Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Rockstar Tom DeLonge: "There is time dilation caused by the gravity bubble with UFO's" 👽🛸 On Joe Rogan the Blink 182 frontman described how claimed advanced craft create an artificial gravity bubble that produces a real time difference between the inside of the machine and the outside world. "They... also time travel which is different than what people think in like a movie. When you use the technology you have a time difference between what they are doing inside of an artificially created bubble of gravity of sorts and then what is on the outside." "If you are on the inside of one of those machines everything would be skewed more black and white. There would be like a redshift and everybody would look frozen so you literally could fly around and grab a coke out of someone's hand and put it in someone else's hand." DeLonge said the description came from physicists he consulted, including Dr. Hal Puthoff, a Nobel nominee and expert in plasma physics and exotic advanced propulsion. The account applies known effects such as gravitational time dilation and redshift to the performance of these craft.show more

Interstellar

148,477 subscribers

17,403 views • 6 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Age of Disclosure...🧐🤔🛸🛸🛸🛸🛸🛸🛸 They mentioned a “bubble” that keeps everything “normal” for beings inside the bubble in regards to time and space, but those outside of the bubble see the craft ascend at breakneck speed. One of the witnesses mentioned the “bubble” is why people had issues taking clear pictures of the craft in the past. It’s because we are trying to take pictures of the space and time barrier. With the sensor upgrades, we are able to see more clearly.

Age of Disclosure...🧐🤔🛸🛸🛸🛸🛸🛸🛸 They mentioned a “bubble” that keeps everything “normal” for beings inside the bubble in regards to time and space, but those outside of the bubble see the craft ascend at breakneck speed. One of the witnesses mentioned the “bubble” is why people had issues taking clear pictures of the craft in the past. It’s because we are trying to take pictures of the space and time barrier. With the sensor upgrades, we are able to see more clearly.

UFO mania

91,968 views • 9 months ago

Bob Lazar on Joe Rogan: “The craft came from Zeta Reticuli… but that information may not be true.” 👽 "Maybe The UFO did not come from space, maybe it's different dimensions - Anything is possible" In his return to the JRE, the Area 51 whistleblower questions the old briefing he received and explains these craft don’t “Fly” like we think they create a gravity distortion bubble with no friction, deforming space-time around them. What if it’s disinformation? Are they extraterrestrial, interdimensional, or something else entirely? What do you think is the real origin of these craft? Drop your theory below.

Bob Lazar on Joe Rogan: “The craft came from Zeta Reticuli… but that information may not be true.” 👽 "Maybe The UFO did not come from space, maybe it's different dimensions - Anything is possible" In his return to the JRE, the Area 51 whistleblower questions the old briefing he received and explains these craft don’t “Fly” like we think they create a gravity distortion bubble with no friction, deforming space-time around them. What if it’s disinformation? Are they extraterrestrial, interdimensional, or something else entirely? What do you think is the real origin of these craft? Drop your theory below.

Interstellar

12,503 views • 4 months ago

🚨 Bob Lazar on the Incredible Frozen Candle & Time Dilation Test at AREA 51 👽🛸😱 They point the gravity emitter at it and “The flame stopped flickering. It just stood like it was a photograph of itself.” Then: “It’s that flame is frozen in time.” Bob replies: “It can’t be because I can see it. If it was frozen in time, there wouldn’t be photons emitting from it.” But it was. Science + Alien tech = The ultimate “What the hell” clip. What do you think is really happening here? Real time dilation from gravity manipulation? Could this tech actually exist? Drop your thoughts 👇

🚨 Bob Lazar on the Incredible Frozen Candle & Time Dilation Test at AREA 51 👽🛸😱 They point the gravity emitter at it and “The flame stopped flickering. It just stood like it was a photograph of itself.” Then: “It’s that flame is frozen in time.” Bob replies: “It can’t be because I can see it. If it was frozen in time, there wouldn’t be photons emitting from it.” But it was. Science + Alien tech = The ultimate “What the hell” clip. What do you think is really happening here? Real time dilation from gravity manipulation? Could this tech actually exist? Drop your thoughts 👇

