正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Ronaldo Said Something About His Son That I believe Every Academy Should Be Paying Attention To Cristiano Ronaldo recently suggested his son may not have what it takes to reach elite levels. Not because of talent or skill but because he grew up in privilege rather than adversity. If... Ronaldo, arguably the most driven player of his generation, cannot instill that hunger in his own household, what does that tell us about environmental factors versus innate drive? This raises critical questions for football academies: -Does material comfort genuinely diminish competitive drive? -Can intrinsic motivation replace the extrinsic pressure of necessity? -Should elite academies be developing specialized programming for players from privileged backgrounds, or does this suggest certain psychological traits simply cannot be manufactured regardless of resources invested? The traditional academy model assumes hunger is universal. Ronaldo's observation challenges that assumption entirely. And if clubs ignore it, they're leaving a blind spot in their talent development strategies. The implications extend beyond one family. They challenge how we conceptualize elite development entirely. This is something we all, especially talent developers, should ponder on. What do YOU think? Should academies around the world artificially create hard situations for their players to keep them hungry? If yes, how do we balance that with the global best practices relating to the FIFA Safeguarding policy? If no, how then do we get and keep young players motivated?show more

Ajoje⚽⚖️

36,001 subscribers

396,166 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

"Let me be very clear about this argument and discussion that has developed about age and about opportunities for young people," Maxine Waters tells Nicholas Wu. "I do believe that everybody should have the opportunity, with qualifications, to try and be a member of Congress, to try and be in positions for any of our regulatory agencies. I believe in the vote. "Now, having said that, I don't think we should talk about whether or not we should give up the mantle. I think it should be about supporting the idea that everybody should have an opportunity. Young people should run for these offices, and if they are competent, if they're capable, if they raise the money — if they do all of those things and they win, then they should have the seat. "For those of us who've been there, I want us to be absolutely looked at, to be criticized, to be examined, to see whether or not we have done what was expected of us and whether or not we have truly represented the people that have put us in these offices. "If we're not doing that, then we shouldn't be there, and we will probably not win our seats, but if we have, then ... we'll stay there. I'll be there. I'm not moving."

"Let me be very clear about this argument and discussion that has developed about age and about opportunities for young people," Maxine Waters tells Nicholas Wu. "I do believe that everybody should have the opportunity, with qualifications, to try and be a member of Congress, to try and be in positions for any of our regulatory agencies. I believe in the vote. "Now, having said that, I don't think we should talk about whether or not we should give up the mantle. I think it should be about supporting the idea that everybody should have an opportunity. Young people should run for these offices, and if they are competent, if they're capable, if they raise the money — if they do all of those things and they win, then they should have the seat. "For those of us who've been there, I want us to be absolutely looked at, to be criticized, to be examined, to see whether or not we have done what was expected of us and whether or not we have truly represented the people that have put us in these offices. "If we're not doing that, then we shouldn't be there, and we will probably not win our seats, but if we have, then ... we'll stay there. I'll be there. I'm not moving."

Semafor

89,788 次观看 • 4 个月前

Mikel Arteta on how he handles transfer speculation with his players: "Very simple. Whatever you read, if you have a question, come and knock on my door and I will tell you whether it is true or not. If we put now the catalogue on all these walls about all the players that we wanted in the last three months, I think we need the whole building to put it on. So I think they know that there's so much speculation with a lot of players. "If ever they feel the doubt of what we think of them and if we're going to recruit a player, I tell them straight away. Normally I do it - so, 'we're going to sign somebody in their position', and normally tell them that these are the plans and these are the reasons why we have the plans. 'We still believe the same in you, but the competition is going to increase.' I prefer to do it that way."

Mikel Arteta on how he handles transfer speculation with his players: "Very simple. Whatever you read, if you have a question, come and knock on my door and I will tell you whether it is true or not. If we put now the catalogue on all these walls about all the players that we wanted in the last three months, I think we need the whole building to put it on. So I think they know that there's so much speculation with a lot of players. "If ever they feel the doubt of what we think of them and if we're going to recruit a player, I tell them straight away. Normally I do it - so, 'we're going to sign somebody in their position', and normally tell them that these are the plans and these are the reasons why we have the plans. 'We still believe the same in you, but the competition is going to increase.' I prefer to do it that way."

Connor Humm

179,646 次观看 • 1 个月前

This World Cup has shown how Argentinian players are just built different, and it was interesting because, in the press conferences, both managers addressed this. First, Tuchel talks about the Argentinian value of the ball and how they protect the ball at all costs, how they manage those small spaces, and how they learn this from a young age. He references culture, and this is exactly it. A child playing in a certain environment leads to that. Not every Argentinian child is on the national team, but it raises the ceiling. It creates a certain type of style and a certain type of player. Then Scaloni also references his culture. He sees them play without fear of losing. It comes from playing in an environment where you are constantly faced with the potential of losing and being able to play with that pressure, right? They don’t fight against it. They play with it. They use it. And I think this is where youth football coaches should really take note. This does not mean we should copy and paste Argentinian culture into every training environment, because culture cannot just be copied. But the values within that culture can be inculcated in every training environment. The value of the ball. The courage to receive it in small spaces. The ability to protect it under pressure. The confidence to keep playing after a mistake. The willingness to play with the possibility of losing rather than constantly trying to avoid it. Those values can become part of the environment we create every day. They can be present in the games we design, in what we praise, in what we allow players to struggle with, and in how we respond when they lose the ball. If every mistake leads to the coach stopping the session, giving the answer, or taking the pressure away, then players never learn to play with that pressure. They learn to wait for the coach. It was cool to see how two managers, at such a big stage, reference culture and the environments that kids play in when they’re young. Because the players we see on the biggest stage were not only created by tactics or coaching information. They were created by environments that taught them what to value, how to relate to the ball, and how to play when there was something to lose.

