Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

"Rods from God" is the informal name for Project Thor, a concept for a space-based kinetic weapon. Instead of using explosives or nukes, you put heavy, ultra-dense tungsten rods into orbit. When you want to hit a target on Earth, you de-orbit a rod and let gravity do the...

166,720 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

75 Kommentare

Profilbild von W.R. Schock, QBD
W.R. Schock, QBDvor 1 Monat

Rods of God are the most dangerous WMDs in the world, nuclear ballistics are archaic & banned from human use. They're fiction used as a scare tactic.

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

Weapons of mass destruction or generalized strike platforms in orbit is heavily restricted under international frameworks like the Outer Space Treaty of 1967.

Profilbild von W.R. Schock, QBD
W.R. Schock, QBDvor 1 Monat

We have weapons outside of view above that are invisible that instantly translocate & have since the 40s.

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

It wouldn't surprise me, I believe MH370 was teleportation.

Profilbild von Charlie Sunshine
Charlie Sunshinevor 1 Monat

You know darn well they've either done it, use it, or have figured out better methods. Either way, it's been done. They leave nothing off the table.

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

I agree. In the race for supremacy it's everything under the sun.

Profilbild von Paul Keegstra
Paul Keegstravor 1 Monat

Wait until Starship is operational. It will have the weight capacity to carry one or more satellites that are "rods from God" capable. Then the question will be: what is the greater taboo: space launched fallout free WMD or terrestrial nuclear weapons?

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

There will definitely be lots of publicly unaccounted payloads. Can't we just focus on real abundance? And a lot of this fighting over resources may sort itself out.

Profilbild von Thomas Walker 🇺🇸
Thomas Walker 🇺🇸vor 1 Monat

When @elonmusk builds a lunar mass driver, he will effectively have the most powerful weapon in existence

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

@elonmusk Don't tell everyone 🤫

Profilbild von one/two_life
one/two_lifevor 1 Monat

Can we get Jake to do the voiceover of the footage?

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

"Rods of God are on a Mission from God." 😎😎 😂

Profilbild von Louis R Woodhill
Louis R Woodhillvor 1 Monat

Read "The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress." We need electromagnetic catapults on the moon that can throw big rocks at the earth.

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

I'm ahead of you on that advice.

Profilbild von Michael Knight UK
Michael Knight UKvor 1 Monat

Great post. I never thought of interlocking segments, that’s genius. This is a thing. I’m convinced.

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

If I can think about it, then they probably thought about it in the 1950s! If it's possible, and there's a desire, and money doesn't matter, and it's a fun project, and it's a reason to print more imaginary money, etc, etc, then they could have done it... There coild be dozens of X-37Bs (or better) out there that we don't know about.

Profilbild von Vikky
Vikkyvor 1 Monat

Honestly I shudder to think what can be deployed to space if Starship makes it cheap with 200Ton payload. Moab weighs 15 tons btw.

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

I had to look MOAB up, I was thinking of an off road desert vehicle, but knew that couldn't be correct. 😂 Yes, I've heard of this ordinance. I imagine there are things ready and waiting to be lifted into orbit. I imagine there are many rockets (and other things) with such items on them and ready to go at the push of a button. ---If, say, out current capabilities were taken out via EMP or shotgun-type ordinance... There are probably a great number of things up there pretending to be regular satellites. Including chemical lasers and things that can be simply dropped like the Rod of God. They probably have plans to redirect floating junk or space rocks of good size. I was able to get AI to admit to, "objects [space rocks orbiting earth] large enough to cause city-level damage (roughly 20–50+ meters in size."

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

👇

Profilbild von Dani Debatte
Dani Debattevor 1 Monat

Rest assured that the Iranian response will be at least as devastating as any attack with such an orbital kinetic weapon. Mach 10? Iranian missiles fly up to Mach 15. With an explosive payload of up to 80 warheads.

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

I'm actually against war, that's why I voted for Trump three times. Not super happy with this performance...

Profilbild von Dani Debatte
Dani Debattevor 1 Monat

Then vote him away 🪄✨ elect the next warmonger. Seriously: your democratic political system has failed. It doesn't matter whom you elect. Your country has been colonized by Israel, and there's no political solution for this, but the 2A.

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

Did you SEE the other people and all they did though?

Profilbild von Dani Debatte
Dani Debattevor 1 Monat

That's what I meant. There is no political solution because your political system is compromised and they'll always present you the worst possible alternatives. Your elections are rigged anyways.

Profilbild von OneGoodShibe - Official King of Dogecoin 🫣🤣
OneGoodShibe - Official King of Dogecoin 🫣🤣vor 1 Monat

How much taxpayer money was spent just to haul all of that "ultra dense" tungsten into space? 🤔 That said, silver lining for the country that gets hit, it now owns a giant chunk of a pretty rare material.

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

Interesting. Makes you wonder what we have in our secret stockpiles. If I were running things in the black budget community, I would have secret underground mining and forging operations.

Profilbild von OneGoodShibe - Official King of Dogecoin 🫣🤣
OneGoodShibe - Official King of Dogecoin 🫣🤣vor 1 Monat

Yeah, agreed. And since no one knows what those budgets are or for how long, they could have been stockpiling for a while.

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

I miss watching Connections, with James Burke.

Profilbild von flow in
flow invor 1 Monat

the space plane can even go pick up asteroids and throw them

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

Doubtful 😆, but something can likely move space rocks orbiting the Earth.

Profilbild von flow in
flow invor 1 Monat

orbiting space rocks is asteroids.

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

There are lots of names for that kind of stuff, including minimoons. I looked it up earlier for another comment in this thread.

Profilbild von flow in
flow invor 1 Monat

its clear there is plenty of stuff up there for the spaceplane to pick up and throw, or use to manufacture things to throw

Profilbild von Stews
Stewsvor 1 Monat

The only other country rumored to have this system is Russia ???

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

For sure Russia has had heavy rockets for years.

Profilbild von Anthony A
Anthony Avor 1 Monat

This is why we built the space shuttle. Not many space vehicles can transport telephone pole sized hunks of tungsten into orbit. The space shuttle could, under the cover of exploration and discovery

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

Strong possibility there.

Profilbild von Sunny ☀️ (ThisIsHowItStarts)
Sunny ☀️ (ThisIsHowItStarts)vor 1 Monat

I guess DEW’s don’t give you the same amount of depth performance. 🤷🏼‍♀️

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

That's for zapping surface people. 😂

Profilbild von Sunny ☀️ (ThisIsHowItStarts)
Sunny ☀️ (ThisIsHowItStarts)vor 1 Monat

Maui and the Palisades enter the chat 🔥

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 3 Tagen

The way I think, if space weapons are admitted today, we had them already 40+ years ago.

Profilbild von American Terminator Skull
American Terminator Skullvor 1 Monat

And it’s great when your government wants to do false flag high damage bullshit against its citizens.

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

😬 Yeah, and no traceable nuclear materal afterwards.

Profilbild von Cleburne_Parker
Cleburne_Parkervor 1 Monat

I still miss Jerry Pournelle, and his blog Chaos Manor.

Profilbild von Chuck Petras
Chuck Petrasvor 1 Monat

@GrandpaRoy2

Profilbild von Jon Werner
Jon Wernervor 1 Monat

I read about this concept in Popular Mechanics magazine 20-30 years ago!!

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

June 2004 issue of Popular Science 🚀💥🌎

Profilbild von McCallum
McCallumvor 1 Monat

Soon we'll be able to use starship to build the systems in space.

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

Greenhouses to send food back to Earth? 🌏🫶

Profilbild von philw1776🚀🏈🪐🔭
philw1776🚀🏈🪐🔭vor 1 Monat

SpaceX starship says hello

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

It kinda looks like a starship 😂

Profilbild von Brian Stott
Brian Stottvor 1 Monat

Granite mountain - ISN'T REINFORCED.

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

I don't know that a mountain made out of granite needs to be reinforced--- for most stuff. Look at Cheyenne Mountain, for example. Just dig deeper and have tunnels leaving the area, I suppos .

Profilbild von B
Bvor 1 Monat

You wouldn’t even need to thread them, diffusion bonding/forge welding is extremely easy in the cold of space

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

Grok took a pass on answering my question.

Profilbild von Doctor Metrons Somatic Aether
Doctor Metrons Somatic Aethervor 1 Monat

No such thing.... (too bad)

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

It's nicer than nuclear ICBMs

Profilbild von Pork Chop Express
Pork Chop Expressvor 1 Monat

Cool concept. This was used in the movie, GI Joe Retaliation.

Profilbild von T. Emerson
T. Emersonvor 1 Monat

The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress, Heinlein’s 1966 book.

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

Read it twice and listened to the audiobook twice! Great book. Heinlein has awesome books.

Profilbild von T. Emerson
T. Emersonvor 1 Monat

Come to think of it, an AI character was key. I’ve read it a couple of times, but was decades ago, so, time to read it again.

Profilbild von xoHIox
xoHIoxvor 1 Monat

If they exist Trump would of used them…

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

Not Trump, he shows great restraint!

Profilbild von 🇩🇪🇮🇹🇺🇸Saviero Xaver 🤨🤣🤣
🇩🇪🇮🇹🇺🇸Saviero Xaver 🤨🤣🤣vor 1 Monat

This idea failed many times….

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

So did the light bulb

Profilbild von Joey B
Joey Bvor 1 Monat

Did they do this in a Call of Duty game?

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

Looks like Rods Of God was (is?) in Call Of Duty, called ODIN (Orbital Defense Initiative).

Profilbild von The Dour Dragon
The Dour Dragonvor 1 Monat

To make a single 12 ton rod out of 1000lbm modules would require 24 flights per rod. @grok how many times has the x-37b flown?

Profilbild von No Name
No Namevor 1 Monat

If the X-37b was a secret assembly crew you would think they would fly it more than every 400 days or so...

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

What if there are a lot more X-37Bs in existence, or beter versions?

Profilbild von T.H.Engeneering
T.H.Engeneeringvor 1 Monat

And how do you slow it down enough to get it out of orbit?

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

The speed desired and used to multiply the effect of the mass. Kinetic energy quadruples every time you double speed of a mass.

Profilbild von T.H.Engeneering
T.H.Engeneeringvor 1 Monat

Ok... basics of orbital mechanics. The faster you go, the higher orbit you are in. If the magazine of rods is sitting in a stable orbit, and it lets go, the rod doesn't fall, it just stays going the same speed. It would have to throw it downward.

Profilbild von Dutch1777
Dutch1777vor 1 Monat

I didn't design the video, but if that is a constraint, then why won't they just put it in a non-synchronous orbit? Furthermore when deployed from this moving orbit (relative the the earth's surface) it would be better positioned in a high orbit that goes against the earth's spin, retrograde. Going against the earth's orbit would allow a kinetic weapon to have more energy on impact. And allow a smaller window of interception.

Profilbild von shiesty J
shiesty Jvor 1 Monat

Watching too much gi joe

Ähnliche Videos

Elon Musk just explained why the SpaceX IPO is an energy story and the energy constraint is why he believes space becomes the only viable path for AI to scale (Save this). The argument he is making is one of the most important and least understood things happening in technology right now. The United States currently consumes roughly 500 gigawatts of electricity on average. To double that capacity which is what continued AI expansion on the current terrestrial trajectory would eventually require would mean building as many power plants as currently exist in the entire country. He is not arguing that this is technically impossible, just that communities are not willing to accept it, that permitting timelines make it unrealistic, and that the hard ceiling on Earth based power generation means the expansion of AI compute will eventually hit a wall that no amount of capital can overcome on the ground. His observation is that in space, that wall does not exist. A solar panel in orbit produces roughly five times more power than the same panel on Earth, operates in continuous sunlight uninterrupted by weather or nighttime, and benefits from the vacuum of space as a completely passive cooling system meaning the two largest operating costs of any terrestrial data center, energy and cooling, are effectively eliminated. He then said that you could theoretically increase harnessed energy by a factor of one million and still be using less than a millionth of the sun's total energy output. This is the underlying physics of why SpaceX filed with the FCC to launch up to one million solar powered AI satellites, and why they described that constellation in their own filing as a first step toward becoming a Kardashev Type II civilization capable of harnessing the full power of the sun. To understand what makes this credible rather than visionary, you need to understand what SpaceX already controls that no other company on earth possesses. Starship, once operating at full cadence, can deliver 100 to 150 tons of payload to orbit per launch, at a target cost per kilogram that is an order of magnitude lower than any existing vehicle. Musk's stated ambition is to scale Starship to 10,000 to 30,000 launches per year, a frequency that would allow the deployment of orbital compute infrastructure at a pace that is currently unimaginable with any existing rocket. He told xAI staff earlier this year that achieving space-based AI at scale will eventually require manufacturing facilities on the moon, building solar panels and heat dissipation structures from lunar silicon and aluminum, and launching them into orbit from there rather than from Earth's surface because the moon's lower gravity makes the economics of launch dramatically more favorable. SpaceX's S-1 filing explicitly states that its launch capabilities could enable massive AI compute satellite constellations with the potential for millions of satellites for orbital data centers, with the first launch potentially occurring as soon as 2028. Google and Alphabet are already in advanced talks with SpaceX about deploying space-based data centers. Starcloud, a startup running Nvidia H100 GPUs in orbit, has already validated that high-performance AI inference workloads can operate in space, with plans to scale to five gigawatts of orbital compute power by 2035. This is why Musk believes the cost crossover happens in two to three years because SpaceX's launch cost trajectory intersects with the accelerating energy constraint on the ground in a way that makes space genuinely cheaper, faster, and less regulated at exactly the moment AI demand is hitting its hardest physical limits.

