's going to be a shift of burden, 60-40 to 40-60 US–Europe and Canada.

Scott Robertson

26,072 次观看 • 2 个月前

.David Wolpe to Dave Rubin: "The idea of Rosh Hashanah, in part, is renewal. I think it is a deep Jewish belief that the way the world is need not be the way the world will be in a month or a year and that we really do have the potential to change ourselves and by changing ourselves, change the world around us."
0:48

.David Wolpe to Dave Rubin: "The idea of Rosh Hashanah, in part, is renewal. I think it is a deep Jewish belief that the way the world is need not be the way the world will be in a month or a year and that we really do have the potential to change ourselves and by changing ourselves, change the world around us."

The Rubin Report

23,226 次观看 • 9 个月前

Goldman Sachs CEO and former U.S. Treasury Secretary: Stablecoins will be “enormous” “You can use stablecoins to very effectively — particularly in small transactions; big transactions you use FedWire — to go from US dollar stablecoins to euros or yen or other things. I think it is enormous, and I think the stablecoin legislation is a big step in the right direction,” says former U.S. Secretary Treasury Steven Mnuchin. Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon agrees: “Higher speed, less friction.” Both also agree that stablecoins are not a threat to the U.S. dollar, and will in fact strengthen it. Mnuchin explains: “If you have stablecoins that are backed by U.S. Treasuries, I don’t think the U.S. needs to issue its own stablecoin. I think you’re going to see enormous use cases for these.” “And enormous demand for the dollar over time,” Solomon adds. “To me, [stablecoins] strengthen the moat around the dollar and the dollar’s position as the global reserve currency.” Roughly 52% of all stablecoins live on Ethereum (~$163 billion). If you exclude Tron, Ethereum’s stablecoin dominance jumps to 71%. Source: Goldman Sachs (Mar 2026)
1:23

Goldman Sachs CEO and former U.S. Treasury Secretary: Stablecoins will be “enormous” “You can use stablecoins to very effectively — particularly in small transactions; big transactions you use FedWire — to go from US dollar stablecoins to euros or yen or other things. I think it is enormous, and I think the stablecoin legislation is a big step in the right direction,” says former U.S. Secretary Treasury Steven Mnuchin. Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon agrees: “Higher speed, less friction.” Both also agree that stablecoins are not a threat to the U.S. dollar, and will in fact strengthen it. Mnuchin explains: “If you have stablecoins that are backed by U.S. Treasuries, I don’t think the U.S. needs to issue its own stablecoin. I think you’re going to see enormous use cases for these.” “And enormous demand for the dollar over time,” Solomon adds. “To me, [stablecoins] strengthen the moat around the dollar and the dollar’s position as the global reserve currency.” Roughly 52% of all stablecoins live on Ethereum (~$163 billion). If you exclude Tron, Ethereum’s stablecoin dominance jumps to 71%. Source: Goldman Sachs (Mar 2026)