This World Cup has shown how Argentinian players are just built different, and it was interesting because, in the press conferences, both managers addressed this. First, Tuchel talks about the Argentinian value of the ball and how they protect the ball at all costs, how they manage those small spaces, and how they learn this from a young age. He references culture, and this is exactly it. A child playing in a certain environment leads to that. Not every Argentinian child is on the national team, but it raises the ceiling. It creates a certain type of style and a certain type of player. Then Scaloni also references his culture. He sees them play without fear of losing. It comes from playing in an environment where you are constantly faced with the potential of losing and being able to play with that pressure, right? They don’t fight against it. They play with it. They use it. And I think this is where youth football coaches should really take note. This does not mean we should copy and paste Argentinian culture into every training environment, because culture cannot just be copied. But the values within that culture can be inculcated in every training environment. The value of the ball. The courage to receive it in small spaces. The ability to protect it under pressure. The confidence to keep playing after a mistake. The willingness to play with the possibility of losing rather than constantly trying to avoid it. Those values can become part of the environment we create every day. They can be present in the games we design, in what we praise, in what we allow players to struggle with, and in how we respond when they lose the ball. If every mistake leads to the coach stopping the session, giving the answer, or taking the pressure away, then players never learn to play with that pressure. They learn to wait for the coach. It was cool to see how two managers, at such a big stage, reference culture and the environments that kids play in when they’re young. Because the players we see on the biggest stage were not only created by tactics or coaching information. They were created by environments that taught them what to value, how to relate to the ball, and how to play when there was something to lose.

David Garcia

170,486 次观看 • 2 个月前

Elon Musk: We will not accept an anointed class of journalists who tell us what to think. “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Interview with the BBC, April 12, 2023

Elon Musk: We will not accept an anointed class of journalists who tell us what to think. “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Interview with the BBC, April 12, 2023

ELON CLIPS

1,266,090 次观看 • 1 年前

ELON: WE WILL NOT ACCEPT AN ANOINTED CLASS OF JOURNALISTS WHO TELL US WHAT TO THINK “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Source: Interview with the BBC, April 2023, Elon Musk

ELON: WE WILL NOT ACCEPT AN ANOINTED CLASS OF JOURNALISTS WHO TELL US WHAT TO THINK “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Source: Interview with the BBC, April 2023, Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

115,251 次观看 • 1 年前

Jorge Jesus on Cristiano: “I just said that Ronaldo is different from all the players in the world because of his status and the professionalism he has shown throughout his career. I have no doubt, and I said it today. 90% of the fans who attended the match came to see Cristiano. Cristiano is a global phenomenon. We in Portugal do not know how to appreciate this, and we do not have any understanding in Portugal of what Cristiano’s popularity means outside our country. As a Portuguese, I feel very proud, not only because I am coaching a great player, but also because he is an exceptional professional. As our friend here said, I believe that the vast majority of the fans who attended today were because of him. Now we have the final ahead of us, and I hope that the stadium will be full to support Al Nassr to achieve victory, and for Cristiano as well.”

Jorge Jesus on Cristiano: “I just said that Ronaldo is different from all the players in the world because of his status and the professionalism he has shown throughout his career. I have no doubt, and I said it today. 90% of the fans who attended the match came to see Cristiano. Cristiano is a global phenomenon. We in Portugal do not know how to appreciate this, and we do not have any understanding in Portugal of what Cristiano’s popularity means outside our country. As a Portuguese, I feel very proud, not only because I am coaching a great player, but also because he is an exceptional professional. As our friend here said, I believe that the vast majority of the fans who attended today were because of him. Now we have the final ahead of us, and I hope that the stadium will be full to support Al Nassr to achieve victory, and for Cristiano as well.”

Al Nassr Zone

38,968 次观看 • 1 年前

"The benefits (ending world hunger?), I think, outweigh the risk of the communists getting ahold of it." ~JN 🛸 Should EVERYTHING UFO, Including the Tech, Be Declassified? 🛸 Davis: We should NOT declassify the technology because our adversaries may gain an edge over us. Nuccetelli: "It's becoming more difficult for me to agree that this technology should [remain] classified. What if it could extend life? What if it can cure cancer?" (Everybody agrees that anything related to alleged bodies of non-human intelligence - or living beings - should be declassified. But you will find various opinions about declassifying the technology. Today, I agree with Jeff: Declassify ALL of it. Especially if we've made progress and that tech can help humanity and the planet right now. Do I think it will be declassified any time soon? No. Hell, we're struggling to get ANY of this declassified, except meh videos, inconclusive photos and old documents.) Dr. Eric Davis: "Anything about [UFOs] at a whole-picture level would be good and not damage national security. But I think what was scientifically discovered by the material scientists, the mechanical engineers, thermal engineers, electronic...electrical engineers, computer engineers, aerospace engineers, propulsion physicists and engineers, power engineers, all that - the technical details of what they've been reverse engineering and studying, regardless of whether they were successful in reproducing it or not, should NOT be declassified. Because that'll give our foreign adversaries a military edge, "Should we come up with a technical solution from the reverse engineering that could give us a big, huge military edge over our adversaries. So that's why we don't want to declassify the nitty-gritty technical details about those recovered UAP. Is that our adversaries, if they get a hold of that information, publicly, before we reverse engineer it successfully and turn it into a useful technology, then that means they will. They'll put 100 times, 1000 times more money than we do into reverse engineering until they get an answer." ~ Jeff Nuccetelli - Jeff Nuccetelli: "This is kind of this threat narrative that we keep hearing. Like, if we don't keep it secret, the Chinese are gonna win, right? And, you know, I do understand that to up to a point. But, by keeping it secret, you're limiting the entire human race, right? If these power sources and these technologies and anti-gravity and on and on, that might be real, that seem like they might be real, the more further we get down this path... It's like, at what point do we the people get to benefit from incredible technology, right? "What if, you know, it could extend life? What if it can cure cancer? What if it can end hunger? What if it can help save the planet from climate change and pollution? It's becoming more difficult for me to agree that this technology should be classified, because, you know, the benefits, I think, outweigh the risk of, you know, the communists getting ahold of it."

"The benefits (ending world hunger?), I think, outweigh the risk of the communists getting ahold of it." ~JN 🛸 Should EVERYTHING UFO, Including the Tech, Be Declassified? 🛸 Davis: We should NOT declassify the technology because our adversaries may gain an edge over us. Nuccetelli: "It's becoming more difficult for me to agree that this technology should [remain] classified. What if it could extend life? What if it can cure cancer?" (Everybody agrees that anything related to alleged bodies of non-human intelligence - or living beings - should be declassified. But you will find various opinions about declassifying the technology. Today, I agree with Jeff: Declassify ALL of it. Especially if we've made progress and that tech can help humanity and the planet right now. Do I think it will be declassified any time soon? No. Hell, we're struggling to get ANY of this declassified, except meh videos, inconclusive photos and old documents.) Dr. Eric Davis: "Anything about [UFOs] at a whole-picture level would be good and not damage national security. But I think what was scientifically discovered by the material scientists, the mechanical engineers, thermal engineers, electronic...electrical engineers, computer engineers, aerospace engineers, propulsion physicists and engineers, power engineers, all that - the technical details of what they've been reverse engineering and studying, regardless of whether they were successful in reproducing it or not, should NOT be declassified. Because that'll give our foreign adversaries a military edge, "Should we come up with a technical solution from the reverse engineering that could give us a big, huge military edge over our adversaries. So that's why we don't want to declassify the nitty-gritty technical details about those recovered UAP. Is that our adversaries, if they get a hold of that information, publicly, before we reverse engineer it successfully and turn it into a useful technology, then that means they will. They'll put 100 times, 1000 times more money than we do into reverse engineering until they get an answer." ~ Jeff Nuccetelli - Jeff Nuccetelli: "This is kind of this threat narrative that we keep hearing. Like, if we don't keep it secret, the Chinese are gonna win, right? And, you know, I do understand that to up to a point. But, by keeping it secret, you're limiting the entire human race, right? If these power sources and these technologies and anti-gravity and on and on, that might be real, that seem like they might be real, the more further we get down this path... It's like, at what point do we the people get to benefit from incredible technology, right? "What if, you know, it could extend life? What if it can cure cancer? What if it can end hunger? What if it can help save the planet from climate change and pollution? It's becoming more difficult for me to agree that this technology should be classified, because, you know, the benefits, I think, outweigh the risk of, you know, the communists getting ahold of it."

Joe Murgia

34,836 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 Carlo Ancelotti on the footballer with the biggest global impact on football between Cristiano Ronaldo, Neymar Jr. and Lionel Messi: 🗣️ “All three players changed football in different ways.” “Neymar brought joy to the game. Millions of young players around the world tried to copy his skills, his confidence and his creativity.” “Messi showed people that football intelligence and technical ability can reach levels that seem almost impossible. He inspired an entire generation.” “But when we talk about global impact, I think Cristiano Ronaldo stands alone.” 🗣️ Reporter: “Why do you say that?” 🗣️ Ancelotti: “Because Cristiano’s influence goes beyond football itself.” “You can go to Europe, South America, North America, Africa, Asia or the Middle East and you will find people wearing Cristiano Ronaldo shirts, copying his celebrations and following his career.” “He became more than a football player. He became a global sporting icon.” “His impact reached fans who don’t even watch football regularly. Very few athletes in history have achieved that.” “He changed how footballers think about professionalism, fitness, preparation and longevity.” “When young players talk about discipline and hard work, Cristiano Ronaldo is usually the example they mention.” “Neymar had an enormous impact in Brazil and around the world. Messi inspired millions with his genius. But Cristiano’s influence crossed every border, every culture and every generation.” “For me, if we’re discussing pure global impact on football and football culture, Cristiano Ronaldo is number one.” “He didn’t just leave a mark on the game. He became one of the faces of the game worldwide.” {beIN SPORTS}

🚨 Carlo Ancelotti on the footballer with the biggest global impact on football between Cristiano Ronaldo, Neymar Jr. and Lionel Messi: 🗣️ “All three players changed football in different ways.” “Neymar brought joy to the game. Millions of young players around the world tried to copy his skills, his confidence and his creativity.” “Messi showed people that football intelligence and technical ability can reach levels that seem almost impossible. He inspired an entire generation.” “But when we talk about global impact, I think Cristiano Ronaldo stands alone.” 🗣️ Reporter: “Why do you say that?” 🗣️ Ancelotti: “Because Cristiano’s influence goes beyond football itself.” “You can go to Europe, South America, North America, Africa, Asia or the Middle East and you will find people wearing Cristiano Ronaldo shirts, copying his celebrations and following his career.” “He became more than a football player. He became a global sporting icon.” “His impact reached fans who don’t even watch football regularly. Very few athletes in history have achieved that.” “He changed how footballers think about professionalism, fitness, preparation and longevity.” “When young players talk about discipline and hard work, Cristiano Ronaldo is usually the example they mention.” “Neymar had an enormous impact in Brazil and around the world. Messi inspired millions with his genius. But Cristiano’s influence crossed every border, every culture and every generation.” “For me, if we’re discussing pure global impact on football and football culture, Cristiano Ronaldo is number one.” “He didn’t just leave a mark on the game. He became one of the faces of the game worldwide.” {beIN SPORTS}

SethOfficial

47,449 次观看 • 3 个月前

'To them, we could be like a fungus. Some might say, 'Look, if they were going to do harm to us, wouldn't they have done it by now?' I don't know. We think we're at the top of the food chain. What if, we're not?" (This is SO GOOD and worth your time. Kudos to Dr. Phil because this is one of the best I've seen from a mainstream voice in discussing the, potential, issues with Disclosure that something more advanced is on this planet with us. It was uploaded to his YT on May 8th of this year.) ~ Dr. Phil: "I mean, think about it. Doesn't it cause us to question the meaning of humanity and the cosmos? Wouldn't it change that? Wouldn't it cause us to have to reexamine philosophy, religion, personal worldviews? "Potential reframing of human exceptionalism that we base our value systems on, is that we're at the top of the food chain. That there is human exceptionalism. That we, as humans, are the be-all and end-all of this world. And then, all of a sudden, we find out, not true. To them, we could be like a fungus. "People have posed questions like, 'Well, if they're here, why haven't they talked to us? Why haven't they identified themselves to us?' It may be that we're so minuscule and irrelevant, why would they bother. "And so, the psychological impact on individuals, the individual effects, could result in acute stress, just being awestruck, unbelievable curiosity, and existential anxiety. Like, who are we? If we're not at the top of the food chain, if we're not the be-all and end-all of the Universe, then what are we? Are we like gum on the shoe of the superior beings? How would we explain all of that? "And so people would begin to look for coping strategies, immediately seeking information, spiritual exploration, figuring out how do I fit in? And then, in terms of community dynamics, the world, it could be very divisive. It could increase everything that we do, culturally, religiously, political identities. Rumors, and misinformation could flourish, especially on the web. Oh my God, can you imagine what would start flying around then? Making trusted communicators really crucial. And if there's a crisis of confidence with the government because they've lied to you for so long, where do you go to get real information? "And the long-term mental health aspects when you don't know the motives or the intent of these entities could create chronic worry, conspiracy thinking, paranoia, feelings of unbelievable inadequacy. Some may celebrate with renewed optimism, like 'Wow, look what we found! These people, if they can do all this, maybe they can cure all the diseases. They can come up with solutions to problems. This is great!' "How would governments react (laughs)? Russia, China, United States would all be scrambling to establish some kind of process for monitoring potential collaboration. Our intelligence communities would go crazy. Our Department of Defense, our science agencies would have to start redoing everything, revisiting risk assessment. "Of course, we would be trying to establish exchange programs. Maybe they're not even interested? Like I say, we could be like gum on their shoe. Who knows? How do you feel about that? "If they were to reveal themselves, what is their agenda? Some might say, 'Look, if they were going to do harm to us, wouldn't they have done it by now?' I don't know. If we're so insignificant, it doesn't matter, it could be irrelevant. But then, why are they here? Now you may think, 'Okay, Doctor Phil's finally gone over the high side. He's gone down nutball highway.' That's not what I'm telling you. "I'm saying the government knows more than they're telling us. My question is: Is it unsafe for the general population to know all of this? Would it create such anxiety and panic that it's more than people can handle? Because it would rewrite almost every value, every paradigm that we know. Because we think we're at the top of the food chain. What if, we're not? What does that mean? And how would you feel about that? "You really need to ask yourself those questions because I think we're getting ready, maybe not to meet someone from another galaxy, but I think we're getting ready to find out there are things that we can't explain, but do have in our possession. Evidence that we can explain with concepts we understand. The question is: How do you feel about it? Because that's the real story." (He briefly mentions Grusch in the full, video.)

'To them, we could be like a fungus. Some might say, 'Look, if they were going to do harm to us, wouldn't they have done it by now?' I don't know. We think we're at the top of the food chain. What if, we're not?" (This is SO GOOD and worth your time. Kudos to Dr. Phil because this is one of the best I've seen from a mainstream voice in discussing the, potential, issues with Disclosure that something more advanced is on this planet with us. It was uploaded to his YT on May 8th of this year.) ~ Dr. Phil: "I mean, think about it. Doesn't it cause us to question the meaning of humanity and the cosmos? Wouldn't it change that? Wouldn't it cause us to have to reexamine philosophy, religion, personal worldviews? "Potential reframing of human exceptionalism that we base our value systems on, is that we're at the top of the food chain. That there is human exceptionalism. That we, as humans, are the be-all and end-all of this world. And then, all of a sudden, we find out, not true. To them, we could be like a fungus. "People have posed questions like, 'Well, if they're here, why haven't they talked to us? Why haven't they identified themselves to us?' It may be that we're so minuscule and irrelevant, why would they bother. "And so, the psychological impact on individuals, the individual effects, could result in acute stress, just being awestruck, unbelievable curiosity, and existential anxiety. Like, who are we? If we're not at the top of the food chain, if we're not the be-all and end-all of the Universe, then what are we? Are we like gum on the shoe of the superior beings? How would we explain all of that? "And so people would begin to look for coping strategies, immediately seeking information, spiritual exploration, figuring out how do I fit in? And then, in terms of community dynamics, the world, it could be very divisive. It could increase everything that we do, culturally, religiously, political identities. Rumors, and misinformation could flourish, especially on the web. Oh my God, can you imagine what would start flying around then? Making trusted communicators really crucial. And if there's a crisis of confidence with the government because they've lied to you for so long, where do you go to get real information? "And the long-term mental health aspects when you don't know the motives or the intent of these entities could create chronic worry, conspiracy thinking, paranoia, feelings of unbelievable inadequacy. Some may celebrate with renewed optimism, like 'Wow, look what we found! These people, if they can do all this, maybe they can cure all the diseases. They can come up with solutions to problems. This is great!' "How would governments react (laughs)? Russia, China, United States would all be scrambling to establish some kind of process for monitoring potential collaboration. Our intelligence communities would go crazy. Our Department of Defense, our science agencies would have to start redoing everything, revisiting risk assessment. "Of course, we would be trying to establish exchange programs. Maybe they're not even interested? Like I say, we could be like gum on their shoe. Who knows? How do you feel about that? "If they were to reveal themselves, what is their agenda? Some might say, 'Look, if they were going to do harm to us, wouldn't they have done it by now?' I don't know. If we're so insignificant, it doesn't matter, it could be irrelevant. But then, why are they here? Now you may think, 'Okay, Doctor Phil's finally gone over the high side. He's gone down nutball highway.' That's not what I'm telling you. "I'm saying the government knows more than they're telling us. My question is: Is it unsafe for the general population to know all of this? Would it create such anxiety and panic that it's more than people can handle? Because it would rewrite almost every value, every paradigm that we know. Because we think we're at the top of the food chain. What if, we're not? What does that mean? And how would you feel about that? "You really need to ask yourself those questions because I think we're getting ready, maybe not to meet someone from another galaxy, but I think we're getting ready to find out there are things that we can't explain, but do have in our possession. Evidence that we can explain with concepts we understand. The question is: How do you feel about it? Because that's the real story." (He briefly mentions Grusch in the full, video.)

Joe Murgia

16,822 次观看 • 2 个月前

🗣️ Mikel Arteta on if it's important to keep players from the academy: "Certainly. I mean, the players that have been raised in our system and they feel generally that love and that connection with the club, it brings something else. "There is no question about that, and we need to look after them in a really special way because they bring value that is very difficult to find. That's why, when we can, we want to protect those assets as much as possible, develop them and make them extremely important for the club." 🗣️ on sending players on loan to Premier League clubs: "I think those are individual cases. Those players have to be ready as well to compete in the Premier League and to play regularly. "The priority is to expose those players and give them minutes, you better agree that that's going to be the case, and how many clubs, teams, managers in this league can guarantee that that's going to happen to a really young player that probably hasn't had exposure. "If you find it, great, because that's the level that we want them to compete. But sometimes they need a different pathway. The beauty of this is that the pathway can be completely different and the outcome can be the same, and this is the magic of football as well."

🗣️ Mikel Arteta on if it's important to keep players from the academy: "Certainly. I mean, the players that have been raised in our system and they feel generally that love and that connection with the club, it brings something else. "There is no question about that, and we need to look after them in a really special way because they bring value that is very difficult to find. That's why, when we can, we want to protect those assets as much as possible, develop them and make them extremely important for the club." 🗣️ on sending players on loan to Premier League clubs: "I think those are individual cases. Those players have to be ready as well to compete in the Premier League and to play regularly. "The priority is to expose those players and give them minutes, you better agree that that's going to be the case, and how many clubs, teams, managers in this league can guarantee that that's going to happen to a really young player that probably hasn't had exposure. "If you find it, great, because that's the level that we want them to compete. But sometimes they need a different pathway. The beauty of this is that the pathway can be completely different and the outcome can be the same, and this is the magic of football as well."

Connor Humm

23,899 次观看 • 1 个月前

Each generation has its own challenges We often teach the next generation what we learned from the world we knew, forgetting that they are preparing for a world we never experienced. The values of discipline, sacrifice and resilience remain important, but the circumstances in which young people must apply them have changed profoundly. Every generation has its own challenges, and therefore every generation needs its own tools. A concert may seem like an unlikely place to think about generational change, but watching more than 12,000 young people gather on Saturday for the Diamond Platnumz and Bruce Melodie concert made one thing clear to me: young people are not growing up in the world we grew up in, and we should stop expecting them to navigate it as though they are. Most of the crowd was young, and as i watched them sing, dance and enjoy themselves in an atmosphere that was vibrant, energetic and largely disciplined, i found myself thinking about just how much the world around them has changed. In our time, entertainment usually meant going to a disco, and those who attended could quickly be labelled “bad boys” or “sluts.” Leisure was often viewed through the lens of morality. Today, young people can attend professionally organised concerts, experience artists and cultures from across the region, and participate in a creative economy that barely existed in its current form when we were their age. Our generation was, in many respects, a generation of survival. The constraints we grew up with shaped how we understood discipline, ambition, sacrifice and success, and those experiences built resilience that remains valuable. But we should not turn the circumstances that shaped us into a universal blueprint for how the next generation should live. The post-genocide generation is not growing up in an easier world; it is growing up in a more complicated one, marked by unemployment and competition, digital pressure, rapidly changing technology and social expectations increasingly influenced by a world without borders. A young person in Rwanda can discover what is happening in Nevada, Shanghai or Glasgow within seconds, follow global conversations, encounter careers we never knew existed and build an audience without leaving their bedroom. We cannot expect the worldview of a generation that communicated with pen pals through letters sent by post to be replicated by a generation that experiences the world in real time. Our generation learned how to survive; this generation must also learn how to navigate. That distinction should shape how we think about youth policy. Young people do not simply need to be managed; they need environments that allow them to connect, create, experiment, learn and build livelihoods. That is why a concert should not be dismissed as merely entertainment. What happens on a stage can create work behind it: musicians, sound engineers, event organisers, photographers, designers, vendors, transport providers, fashion entrepreneurs and digital creators all participate in an economic ecosystem that deserves to be taken seriously. What if events of this scale were organised every two months, and similar creative spaces deliberately developed beyond Kigali and into secondary cities? We would not simply be giving young people something to do; we would be creating markets in which young talent can become enterprise. Rwanda has demonstrated strong political will to empower young people. The harder question is whether that ambition is reaching them where they live. How are districts and sectors translating national commitments into practical opportunities, and how effectively are available resources being used to support initiatives that create jobs, livelihoods and innovation? The same question must be asked of our education system. Are we preparing young people merely to pass examinations and compete for scarce employment, or are we developing their ability to think critically, create, adapt, collaborate and navigate uncertainty? In a rapidly changing world, education cannot simply prepare young people for the jobs that exist today; it must prepare them to recognise and create the opportunities that will exist tomorrow. Young people do not simply need to be controlled or constantly reminded that previous generations had it harder. They need spaces to connect, create, learn, experiment and thrive. We can pass on our wisdom without requiring them to inherit all of our circumstances. We can teach discipline without teaching fear and preserve our values without preventing the next generation from creating new ones. #Mindset

Each generation has its own challenges We often teach the next generation what we learned from the world we knew, forgetting that they are preparing for a world we never experienced. The values of discipline, sacrifice and resilience remain important, but the circumstances in which young people must apply them have changed profoundly. Every generation has its own challenges, and therefore every generation needs its own tools. A concert may seem like an unlikely place to think about generational change, but watching more than 12,000 young people gather on Saturday for the Diamond Platnumz and Bruce Melodie concert made one thing clear to me: young people are not growing up in the world we grew up in, and we should stop expecting them to navigate it as though they are. Most of the crowd was young, and as i watched them sing, dance and enjoy themselves in an atmosphere that was vibrant, energetic and largely disciplined, i found myself thinking about just how much the world around them has changed. In our time, entertainment usually meant going to a disco, and those who attended could quickly be labelled “bad boys” or “sluts.” Leisure was often viewed through the lens of morality. Today, young people can attend professionally organised concerts, experience artists and cultures from across the region, and participate in a creative economy that barely existed in its current form when we were their age. Our generation was, in many respects, a generation of survival. The constraints we grew up with shaped how we understood discipline, ambition, sacrifice and success, and those experiences built resilience that remains valuable. But we should not turn the circumstances that shaped us into a universal blueprint for how the next generation should live. The post-genocide generation is not growing up in an easier world; it is growing up in a more complicated one, marked by unemployment and competition, digital pressure, rapidly changing technology and social expectations increasingly influenced by a world without borders. A young person in Rwanda can discover what is happening in Nevada, Shanghai or Glasgow within seconds, follow global conversations, encounter careers we never knew existed and build an audience without leaving their bedroom. We cannot expect the worldview of a generation that communicated with pen pals through letters sent by post to be replicated by a generation that experiences the world in real time. Our generation learned how to survive; this generation must also learn how to navigate. That distinction should shape how we think about youth policy. Young people do not simply need to be managed; they need environments that allow them to connect, create, experiment, learn and build livelihoods. That is why a concert should not be dismissed as merely entertainment. What happens on a stage can create work behind it: musicians, sound engineers, event organisers, photographers, designers, vendors, transport providers, fashion entrepreneurs and digital creators all participate in an economic ecosystem that deserves to be taken seriously. What if events of this scale were organised every two months, and similar creative spaces deliberately developed beyond Kigali and into secondary cities? We would not simply be giving young people something to do; we would be creating markets in which young talent can become enterprise. Rwanda has demonstrated strong political will to empower young people. The harder question is whether that ambition is reaching them where they live. How are districts and sectors translating national commitments into practical opportunities, and how effectively are available resources being used to support initiatives that create jobs, livelihoods and innovation? The same question must be asked of our education system. Are we preparing young people merely to pass examinations and compete for scarce employment, or are we developing their ability to think critically, create, adapt, collaborate and navigate uncertainty? In a rapidly changing world, education cannot simply prepare young people for the jobs that exist today; it must prepare them to recognise and create the opportunities that will exist tomorrow. Young people do not simply need to be controlled or constantly reminded that previous generations had it harder. They need spaces to connect, create, learn, experiment and thrive. We can pass on our wisdom without requiring them to inherit all of our circumstances. We can teach discipline without teaching fear and preserve our values without preventing the next generation from creating new ones. #Mindset

Joseph Nkurunziza Ryarasa

22,768 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 Ryan Giggs on Morgan Rogers reportedly demanding Champions League football before considering a move to Manchester United: 🗣️ “I’ve never really understood that mindset. If a player truly wants to play for Manchester United, he should want to come because of the badge, the history and the challenge of helping the club get back where it belongs. You don’t join Manchester United for one competition. You join because you want to be part of building something special. It’s not like Morgan Rogers is guaranteed to win the Champions League or score 40 goals just because he’s playing in it. Football doesn’t work like that. I actually agree with what Ruben Amorim said about this type of situation. The club has to be careful about bringing in players whose motivation is tied to a particular competition. Because what happens when you’re not in that competition? Does the hunger disappear? Does the freedom to play disappear? Does the commitment drop? Manchester United need players who want to fight for the club regardless of whether they’re playing in the Champions League, Europa League or nowhere in Europe. The best players I’ve played with wanted to represent Manchester United because they loved the club and wanted success here. That mentality is more important than any competition.” {SPORTbible }

🚨 Ryan Giggs on Morgan Rogers reportedly demanding Champions League football before considering a move to Manchester United: 🗣️ “I’ve never really understood that mindset. If a player truly wants to play for Manchester United, he should want to come because of the badge, the history and the challenge of helping the club get back where it belongs. You don’t join Manchester United for one competition. You join because you want to be part of building something special. It’s not like Morgan Rogers is guaranteed to win the Champions League or score 40 goals just because he’s playing in it. Football doesn’t work like that. I actually agree with what Ruben Amorim said about this type of situation. The club has to be careful about bringing in players whose motivation is tied to a particular competition. Because what happens when you’re not in that competition? Does the hunger disappear? Does the freedom to play disappear? Does the commitment drop? Manchester United need players who want to fight for the club regardless of whether they’re playing in the Champions League, Europa League or nowhere in Europe. The best players I’ve played with wanted to represent Manchester United because they loved the club and wanted success here. That mentality is more important than any competition.” {SPORTbible }

SethOfficial

493,942 次观看 • 4 个月前

Junet Mohamed: What we have said today is what everyone knows about Gachagua. It does not need any evidence or any substantiation. This is a man who has even claimed that the president should be killed like a snake. This is the guy who has said that this country will burn in 2027 if the election does not go his way. NCIC has failed in its mandate because it cannot allow somebody of Gachagua’s type to continue doing what he is doing in this country #CitizenExplainer

Junet Mohamed: What we have said today is what everyone knows about Gachagua. It does not need any evidence or any substantiation. This is a man who has even claimed that the president should be killed like a snake. This is the guy who has said that this country will burn in 2027 if the election does not go his way. NCIC has failed in its mandate because it cannot allow somebody of Gachagua’s type to continue doing what he is doing in this country #CitizenExplainer

Citizen TV Kenya

32,562 次观看 • 1 个月前

We talk about the Minnesota youth hockey model a lot, and so I get asked about it a lot. Why does Minnesota have not only the most players, but why do they develop the most elite players as well? One of the main reasons is that the path is simple to understand for players and families. You get into the game playing for your town, you play for your town all the way into high school, and then you go to junior/college hockey if you’re good enough. In so many other places, the path is confusing. Do I play town or club? When do I make the jump to AAA? Do I stay with the organization in my city or do I go to another club? What tier of hockey is right for my kid? The amount of options and decisions often leads to FOMO, confusion, decision fatigue, and a burnout for players and families. It also leads to a lot of jersey chasing and organization hopping rather than playing for something bigger than you, which is huge for a development of a love for the game. If we can simplify the path, tiers can work together rather than against each other, and create a model where families can better understand the path to help their kids achieve their dreams, our sport will grow and we will develop more elite players. We talked all about this on our latest podcast on what we’ve learned about youth hockey.

We talk about the Minnesota youth hockey model a lot, and so I get asked about it a lot. Why does Minnesota have not only the most players, but why do they develop the most elite players as well? One of the main reasons is that the path is simple to understand for players and families. You get into the game playing for your town, you play for your town all the way into high school, and then you go to junior/college hockey if you’re good enough. In so many other places, the path is confusing. Do I play town or club? When do I make the jump to AAA? Do I stay with the organization in my city or do I go to another club? What tier of hockey is right for my kid? The amount of options and decisions often leads to FOMO, confusion, decision fatigue, and a burnout for players and families. It also leads to a lot of jersey chasing and organization hopping rather than playing for something bigger than you, which is huge for a development of a love for the game. If we can simplify the path, tiers can work together rather than against each other, and create a model where families can better understand the path to help their kids achieve their dreams, our sport will grow and we will develop more elite players. We talked all about this on our latest podcast on what we’ve learned about youth hockey.

Topher Scott

117,208 次观看 • 2 个月前

#WATCH | Delhi | On the debate around the Sanchar Saathi app, Union Minister for Communications Jyotiraditya Scindia says, "Do not go by what the rumours are in the public domain. 7B also does not say that you cannot uninstall the app. The problem is that a lot of reality is lost if you don't go into the details. 7B only says that the phones should have the apps installed and there should be no hindrance for the user to be able to access them, and it should not be disabled so that the user cannot use it. Nowhere does 7B say that the user cannot delete the app. 7B is not for users; it is for the installation of the app by the manufacturers. 7B has been misconstrued... I have said in the Parliament that we have only one aim, that is the safety of the common people. We have to save the common people from this cancer called fraud... Now we need to decide between saving people from this fraud or letting this fraud continue... From the feedback we have received, we are ready to amend the rules, and I have said it in the Parliament. We are not adamant..."

#WATCH | Delhi | On the debate around the Sanchar Saathi app, Union Minister for Communications Jyotiraditya Scindia says, "Do not go by what the rumours are in the public domain. 7B also does not say that you cannot uninstall the app. The problem is that a lot of reality is lost if you don't go into the details. 7B only says that the phones should have the apps installed and there should be no hindrance for the user to be able to access them, and it should not be disabled so that the user cannot use it. Nowhere does 7B say that the user cannot delete the app. 7B is not for users; it is for the installation of the app by the manufacturers. 7B has been misconstrued... I have said in the Parliament that we have only one aim, that is the safety of the common people. We have to save the common people from this cancer called fraud... Now we need to decide between saving people from this fraud or letting this fraud continue... From the feedback we have received, we are ready to amend the rules, and I have said it in the Parliament. We are not adamant..."

ANI

34,234 次观看 • 10 个月前

#WATCH | India AI Impact Summit 2026 | Delhi: Founder Chairman and CEO of Sampark Foundation & former CEO of HCL Technologies, Vineet Nayar says, "...From an employment point of view I think it is very important for us to understand that Indian companies, including Indian IT companies, are going to be profit-driven and therefore if you believe that they are going to create employment you must be dreaming. Therefore, the question is how do we create employment in this environment, and that employment comes from mass scale startups, which is what this government has already doing. So, how do we create new sets of people who are trying to solve new sets of problems not new sets of technology and if we do that we will get it right. I think we as Indians have to be very careful on who does data belong to and that is the debate we have a problem with. The LLM models which exist worldwide are far superior than the Indian models. Unfortunately, in India, we never develop products, so therefore we do not have SLMs and LLMs which are world-class. On one side, we have global LLM products which are coming to India and trading on our Indian data. Should we allowed that or should we not allowed that? But on the other side if we don't allow that then we have the data but we don't have the LLM models. So, how do we encourage technology completely to develop the LLM models. This needs radicals strategic thinking and a very important aspect otherwise we will either give up a data. So, I think it's a very critical aspect for us to think about - who does this data belong, what is the kind of incentives we are going to give to develop LLM technologies or SLM technologies fast so that we train on our data otherwise an LLM will come in with our data and we'll immediately see return and we'll celebrate and we will do all these kind of press releases but the India will lose a competitive advantage on something which is very critical for the next decade."

#WATCH | India AI Impact Summit 2026 | Delhi: Founder Chairman and CEO of Sampark Foundation & former CEO of HCL Technologies, Vineet Nayar says, "...From an employment point of view I think it is very important for us to understand that Indian companies, including Indian IT companies, are going to be profit-driven and therefore if you believe that they are going to create employment you must be dreaming. Therefore, the question is how do we create employment in this environment, and that employment comes from mass scale startups, which is what this government has already doing. So, how do we create new sets of people who are trying to solve new sets of problems not new sets of technology and if we do that we will get it right. I think we as Indians have to be very careful on who does data belong to and that is the debate we have a problem with. The LLM models which exist worldwide are far superior than the Indian models. Unfortunately, in India, we never develop products, so therefore we do not have SLMs and LLMs which are world-class. On one side, we have global LLM products which are coming to India and trading on our Indian data. Should we allowed that or should we not allowed that? But on the other side if we don't allow that then we have the data but we don't have the LLM models. So, how do we encourage technology completely to develop the LLM models. This needs radicals strategic thinking and a very important aspect otherwise we will either give up a data. So, I think it's a very critical aspect for us to think about - who does this data belong, what is the kind of incentives we are going to give to develop LLM technologies or SLM technologies fast so that we train on our data otherwise an LLM will come in with our data and we'll immediately see return and we'll celebrate and we will do all these kind of press releases but the India will lose a competitive advantage on something which is very critical for the next decade."

ANI

18,753 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨Kylian Mbappé was asked who the greatest footballer in history is between Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi: 🎙️ Reporter: “Kylian, when people debate the greatest player of all time, where do you stand?” 🗣️ [Smiles] “I always try to avoid these questions because, honestly, we are talking about two players who changed football forever. “I have huge respect for both Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi. They have dominated the game for nearly two decades and achieved things that many people thought were impossible. “But if I have to choose one, I would say Cristiano Ronaldo. “It’s not only about the trophies, the goals or the records — it’s about the journey. “He succeeded in different leagues, different countries and different teams. He won everywhere he went and adapted to every challenge. “What has always inspired me most is his mentality. His discipline, his work ethic and his desire to improve every single day are unmatched. “He showed the world that talent is important, but mentality and hard work can take you even further. “For young players, Cristiano proved that there are no limits if you are willing to sacrifice and push yourself every day. “That is why, for me, he is the greatest. #ARGAUT {talkSPORT}

🚨Kylian Mbappé was asked who the greatest footballer in history is between Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi: 🎙️ Reporter: “Kylian, when people debate the greatest player of all time, where do you stand?” 🗣️ [Smiles] “I always try to avoid these questions because, honestly, we are talking about two players who changed football forever. “I have huge respect for both Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi. They have dominated the game for nearly two decades and achieved things that many people thought were impossible. “But if I have to choose one, I would say Cristiano Ronaldo. “It’s not only about the trophies, the goals or the records — it’s about the journey. “He succeeded in different leagues, different countries and different teams. He won everywhere he went and adapted to every challenge. “What has always inspired me most is his mentality. His discipline, his work ethic and his desire to improve every single day are unmatched. “He showed the world that talent is important, but mentality and hard work can take you even further. “For young players, Cristiano proved that there are no limits if you are willing to sacrifice and push yourself every day. “That is why, for me, he is the greatest. #ARGAUT {talkSPORT}

SethOfficial

1,743,044 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 OBAMA ON AI: "If we are thinking about AI just in terms of how do we cure cancer or get better energy, you can do that without having agentic AI and having it just roaming free in the internet. The reason you are doing that is because you have to market a product that people will pay money for. That’s a misalignment between what our society needs and the commercial imperatives that these companies are facing, not because necessarily they’re trying to do bad things, but because they’ve got to justify these valuations. So, that’s one more reason why it is really important for us to have a competent government and a serious bipartisan conversation around this issue, and we have to do it fast. And I would encourage voters to pay attention to this. If somebody does not have a serious plan for how to deal with this, then they’re not meeting the moment, and you should probably look for somebody else."

🚨 OBAMA ON AI: "If we are thinking about AI just in terms of how do we cure cancer or get better energy, you can do that without having agentic AI and having it just roaming free in the internet. The reason you are doing that is because you have to market a product that people will pay money for. That’s a misalignment between what our society needs and the commercial imperatives that these companies are facing, not because necessarily they’re trying to do bad things, but because they’ve got to justify these valuations. So, that’s one more reason why it is really important for us to have a competent government and a serious bipartisan conversation around this issue, and we have to do it fast. And I would encourage voters to pay attention to this. If somebody does not have a serious plan for how to deal with this, then they’re not meeting the moment, and you should probably look for somebody else."

MeidasTouch

7,128,515 次观看 • 15 天前

Shuler: If you think about every industrial revolution we’ve been through, working people have helped us make that transition. It’s really because we’ve helped tame the technology and figured out how to use it in the most effective way. So I think your question about augmentation versus replacement is the big question we have. If we can all agree that this is about making our jobs better, safer, easier, and more productive, then we’re all in. But if you’re looking to de-skill, dehumanize, and replace workers, to put people out on the street with no path forward, then absolutely you’re going to have a revolution. So I think that’s something we all need to be very real about and think seriously about. If we’re going to have productivity gains, working people—the ones who make these industries happen—need to share in that. There hasn’t been a lot of discussion about that here. Of course, in terms of how we create policies, how we create tax infrastructure, whether or not we are redistributing—yes, that word is a dirty word around here—we need to talk about it and confront how we’re going to make sure working people share in the gains of these technologies. And if you look at the numbers of jobs, let’s talk about job quality. Yes, maybe there are a lot of jobs created, but what kind of jobs are we talking about? Are they jobs that can sustain a family? Is it a job where people can actually work one job? One job should be enough.

Shuler: If you think about every industrial revolution we’ve been through, working people have helped us make that transition. It’s really because we’ve helped tame the technology and figured out how to use it in the most effective way. So I think your question about augmentation versus replacement is the big question we have. If we can all agree that this is about making our jobs better, safer, easier, and more productive, then we’re all in. But if you’re looking to de-skill, dehumanize, and replace workers, to put people out on the street with no path forward, then absolutely you’re going to have a revolution. So I think that’s something we all need to be very real about and think seriously about. If we’re going to have productivity gains, working people—the ones who make these industries happen—need to share in that. There hasn’t been a lot of discussion about that here. Of course, in terms of how we create policies, how we create tax infrastructure, whether or not we are redistributing—yes, that word is a dirty word around here—we need to talk about it and confront how we’re going to make sure working people share in the gains of these technologies. And if you look at the numbers of jobs, let’s talk about job quality. Yes, maybe there are a lot of jobs created, but what kind of jobs are we talking about? Are they jobs that can sustain a family? Is it a job where people can actually work one job? One job should be enough.

Acyn

41,942 次观看 • 8 个月前