Interstellar

123,797 views • 4 months ago

😎🤌 According to Bob Lazar, UAP operate using a gravity wave-based propulsion system that distorts space-time rather than using conventional thrust 👽🛸 The craft generate power and gravity waves through a reactor fueled by a stable isotope of Element 115. In the reactor, Element 115 is bombarded with protons, briefly becomes Element 116, decays, and releases small amounts of antimatter. This antimatter annihilates with matter to produce enormous energy (near 100% efficient), which powers the craft and also creates a unique Gravity A wave (a micro-scale gravity field Lazar says is an extension of the strong nuclear force). This Gravity A wave forms around the reactor at the top of the craft. A waveguide channels it downward into three gravity amplifiers arranged in a triangle at the base. These amplifiers run at full power at all times and can phase-shift the wave (0° to 180°) to control direction and strength. By focusing and amplifying the gravity wave, the craft creates a powerful, localized gravitational distortion: - It bends/warps space-time in front of the vehicle. - This effectively pulls the destination toward the craft (instead of pushing the craft forward through space). Operation modes: - Omicron mode (hovering/low speed): Amplifiers point downward → craft balances/sits on its own gravity field (explains the characteristic wobble/bobbing seen in many videos). - Delta mode (high speed/travel): Amplifiers point forward → extreme space-time warping for rapid movement. Key effects: - No inertia (occupants feel no acceleration). - Time dilation near the craft. - Optical distortion (gravity lensing can make the craft appear blurry, shimmering, or invisible). In essence, the craft "falls" toward its target by warping space ahead of it, allowing extreme speeds, sharp turns, and interstellar travel without conventional motion or time dilation issues for the occupants. (#UAP #UFO #UFOSighting)

😎🤌 According to Bob Lazar, UAP operate using a gravity wave-based propulsion system that distorts space-time rather than using conventional thrust 👽🛸 The craft generate power and gravity waves through a reactor fueled by a stable isotope of Element 115. In the reactor, Element 115 is bombarded with protons, briefly becomes Element 116, decays, and releases small amounts of antimatter. This antimatter annihilates with matter to produce enormous energy (near 100% efficient), which powers the craft and also creates a unique Gravity A wave (a micro-scale gravity field Lazar says is an extension of the strong nuclear force). This Gravity A wave forms around the reactor at the top of the craft. A waveguide channels it downward into three gravity amplifiers arranged in a triangle at the base. These amplifiers run at full power at all times and can phase-shift the wave (0° to 180°) to control direction and strength. By focusing and amplifying the gravity wave, the craft creates a powerful, localized gravitational distortion: - It bends/warps space-time in front of the vehicle. - This effectively pulls the destination toward the craft (instead of pushing the craft forward through space). Operation modes: - Omicron mode (hovering/low speed): Amplifiers point downward → craft balances/sits on its own gravity field (explains the characteristic wobble/bobbing seen in many videos). - Delta mode (high speed/travel): Amplifiers point forward → extreme space-time warping for rapid movement. Key effects: - No inertia (occupants feel no acceleration). - Time dilation near the craft. - Optical distortion (gravity lensing can make the craft appear blurry, shimmering, or invisible). In essence, the craft "falls" toward its target by warping space ahead of it, allowing extreme speeds, sharp turns, and interstellar travel without conventional motion or time dilation issues for the occupants. (#UAP #UFO #UFOSighting)

★ UAP Luigi ★ 👁️⃤ 🇺🇸 👽MJ12 SOM1-01

43,212 views • 8 months ago

"In a fantasy or science fiction story, you can get away with one big lie. You can include one thing that's convenient for the author in order to make the plot work. In Children of Time, the question is 'what if a species of a spider developed a society, civilization, and technology. But the big lie is literally that there is a nanovirus is assisting the uplift of the spiders, and the lie is the amount of time that'll take. Because of the nanovirus, that happens in tens of thousands of years rather than hundreds of millions of years, which you would need by evolution. People need to read a book and think 'that's a thing that could happen.' It gives your book a weight and gravity that it would not have if it was magic talking spiders. So in order to support your One Big Lie, everything else needs to be true." — Adrian Tchaikovsky

"In a fantasy or science fiction story, you can get away with one big lie. You can include one thing that's convenient for the author in order to make the plot work. In Children of Time, the question is 'what if a species of a spider developed a society, civilization, and technology. But the big lie is literally that there is a nanovirus is assisting the uplift of the spiders, and the lie is the amount of time that'll take. Because of the nanovirus, that happens in tens of thousands of years rather than hundreds of millions of years, which you would need by evolution. People need to read a book and think 'that's a thing that could happen.' It gives your book a weight and gravity that it would not have if it was magic talking spiders. So in order to support your One Big Lie, everything else needs to be true." — Adrian Tchaikovsky

David Perell

66,154 views • 6 months ago

Tom DeLonge on UFO's: "They were in front of our noses the whole time" 🛸👽 "This is going to cause our government to wake the hell up and look at things that we never saw before" "We are literally the group that is responsible for why you read about UFOs in the papers today without all the stigma. His organization To the Stars Academy helped bring about the proper declassification of military videos with supporting data from radar sensors and multiple observers confirming objects with remarkable speed and altitude." "If 10% of this is true it is like the missing glue to all world events going back as far as we can think." DeLonge suggests these may be displacement craft from parallel realities capable of manipulating frequency electro magnetics gravity time and consciousness. Conversations like this are pushing for greater transparency and investigation into phenomena that could reshape our understanding of reality and whether humanity is alone in the universe.

Tom DeLonge on UFO's: "They were in front of our noses the whole time" 🛸👽 "This is going to cause our government to wake the hell up and look at things that we never saw before" "We are literally the group that is responsible for why you read about UFOs in the papers today without all the stigma. His organization To the Stars Academy helped bring about the proper declassification of military videos with supporting data from radar sensors and multiple observers confirming objects with remarkable speed and altitude." "If 10% of this is true it is like the missing glue to all world events going back as far as we can think." DeLonge suggests these may be displacement craft from parallel realities capable of manipulating frequency electro magnetics gravity time and consciousness. Conversations like this are pushing for greater transparency and investigation into phenomena that could reshape our understanding of reality and whether humanity is alone in the universe.

Interstellar

62,577 views • 2 months ago

Tom DeLonge: "I was read in to secret government programs on UFOs and aliens." 👽🎸🛸 On Joe Rogan the Blink 182 frontman describes how these crafts fold spacetime. "These crafts fold space time like folding a piece of paper and punching a pencil through it." They do not travel in straight lines from point A to point B. They interface with the fabric of space itself, which is malleable. That is why videos show them blinking on and off as they jump through folded space. DeLonge says high level insiders from Skunk Works, intelligence agencies and the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program briefed him. Different races compete here like proxy wars on Earth. The greys with big black eyes, he believes, are biological androids programmed for space travel with transmitters in their heads. He links it to ancient history. Advanced groups influenced civilization after catastrophes, and Roswell wreckage reportedly carried ancient Greek markings for "Freedom." Earlier today, Tom Delonge said on a podcast at Comican that he is actively consulting the US Government on UFO's & Aliens 👀

Tom DeLonge: "I was read in to secret government programs on UFOs and aliens." 👽🎸🛸 On Joe Rogan the Blink 182 frontman describes how these crafts fold spacetime. "These crafts fold space time like folding a piece of paper and punching a pencil through it." They do not travel in straight lines from point A to point B. They interface with the fabric of space itself, which is malleable. That is why videos show them blinking on and off as they jump through folded space. DeLonge says high level insiders from Skunk Works, intelligence agencies and the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program briefed him. Different races compete here like proxy wars on Earth. The greys with big black eyes, he believes, are biological androids programmed for space travel with transmitters in their heads. He links it to ancient history. Advanced groups influenced civilization after catastrophes, and Roswell wreckage reportedly carried ancient Greek markings for "Freedom." Earlier today, Tom Delonge said on a podcast at Comican that he is actively consulting the US Government on UFO's & Aliens 👀

Interstellar

38,847 views • 7 days ago

Who is Mr. Global, aka, the committee that runs the world? Who, what group of people, or WHAT is controlling our world or realm, and why are they doing what they do? It's time to understand that you have been lied to about almost everything that you have been told and that the TRUTH is far stranger than any fiction. In the end and at the highest level there is a real battle between Good vs. Evil between angels and demons…. Between those who are on the side of the light and those who have joined with demons. Ht

Who is Mr. Global, aka, the committee that runs the world? Who, what group of people, or WHAT is controlling our world or realm, and why are they doing what they do? It's time to understand that you have been lied to about almost everything that you have been told and that the TRUTH is far stranger than any fiction. In the end and at the highest level there is a real battle between Good vs. Evil between angels and demons…. Between those who are on the side of the light and those who have joined with demons. Ht

Melissa Redpill - Freedom Force

20,078 views • 9 months ago

When asked what NHI are. “They could be an advanced form of human… maybe time travelling back. Or a species that broke off from us and embedded a civilization in the seabed.” Dr. Hal Puthoff

When asked what NHI are. “They could be an advanced form of human… maybe time travelling back. Or a species that broke off from us and embedded a civilization in the seabed.” Dr. Hal Puthoff

Holly Wood

19,416 views • 1 year ago

🚨 Bob Lazar explains why UFOs are invisible sometimes: "you actually cannot see the craft the light bends around it... gravity bends light it bends radio waves." 😱👽🛸 He continues: "the craft is sitting in the air and you walk underneath it and look up... you're bending gravity bends light... it shouldn't be possible to communicate with a craft that has an envelope around it that's distorting all forms of energy." The heart-shaped distortion: "there's a wave guide that goes up to the top... it produces a heart-shaped gravitational Distortion around the craft." From JRE clip—gravity tech creates an energy-bending envelope that hides the craft and blocks signals, yet somehow they communicate. Explains blurry photos, sudden disappearances, and why no clear evidence? What do YOU think—does this gravity distortion make the lack of HD UFO videos believable? Or is it too convenient? Would walking under one freak you out? Drop your theories or if this changes your view on sightings below! 👇

🚨 Bob Lazar explains why UFOs are invisible sometimes: "you actually cannot see the craft the light bends around it... gravity bends light it bends radio waves." 😱👽🛸 He continues: "the craft is sitting in the air and you walk underneath it and look up... you're bending gravity bends light... it shouldn't be possible to communicate with a craft that has an envelope around it that's distorting all forms of energy." The heart-shaped distortion: "there's a wave guide that goes up to the top... it produces a heart-shaped gravitational Distortion around the craft." From JRE clip—gravity tech creates an energy-bending envelope that hides the craft and blocks signals, yet somehow they communicate. Explains blurry photos, sudden disappearances, and why no clear evidence? What do YOU think—does this gravity distortion make the lack of HD UFO videos believable? Or is it too convenient? Would walking under one freak you out? Drop your theories or if this changes your view on sightings below! 👇

Interstellar

91,301 views • 6 months ago

You can drop first-world peoples ANYWHERE, and they just BUILD A FIRST-WORLD CULTURE. Drop them into what would become South Africa and they build a first-world society out of nothing. Drop them into what would become Rhodesia and they AGAIN build a first-world society out of nothing. Drop them into Australia and they YET AGAIN build a first-world society out of NOTHING. You could drop first-world peoples into the MIDDLE OF GREENLAND, and in not time--guess what--FIRST WORLD SOCIETY OUT OF NOTHING! And when you later drive the first-worlders OUT of the societies they created, and hand those societies over to third-worlders, those societies rapidly devolve back to the third-world status one WOULD EXPECT in the hands of a people with average IQs in the 60s or even 50s. THESE CONSISTENTLY DIFFERENT OUTCOMES ARE THE RESULT OF DISTINCTLY DIFFERENT PEOPLES WITH VERY DIFFERENT GENETICALLY WIRED & UNCHANGEABLE IQs. CHECK OUT THE FULL SHOW HERE:

You can drop first-world peoples ANYWHERE, and they just BUILD A FIRST-WORLD CULTURE. Drop them into what would become South Africa and they build a first-world society out of nothing. Drop them into what would become Rhodesia and they AGAIN build a first-world society out of nothing. Drop them into Australia and they YET AGAIN build a first-world society out of NOTHING. You could drop first-world peoples into the MIDDLE OF GREENLAND, and in not time--guess what--FIRST WORLD SOCIETY OUT OF NOTHING! And when you later drive the first-worlders OUT of the societies they created, and hand those societies over to third-worlders, those societies rapidly devolve back to the third-world status one WOULD EXPECT in the hands of a people with average IQs in the 60s or even 50s. THESE CONSISTENTLY DIFFERENT OUTCOMES ARE THE RESULT OF DISTINCTLY DIFFERENT PEOPLES WITH VERY DIFFERENT GENETICALLY WIRED & UNCHANGEABLE IQs. CHECK OUT THE FULL SHOW HERE:

Andrew Branca Show

305,767 views • 7 months ago

ELON MUSK: "We can make a moon base, and I think it'll be pretty cool if you could have a vacation on the moon, like that would be the most epic vacation. I think that will be possible in the future. And then Mars is another step beyond that. Mars is a whole planet, and with gravity much closer to that of Earth, and it has an atmosphere, and if you warm up Mars, you could one day make Mars like Earth, meaning with like liquid oceans and life, and where you could walk outside without a spacesuit type of thing."