Milk Road AI

12,738 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

A single gigawatt of orbital compute requires roughly 200 Starship launches and Elon Musk is not satisfied with gigawatts (Save this). The target is 100 gigawatts of orbital compute per year which means SpaceX is staring down a launch requirement that no organization in human history has ever attempted at anything close to that scale. He acknowledges that scaling to gigawatts per year in orbit is a very hard challenge, but then points to something most people have missed entirely, SpaceX has already demonstrated the foundational capability, because building and launching thousands of Starlink satellites per year is the same industrial problem applied to a different payload. When you understand the orbital compute satellite as a larger version of Starlink V3 with an Nvidia GPU rack at the center instead of a communications payload, the manufacturing and launch scaling challenge stops looking like science fiction and starts looking like a production ramp. The infrastructure to support that ramp is already being built. SpaceX is currently capacitizing for thousands of launches per year, two launch towers and pads in South Texas are operational, the first pad at Cape Canaveral is nearly complete, a second is on the way at Launch Complex 37, and additional locations are already in discussion. As the CFO says it "You need to have those cost curves as you ramp up in volume and time, your costs go down." The vision he describes for what this eventually enables is striking in its specificity. He imagines asking Grok a question on his phone, the inference running on an orbital compute satellite, and the answer coming back down through Starlink direct-to-cell, a complete AI query processed entirely in space, from prompt to response, without touching a single terrestrial data center. That moment, he says, is closer than the industry thinks, with initial capability demonstrations possible as soon as next year. The bottleneck that stands between now and that moment is not the satellite design, the cooling physics, or the silicon, all of which SpaceX has already worked through.

Milk Road AI

67,868 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Remote Viewer Just Exposed a SECRET Military War That No One Realizes Is Going On. No it's not the Iran War. No It's not the Gaza War.... It's an INVISIBLE WAR. Remote Viewer, Edward Riordan, exposes what's actually going on, that we are not aware of: ."..Was some object here flying across? It was in motion. Flying, zipping, moving, moving motion accelerating. Very fast speeds like a rubber bullet. It reminded me of just very fast moving." "The object itself was manmade. The notions here are like space travel technology and or weapons of war, flight or missile built in and for the same thing. So these are like military space weapon kind of stuff. Military and contractor budget facility. That was this place, a military contractor budget facility. And with these kinds of crafts, spacecrafts here or flying..." "...It was, a sense of advanced technology, space flight and weapons. But for what, though, I wonder? Stealth machines... How does this relate to the tasking though I questioned... A secret budget operation is what it felt designed for." "But what is it developed for, though? I pondered protecting, protection from enemies. See, this is where I get interesting protection from enemies seen and not seen." "Stealth level, even cloaked, even in remote flying. Meaning the pilot is on the ground in a VR simulator while the plane flies the mission. Is this what the target is all about? So I wonder, the testing of a system, a flying system protecting an unseen entity. This is case where stuff got very interesting. Here we're protecting an unseen entity, protecting the unseen. But what does that even mean, though, I wonder? And defense system designed and built for the unseen. For those who you are not to see or cannot see." "is all of that unseen seen surface at all theoretical in theory, a threat from an an interdimensional force and to protect the unseen from here?" "...Very sci fi, heavy on the defense. To fight off, an invisible or cloaked enemy...." "he signal was like that. The dark night, satellite thinking. Wow, this is really pretty wild. Wow... getting this notion here that this thing, that this invisible thing is going to bleed over from that world into this world.... seen as a continuation war or hostility factor in the world that people will continue to quote, seems as a continuation war or hostility factor in the world. People will continue to question, is it a real, is it a simulation? Do I need to be concerned? All their questions, the effects of this hostility don't seem to do much for the average person living out their lives. It affects them, but not in ways they can or will register directly. The main element remains hidden and or secret..."

Future Forecasting Group

19,006 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

#WATCH | On being asked about the West Asia conflict and where the Islamabad MoU stands right now, Senior Journalist, Political Commentator & Author, Fareed Zakaria says, "It's completely dead. It was predictable that it would be dead... Iran has figured out it has a usable nuclear weapon that can be used as leverage, which is control over the Strait of Hormuz...What we are trying to solve now is a problem created by the war itself, and even that has not been solved. In my opinion, the whole thing is a very humiliating defeat for the United States" "It's completely dead. And it was predictable that it would be dead because it is a memorandum of misunderstanding...Iran has figured out it has a usable nuclear weapon, in other words, a weapon that is actually more powerful because it can be used as leverage. That leverage is control over the Strait of Hormuz, and they want to assert that power...To give you an understanding of how poorly this war has gone for the United States, remember President Trump's original goal, which was to destroy the Iranian regime, have the people of Iran launch an uprising, and bring democracy to Iran. That didn't work. The goal number two became the nuclear issue...The desire to get the Iranians to hand over their enriched uranium, swear that they would never use it again, and permanently end the program none of that has happened. The third goal then became control of the Strait of Hormuz, which, of course, was open before the war. What we are trying to solve now is a problem created by the war itself, and even that has not been solved. In my opinion, the whole thing is a very humiliating defeat for the United States" Watch full interview here:

ANI

49,120 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

I’m seeing a lot of questions on the launch of China’s Chang’e 6 mission yesterday to get samples - for the first time - from the far side of the moon. We don’t know (afaik) why specifically they’re doing that, but we have a pretty good idea what grand vision China is working towards with their space program. How? From this 2022 video by Chas Freeman (former Assistant Secretary of Defense and Nixon's interpreter during his era-defining 1972 China visit), who imho is undoubtedly one of the most knowledgeable former US officials on China. He says that according to his own discussions with people running China’s space program, they’re following the vision described in the book "The high frontier" by Gerard K. O'Neill, which Freeman says has "become the bible of the Chinese space program". I read the book. So what vision does it describe? The book was written in 1976 by O'Neill who was a professor of physics at Princeton University. He also founded the Space Studies Institute, an organization devoted to funding research into space manufacturing and colonization. In other words, he knew his stuff. The book makes the very fair point that we have massive resource constraints on earth, especially given the growing population. He estimated in 1976 that we should be "about six and a half billion people in the year 2000", and we were 6.114 billion back then so he was pretty prescient. He estimates that these constraints will progressively give rise to more and more social tensions as the growing earth population competes for our limited resources as well as faces global problems like climate change. In his view, dealing with this will either require "an authoritarian regime capable of mounting the immense task of social reorganization needed to escape catastrophe" or, alternatively, “mankind would [need to adopt] a static society [that would be] forced in self-defense to suppress new ideas". The 3rd alternative is of course the colonization of space. The most interesting aspect of the book is that he claims everything he writes is feasible with knowledge and technology that already existed in the late 70s. In short he calls for the establishment of large human habitats in the Earth-Moon system, located at stable Lagrange points ("parking spots" in space where gravity from different spatial bodies cancel each other out). In particular he developed the concept of what's known today as the "O'Neill cylinder" which he says "could support quite easily a population of ten million people, growing its food in agricultural cylinders near but outside the main habitat". Energy-wise, it'd simply make use of solar energy via a system of mirrors. As he describes it: "the concentration of the unvarying, intense sunlight of space by very lightweight, inexpensive mirrors can provide all the energy that industry will ever need [...] at a fraction of a cent per kilowatt-hour". He envisages building these habitats with material from the moon, shot into space via "mass drivers", a form of electromagnetic catapult. Also "the habitats would have artificial gravity similar as that of earth by rotating about twenty-eight times an hour”, but he also envisages low-gravity areas, especially for recreational activities such as swimming pools or dancing representations. To trade with earth, he develops the idea of beaming solar power back to earth via "microwave from solar power stations in orbit". As he describes it "the microwave beam would arrive at Earth with a beam width of about seven kilometers. Its intensity would be modest, less than half that of sunlight. In contrast to sunlight, though, it would be there all the time, even at night or in clouds or rain, and it would be in a form ready for conversion to DC current with a loss of only 10 percent. The areas receiving these beams’ output on Earth would be fenced, and outside the fence the intensity of microwave radiation would be no higher than outside a microwave oven with the door closed. He estimates that if "Satellite Solar Power Stations (SSPS) were to become the sole source of electric energy in the United States in the year 2000, the land area necessary for the SSPS antennas would still be only 0.2 percent of that of the continental United States". In short, the establishment of space colonies could lead to the fulfillment of a good share of Earth's energy needs. Last but not least he describes life in space habitats as better than that of earth, largely thanks to the level of control we'd have over the environment (total climate control which would enable an abundance of food and no natural disaster) as well as unlimited cheap energy. To conclude, Chas Freeman typically really knows his stuff when it comes to China and he’s very intellectually honest (a rare trait among US officials) so I have no doubt he tells the truth when he says the Chinese told him that was the vision. And China famously thinks very big and very long term so it would be quite like them to go for something like this. There are also quite a few tangible signs that China is working towards that vision. See for instance this November 2022 news where “China’s space station will join a project to collect solar power from space and send it to Earth in a high-energy microwave beam”: That’s exactly O’Neill’s vision! Or check this October 2022 news that says China is developing new "electromagnetic sledges" that can propel a carriage weighing a few tonnes to a record speed, with a key application for this being “aerospace”: Remember: O’Neill’s vision is to build his habitats with material from the moon, shot into space via "mass drivers", a form of electromagnetic catapult. So there you go… Or also the fact that the Chinese will build, together with the Russians, a moon base - planned for 2028 - powered by a “space nuclear reactor” that’s already been developed (on Earth) and has passed review by China’s Ministry of Science: The space nuclear reactor can generate 1MW of electricity, enough to power 10 International Space Stations. Enough power, maybe, to undertake mining activity and power an electromagnetic catapult… After visions change, the world changes, so it’s also possible that China’s view on what they want to do has evolved. In any case, Chas Freeman is right that China’s motivation for all its initiatives in space can’t just be to “boldly explore where no-one has been before”, they have to be working towards something. And Freeman is also absolutely right to lament that the U.S. decided to ban any cooperation in space with the Chinese. Those endeavors are something that could have been jointly developed as a multilateral effort to unite us all as a species… Instead China is now forced to go at it alone with Russia and we face a future where our petty divisions on Earth will be carried with us to space…