Etherealize

36,404 次观看 • 3 个月前

Tomorrow, we publish a new The Edge Podcast with Robinhood GM of Crypto, Johann Kerbrat. This clip might be the clearest articulation I’ve ever heard on why Ethereum's roadmap is working, and why Robinhood chose to build its own L2 using Arbitrum. + Ethereum offers security, with proven decentralization + New L1s = centralized databases + EVM liquidity is essential for tokenized stocks & RWAs + Arbitrum’s tech stack wins on engineering merit No edits. No spin. Just a major U.S. fintech explaining why they’re building the future of finance on Ethereum. Real validation for those of us who are long term Ethereum/ETH investors. Here is the clip and transcript for Johann answering why Robinhood chose to build its own Ethereum L2: "You see a lot of companies right now building their own L1. And for us, we felt excited about this idea where we can control anything that we want to build and we don't have to deal with any other chain to talk to or anything like that. But at the same time, creating the security of a real proper decentralized chain is extremely difficult, as you know. And we basically get that for free with Ethereum. The network has been going on for a very long time now and the security is stable and it's decentralized. And I think that's really the key two points that we wanted to have. When you look at some of these new L1s that are being created, it's not really decentralized and it's not really secure. So at the end of the day, you're basically having like a... fancy database that is probably a bit slower to use than an actual database. And so we didn't really see the value in that. With Ethereum, we get the security by default. The second thing that we get by having an L2 is that you get all this liquidity that is already part of all the EVM compatible chains. And that was also a very important decision factor for us. If we really want to bring the stock market onto the chain, we need to have this liquidity. It's not going to be possible if it's in a closed loop or in a closed chain that nobody can access and you need to have like 20 different hoops before you can bridge to that chain. So for us, that was kind of the two elements that we really wanted to focus on and that's why we decided on building on Ethereum. And then we decided on Arbitrum mostly because we love the technology. There's a few things that we are excited about. For example, Stylus. It's a way that we can basically use different language into the chain and we can build on top of that. We also like the way that they prioritize transactions that is, we think, a better way than some of the competition. And so basically we'll use the Arbitrum stack and we'll create our own L2, which will make us also compatible with all the Arbitrum chains. And so we think it's kind of the best of all the worlds. But for us, the idea is like we will start with public stock, and then we think that we can tokenize anything really, not just stocks. It can be private stock, it can be art, it can be real estate, whatever you want to think of. And so we really wanted to have a platform that is kind of easy to build on and we can keep adding on it. At the same time, we know that regulation are going to be hard on some of these products, especially when it comes to financial products. You always have different regulators. You have different rules depending on the region. If you're in the EU versus the US versus LATAM. And so we felt like we wanted to have our own layer that we could customize for these needs. And then anyone that is building on the chain will also be able to benefit from what we are building, versus just putting everything in a contract that will be just good for the people that are using the Robinhood contracts. But so at this point, we announced the chain in June. We are in private test right now, and then we'll do more announcements in the future." Subscribe for the full episode tomorrow! ► Newsletter: ► Spotify: ► Apple: ► Youtube: ► Pods:
3:27

Tomorrow, we publish a new The Edge Podcast with Robinhood GM of Crypto, Johann Kerbrat. This clip might be the clearest articulation I’ve ever heard on why Ethereum's roadmap is working, and why Robinhood chose to build its own L2 using Arbitrum. + Ethereum offers security, with proven decentralization + New L1s = centralized databases + EVM liquidity is essential for tokenized stocks & RWAs + Arbitrum’s tech stack wins on engineering merit No edits. No spin. Just a major U.S. fintech explaining why they’re building the future of finance on Ethereum. Real validation for those of us who are long term Ethereum/ETH investors. Here is the clip and transcript for Johann answering why Robinhood chose to build its own Ethereum L2: "You see a lot of companies right now building their own L1. And for us, we felt excited about this idea where we can control anything that we want to build and we don't have to deal with any other chain to talk to or anything like that. But at the same time, creating the security of a real proper decentralized chain is extremely difficult, as you know. And we basically get that for free with Ethereum. The network has been going on for a very long time now and the security is stable and it's decentralized. And I think that's really the key two points that we wanted to have. When you look at some of these new L1s that are being created, it's not really decentralized and it's not really secure. So at the end of the day, you're basically having like a... fancy database that is probably a bit slower to use than an actual database. And so we didn't really see the value in that. With Ethereum, we get the security by default. The second thing that we get by having an L2 is that you get all this liquidity that is already part of all the EVM compatible chains. And that was also a very important decision factor for us. If we really want to bring the stock market onto the chain, we need to have this liquidity. It's not going to be possible if it's in a closed loop or in a closed chain that nobody can access and you need to have like 20 different hoops before you can bridge to that chain. So for us, that was kind of the two elements that we really wanted to focus on and that's why we decided on building on Ethereum. And then we decided on Arbitrum mostly because we love the technology. There's a few things that we are excited about. For example, Stylus. It's a way that we can basically use different language into the chain and we can build on top of that. We also like the way that they prioritize transactions that is, we think, a better way than some of the competition. And so basically we'll use the Arbitrum stack and we'll create our own L2, which will make us also compatible with all the Arbitrum chains. And so we think it's kind of the best of all the worlds. But for us, the idea is like we will start with public stock, and then we think that we can tokenize anything really, not just stocks. It can be private stock, it can be art, it can be real estate, whatever you want to think of. And so we really wanted to have a platform that is kind of easy to build on and we can keep adding on it. At the same time, we know that regulation are going to be hard on some of these products, especially when it comes to financial products. You always have different regulators. You have different rules depending on the region. If you're in the EU versus the US versus LATAM. And so we felt like we wanted to have our own layer that we could customize for these needs. And then anyone that is building on the chain will also be able to benefit from what we are building, versus just putting everything in a contract that will be just good for the people that are using the Robinhood contracts. But so at this point, we announced the chain in June. We are in private test right now, and then we'll do more announcements in the future." Subscribe for the full episode tomorrow! ► Newsletter: ► Spotify: ► Apple: ► Youtube: ► Pods:

DeFi Dad ⟠ defidad.eth

62,600 次观看 • 7 个月前

David Sacks breaks down the true risk of AI David Sacks "It’s not that I think the AI is going to develop a mind of its own. I don’t think the technology is anywhere close to that. But I do think that it could be used by the government in a much more invasive and intrusive way, in the manner that the government was, the Deep State was already trying to get in bed with the social networks. There is a real risk that AI is used by future governments or the Deep State basically to surveil us, to censor us, and even potentially to brainwash us, because it is really good for that."
2:50

David Sacks breaks down the true risk of AI David Sacks "It’s not that I think the AI is going to develop a mind of its own. I don’t think the technology is anywhere close to that. But I do think that it could be used by the government in a much more invasive and intrusive way, in the manner that the government was, the Deep State was already trying to get in bed with the social networks. There is a real risk that AI is used by future governments or the Deep State basically to surveil us, to censor us, and even potentially to brainwash us, because it is really good for that."

jay plemons

102,370 次观看 • 6 个月前

Whitney Webb: "Larry Fink is now running...the World Economic Forum...[and] the tokenization agenda in particular seeks to tokenize...the natural world and transform it into financial assets...[Recall] the phrase that we all heard during the COVID era—'You'll own nothing and be happy'—Well, there's certain people that want to own everything, and that includes things that have never been able to be owned before...like the public commons, like rivers, lakes, the ocean itself, natural forests...These people want to put all of that into the financial system [to] fractionalize it, tokenize it, and sell pieces of it around. You know, use it to speculate on. I mean, it's very bonkers." This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout, is taken from an interview with Glenn Beck (Glenn Beck) posted to YouTube on October 11, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Larry Fink is now running, I believe the World Economic Forum. He's acting chairman. And— in addition to saying that everything will be tokenized, he's said that everything will soon be on the same universal digital ledger or database, and that everything on that database will have a unique identifier number. So for you as an individual, your identifier number, will presumably be your digital ID or directly linked to that, but everything will have a digital ID. "The tokenization agenda in particular seeks to tokenize not just, you know, assets that we traditionally think of, like real estate for example, or, or gold or you know, physical assets as well as digital, assets like Bitcoin. There's a major effort, connected with people like, like Fink and also people like Mark Carney, who's now prime, Minister of Canada, to tokenize, the. The natural world and transform it into financial assets. "And there was an attempt to do this to an extent, under the Biden administration, I believe, through the Department of Interior, with natural asset corporations. But that has not gone away. And there are groups, for example, one of the creators of the ETF, model originally, which BlackRock now now owns, iShares. His name is Peter Knez, I think is how you pronounce it. He's trying to turn the Amazon rainforest, into a digital commodity sort of similar to Bitcoin in terms of like the, the scarcity idea that, you know, each hectare of the Amazon rainforest would represent, you know, a token and then, and then financialize it that way. And then each hectare would then be. Have its unique identifier right on, on the, on the blockchain and, and would be, you know, serviced by surveillance drones and all sorts of stuff. "So even our most like natural. The places we conceptualize is the most natural places on Earth. These people want to come in place surveillance technology and you know, tokenize it and put it on a blockchain and use it to you know, I would argue in the case particularly of natural asset, corporations and the group behind it, the intrinsic exchange group, they just want to open up a huge new asset class. They call it nature's opportunity, so that they can continue engaging in the same type of bad, behavior that for example, bought us, brought us the 2008 financial crisis, by you know quintupling the amount of assets currently in play. "So apply this now to the. The phrase that we all heard during the COVID era. You'll own nothing and be happy. Well, there's certain people that want to own everything, and that includes things that have never been able to be owned before that were considered things like the public commons, like rivers, lakes, the ocean itself, natural forests, all sorts of it. These people want to put all of that, into the financial system, fractionalize it, tokenize it, and sell Sell pieces of it around. You know, use it to speculate on. I mean, it's, it's. It's very bonkers."
4:09

Whitney Webb: "Larry Fink is now running...the World Economic Forum...[and] the tokenization agenda in particular seeks to tokenize...the natural world and transform it into financial assets...[Recall] the phrase that we all heard during the COVID era—'You'll own nothing and be happy'—Well, there's certain people that want to own everything, and that includes things that have never been able to be owned before...like the public commons, like rivers, lakes, the ocean itself, natural forests...These people want to put all of that into the financial system [to] fractionalize it, tokenize it, and sell pieces of it around. You know, use it to speculate on. I mean, it's very bonkers." This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout, is taken from an interview with Glenn Beck (Glenn Beck) posted to YouTube on October 11, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Larry Fink is now running, I believe the World Economic Forum. He's acting chairman. And— in addition to saying that everything will be tokenized, he's said that everything will soon be on the same universal digital ledger or database, and that everything on that database will have a unique identifier number. So for you as an individual, your identifier number, will presumably be your digital ID or directly linked to that, but everything will have a digital ID. "The tokenization agenda in particular seeks to tokenize not just, you know, assets that we traditionally think of, like real estate for example, or, or gold or you know, physical assets as well as digital, assets like Bitcoin. There's a major effort, connected with people like, like Fink and also people like Mark Carney, who's now prime, Minister of Canada, to tokenize, the. The natural world and transform it into financial assets. "And there was an attempt to do this to an extent, under the Biden administration, I believe, through the Department of Interior, with natural asset corporations. But that has not gone away. And there are groups, for example, one of the creators of the ETF, model originally, which BlackRock now now owns, iShares. His name is Peter Knez, I think is how you pronounce it. He's trying to turn the Amazon rainforest, into a digital commodity sort of similar to Bitcoin in terms of like the, the scarcity idea that, you know, each hectare of the Amazon rainforest would represent, you know, a token and then, and then financialize it that way. And then each hectare would then be. Have its unique identifier right on, on the, on the blockchain and, and would be, you know, serviced by surveillance drones and all sorts of stuff. "So even our most like natural. The places we conceptualize is the most natural places on Earth. These people want to come in place surveillance technology and you know, tokenize it and put it on a blockchain and use it to you know, I would argue in the case particularly of natural asset, corporations and the group behind it, the intrinsic exchange group, they just want to open up a huge new asset class. They call it nature's opportunity, so that they can continue engaging in the same type of bad, behavior that for example, bought us, brought us the 2008 financial crisis, by you know quintupling the amount of assets currently in play. "So apply this now to the. The phrase that we all heard during the COVID era. You'll own nothing and be happy. Well, there's certain people that want to own everything, and that includes things that have never been able to be owned before that were considered things like the public commons, like rivers, lakes, the ocean itself, natural forests, all sorts of it. These people want to put all of that, into the financial system, fractionalize it, tokenize it, and sell Sell pieces of it around. You know, use it to speculate on. I mean, it's, it's. It's very bonkers."

Sense Receptor

144,709 次观看 • 8 个月前

David Friedberg Explains the Hidden Collapse Beneath Record Stock Prices 🔥🪙 “Instead of trading it in US dollars, what if you just look at the US stock market, the total value, in ounces of gold?” “The stock market's up in dollar-denominated terms, but if you look at the stock market relative to gold, it's actually down.” “In a democracy, like we have for the past 250 years, without adequate constitutional constraints, it has always been the case that over time government spending goes up.” “And this is because in a democracy, people ask for their government to do more every year, and as they ask for their government to do more every year, the government agents who are elected say, ‘Okay, here you go,’ and they spend more.” “And eventually, when the borrowing capacity gets unlocked, which is what happened in the United States when we went off the gold standard, you borrow like crazy, you print money to fund those borrowing costs, but eventually the bill comes due.” “And in the United States, the bill is coming due.” “But I just want to tie it back to Minnesota, Donald Trump, and socialism.” “I think it's important for us to just highlight that if you own assets like we do, the four of us, we own stocks, we own real estate, we own other assets.” “As the dollar devalues and everything inflates in value, our asset prices go up and we get wealthier, and wealthier, and wealthier.” “The majority of Americans do not own assets. They are net asset negative.” “As a result, they live off of income and they do not benefit from the de-dollarization like asset holders do.” “And I fundamentally believe that much of the civil unrest and ultimately the divide in this country is driven by the fact that de-dollarization, because of excess government spending, ultimately leads a majority of people in this country to feeling oppressed and left behind because they're seeing a few people in the country accelerate their net worth, like all of us here, and there's no way for them to catch up because they don't actually own assets.”
1:46

David Friedberg Explains the Hidden Collapse Beneath Record Stock Prices 🔥🪙 “Instead of trading it in US dollars, what if you just look at the US stock market, the total value, in ounces of gold?” “The stock market's up in dollar-denominated terms, but if you look at the stock market relative to gold, it's actually down.” “In a democracy, like we have for the past 250 years, without adequate constitutional constraints, it has always been the case that over time government spending goes up.” “And this is because in a democracy, people ask for their government to do more every year, and as they ask for their government to do more every year, the government agents who are elected say, ‘Okay, here you go,’ and they spend more.” “And eventually, when the borrowing capacity gets unlocked, which is what happened in the United States when we went off the gold standard, you borrow like crazy, you print money to fund those borrowing costs, but eventually the bill comes due.” “And in the United States, the bill is coming due.” “But I just want to tie it back to Minnesota, Donald Trump, and socialism.” “I think it's important for us to just highlight that if you own assets like we do, the four of us, we own stocks, we own real estate, we own other assets.” “As the dollar devalues and everything inflates in value, our asset prices go up and we get wealthier, and wealthier, and wealthier.” “The majority of Americans do not own assets. They are net asset negative.” “As a result, they live off of income and they do not benefit from the de-dollarization like asset holders do.” “And I fundamentally believe that much of the civil unrest and ultimately the divide in this country is driven by the fact that de-dollarization, because of excess government spending, ultimately leads a majority of people in this country to feeling oppressed and left behind because they're seeing a few people in the country accelerate their net worth, like all of us here, and there's no way for them to catch up because they don't actually own assets.”

The All-In Podcast

189,007 次观看 • 5 个月前

Jake Barber: “where I’m at with it, what I think might be going on taking in everything I’ve learned in the last 6 yrs plus my own personal experiences” .. it’s about controlling the population.. “you don’t need to go through man to get to God, you don’t need to go through the Catholic Church and those appointed in leadership at the time to have a relationship with God. You can have a personal direct line to god.” .. “I think that if humans learn that there is something special about us .. that we aren’t just beasts, we are also something like a god or have a portion of God or a connection to the world around us and other dimensions and to a higher level of consciousness, that it will be harder for governments to control and keep us suppressed.” .. goes onto explain that this understanding and elevation of our species would empower us in a way that would destabilise the current state of economics, politics, boarders, wars .. “all of that goes away”.
2:28

Jake Barber: “where I’m at with it, what I think might be going on taking in everything I’ve learned in the last 6 yrs plus my own personal experiences” .. it’s about controlling the population.. “you don’t need to go through man to get to God, you don’t need to go through the Catholic Church and those appointed in leadership at the time to have a relationship with God. You can have a personal direct line to god.” .. “I think that if humans learn that there is something special about us .. that we aren’t just beasts, we are also something like a god or have a portion of God or a connection to the world around us and other dimensions and to a higher level of consciousness, that it will be harder for governments to control and keep us suppressed.” .. goes onto explain that this understanding and elevation of our species would empower us in a way that would destabilise the current state of economics, politics, boarders, wars .. “all of that goes away”.

👽 (Ruby) 👽

58,917 次观看 • 10 个月前

🚨Peter Schiff: China🇨🇳 is silently dumping the dollar, a US🇺🇸 dollar crisis is coming soon! ‘China is gradually weaning themselves off of the dollar. That’s why, if you look at their holdings of US Treasuries, they’ve actually gone down a bit over the years. If you look at all the new Treasuries we’ve issued over the years, the fact that the Chinese haven’t bought any of them is a big deal because they used to be a main buyer of these assets. Instead of buying more Treasuries, they’ve bought more gold. So if you look at US dollar debt as a percentage of all the reserves the Chinese own, Treasuries are a much smaller percentage of their total reserves than they once were, especially if you consider the appreciation of gold. I would guess the reason they’re not moving more dramatically is because they probably don’t want to cause a crash, the dollar to implode, the Treasury market to implode, because they are trying to sell and want to get a decent price. So I think they’re happy to slowly bleed it off to try to get that good price. They just have to worry about the impact on the dollar, because if they try to dump too many dollars at once, the dollar could go down, and especially if a lot of other countries see that and want to get out. There could be a run on the dollar. If all the holders decide they want to get out, they don’t want to be the last one holding the dollar, and so it becomes a rush, and we could be in a US dollar crisis relatively soon anyway… I think we’re heading for a real crisis in the US, and I think countries that are smart would be trying to get ahead of that by selling whatever they can, as quietly as they can, out of US dollars and any US dollar-denominated debt.’ -Peter Schiff on Going Underground
3:31

🚨Peter Schiff: China🇨🇳 is silently dumping the dollar, a US🇺🇸 dollar crisis is coming soon! ‘China is gradually weaning themselves off of the dollar. That’s why, if you look at their holdings of US Treasuries, they’ve actually gone down a bit over the years. If you look at all the new Treasuries we’ve issued over the years, the fact that the Chinese haven’t bought any of them is a big deal because they used to be a main buyer of these assets. Instead of buying more Treasuries, they’ve bought more gold. So if you look at US dollar debt as a percentage of all the reserves the Chinese own, Treasuries are a much smaller percentage of their total reserves than they once were, especially if you consider the appreciation of gold. I would guess the reason they’re not moving more dramatically is because they probably don’t want to cause a crash, the dollar to implode, the Treasury market to implode, because they are trying to sell and want to get a decent price. So I think they’re happy to slowly bleed it off to try to get that good price. They just have to worry about the impact on the dollar, because if they try to dump too many dollars at once, the dollar could go down, and especially if a lot of other countries see that and want to get out. There could be a run on the dollar. If all the holders decide they want to get out, they don’t want to be the last one holding the dollar, and so it becomes a rush, and we could be in a US dollar crisis relatively soon anyway… I think we’re heading for a real crisis in the US, and I think countries that are smart would be trying to get ahead of that by selling whatever they can, as quietly as they can, out of US dollars and any US dollar-denominated debt.’ -Peter Schiff on Going Underground

Afshin Rattansi

107,846 次观看 • 5 个月前

The US dollar is going to be debased for the rest of our lives. That is great news for assets like stocks, bitcoin, and gold.
1:56

The US dollar is going to be debased for the rest of our lives. That is great news for assets like stocks, bitcoin, and gold.

Anthony Pompliano 🌪

77,310 次观看 • 1 年前

Interview with World Liberty Financial Zach Witkoff CEO Zach Witkoff on Fox Business ☝🏻🦅 The most important points from the interview WLFI 👇🏻 Vision We fully support the president’s agenda to make America the crypto capital of the world Banks vs Crypto If you actually look at deposit flight over the past year you haven’t seen it at all Some of the bigger banks have actually seen deposits come into the bank Stablecoins We’re really just talking about a digital dollar here Stablecoins allow you to earn up to 3% to 3.5% backed by US Treasuries one to one $USD1 Growth We’ve grown to over 4.5 billion in just under a year The business is doing well over 150 million in annualized revenue Future of Payments We believe we’ll live in a world where agents are transacting and paying one another Global Impact This will help ensure that the US dollar will remain the reserve currency Tokenization I do believe that most markets and most assets will be tokenized in the future Watch full interview 👇
8:11

Interview with World Liberty Financial Zach Witkoff CEO Zach Witkoff on Fox Business ☝🏻🦅 The most important points from the interview WLFI 👇🏻 Vision We fully support the president’s agenda to make America the crypto capital of the world Banks vs Crypto If you actually look at deposit flight over the past year you haven’t seen it at all Some of the bigger banks have actually seen deposits come into the bank Stablecoins We’re really just talking about a digital dollar here Stablecoins allow you to earn up to 3% to 3.5% backed by US Treasuries one to one $USD1 Growth We’ve grown to over 4.5 billion in just under a year The business is doing well over 150 million in annualized revenue Future of Payments We believe we’ll live in a world where agents are transacting and paying one another Global Impact This will help ensure that the US dollar will remain the reserve currency Tokenization I do believe that most markets and most assets will be tokenized in the future Watch full interview 👇

AB 🔶

88,520 次观看 • 2 个月前