ELON MUSK: "We can make a moon base, and I think it'll be pretty cool if you could have a vacation on the moon, like that would be the most epic vacation. I think that will be possible in the future. And then Mars is another step beyond that. Mars is a whole planet, and with gravity much closer to that of Earth, and it has an atmosphere, and if you warm up Mars, you could one day make Mars like Earth, meaning with like liquid oceans and life, and where you could walk outside without a spacesuit type of thing."

DogeDesigner

37,474 views • 2 months ago

David Friedberg: “Gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” @jason: “Friedberg, what are your thoughts on the gaming industry versus social media versus traditional media?” david friedberg: “One way to answer that question is to think about how people spend their time.” “Do you spend more minutes on social media, or on traditional media, or playing games? And how is that trending?” “But importantly, which of those will accrue more benefit, and as a result, drive more hours spent from AI?” “One way to think about this thesis is that AI is going to ultimately accrue to video game entertainment far more than social media entertainment or traditional content.” “If you believe in AI, and you believe in the improvements in productivity, generally speaking, people in the industrialized world will generally have more free time on their hands and be able to support themselves with the deflationary effects of AI over time.” “So if there's more time on people's hands, the general market for entertainment is growing, and if the general market for entertainment is growing, gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” “Because I think you can create dynamic, more engaging experiences that will benefit from a back and forth sort of relationship than you can with traditional content or with social media.” “If you're a noob in Fortnite, like you're an early player in Fortnite, you're mostly playing against AI, because what they do is they tune the AI to be easier to beat so that you can slowly develop your skills.” “What was happening early was they were seeing a high degree of churn in Fortnite because kids would go on and play for the first time and they'd get paired up with kids that were better than them, and so they would never win, and they would get frustrated and they would quit the game and stop.” “So the churn rate was high. So AI unlocked higher engagement and higher retention, and I think we're seeing that in a lot of different gaming platforms now.” “So AI can be used, for example, to maximally increase time, engagement, satisfaction, happiness.”

David Friedberg: “Gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” @jason: “Friedberg, what are your thoughts on the gaming industry versus social media versus traditional media?” david friedberg: “One way to answer that question is to think about how people spend their time.” “Do you spend more minutes on social media, or on traditional media, or playing games? And how is that trending?” “But importantly, which of those will accrue more benefit, and as a result, drive more hours spent from AI?” “One way to think about this thesis is that AI is going to ultimately accrue to video game entertainment far more than social media entertainment or traditional content.” “If you believe in AI, and you believe in the improvements in productivity, generally speaking, people in the industrialized world will generally have more free time on their hands and be able to support themselves with the deflationary effects of AI over time.” “So if there's more time on people's hands, the general market for entertainment is growing, and if the general market for entertainment is growing, gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” “Because I think you can create dynamic, more engaging experiences that will benefit from a back and forth sort of relationship than you can with traditional content or with social media.” “If you're a noob in Fortnite, like you're an early player in Fortnite, you're mostly playing against AI, because what they do is they tune the AI to be easier to beat so that you can slowly develop your skills.” “What was happening early was they were seeing a high degree of churn in Fortnite because kids would go on and play for the first time and they'd get paired up with kids that were better than them, and so they would never win, and they would get frustrated and they would quit the game and stop.” “So the churn rate was high. So AI unlocked higher engagement and higher retention, and I think we're seeing that in a lot of different gaming platforms now.” “So AI can be used, for example, to maximally increase time, engagement, satisfaction, happiness.”

The All-In Podcast

70,365 views • 10 months ago

This is a recording of the inside of a Scientology building. The young men entered and ran through it recording the whole time. There’s a lot of intrigue and secrecy involved there. What do you think of when you hear Scientology? Tom Cruise perhaps.

This is a recording of the inside of a Scientology building. The young men entered and ran through it recording the whole time. There’s a lot of intrigue and secrecy involved there. What do you think of when you hear Scientology? Tom Cruise perhaps.

Suzee Q

2,907,750 views • 4 months ago

From Eric Vishria on how the top AI founders are building products completely opposite of the SaaS era: "One of the things that is really different in the AI world versus the SaaS world, is that in the SaaS world, over and over again, you had people who really understood the customer. And the problem. And then they understood a domain. They understood what the technology was more or less capable of. But it wasn't a real question of if you could build something or not. For example, take Salesforce, Workday, and ServiceNow. CRM existed before Salesforce. HR management existed before Workday. Same thing with ServiceNow. So in every case, Salesforce followed Siebel. Workday followed Peoplesoft. ServiceNow followed Peregrine and Remedy, and others. So they were just kind of, cloud SaaS versions of the prior generation product. They just understood the customers. They understood the problem. And they were just like, here's a better version. And that evolved a little bit over time in SaaS land. But that's what it is. And so product development in that way was done by people who really understood the customer and the problems. And then just took advantage of the next wave. And this is almost diametrically opposite of product development in the AI era. When I look at the teams that are having the most success today, they have intimate knowledge of the models. They are right on the frontier of understanding which models are better at what, and why, and when. And what they're going to be good at and what they're not going to be good at. And what they're spending their time on, is figuring out how do I apply this capability of this model to this domain or to this user. So they're actually working inside out or technology out, versus customer problem in. And of course, they understand the customer problem. And a lot of times they have firsthand knowledge of it. But they're really close to the metal and capability, and they're applying it. And I think this is a really different way to develop products than in SaaS. I started my career as a product manager a long time ago, and it's almost the complete opposite of everything you learned. "Listen to the customer, understand it, then bring it back to the engineering and product teams." If you did that right now, ask a bunch of customers what they want out of AI, and you brought it back, for the most part, it may not be possible today with today's technology. Whereas the teams that are winning right now really understand the technology and are applying it out. And so I think this reversal matters. I think it's a big difference in terms of how companies are getting built. And maybe even the types of entrepreneurs that will be successful. I'm not sure. You're seeing some real change there. Look at the Bret Taylor's at Sierra. That's a super, super technical founder who really gets it. Brett and Clay really get it. You look at Michael and his co-founders at Cursor. They're super technical founders and they get it. They all really understand what these things can and can't do. And that's a pretty different dynamic relative to the way the best SaaS companies got built." Link in bio for the full conversation going deep on the current class of startups going from zero to $100m+ in ARR within 12 months.

From Eric Vishria on how the top AI founders are building products completely opposite of the SaaS era: "One of the things that is really different in the AI world versus the SaaS world, is that in the SaaS world, over and over again, you had people who really understood the customer. And the problem. And then they understood a domain. They understood what the technology was more or less capable of. But it wasn't a real question of if you could build something or not. For example, take Salesforce, Workday, and ServiceNow. CRM existed before Salesforce. HR management existed before Workday. Same thing with ServiceNow. So in every case, Salesforce followed Siebel. Workday followed Peoplesoft. ServiceNow followed Peregrine and Remedy, and others. So they were just kind of, cloud SaaS versions of the prior generation product. They just understood the customers. They understood the problem. And they were just like, here's a better version. And that evolved a little bit over time in SaaS land. But that's what it is. And so product development in that way was done by people who really understood the customer and the problems. And then just took advantage of the next wave. And this is almost diametrically opposite of product development in the AI era. When I look at the teams that are having the most success today, they have intimate knowledge of the models. They are right on the frontier of understanding which models are better at what, and why, and when. And what they're going to be good at and what they're not going to be good at. And what they're spending their time on, is figuring out how do I apply this capability of this model to this domain or to this user. So they're actually working inside out or technology out, versus customer problem in. And of course, they understand the customer problem. And a lot of times they have firsthand knowledge of it. But they're really close to the metal and capability, and they're applying it. And I think this is a really different way to develop products than in SaaS. I started my career as a product manager a long time ago, and it's almost the complete opposite of everything you learned. "Listen to the customer, understand it, then bring it back to the engineering and product teams." If you did that right now, ask a bunch of customers what they want out of AI, and you brought it back, for the most part, it may not be possible today with today's technology. Whereas the teams that are winning right now really understand the technology and are applying it out. And so I think this reversal matters. I think it's a big difference in terms of how companies are getting built. And maybe even the types of entrepreneurs that will be successful. I'm not sure. You're seeing some real change there. Look at the Bret Taylor's at Sierra. That's a super, super technical founder who really gets it. Brett and Clay really get it. You look at Michael and his co-founders at Cursor. They're super technical founders and they get it. They all really understand what these things can and can't do. And that's a pretty different dynamic relative to the way the best SaaS companies got built." Link in bio for the full conversation going deep on the current class of startups going from zero to $100m+ in ARR within 12 months.

The Peel

209,752 views • 1 year ago

"I think the biggest difference is the amount of people around... When you have those goals and expectations there are obviously going to be more eyes on the team" Luis Robert Jr. on the difference between the White Sox and Mets organizations:

"I think the biggest difference is the amount of people around... When you have those goals and expectations there are obviously going to be more eyes on the team" Luis Robert Jr. on the difference between the White Sox and Mets organizations:

SNY

37,673 views • 6 months ago