Arnaud Bertrand

265,181 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨 BREAKING: Sen. Eric Schmitt is CALLING OUT the war machine and military industrial complex for trying to SINK President Trump's Russia-Ukraine war peace plan "They live in this fantasy world that another round of sanctions or another round of weapons or another round of cash is going to solve the problem, and it WON'T!" "The Washington consensus has been so WRONG about this, for so long, and they've been wrong about a lot of things over the last 30 years!" "President Trump approaches this as a realist. You take the world as it is, not how you want it to be, not how you wish it would be, but actually how it is." "A lot of people won't say it, the Ukrainians have been losing for a long time. They've lost 20% of their territory. They have a manpower problem. They have a munitions problem." "I think what President Trump is trying to accomplish is maintain Ukrainian sovereignty, make sure there's a pathway to rebuild the country, and also lessen the likelihood that this will ever happen again." "And so they put forward a proposal, a framework, Secretary of State Rubio, the Secretary of the Army Driscoll, they're all in Geneva right now working with the Ukrainians, working with the Europeans to try to get to some consensus here on the 28 points." "I would say that most of those, at least half of those, have been talked about for a long time and there's a lot of agreement." "So you've to narrow the gap now and try to get to a place where you recognize the realities on the ground." Eric Schmitt

Eric Daugherty

32,984 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Why Japan Is Teaching Rockets to Come Home The concept of a reusable rocket is deceptively simple: instead of discarding an expensive stage into the ocean after every launch, land it and launch it again. SpaceX built its competitive edge on this very principle—and now others are mastering the same technology. Japan joined this club over the weekend. Its space agency, JAXA, conducted the first flight of the RV-X—a small experimental rocket developed in partnership with Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. The flight was brief, lasting less than a minute: it rose 11 meters, shifted 16 meters laterally, and executed a soft, vertical landing. Keeping a rocket upright on a column of thrust is akin to balancing a pencil on your fingertip—except the pencil weighs tons and is powered by a flame. A split-second error is all it takes to lose that vertical stability. Engineering features play a crucial role here: an upgraded engine that has undergone 165 hot-fire tests and four shock-absorbing legs designed to cushion the impact with the ground. All of this serves as a rehearsal for a far more ambitious goal: a future reusable successor to the current expendable H3 rocket, intended to deliver payloads to orbit at a significantly lower cost. Japan is not acting alone; it is developing the RV-X in collaboration with France and Germany, while just a day earlier, China successfully recovered a first stage for the first time. The world is gradually shifting toward rockets that do not burn up after a single flight but instead return to pick up their next payload.

Black Hole

16,794 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten