Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

ROMUALDEZ BREAKS SILENCE: I WILL NOT BE YOUR SCAPEGOAT Former House speaker Martin Romualdez rejected allegations that he masterminded a massive corruption scheme and said he will confront what he described as a “false, twisted, and unfair” narrative. After months of silence, Romualdez said he is ready to address...

40,014 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

ZELENSKYY ON HIS CONVERSATION WITH ABRAMOVICH: Ceasefire is the biggest compromise from our side to your side. ZELENSKYY: Abramovich, so he came to Kyiv,bI think that he said: "I have message direct to you, and I want to get message, and take message from you, and to give it to Putin." But he said that it has to be silently, without any kind of, public messages. I said, "Look, it's your choice. Okay, for us it doesn't matter, public or un-public." But it's always with Russians such way. If they say something has to be between us, it's mean that tomorrow not only we will know about it. But it's not a secret. He came, and he wanted to give me the message that they want to to understand what we are ready to do. I said: "The question is not about us. You are fighting against us on our territory." And I said to him about Donbas, it was the key message. And I said: "No, we will not leave, and we will not go out from our territory. No, we will not give you a victory such way. And you will not get it." And we spoke about any kind of compromises. I said that all the compromises after ceasefire. Ceasefire is the biggest compromise from our side to your side. JOURNALIST: So is he a go-between now? Between you and Vladimir Putin, he's going back and forth? ZELENSKYY: I don't know. When he got message from me, he said he will go directly to Putin. I said: "Okay, I'm ready to meet, not in Moscow, not in Belarus, and not in Minsk," and it's understandable why. I said, "You can choose any time from tomorrow. You can choose any day, any format. We can choose with President Trump. I'm sure that he will be ready to come, and we can do it with Europeans. I'm sure that everybody want to help, or we can choose the way bilateral, just bilateral meeting."

Kateryna Lisunova

25,494 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

WATCH: As early as April, retired Marine Orly Guteza said he was being pressured to deny delivering cash to former House Speaker Martin Romualdez residence and instead implicate Sen. Rodante Marcoleta and former Rep. Mike Defensor in his affidavit. In a video posted by Defensor on April 29, Guteza is heard telling his wife that he was being made to read a new affidavit stating that he did not deliver cash to Romualdez and accusing the two lawmakers instead. Fast-forward to the present, Guteza has recanted his earlier account and his affidavit now contains essentially the same allegations, claiming that Marcoleta and Defensor—both now detained—pressured him to make the accusations. The Office of the Ombudsman has since downplayed Guteza’s reversal, describing recantations in high-profile cases as a “classic pressure tactic.” It said the investigation does not hinge on Guteza or the other Marines who recanted, noting that 28 other witnesses are prepared to provide direct and material information in the case involving Romualdez. Ombudsman Boying Remulla earlier said the Romualdez camp was pulling the strings behind the recantations, describing the moves as a desperate effort as the flood-control probe closes in on the former Speaker. Atty. Levito Baligod, counsel for the former Marines, said his clients were offered up to ₱10 million each to recant and were also subjected to threats to their security. Baligod said he has screenshots of messages and recorded conversations that he plans to submit to Ombudsman investigators. George Villalon Jr., one of the witnesses who stood by his testimony, separately claimed that offers to reverse their accounts reached ₱20 million to ₱25 million.

Peanut Gallery Media Network

14,880 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce

Many people tagged me in a viral video of this American man, who has been widely referred to as the "Mzungu Chokoraa," claiming that he had been abandoned and was living on the streets. After I shared the video, his wife reached out to me and requested that I visit him to understand the true situation. This evening, I met him and his family, and I learned that he is not homeless. He is a married man, a father of five children, and has been living with his family in Texas, USA. According to his family, he has bipolar disorder, and his condition became worse after the passing of his mother. He is currently under medical care and takes prescribed medication. The family explained that during some episodes of his illness, he may leave home and wander the streets. This has led many people to believe that he is homeless, which is not true. They also shared that he has a passion for recycling and environmental conservation, which is why he is sometimes seen collecting recyclable materials or around dumpsites. I would like to clarify to the general public that this man is not homeless. He has a loving family that cares deeply for him. When you see him on the streets, please do not judge or discriminate against him. Instead, treat him with dignity, kindness, and respect, knowing that he is living with a mental health condition. The family has also appealed to the public not to buy him alcohol or give him weed, as both can interfere with his prescribed medication and may seriously affect his health. Let us replace stigma with understanding and compassion. Mental health conditions can affect anyone, and those living with them deserve our support, respect, and humanity.

Geoffrey Mosiria

132,491 görüntüleme • 27 gün önce

VIDEO | Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) President Vikas Singh on NALSAR controversy, says, "BCI chairman is behaving like the BCI is his personal property. Whenever he issues an order, letter or direction, he does not even refer to under which provision of the Act or regulation he's making such kind of an order... The resolution, the order which was passed was wholly illegal. And in fact, some people had also approached me, and we were about to mention the matter in the morning. A writ petition also was to be filed. And I'm 100% sure it would have been stayed by the Supreme Court. Probably he got a hint of that and he started withdrawing in phases. First, he withdrew partially, then NALSAR passed a resolution on whether they can do such an inquiry or not, which is also permissible, and they will consider it in the executive committee. So he realised that they may ultimately say that they will not do even that inquiry which he said should happen in the second letter. So at night, he tweeted that he will withdraw completely. He has to understand that he is the chairman of the regulator of the entire legal profession. He has to set the right standards for the youngsters to follow. I am not trying to, for once, even suggest that what the children did with regard to not protesting against the CJI coming for the convocation. But that is their right under the Constitution. They may be ill-advised, they may be, you know, not doing the right thing. They may be justified also..." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

71,756 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce